下載本文檔
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、WAR CRIME OF EXSIVE INCIDENTAL LOSS, INJURY, OR DEATH1. AAF and members committed the war crime of exsive incidental loss, injury,or death.(1) The AAF and NIA directed the attack.Attacks means acts ofagainst the adversary, whether in offence or in1defense.dreds of projectiles were firedo Kiesh inclu
2、ding BAS factory andBings building which were directed by the AAF and NIA.(2) The attack caused exsive incidental loss.1.1 the BAS factory and Bing are military objectivesAs the military objecs been defined2, if a civilian object is being utilized by themilitary then att moment it is potentially a m
3、ilitary objective. At the moment, thefactory was attacked, the workers were overworking just because of the setup of theexplosive product line. Thus, the factory was a military objective at the moment.Bing, as the leader of the DKF, was a combatant who could beed.31.2 The attack caused exsive incide
4、ntal loss.Exsive means thedisproportion is clearly discernible.4The proportionality isbetn the losses and theipated military advantages. Theipated advantage1 Article 49(1) , AP2 Article 52 , AP3 Combatants are defined to mean members of the armed for , with the exception of medical and religiousnel
5、Marco Sassoli 不能這么人名,在那本書上說的?4 Yoram Dinstein, Hostilities, pg 120批注 3: 此處應(yīng)說啥是比例原則,不是啥是比例。表達的是不符合比例原則。advantages 單數(shù)復(fù)數(shù)批注 2: 生產(chǎn)啥裝置得說一下吧?生產(chǎn)民用還是?否則Product 怎么能是Military Object?批注 1: 其他是都是military objectives? 本罪的不是所有嗎?to be gained from the particular military activity must be weighed against theprobable c
6、ivilian losses.5The two-day artillery and air attacks made many of theor useless.When the artillery ss fell on the BAS factory juslf an hour after the quittingtime, there were still many workers working in it. Around 15 workers were killed,another 30 were severely injured. However the production lin
7、e was just being set uphad been assembled yet. 6 There was little militaryand no explosive deviadvantages but more incidental loss.Durino strikes on Bings apartment by armed drones, almost all the people werein sleep and Bing was nothe building. Besides, the second strike was only thirtys were kille
8、d,another 50 were injured. Theminutes after the.735apartment building was severely damaged and the buildings residents moved out ofPeace Garden .The value of so many peoples life and heals well as their propertyis moren the petratorsipated military advantage.(3) The AAF knew the attack would cause d
9、eath, injury or damage and it wasdisproportionate.According to the ICC s ute8, the knowledge here means awarenesst such anattack would cause exsive incidental loss. In determining whether an attack wasexsive it is nesary to examine whether a reasonably well-informedhecircumstanof the actual petrator
10、, making reasonable use of the information5 Galic Trail Judgement, ICTY, para 376 Moot problem, para 257 Moot problem, para 288 Article 30(3), ICC S ute批注 微軟用戶5: 到底單數(shù)復(fù)?批注 4: 既然是listed, 那么在這里想表達什么?本來就改炸,炸壞正常?。考儌€人意見listedseither destroyedavailable to him or her, could have expected exsive civilian cas
11、ualties to resultfrom the attack.9object of an attack, there is still a requirement to take all fechoice of means and methods of attack to avoid and to mincivilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects.On 17 July 2009, Alphonian reconnaissance drones were observe s, assessing the
12、damages and advising how to adjust their fire.10 The petrators were actually welhad observed lights in BAS factory. The petrators knewin a residential area, a civilian object. The strikes happene6:30am, when almost all people were in sleep. And(As a restime to leave or help others. The AAF should ha
13、ve expecteloss. However, the petrator didnt take any feasible precautions.(4)The attacks at the BAS factory and Bings building were part of the system of theernational armedbetn the AAF and the DKF. General Reed approvedBings building and the BAS factory to be one of the listeds in the artilleryatta
14、cks and heknewt the attack was part theernational.2. General Reed bears the individual responsibility for the crime.rson shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime iftcommits such a crime jo ly with another.The co-petration had the119 Galic Trail Judgement, ICTY, para 5810
15、 Moot problem, para 2311 Article 25(3)(a), ICC s utes批注 微軟用戶8: 沒有邏輯詞,感覺都是事實陳述。eg. As a result,he extend, ThereforeThe fornd fifth elements were also satisfied. 批注 微軟用戶9: 這兩個要素是什么沒有交代啊。批注 微軟用戶7: 不能有 happened. The apartment was struck twice at 6:00am and 6:30am respectively, when almost all the people
16、 were in sleep.asible precautionshe imize incidental loss orcircling above Kiesh to ders of artillery unitsl-informed. They should t Bings apartment wasd twice at 6:00am andult) they had no enough d the exsive civilian批注 微軟用戶6: 整句表達有問題Even ifrson or an object is a legitimateto attack, all the feasib
17、le measures should be adopted to select appropriate attack ways, so as to avoid or minimize civilians death or injury, as well as their property losses.Even once aor an object is determined to be a legitimatefollowing elements12:(1) The objective elements includes the existence of an agreement or co
18、mmon planbetn two or moreco-petrator resultings and the co-ordinated essential contribution by eachhe realization of the objective elements of the crime.The Operation Tderstorm was planned by a group which was consisted of theAlphonian Defence Minister Tom Atom, the Head of Nationalelligence Agency(
19、NIA), Perry Ash, General Reed, his deputy, Colonel Harvey Simms as well as othermilitary staff. In a meeting of 7 January 2009, it was decidedt artillery attacks andair strikes would be used. General Reed approved the list ofs for artilleryattacks and air strikes, including the BAS factory and Bings
20、 building. He orderedAAF to attack the factory and agreed Ash to use armed drones to attack Bingsbuilding.13In, the operation was planned by a group including Reed. Reed did orderand participatehe attack aiming at Kiesh according to the decided plan.(1) The subjective element ist the must fulfill the subjective elements ofthe crime in question14.While planning the Operation Tderstorm, they decidedt artillery attacks and airstrikes wou
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025屆江蘇省姜堰市中考生物最后一模試卷含解析
- 2025年智能收銀機購銷與用戶數(shù)據(jù)保護協(xié)議3篇
- 甘肅省慶陽市(2024年-2025年小學(xué)六年級語文)部編版競賽題(上學(xué)期)試卷及答案
- 二零二五年度高端酒店式餐館合作運營協(xié)議2篇
- 二零二五版企業(yè)股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整分配合同范本3篇
- 2025年上半年鄭州惠濟區(qū)事業(yè)單位及招考易考易錯模擬試題(共500題)試卷后附參考答案
- 2025年水渠建設(shè)與水資源調(diào)度管理服務(wù)合同3篇
- 2025年上半年遼寧錦州市12345政務(wù)服務(wù)便民熱線平臺服務(wù)外包人員招聘易考易錯模擬試題(共500題)試卷后附參考答案
- 2025年上半年遼寧省阜新市直事業(yè)單位招聘200人和重點基礎(chǔ)提升(共500題)附帶答案詳解-1
- 2025年上半年遼寧省朝陽市人民監(jiān)督員增補32人易考易錯模擬試題(共500題)試卷后附參考答案
- 齲病的治療 深齲的治療
- GB/T 35005-2018集成電路倒裝焊試驗方法
- 投標(biāo)報價明顯低于采購預(yù)算價說明函
- 福建師范大學(xué)(答案)課程考試2023年2月《刑事訴訟法》作業(yè)考核試題
- 寫人事物景作文課件
- 廠級安全培訓(xùn)資料
- 中國藥科大學(xué)《藥物化學(xué)》教學(xué)日歷
- 露天礦山課件
- 經(jīng)濟效益證明(模板)
- 銀行卡凍結(jié)怎么寫申請書
- 果樹蔬菜病害:第一章 蔬菜害蟲
評論
0/150
提交評論