Sipri-和平環(huán)境:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)新時(shí)代的安全(英)-_第1頁(yè)
Sipri-和平環(huán)境:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)新時(shí)代的安全(英)-_第2頁(yè)
Sipri-和平環(huán)境:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)新時(shí)代的安全(英)-_第3頁(yè)
Sipri-和平環(huán)境:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)新時(shí)代的安全(英)-_第4頁(yè)
Sipri-和平環(huán)境:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)新時(shí)代的安全(英)-_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩174頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK1

ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

Securityin

aneweraofrisk

2ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

Foreword2

Executivesummary4

1Twocrisesandadeficit8

2Aneweraofrisk26

3Ajustandpeacefultransition42

4Foundationsofanewsecurity60

5TowardsanEnvironmentofPeace72

Conclusion81

References82

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK3

Humanityhastheknowledgeandskillstoescapefromthetroubleinwhichwefindourselves.Wecandrawhopefromtheexamplesofcollaborativeactionsbeingtaken.

FOREWORD

Thespectreofnuclearwarthreatenedmassannihilationandglobalradioactivefallout.

Governmentsbegantheirsearchforcooperativesolutionsatthe1972UnitedNationsConferenceontheHumanEnvironmentinStockholm,whose50thanniversarywemarkthisyear.Theconferencesignifiedarecognitionthatcommonthreatscanonlyhavecommonsolutionsandsparkedaglobalconsensusonaction.ItcatalysedtheformationoftheUNEnvironmentProgrammeandtheestablishmentofenvironmentministriesingovernmentsacrosstheworld.Itledtoagreementsthathaveaddressedissuessuchasacidrainanddestructionoftheozonelayer.

Thesesuccesses,manyachievedcooperatively,shouldgiveuscauseforoptimismthisyear,whichwillseeleadersconveninginJunefortheStockholm+50summit:‘Ahealthyplanetfortheprosperityofall—ourresponsibility,ouropportunity.’EnvironmentofPeacedemonstratesclearlythatahealthyplanetisessentialforsecurityaswellasprosperity,andshowsthatincludingthe

fulldiversityofpeopleinsolutionsisessentialforsuccess.Inthiscontext,weshouldespeciallymarkandcelebratetheroleofoftenmarginalizedgroupssuchasIndigenousPeoples,womenandyouth,whoseinsightsareofteninvisibletotop-downdecisionmaking.

IhopethatyouwilltakeawaythreeprincipalconclusionsfromEnvironmentofPeace.First,thatthereisaprofoundneedtobeginanticipatingandmanagingtheincreasingriskstopeacestemmingfromtheinterlinkedsecurityandenvironmentalcrises.Second,thatwithoutastepchangeinactiononallaspectsofenvironmentaldegradation—cuttinggreenhousegasemissions,reducingpollution,arrestingthedeclineinspeciesandecosystems,andmore—thesecuritychallengewillinevitablygetworse.

Thethirdconclusionisthatthereishope.Humanityhastheknowledgeandskillstoescapefromthetroubleinwhichwefindourselves.Wecandrawhopefromtheexamplesofcollaborativeactionsbeingtakenbygovernments,civilsociety,localcommunitiesandmultinationalgroupingsthataresuccessfullyaddressinghazardoussituations.Theneedistolearnfromthemandscaleup.Theprinciplesandrecommendationsattheendofthisreportpointtheway.

Despitethesebrightnotes,wearedeliveringareport

thatlaysbareaprofoundproblemwithdeep-lyingrootsandcomplexmanifestations.AndwearedeliveringitaspeopleacrosstheworldwrestlewiththeimpactsoftheCovid-19pandemicandtheconsequencesofRussianaggressioninUkraine.Therefore,somemightsaythisisnotthetime.Iwouldarguetheopposite:thisisexactlythetime.Foronething,ithastobe,giventheurgencyoftheproblem;foranother,addressingthevulnerabilitiesexposedbyrecenteventswillalsobuildresilienceagainstescalatingenvironmentalharmandadarkeningsecurityhorizon.

Asweenteraneweraofriskcreatedbytheconjunctionofthetwincrises,letusrecallourhistoryandrebuildthecooperativespiritofStockholm’72onissuesthatthreatenusall.Throughcooperationwecanandmustfindawayfromdarknesstolightoncemore,andbuildalastingenvironmentofpeace.

4ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

*Fragilityisdefinedas‘thecombination

ofexposuretoriskandinsufficient

copingcapacityofthestate,systems

and/orcommunitiestomanage,

absorbormitigatethoserisks’(OECD).

BehindtheheadlinesofwarinEuropeandtheaftershocksoftheCovid-19pandemic,ourworldisbeingdrawnintoablackholeofdeepeningtwincrisesinsecurityandtheenvironment.Indicatorsofinsecurityarerising,whileindicatorsofenvironmentalintegrityaresinking.Themixistoxic,profoundanddamaging;andinstitutionswiththepowertofindsolutions,includinggovernments,arewakingupfartooslowly.

Intermsofsecurity,thereisanincreaseintheincidenceofconflictandthenumbersofdeadanddisplacedpeople—atrendinexistencelongbeforetheRussianinvasionofUkraine.Spendingonarmsandmilitaryforcesisrising;theuseofnuclearweaponsseemstobelessunthinkablethanitwaspreviously.Intermsoftheenvironment,manifestationsofdeclineincludemoreextremeweather,risingseas,constraintsonwateravailability,thedeclineinmammalsandpollinatinginsects,plasticpollution,dyingcoralreefsandshrinkingforests.

Thedarkeningsecurityhorizonpresentsonelayerofriskstopeace;environmentaldeclineaddsasecondlayer.Theinteractionofthetwotrendsproducesathird,morecomplexsetofrisks,whosesignificancehumanityisonlybeginningtograsp.

However,itisclearthatthetwocrisesdointeract.Countriesfacingthehighestlevelsofecologicalthreatarestatisticallylikelytobethosewherepeaceisatitsmosttenuous.Theyalsotendtobemarkedbyfragilityandlowcapacityforresilience.*Forthemostpart,thesecountrieshavedonelittletocausetheglobalenvironmentalcrisis,buttheybearthebruntofitseffects.HalfoftheongoingUnitedNationspeaceoperationsareincountrieswiththehighestexposuretoclimatechangeimpacts.Thesecorrelationsarenotcoincidences.

ThisistheentrypointforEnvironmentofPeace.

Thelinkbetweenenvironmentalintegrity,peaceandhumanwell-beingshouldnotreallybecontentious.Sincethe1972UNConferenceontheHumanEnvironmentinStockholm,countrieshaverecognizedthatecologicalintegrityisessentialtohumandevelopment.InagreeingtheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsin2015,governmentsdeclared:‘Therecanbenosustainabledevelopmentwithoutpeaceandnopeacewithoutsustainabledevelopment.’In2021,theUNHumanRightsCouncilformallyrecognizedahealthyenvironmentasafundamentalhumanright.

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK5

Reducinginsecurity

andconflictin

thisnewera

ofriskmeans

fundamentally

changinghowwe

thinkaboutpeace.

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

Yetourenvironmentisrapidlydegrading.Althougheverygovernmentisawareofclimatechangeandwiderenvironmentaldecline,andsomehavemadeprogressonissuessuchaspollutionanddeforestation,theyarecollectivelyfailingtotacklethemajordriverswithsufficienturgency.Amongotherimpacts,degradingthenaturalenvironmentmakesitmorelikelythatdiseaseswillspreadfromwildanimalsintothehumanpopulation.Andthelasttwoyearshaveshownhowdevastatingsuchdiseasescanbe.

Beyondtheirdirecteffects,climatechangeandthewiderenvironmentalcrisiscontributetoinsecurity.Theevidenceshowsthattheyoftengeneratesocialandpoliticalinstability,which,unresolved,canescalateintoviolence.Armedconflictnotonlydamagestheenvironment,butitmakeseffectiveenvironmentalgovernancehardertoachieve.Confrontation,disputesandconflictalsosourtheinternationalatmosphereforarrivingatcooperativeresponsestoenvironmentalchallenges.

Becauseoftheseinterlinkages,theideaofsecuritythatdrivesthisreportisaninclusiveone.Thetraditionaldefence-orstate-centredstandpointtellspartofthestoryofsecurityandinsecurity.Themorepeople-centred,humansecurityconcepttellsanotherpart.Foratrulypeacefulandsecureworld,weneedtogetbothpartsright.

What,then,istobedone?

Astheevidencewillshow,reducinginsecurityandconflictinthisneweraofriskmeans,asastartingpoint,fundamentallychanginghowwethinkaboutpeace.Withenvironmentaldegradationpartofthesecurityproblem,restoringenvironmentalintegrityneedstobepartofthesecuritysolution.Thisalsoimpliesanoverwhelmingneedformoreambitiousandmoreeffectivecooperationbetweengovernmentsonpeaceandsecurityateverylevel,fromconceptualtooperational;becausewhenthethreataffectsallcountries,militarizationandnationalassertivenessareclearlynotgoingtobeaneffectiveresponse.TheymayperhapsbeinevitablewhenfacedwithacutesituationssuchastheinvasionofUkraine,buttheycannotbeasolutiontothebroaderandescalatingcrises.Inthelongrun,cooperationisself-interest.

Ifonedefiningcharacteristicofaneffectiveresponseiscooperation,anotherisadaptability.Thecrisesaregoingtoevolve,creatingrisksandimpactsthatcannotbepreciselyknown.Theresponsesofpeoplewillalsochange.Decisionmakerswillneedtointervene,learnfromexperienceandinterveneagain.

Currently,governmentsarespendingmoneyinwaysthatstokeinsecurityratherthantacklingit.Subsidiesthatfundenvironmentalharmbysupportingactivitiessuchasfossilfuelextractionanduse,overfishinganddeforestationamounttotrillionsofdollarsperyear.Giventhelinkbetweenenvironmentaldeclineandinsecurityandconflictrisk,thesecanalsoberegardedasconflictsubsidies.Lookedatthroughthislens,thewisdomofcontinuingwiththemappearsdoublyquestionable.

Atthesametime,theworld’srichestcountriesareconspicuouslyfailingtogeneratetheinternationalfinancingneededtotackleclimatechangeandbiodiversityloss—furtherexacerbating

6ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

Whenthe

threataffectsall

countries,national

assertivenessis

notgoingtobean

effectiveresponse.

Cooperationis

selfinterest.

insecurityandconflictrisk.Moreover,fundstoaidadaptationtoenvironmentaldeclineandtobuildresiliencearenotbeingspentinthemostneededareas;themostfragilestates,whichbydefinitionhavetheclearestneed,receivejust1/80thpercapitaoftheclimatefinancingthatflowstonon-fragilestates.

Resilienceallowscommunitiesandcountriestosurviveshockswithoutresortingtoconflict,andtorebuildswiftlyafterwards.Itisessentialforsecurityinallitsforms.Yetthesecurityandenvironmentalcriseseroderesilience.

Combattingvulnerabilitiesandbuildingresilienceagainstclimateshockswillalsoprovideabufferagainstnon-climaterelatedthreats.In2010,aheatwavefuelledbyclimatechangecontributed,viaadecimatedgrainharvestinRussiaandaconsequentspikeinbreadprices,totheArabSpring.In2022,RussianandUkrainiangrainharvestsarelikelytobesubstantiallylowerthanusual,aprospectthatisalreadypushingworldpricesdangerouslyhighagain.Differentcause,similarrisk;increasingresiliencewouldprotectagainstboth.

Resiliencecanamelioratetherisksposedbyenvironmentaldegradation,butitcannottacklethecauses.Haltingandthenreversingenvironmentaldeclineinvolvesmakingtransitionsinmanyaspectsofsocietyatunprecedentedpaceandscale.Buttransitionscanfractureanddislocatecommunities.Acrosstheworld,particularlyintheGlobalSouth,initiativesinbiofuels,hydropower,natureconservationandclimateadaptation—oftenconceivedwithgoodintentions—haveregularlystokedinsecurityandconflict.Manytimes,theyfailbecauseofit.Theenvironmentalcrisisisnowtoobigtopermitfailure;so,themyriadtransitionsneededinenergy,transportation,industryandabovealllandusehavetowork.Thatmeansactivelyinvolvingcommunitiesintheirdesignandimplementationinordertoachievejustandpeacefultransitions,whicharethenmorelikelytobesuccessfulones.

Thenatureofgovernmentsandtheirrelationshipwiththeircitizensisalsogoingtobekeytomakinggooddecisions.Therecentriseofautocratsandpopulistshasnotbeengoodforeithersecurityortheenvironmentandhasunderminedtheresilienceofglobalinstitutionsthatfacilitatecooperationonbothissues.Tacklingshared,complexproblemswillbemucheasierinaworldwheregovernmentstreattheircitizensandeachotherwithrespect,involvetheircitizensindecisionmaking,andgroundtheirpoliciesinevidence.

Asweshowinthisreport,therearerealexamplesofhopetodrawon.IntheUNsystem,atregionallevelandwithincountries,thelinksbetweenenvironmentaldegradationandinsecurityareinplacesbeingtakenmoreseriously.Mostgovernmentsareopentocooperationontheseissues,andinsomecasestheyarepursuingit.Non-governmentalorganizationsareactivelybuildingpeacethroughenvironmentalenhancement.Theseexamplesaremodelsthatcanbeupscaled,providedthevisionandwillarethere.

Weconcludebypresentingaseriesofsixrecommendationsforaction,andasetoffiveprinciplestoguideit.Theprinciplesincludecooperationandadaptability,which,intheface

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK7

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

ofanunpredictablychangingrisklandscape,arejustcommonsense.Soisinclusion,becausesolutionsinwhichallpartieshaveasayaremorelikelytosucceed.Solutionswillhavetotakeaccountofthefactthattheproblemisbothpressinganddeep-rooted,meaningthatactionhastobeginimmediatelyyetbeguidedbyfar-sightedvision.

SomeofourrecommendationsforactionconcerntheUNsystem,someareaimedatnationalgovernments,andsomeconnectwiththeprivatesector,civilsocietyandothersectors.Althoughmanytypesofentitycanandshouldplayarole,governmentsarecentralduetotheiruniquepoweraslegislators,rule-makersandallocatorsofresources.Governmentscanalsoenactchangequickly;andtimeisundeniablyshort.Chapter5setsouttherecommendationsindetail,butinsummary:

1Addressthelinkedcriseswithjointsolutions.Identifyandimplementmeasuresthatbuildbothpeaceandenvironmentalintegrity.

2Investinpreparednessandresilience.Buildcapacitytodetectsignsofgrowingthreatsanddefusetensions.

3Financepeace,notrisk.Meetinternationalfundingobligations,ensurefundingreachesthemostfragilecommunitiesandendconflictsubsidies.

4Deliverajustandpeacefultransition.Assessandaddresspossiblenegativeoutcomesofpro-environmentmeasuresbeforeimplementation.

5Bedeliberatelyinclusive.Involvemarginalizedgroupsfullyindecisionmakingandsharethebenefits.

6Research,educate,inform.Understandandcommunicatetherisksandbuildcooperationthrougheducation.

Allourrecommendationscan,giventhewill,beimplementedwithinafewyears.Wewouldurgegovernments,communitiesandotherdecision-makinginstitutionstocommittodoingso.ActivecrisessuchasthatunfoldinginUkrainemaycommandattentionfortheirduration,butenvironmentaldegradationwillcontinueuntilgovernmentsacttoendit,aswillthecreationofcomplexrisksbytheinteractionofthetwincrises.

Securityandenvironmentalintegrityarebothheadedinthewrongdirection,tothedetrimentofeverycountryandourcollective

commongood.Itisamutuallydamagingsituationdeservingofamutuallybeneficialsolution.

1

TWO

CRISES

Withthetollofconflictrisingandthenaturalenvironmentdegrading

AND

fast,ourworldisfacingtwincrises—andgovernmentsareonlyjustwakinguptothescaleoftherisksthesecrisesposetohumanity.

ADEFICIT

9

TWOCRISESANDADEFICIT

CHAPTER1

Forestsloggedoutofexistence,mountain

glaciersmeltingaway,plasticpollution

permeatinglandandocean.Moredeaths

inconflict,moremoneyspentonweapons,

morepeoplegoinghungry.Humansociety

maybericherthanitwas,butitisalso

markedlylesssecure.Governmentshave

beenlookingtheotherway,andinsome

casesmakingmattersworsebyactively

stokinginsecurity,fearandenvironmental

degradation.Withoutafreshapproach,

thetwincrisescanonlydeepen.

ThegrowthofthehumanfootprintontheEarthhasbeenastonishinglyrapid(seefigures1A–1F).In1950,humanitynumbered2.5billionpeople,withglobalgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)around$9trillion.By2020,just70yearslater,thepopulationhadtripledto7.7billion,whileGDPhadsoared13-foldto$133trillion.1,*

Bysomemeasures,thisrapidexpansioninhumanactivityandprosperityisaremarkablesuccessstory.Butithascome

ataremarkableprice.Thecostisbornebyforests,rivers,theatmosphere,animals,plantsandtheglobalocean.Thecostisalsobornebyhumanity,becauseforests,rivers,theatmosphere,animals,plantsandtheglobaloceanprovideservicesessentialtolifeandwell-being.Astheybecomeimpoverished,sotoodoeshumansociety,sparkingacycleofinsecurity—ordeepeningonethatalreadyexists—anderodingdevelopmentgainsmadeoverdecades.

Modernhumanity’sdemandforresourcesissobigthatithassignificantlyalteredthreequartersoftheworld’slandsurfaceandtwothirdsofthemarineenvironment,squeezinglivingspaceforeverythingelse.2Thedemandforwaterhasswollenalmost8-foldsince1900,3and94%offishstocksarebeingexploitedtoorbeyondtheirmaximumsustainablelimit,reducingfoodsecurity.4Thelitanyofenvironmentalillsincludesozonedepletion,plasticpollution,

*Onapurchasingpowerparitybasis,currentUSdollars.

destructionofnaturalhabitatsfromtropicalrainforeststocoralreefs,decimationofwildanimalsandplants,desertificationofonce

10ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

Figure1A

Figure1B

Figure1C

Exajoules

CHAPTER1

TWOCRISESANDADEFICIT

fertileland,acidificationandde-oxygenationoftheglobalocean,andclimatechange.

ThehumaninfluenceissostarkthatmanyscientistsarguehumanityhasstartedanewepochintheEarth’shistory:theAnthropocene.5For4.5billionyearstheworldwasshapedbynaturalprocesses,suchascontinentaldrift,volcaniceruptions,photosynthesisandevolution;inthelast70years,humaninfluencehasovertakenthemall.

Muchoftheglobalpopulationbecamemoresecureduringthat70-yearperiod,aseconomicandsocialdevelopmentreducedpoverty,hungerandillhealth.Themeetingofbasicneedslessenedthelikelihoodofconflictoveressentialresources.However,therapiddegradationofthenaturalworldisnowthreateningtoturnbackelementsofprogress,creatingnewandsubstantialsecurityrisks.

Thisisespeciallyconcerningbecausetheworldisalreadyfacingasecuritycrisis.Theindicatorsofinsecurityarerising,andtheimpactsofnaturelossandclimatechangeareaddingfueltothefire.Whilefailingtodealwiththesecurityandenvironmentalcrisesseparately,governmentsarealsogenerallyfailingtoappreciatetheirinteractionsandtheadditionalriskstheywillgenerate.

Identifyinganeffectiveapproachtosecurityinthisnewera

ofriskisthecentralquestofEnvironmentofPeace.Webeginby

mappingtherealitiesofthesecuritycrisis,thepresentandfuture

Increasinghumanfootprint

Globalpopulation

GlobalGDP

Globalprimaryenergyuse

Population(billions)

7.4

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

GDP(trillions2011$)

112

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

600

583

500

400

300

200

100

0

Sources:1A1750–1940:InternationalGeosphere-BiosphereProgramme(2015);1940–2015UNPopulationDivision(2021).1B1750–2015:BoltandvanZanden(2020).1C1750–2015:RitchieandRoser(2020).

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK11

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

1750

1775

1800

1825

1850

1875

1900

1925

1950

1975

2000

2015

Figure1D

Figure1E

Figure1F

TWOCRISESANDADEFICIT

CHAPTER1

oftheenvironmentalcrisis,andthecurrentlyinadequateapproachtogovernance.Thesethreestrandsthenrunthroughoutthereport,providingalensthroughwhichtoseetheworldandaframeworkformovingfromanalysistorecommendations.

*Thesedeathsarelargelyduetothe

conflictinSyria.

**Percentagedecreaseofaverage

terrestrialspeciesabundance

relativetoabundancein

undisturbedecosystems.

Thesecuritycrisis

In2010,thenumberofstate-basedarmedconflictsdocumentedaroundtheworldstoodataround30,havingprogressivelyfallensincethebreak-upoftheSovietUnion.Thetrendhasnowreversed.Between2010and2020,thenumbernearlydoubled(to56),asdidthenumberofconflictdeaths.6,*Thisdoublingcanalsobeseeninthenumbersofrefugeesandotherforciblydisplacedpeople,whichrosefrom41millionin2010to82.4millionin2020.7

Theoveralltrendisunmistakeable:theworldisbecoming

lesssafeandsecureforalargeproportionofitsinhabitants.

Inrecentyears,mostarmedconflictshavetakenplace

withinratherthanbetweencountries.8However,outsideforces

areintimatelyinvolvedinmanyofthemostlethalsituations,

withfourconflicts—Iraq,Libya,SyriaandYemen—partially

shapedbyexternalpowers.

GlobalatmosphericconcentrationofCO?

Globalfreshwateruse

Decreaseinaverage

speciesabundance**

CO?(partspermillion)

401

450

425

400

375

350

325

300

275

Freshwateruse(km3)

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

3986

Decreaseinaveragespeciesabundance(%)

3029

25

20

10

15

5

Sources:1D1750–1958:InternationalGeosphere-BiosphereProgramme(2015);1959–Present:USNOAA(2022).1E1901–2014:RitchieandRoser(2017).1F1750–2000:InternationalGeosphere-BiosphereProgramme(2015).

12ENVIRONMENTOFPEACE

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

CHAPTER1

TWOCRISESANDADEFICIT

Withinthelastthreeyears,thePersianGulfhasseenmissilestrikes,proxyattacksandchallengestofreedomofnavigation.TensionsbetweenIndiaandPakistanhaveescalatedtothelevelofarmedclashes,9ashavethosebetweenIndiaandChina.10WarfarehasarisenanewinEthiopiaandtheSouthCaucasus.11Althoughconflictoverwaterbetweencountriesisextremelyrare,conflictoverwaterwithincountriesdoubledbetweenthe2000sandthe2010s.12Theglobaloceanhasnotescapedthetrend,withconflictsoverfishingquadruplingsince2000.13

EvenbeforetheRussianinvasionofUkraine,geopoliticswasbecomingdiscerniblymorefraught.AparticularfeaturehasbeentheincreasinglyfrostyrelationshipbetweenChinaandseveralWesternpowers,notablytheUnitedStates.TheUSAhasimposedtradesanctionsonChina,14ChinahasdeclaredjurisdictionoveralargetractoftheSouthChinaSea,anddisputeshavecontinuedovercyberespionageandhumanrights.Withinthelast10yearsRussiahasattemptedtodestabilizeothercountriesviacyberattacksandelectoralinterference,15andNorthKorea,Russia,SaudiArabiaandtheUSAhaveallcarriedoutillegalkillingsonforeignsoil.16

ThemonthsleadinguptotheinvasionofUkrainesawRussiarestrictinggasexportstosendenergypricessoaringinEuropeandotherregions,17whileBelarusattemptedtoweaponizemigrationalongitsborderwithPoland.18Theinvasionhasnow

Figure2Numberofstate-basedarmedconflictsbetween1989and2020

Numberofstate-basedarmedconflicts

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

56

31

Sources:Petterssonetal.(2021);Gleditschetal.(2002).

SECURITYINANEWERAOFRISK

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論