動物莊園英文讀后感

PAGE動物莊園英文讀后感篇一：ReviewofAnimalfarmReviewof“AnimalFarm”“Animalfarm”tellsatragicsatirethattheoppressedfarmanimalsrebelledtodriveoutMr.Joneswhowasthefarmer,andattemptedtorulethefarmbythemselvesonanequalbasic.However,theanimals`aimseemslikelytobeasortofutopiancommunism,theventurefailedandthefarmwastotallycontrolledbypigswhichwerethebrightestandmostidleanimals.Thisstoryisavividfablethatjustlikesthehumanbeingssociety.Everycharacterhasitsantitype.WhenIreadthenovel,Ifeltsofamiliarwithsomeplotsinhuman`shistory.ItwasinterestinghowOrwellusedtheanimalstomakeastatementaboutpoliticsandsociety.IhaveheardthatthisnovelisfamousforitscriticismagainstSovietCommunism.I`mnotveryfamiliarwithSoviethistory.Buttheanimalsallcalledthemselves“comrade”,whichimpressedmeverymuch.AndthetwoleadersNapoleonandSnowballweretworepresentativetypesofleader.Snowballwasatragiccharacter.Hewasanactivereformerwholearnedtheskillsofmanincludingfarming,reading,writingandarchitecture.Withtheseskills,hetaughtotheranimals.Hehopedeveryanimalcouldlearnmoreandimprovethemselvestobemoreknowledgeableandcultivated.Asaleader,hewasveryresponsibleforotheranimalsandthefarm,andalsocompetent,diligentforhiswork.Althoughsometimeshisdeterminationseemsalittleblindandunpractical,buthewasreallyadventurous,justlikeadoer.However,hewastoosimple-mindedandinnocentinthepowercontestwithNapoleon.Nevertheless,aleaderdemandsgeneraltraitsespeciallyforhisEQlevel.SnowballwastooinnocenttodefendhimselfagainstthesinisterNapoleon.IwonderwhatwillhappenifSnowballhaveseenthroughNapoleon’strapandisabletogetthepower.WillhegraduallybecomecorruptandepicureanjustlikeNapoleon?ItseemsthatifSnowballistheleader,thefarmwillrealizetheirequallyhappyaim.Idon`tknowwhetherhehasthegreedforpowerandluxury,butfromthisstoryIdorealizethatthecommunismisreallyhardandmaybeimpossibletoachieve.Thisnovelcanbeseenastheanalysisofthecausesofthefailureofcommunism,aimingtoprovethathumannatureanddiversitypreventpeoplefrombeingequalandhappy,oratleastequallyhappy.Becauseinhumanworld,thehumannatureanddiversitydecidethattheremustbesomeonearenotonlysatisfiedwithmeetingbasalneedstoexist,andthevariouspeoplewithdifferentfeaturesandthoughtswon`tmakeeveryonesimplyequalinthecivilrightsandindividualneeds.IhaveneverthoughtofthepossibilityofCommunismbefore,butnowIbegintosuspectthataccordingtotheessentialofhumanbeings,it`sreallyatoughmissiontoachievetheCommunism.IknowthestoryisseenasthesatireforSovietCommunism,whichmademeassociatewiththeChineseCommunism.Formypoorpoliticalknowledge,IknowweareintheSocialismphase,primaryfortheCommunism.OurfinaltargetistorealizetheCommunismandIdowonderwhenthisprimaryphaseisanendinginthefuture?Wearerespondedunclearlythatitwillbeaverylongandtoughperiodinthedevelopmentprocessofourcountry,maybemorethanhundredsyears.Buthowaboutthelatergenerations?Asamatteroffact,IsuspectthatnobodyknowswhatthisprimarySocialismwillbeinthefuture,itseemsthatthenationjustmaintainstheactualityandnoonecaresthedirectionofSocialism.Evenifsomeonehavethoughtofit,theyarenotabletoconsideritclearly.Noteveryonecanbethegiant.AndIalsofounditdifferentbetweenSovietandChina.In“AnimalFarm”,Thepigsturnedthesimple“comrades”toruthlessdictatorswhomanagedtowalkonlegsandcarrywhips.Thiskindoftotalitarianismendedupwithfailure,howaboutChineseCommunism?TotalitarianismandtyrannyseemsnoteasytocarryoutinChinaandthephenomenonof“theleaderisalwaysright”maybewillneverappearagainsincetheinstitutionalrevolutionhavetakenplace.WeselectthesamewayofCommunismfromSoviet,andwhatweshoulddoforthenextstepisaserioussocialandnationalproblem.Likeanumberofgirls,i`mnotveryinterestedinthepolitics,butthisbookmademebegintothinkofit.AlthoughI`mnotabletothinkclearlyandsystemically,Ihavegainedalotfromthereadingandthinkingprocess.FromLiuchang《動物農(nóng)莊》和《一九八四》寓真實于寓言與虛構(gòu)中，體現(xiàn)政治小說的藝術(shù)性，使讀者產(chǎn)生驚訝。小說從合情合理的視角，打破常規(guī)敘述，使熟悉的歷史事件陌生與離奇化，使慣常的事件組合陌生化，使語言表達奇特化，故意不用讀者熟知的通用名稱，在語言與閱讀者之間設(shè)置障礙，延長了讀者消解過程。以苦澀、嘲諷與憤怒為一體的幽致，追求悲劇意味的喜劇風(fēng)格，增強象征性與寓意性。運用扭曲的圖景，將變形、變態(tài)的痛苦寓于深刻悖謬中，以達到諷刺的藝術(shù)效果。AnimalFarmandNineteenEightyFourcombinehistoricaltruthwiththefableandfictionnovels,whichshowtheartofpoliticalnovels,tomakereadersfeelsurprised.Withreasonableviews,thetwonovelsmaynotusenormalnarrationtoturnthefamiliarhistoricaleventsintostrangeones,andtochangetheusualeventsintostrangeonestorealizethespecialtiesoflanguageexpression.Thepopularnameswhichareknownbyreadershavenotbeenadoptedonpurposeinthetwonovels.Therearesomeunderstandingbarriersinlanguagetomakereadersspendmuchmoreprolongedtimeinreading.Withthestyleofironyandanger,thenovelshavedemonstratedthecomedystyleoutoftragedyimplicationtoincreasethesymbolicandintentionaleffectiveness.Withstrangeviews,theironyhasbeenappliedtoexpressthepeculiaranguishoutstandingnovel,AnimalFarm,ofwhichmanycriticshavediverseopinions,isundoubtedlyoneofthemostpopularnovelsforthepasthalfcentury.Eventhefamoushistorian,TimothyGartonAsh,afellowofSt.Antony'sCollege,OxfordUniversity,onceconfirmedinpublicthathiswritingshadbeendeeplyinfluencedbyGeorgeOrwell,andregardedOrwell’sbookaspoliticalwritingsaswellasgreatworksofart.Inthespringof1946,whenAnimalFarmwasfirstlypublishedinUnitedStates,ithadalreadybeentranslatedintoninelanguages.Duringthenextthreeyearssinceitspublication,thisnovelhadbeensoldoutalmosthalfamillioncopiesworldwide.ItisimpossibletooverstatethesignificantroleandpopularityofAnimalFarminthehistoryofEnglishliterature.Asfarasthepresentauthorisconcerned,GeorgeOrwell’sadmirableuseofironyinAnimalFarmdeservestobestudiedindetail,soastoshedsomelightonwhythisbookhassuchaworld-wideappealoverthepastsixtyyears.Asafigureofspeechindramaandliterature,ironyisastatementoractionwhoseapparentmeaningisunderlainbyanoppositemeaning.Itistraditionallycategorizedintothreeaspects:verbal;dramatic;situational.Inmostcases,theusesofironyinAnimalFarmbelongtothefirsttwo.Byusingtheironictechnique,GeorgeOrwellisawonderofthenovelistsandcontributesalottotheliteraryworld.[[i]Lasteditedby鄂鯢葉on2005-5-17at08:20[/i]](5253words)摘要《動物農(nóng)莊》，一部以動物故事形式寫成的政治諷刺寓言，是喬治?奧維爾的經(jīng)典著作之一，也為他在英國文學(xué)史上贏得了重要地位。在小說中，奧維爾熟練的運用了反諷的修辭手法，揭示了在動物農(nóng)莊中存在的不平等和獨裁，昭示了這個虛擬的所謂理想世界其實不過是人類社會的一個折射。本文試圖分析小說中反諷的用法，以期更好的理解在過去的60年中，這本小說何以如此成功并受到全世界讀者的歡迎。本文的第一部分從《動物農(nóng)莊》的故事場景，人物和小說在文學(xué)史中的地位等方面對小說做了總體的介紹和概述。接著，筆者通過比較和分析，認(rèn)為小說中的反諷可以大致分為兩種：言語式反諷和戲劇式反諷。其中，本文通過個案分析的方法，分三個方面，對奧維爾在文中的“七誡”的用法進行了探討，認(rèn)為這是言語式反語的經(jīng)典例子。其后，本文再從三個方面：農(nóng)莊中的勞作，財富的分配以及動物彼此間的關(guān)系，采用比較分析的方法對戲劇式反語進行了考察。最后，本文指出采用反諷主要式基于當(dāng)時緊張的戰(zhàn)后國際社會環(huán)境和奧維爾期望揭示政治謊言的目的。這本小說表達了奧威爾對于社會中不平等現(xiàn)象的憤懣之情，帶領(lǐng)讀者去思索在人類世界中的有關(guān)公平、公正的原則?？傊?，正是奧維爾熟練的反諷用法使得《動物農(nóng)莊》成為具有世界影響的政治諷刺小說。關(guān)鍵字：言語式反諷刺戲劇式反諷平等動物農(nóng)莊總計：5253字[[i]Lasteditedby鄂鯢葉on2005-5-17at12:27[/i]]ConclusionAnimalFarmlastsitsworldwidepopularityfornearlysixtyyears.Withtheendofthestrugglesagainstfascismandthevictoryin1945,anewconflictbetweentheWestandtheEastbegantodevelop―—thecoldwar.ItisunfortunateAnimalFarmstartedtobetakenasaninstrumentofpropagandaoftheWestcampaign.WiththeassistanceoftheUnitedStatesgovernment,itbecamemorepopular.Shoulditbereadduringthenextfiftyyears?IsAnimalFarmoutofdatesincetheUnitedSovietSocialistRepublicshavecollapsedandthecoldwarwasend?Thepresentauthorholdsitfirmlythatitwouldnotbe.Thistaleaboutindependenceandequalitywonbutlost,exposingtheevildictatorship,continuestoremindusthatfreedomisfragileandprecious.Thisfictitiousidealanimalworld,createdbyOrwell,wouldforallthetimewarnsthatthedispiteousandinhumanestrugglesofpowersinthehumanworld,andthefearfulrealitythatwhenpowercorrupts,therearealwaysotherforcesatworkseekingtowieldit.Despiteitspoliticimplicationsaboutpowerswitchesanddispassionatecriticismofthehumansociety,thisnovelisstillagreatwork.AnimalFarmisanallegoricalfable,depictingtheabusesofpoweramongagroupoffarmanimalswhorebelagainsttheirhumanownersandattempttoformanegalitariansociety.Asanextremelydisciplinedwriter,Orwellconsistentlyuseslanguagetoenhancethedevelopmentofplotwhileprovidinginsightintothematicconcerns.Writteninapure,subtle,andsimplisticstyle,AnimalFarmevokesdescriptiveimageryandstunningclarityofpurpose.Althoughthenovelbeginswitharelativelylighttone,itgraduallyevolvesintoamenacinganddebilitatingvoid.Comingfullcircle,thenovelendswithatremendoussenseoffutilityandlossaseventhememoryoftherevolutionfadesintoquietandpassiveoblivion.ThewritingstyleofAnimalFarmismostlydeterminedbythetensesocialenvironmentOrwellwasin.Moreover,duotohisattemptsofcombiningpoliticalpurposesofreprehendingthesocialinequalityandartspurposeofcreatingagreatwork,Orwellmakesfulluseofverbalironyanddramaticironytoclarifyhisviewpoints.What’smore,thevitalsuccessofthisnovelliesintheprofoundlyandskillfuluseofverbalironiesanddramaticironiesinagentle,dispassionateandlogicway.Inaword,Orwellisthefirstpersontomakefulluseofthehuman-animalrelationshipforpoliticalorsocialcommentary.HisdistinguishedusesofironymakeAnimalFarmbecomeoneofthemasterpieceswithworldwideappealforthepastsixtydecades.Furthermore,itstillshouldbereadedwithpleasureandprofitforthenextfiftyyears,insideandoutsidetheclassroom,asadeepimpulseforpeopleofthepresentagetorethinkequalityandponderoverthelatentproblemsofourownsociety[[i]Lasteditedby鄂鯢葉on2005-5-16at16:57[/i]]篇二：英文讀后感動物莊園高級詞匯animalfarmFightForWe(為自己而戰(zhàn))周珈羽AnimalFarmtellsastoryaboutfarmanimals.TheyarefedupwithMr.Jones,thefarmerwhotreatsthembadly,sotheydecidetokickhimoffthefarmandrunthefarmthemselves.TheyadoptSevenCommandmentsofAnimalism,ofwhichthemostimportantisAllanimalsareequal”.Pigsaretheleadersoftheoperationofthenewlystart-upfarm.Thankstotherightleadofthepigsandselflessandhardworkingofallanimals,theAnimalFarmdevelopsgoodenoughtotheirdemands.However,lifeisnoteasy.Theleadersseparateintotwofactionssoonafter.Asaresult,Snowball,apigleader,isexpelledbyNapoleon,anotherpig,asabetrayer.AlthoughSnowballwasabraveleader,othersfirmlyconceivehewasn’tandSnowballisabadanimalindeedafterbrainwashingNapoleonoffered.What’smore,theSevenCommandmentsofAnimalismhadalsobeenchanged.Finally,theAnimalFarmbecomesquitedifferentfromwhattheyhopeittobeatthebeginning.Fromthenovel,itisthefaiththatsupportanimalstofindtheirregimeandstruggletheequalfromhumans.Butit’stheambitionthatleadstotheanimalfarm’stragedyanddestroythehopeofdemocracy.Uponfinishingthebook,Ican’thelpthinkingtheanimalfarmissimilartooursociety.Nowadays,it’stheconvictionthatweareallcreatedequal,endowedbyourCreatorwithcertainunalienablerights,amongthemlife,liberty,andthepursuitofhappiness.Buttheprogresshasbeenuneven.therewasatimewhenwewonderwho’stheruleroftheworld,allofushadtheambitiontocontrolthewholeworld,thenwarsbrokeout.Itrobbedmanyinnocentlivesaswellasthepeaceandtheharmony,whichevokeourdeeperthoughts,isitthehomewewanttorebuild?Isitthefaiththatwebelievein?Knowingwhatstupidthingswe’vedone,westoppedthecrimesandgotourfootinthedoorofdemocracy.Ofcoursetheworkofdemocracyhasalwaysbeenhard,contentiousandsometimesbloody.Westillhavetofightforit,withthefaith,nomatterwhenweare,nomatterwhoweare.篇三：動物莊園讀書報告英文bookreportofanimalfarmanimalfarmisthefirstbookichoosetoreadamongthelistofbbctop100novels.thebookhasarousedstrongreactionandbecamefamoussincethedateitwaspublished.itrevealshumanrealitybytellinganimals’storyinfunnybutextremelyironicway.itseemsridiculousforanimalstohavearevolutionandforpigstogovernthefarm.butwhenweputitintohuman’ssociety,thestorymakessense.infactitreflectsontherevolutionhappenedinsovietin20thcentury.animalismissimilartosocialism,whichemphasizesequalityalot,butactuallyinequalityatall.extremeequalityistendtogetintoanembarrassingsituationlike“allanimalsareequal,butsomeanimalsaremoreequalthanothers.”napoleonisalsothereflectionofsoviet’sleadersidalin,whowasfamousforhisarbitrarinessandtoughnessinthehistoryandexpelledtrotsky(snowballreflectsontrotsky).therevolutionofanimalsisbasedonbeingtreatedunfairlybyhuman.becausetheirenthusiasmandhatred,theysuccessatthebeginning.however,theydonotknowhowtoremainasteadyregime.thekeyofkeepingaregimeistosetrestrictionstothepower.inotherwords,tolegislate.theresponsibilityandrightsofbothgovernmentandcitizensshouldbeshowedobviouslyinthelaw.tomakeaconclusion,georgeorwellmakestherevealofpoliticsandhumanityinavividandsimplestory,fromwhichreadersthinkmuchaboutthehistoryandsociety.篇二：動物莊園英文讀后感wuyouclass1profzhangliteraryreadingapril18,XXtheconflictsinanimalfarmanimalfarmmainlynarratesastorywhichisfocusontherebellionbroughtaboutbyanimals,themanagementinthefarmwhenitisinchargedoftwopigs,napoleonandsnowball,andthedifferentopinionsoftwoleaderstocontrolandgovernthewholefarm.1.whatevergoesupontwolegsisanenemy.2.whatevergoesuponfourlegs,orhaswings,isafriend.3.noanimalshallwearclothes.4.noanimalshallsleepinabed.5.noanimalsshalldrinkalcohol.6.noanimalshallkillanyotheranimal.7.allanimalsareequal.fourlegsgood,twolegsbetter.noanimalshallsleepinabedwithsheets.noanimalshalldrinkalcoholtoexcess.noanimalshallkillanyotheranimalwithoutcause.allanimalsareequal/butsomeanimalsaremoreequalthanothers.finally,thefarmiscalledmanorfarmagain.andpigsgovernthefarmjustlikethehuman-beingbefore.accordingtotheplotofthisnovel,hefirstplace,theconflictprimarilyconcentratesontheunsatisfactoryofanimalstowardsthecitizensthanbefore,whichiseasytoresultintheconsequencesofinequalityandunfairphenomenon.thesethreeconflictsareabletoofferusseveralreflectionsinourreallife.firstofall,thegovernmenthasamoralobligationandresponsibilitytocopewiththerelationshipwithpeople,whichcouldbededucedfromtheconnectionsbetweenmrjonesandtheanimals.simplybecauseoftheimproperwaytosolvetherelationship,mrjonesiskickedoutfromhisownfarm,whichisabletoinfertherelationsbetweentheauthorityandthepeoplewhoaregovernedbythisbureau.moreover,corruptioncouldonlybeavoidedundertheregulations.eveniftheoriginalthoughtwasthesametomaintaintheequalityinthefarm,withtheincreaseofwildambitionanddesiretocontrol,thecorruptionandunfairsituationappearsinthefarmultimately.furthermore,inordertocontroltheabuseofrightsandpower,theauthorityandgovernmenthavetotakesomemeasurestomakeitundercontrol,whichissignificantinthesocietyandistheonlywaytoofferthecitizenspleasantandjoyfullife.inconclusion,thereexistthreedifferentconflictsbetweenhumanraceandanimals,fromwhichwecoulddeducethreetroubleswaitedtobesolved.andasfarasiamconcerned,theassignmentofthepowerisoneofthemainsourcestogiverisetoalloftheseconflictsandconsequenceswhichresultinthedispossessionofabetterlife.hence,inordertoownanequalandjustifylife,theabuseofrightshastoberesolvesandundercontrol,whichistheonlywayleadingtothehappyexistencesforhumanbeings.篇三：動物莊園讀后感一、文獻名稱：《動物莊園》二、文獻簡介：用動物對人類抗?fàn)幒笞越覉@來再現(xiàn)前蘇聯(lián)的整個歷史情形，奧威爾的《動物莊園》被公認(rèn)為二十世紀(jì)最杰出的政治寓言?！秳游锴f園》被譯成二十多種文字在全世界流傳，其中的有些語言還變成了人們的口頭禪。本書以隱喻的形式寫革命的發(fā)生以及革命的背叛，自然還有革命的殘酷：一個農(nóng)莊的動物不堪主人的壓迫，在豬的帶領(lǐng)下起來反抗，趕走了農(nóng)莊主；它們建立起一個自己管理自已的家園，奉行“所有動物一律平等”的原則；兩只領(lǐng)頭的豬為了權(quán)力而互相傾軋，勝利者一方宣布另一方是叛徒、內(nèi)奸；豬們逐漸侵占了其他動物的勞動成果，成為新的特權(quán)階級；動物們稍有不滿，便招致血腥的清洗；統(tǒng)治者需要迫使豬與人結(jié)成同盟，建立起獨裁專制；農(nóng)莊的理想被修正為“有的動物較之其他動物更為平等”，動物們又回復(fù)到從前的悲慘狀況。奧威爾在完成寫作時正處于二戰(zhàn)中的英國與蘇聯(lián)尚是盟國，《動物農(nóng)場》的諷刺主題讓它顯得有些不合時宜，出版也頗費周折，最終面世前，被5家出版社拒過稿。而到1945年8月出版后，在冷戰(zhàn)初露端倪的背景下，《動物農(nóng)場》很快成為暢銷書。三、作者簡介：喬治·奧威爾，英國記者、小說家、散文家和評論家。1903年生于英國殖民地的印度，童年耳聞目睹了殖民者與被殖民者之間尖銳的沖突。與絕大多數(shù)英國孩子不同，他的同情傾向悲慘的印度人民一邊。少年時代，奧威爾受教育于著名的伊頓公學(xué)。后來被派到緬甸任警察，他卻站在了苦役犯的一邊。20世紀(jì)30年代，他參加西班牙內(nèi)戰(zhàn)，因?qū)偻新宕幕上担ǖ谒膰H）而遭排擠，回國后卻又因被劃入左派，不得不流亡法國。二戰(zhàn)中，他在英國廣播公司（bbc）從事反法西斯宣傳工作。1950年，死于困擾其數(shù)年的肺病，年僅46歲。喬治·奧威爾一生短暫，但其以敏銳的洞察力和犀利的文筆審視和記錄著他所生活的那個時代，作出了許多超越時代的預(yù)言，被稱為“一代人的冷峻良知”。四、內(nèi)容概要：老少校——老豬，提出了動物主義的思想。斯諾鮑——豬，動物莊園革命的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者之一，后被驅(qū)逐并宣布為革命的敵人。拿破侖——豬，動物莊園革命的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者之一，后來成為莊園的領(lǐng)袖。尖嗓——豬，拿破侖的忠實支持者，擅于言辭。拳擊手——馬，智商不高，但是是動物主義理念的忠實追隨者，積極響應(yīng)革命領(lǐng)袖的號召，后被拿破侖賣給宰馬商，象征著相信“革命理論”的廣大基層人民。珂蘿薇——馬，動物主義的追隨者。與拳擊手一樣勤勞，而且十分關(guān)心別人。同樣象征無產(chǎn)階級。本杰明——驢，對拿破侖的所作所為始終抱有懷疑但明哲自保，象征有獨立思想對極權(quán)主義有所懷疑但明哲保身的知識分子。摩西——烏鴉，被農(nóng)場主人瓊斯馴服。一開始與瓊斯一同逃離農(nóng)莊，后來回到農(nóng)莊。莫麗——馬，愚蠢、貪慕虛榮、物質(zhì)主義者。對于革命沒有興趣，只關(guān)心自己的利益，后來逃離了動物農(nóng)莊。代表俄國的中產(chǎn)階級和小資產(chǎn)階級中較為反動的部分。很多無名的狗——拿破侖在動物莊園實施暴力統(tǒng)治的工具，象征極權(quán)主義國家的各種暴力機構(gòu)。母雞——它們?yōu)榱瞬蛔屇闷苼鲑u自己的蛋，跳上了屋頂并把雞蛋扔下。羊群——盲目追隨拿破侖，高唱“四條腿好兩條腿壞”阻止反對拿破侖的聲音。瓊斯先生——莊園農(nóng)場的舊主人。皮爾金頓先生——狐苑農(nóng)場的主人。弗雷德里克先生——撬棍地農(nóng)場的主人，曾經(jīng)與動物莊園達成買賣協(xié)議，后來毀約并入侵動物莊園。溫珀先生律師——動物莊園與外界的聯(lián)系人。在這個農(nóng)場里動物天天都為農(nóng)場主干活，但是得到的報酬卻很少，可以果腹而已。有一天一頭老公豬（老少校）把它們召集起來，告訴它們你們應(yīng)該站起來反抗農(nóng)場主，應(yīng)該得到自由的生活。動物們在聽到老少校鼓動的話語后都群情激憤，個個摩拳擦掌，唱著革命的歌曲《英格蘭的生靈》，想象著趕走農(nóng)場主，想象著以后的好日子。隨后，革命很快并且很輕易地成功了，后來又發(fā)生了一場“牛棚戰(zhàn)役”，奠定了革命的果實，動物農(nóng)場建立，并且頒布了《七戒》，成為法律。七誡1凡靠兩條腿行走者皆為仇敵；2凡靠四肢行走者或長翅膀者，皆為親友；3任何動物不得著衣；4任何動物不得臥床；5任何動物不得飲酒；6任何動物不得傷害其他動物；7所有動物一律平等。莊園有兩只豬斯諾鮑和拿破侖作為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者。但是不久拿破侖用它養(yǎng)的9只兇悍的狼犬趕走了斯諾鮑，并在以后的時間把所有的罪責(zé)都推到他身上，把它宣傳成農(nóng)場的敵人。最后豬們成了農(nóng)場的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)階級，變得跟以前的農(nóng)場主一樣，甚至更兇殘，而從前的七戒從無數(shù)次地偷偷修改，最后只剩下最后一條“所有動物一律平等，但有些動物比其他動物更平等”。最后小說在人與豬的臉逐漸切換與逐漸混淆不清中進入尾聲。五、理論價值與貢獻：奧威爾通過自身經(jīng)歷以及對斯大林統(tǒng)治下的蘇聯(lián)有自己的判斷。以童話形式寫成的《動物莊園》便是這種思想推動下的產(chǎn)物。《動物莊園》的故事脈絡(luò)被評論家分析為與蘇聯(lián)的歷史乃至整個二十世紀(jì)國際共產(chǎn)主義運動的歷史驚人的相似，在很多的國家都能看到動物莊園的類似影子。作者在書中借由對動物莊園的發(fā)展變化，對共產(chǎn)主義運動未來命運的預(yù)言也被1991年的蘇聯(lián)、東歐劇變和后來的歷史所印證?！秳游镛r(nóng)場》已被譯成60多種文字，在內(nèi)地首次出版后的近二十年來，至今已經(jīng)有了七八個譯本，其非常受歡迎。我們讀這本書，不會忽略奧威爾在講述一個動物童話的同時，向我們發(fā)出的鄭重警告或者預(yù)言。從這個意義上說，我們可以毫無保留地說，《動物農(nóng)場》具有永恒的價值。六、讀后感：1.作者在文獻中傳遞給讀者的思想：《動物莊園》讓我們明白，有獨立人格、思考能力和責(zé)任心的個體是保證整個社會體制公平公正運轉(zhuǎn)的基礎(chǔ)保證，當(dāng)個體對于涉及到自己切身利益的決策不能做出深入的思考分析，權(quán)衡利弊，那么社會公平也就無所謂有無了，集體利益就會變成個人決策。社會個體是人，任何制度都是由人去運作，如果人沒有一定的能力，那么再好的制度都不過是空中樓閣。當(dāng)知識不被重視，政治不被關(guān)心，大眾把一切事物交給政府，任權(quán)力驅(qū)使，沉迷于八卦娛樂，埋頭為金錢房子勞心，那么專制將不再遠，人民離鮑克瑟也不遠了：身上的價值被榨取的涓滴不剩，直至死亡而不自知。“所有動物一律平等，但有些動物比其他動物更平等”，我希望這樣的事情在我們國家能夠得到改善，希望我們的民主更進一步，真正踐行人人平等，沒有特權(quán)階級，所有人都享有同樣的權(quán)利。2.文獻中給你印象最深刻難忘的部分：令我很關(guān)注的是一匹叫鮑克瑟的雄馬，他力大無比，戰(zhàn)斗時奮勇當(dāng)先，工作時盡心盡力，他時時刻刻都是那么努力，那么拼命。而一直鼓勵他好好工作的則是他的座右銘”我會更努力工作“和”拿破侖統(tǒng)治永遠是對的”。他對動物農(nóng)場來說，不得不說勞苦功