![LSE全球新聞機構(gòu)人工智能應(yīng)用調(diào)研報告(英)_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf46/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf461.gif)
![LSE全球新聞機構(gòu)人工智能應(yīng)用調(diào)研報告(英)_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf46/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf462.gif)
![LSE全球新聞機構(gòu)人工智能應(yīng)用調(diào)研報告(英)_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf46/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf463.gif)
![LSE全球新聞機構(gòu)人工智能應(yīng)用調(diào)研報告(英)_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf46/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf464.gif)
![LSE全球新聞機構(gòu)人工智能應(yīng)用調(diào)研報告(英)_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf46/b5c89d51832c833ac326c370df5fdf465.gif)
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
POLIS
JournalismatLSE
GeneratingChange
AglobalsurveyofwhatnewsorganisationsaredoingwithAI
CharlieBeckettandMiraYaseen
Preface
Ournewsmediaworldhasbeenturnedupsidedownagain.Asalways,serioustechnologicalchangeproducesbothdystopianandutopianhype.MuchofthishasbeengeneratedonsocialmediabycorporatePRandpoliticians.Newscoverageandexpertcommentaryhasalso
veeredfromexcitedcoverageofpositivebreakthroughsinfieldssuchasmedicinetomuchmorefrighteningvisionsofnegativeforcesunleashed:GenerativeAI(genAI)isproducingatidalwaveofautomated,undetectabledisinformation;itwillamplifydiscrimination,extremespeechandinequalities.
Anditsimpactonjournalism?Again,muchofthecoveragehasfocusedontheunreliabilityofmanygenAItoolsandthecontroversyoveritsrapaciousappetiteforotherpeople’sdatatotrainitsalgorithms.Astheinitialstormofhypeturnsintomorepracticalconsiderationswehave
beentalkingtonewsorganisationsaroundtheworldaboutthisnewwaveoftechnologicalchange.WhataretheydoingwithAIandgenAI;whatmighttheydointhefuture;andwhataretheirhopesandfearsforitsimpactonthesustainabilityandqualityofthishard-pressedjournalismindustry?
WhetheryouareexcitedorappalledatwhatgenAIcando,thisreportmakesitclearthatitisvitaltolearnandengagewiththistechnology.Itwillchangetheworldwereportupon.Itneedscriticalattentionfromindependentbutinformedjournalists.Butoursurveyshowsitisalso
alreadychangingjournalism.Itbringsexcitingopportunitiesforefficiencyandevencreativity.Asonerespondenttoldus,“Freeinguptimeforjournaliststocontinuedoingtheirjobisthegreatestimpactachieved.”
Butitalsobringsspecificandgeneralhazards.Thegoodnewsfromourrespondents,atleast,isthattheyareawareoftheopportunitiesandrisksandarebeginningtoaddressthem.The
bestorganisationshavesetupstructurestoinvestigategenAIandprocessestoincludealltheirstaffinitsadoption.Theyhavewrittennewguidelinesandstartedtoexperimentwithcaution.Thisisacriticalphase(again!)fornewsmediaaroundtheworld.Journalistshaveneverbeenundersomuchpressureeconomically,politicallyandpersonally.GenAIwillnotsolvethose
problemsanditmightwelladdsome,too.
Responsible,effectivejournalismismoreneededthanever.WehopethisreportandourworkatJournalismAIcontributestothatmission.Welookforwardtohearingfromyou.Letusknow
whatyouaredoingandhowwecanhelp.
ProfessorCharlieBeckett
DirectorPolis,LSE,leaderoftheLSE’sJournalismAIproject
1
Contents
Preface1
TheJournalismAISurvey4
ExecutiveSummary&KeyFindings6
Introduction:HowDidWeGetHere?9
Chapter1:HowAIisBeingUsedinJournalismToday14
1.0HowAreNewsroomsUsingAI?14
1.1Newsgathering15
1.2NewsProduction17
1.3NewsDistribution18
1.4WhyNewsroomsUseAI21
1.5WhatisWorkingandWhatisNot22
Chapter2:AIStrategy25
2.0TheNeedforStrategy25
2.1Newsrooms’AIStrategies
24
2.2HowNewsroomProcessesandRolesareAffectedbyAI28
2.3ReadyforAI?31
2.4TheStrategicChallengestoAIAdoption32
2.5HaveNewsrooms’ApproachestoAIIntegrationChanged?36
Chapter3:EthicsandEditorialPolicy39
3.0AI’sImpactonEditorialQuality39
3.1AlgorithmicBias39
3.2NewsroomApproachestoEthicalConcerns41
3.3EthicalImplicationsforJournalismatLarge43
3.4TheRoleofTechnologyCompanies44
3.5TheRoleofUniversitiesandIntermediaryCompanies
47
2
(continued)
Contents
Chapter4:TheFutureofAIandJournalism49
4.0WhereisThisAllGoing?49
4.1TheNeedforEducationandTraining51
4.2NewsroomCollaboration53
4.3HowWillAIChangeJournalism?54
Chapter5:GenerativeAIandJournalism
57
5.0CurrentUseCases57
5.1OpportunitiesPresentedbyGenerativeAI60
5.2ChallengesPresentedbyGenerativeAI62
Chapter6:TheGlobalDisparityinAIDevelopmentandAdoption65
6.0TheGlobalNorth/SouthDivide65
6.1EconomicandInfrastructuralChallenges66
6.2LanguageandAccessibilityChallenges66
6.3PoliticalRealitiesAffectTrustinAI68
Conclusion:WhatDoesAIMeanforJournalism?71
SixStepsTowardsanAIStrategyforNewsOrganisations72
Glossary73
References77
Readings&Resources83
Acknowledgements85
3
7%
28%
16%
20%
13%
16%
TheJournalismAISurvey
Thisreportisthesecondglobalsurveythatwehaveconducted.Thesampleforthisreportisbiggerwithagreateremphasisongeographicaldiversity.Itisbasedonasurveyof105newsandmediaorganisationsfrom46differentcountriesregardingAIandassociated
technologies.In2019wesurveyed71newsorganisationsfrom32differentcountries,ofwhichonly16haveparticipatedagaininthis2023survey.
Thisyear,wemadeitapointtoreachamorediversegroupofparticipantsinterms
ofthesizeoftheirorganisations.Weinvitedsmallandlargenewsrooms,including
emergingandlegacyorganisations.Inadditiontothis,contributionscameinfromLatinAmerica,sub-SaharanAfrica,theMiddleEastandNorthAfrica(MENA),AsiaPacific,
Europe,andNorthAmerica.Thisnecessitatedanadditionalchapter,focusingonregionalchallengestoAIadoption.
NewsOrganisationsThatCompletedTheSurveyByType
30%
20%
10%
0%
BroadcasterNewspaper
Magazine
NewsAgency
PublishingGroup
Other
4
Thepurposeofthisreportisthesameasthefirst:togiveasenseofwhatishappeningwithAIandwhatrisksandopportunitiesitoffers.WeaskedparticipantshowtheyareengagingwithgenerativeAI(genAI)technologiesanditsimplicationsforthefutureofjournalism.Wehopeitinformsthedebate,helpsnewsorganisationscharttheirwayforward,andguidesustodevelopourprogrammestosupportthatprocess.
Thesurveywassupplementedwithinterviews,andconversationsatjournalism
conferences.Weareverygratefultoeveryonewhohassharedtheirthoughts
andexperienceswithus.ThesurveysandinterviewswereconductedbetweenAprilandJuly,2023.
Wedonotclaimthatthesurveyisrepresentativeoftheglobalindustry–thatwouldbe
almostimpossibleonaninternationalscale–nordoesitequallyreflectallviewpoints
withinthedifferentpartsofnewsorganisations.Butitdoesgiveanunprecedentedinsightintohowthesetechnologiesareperceivedbythosepeopleleadingtheirdevelopmentorapplicationinsidenewsorganisations.
Ourrespondentsrepresentdiverserolesandexpertisewithintheirorganisations;they
includejournalists,technologists,andmanagers.Weencouragednewsorganisationstogatherrepresentativesfromdifferentdepartmentstocompletethesurveycollaboratively.
NB:Thelistoforganisationsthatcompletedthesurveycanbefoundintheacknowledgments.
Thepublishedquoteshavegenerallybeenanonymised.Someorganisationnameswereaddedforcontextafterreceivingpermissionfromtheauthors.Somequoteswereeditedlightlytocorrectliteralsandforsense.Theeditorialresponsibilityforthereportliesentirelywiththeauthor.
5
ExecutiveSummary
&KeyFindings
1ArtificialIntelligence(AI)continuestobeunevenlydistributedamongsmallandlargenewsroomsandregionallyamongGlobalSouthandGlobalNorthcountries.
2ThesocialandeconomicbenefitsofAIaregeographicallyconcentratedintheGlobalNorth,whichenjoytheinfrastructureandresources,whilemanycountriesinthe
GlobalSouthgrapplewiththesocial,cultural,andeconomicrepercussionsofpost-independencecolonialism.
3Morethan75%ofrespondentsuseAIinatleastoneoftheareasacrossthenewsvaluechainofnewsgathering,productionanddistribution.
4IncreasingefficiencyandproductivitytofreeupjournalistsformorecreativeworkwerethemaindriversforAIintegrationformorethanhalftherespondents.
5Arounda1/3oftherespondentssaidtheyhadaninstitutionalAIstrategyorwerecurrentlydevelopingone.
6NewsroomshaveawiderangeofapproachestoAIstrategy,dependingontheirsize,mission,andaccesstoresources.Someearlyadoptersarecurrentlyfocusingon
achievingAIinteroperabilitywithexistingsystems,othershaveadoptedacase-by-caseapproach,andsomemediadevelopmentorganisationsareworkingtowardsbuildingAIcapacityinregionswithlowAIliteracy.
7Arounda1/3ofrespondentsbelievetheirorganisationsarereadytodealwiththe
challengesofAIadoptioninjournalism,whilealmosthalfsaidtheywereonlypartiallyreadyornotreadyyet.
8ManyrespondentssaidAIintegrationischangingexistingroleswithinthenewsroomthroughtrainingandupskilling.Alongthesamelines,AIischangingthenatureofajournalist’sroleandsoughtafterskills.
9Aswesawinour2019report,financialconstraintsandtechnicaldifficultiesremainthemostpressingchallengesforintegratingAItechnologiesinthenewsroom.
10Ethicalconcernsarestillsignificantforourrespondents;manyadvocatefor
explainableAIandsettingethicalguidelinestomitigatealgorithmicbias.
11Settingde-biasingtechniquesemergedasahighlychallengingareafor
mostrespondents.
6
12CulturalresistanceandfearsofjobdisplacementandscepticismofAItechnologies
cannotbediscounted.
13Acrosstheboard,respondentsnotedthatmitigatingAIintegrationchallengesrequiresbridgingknowledgegapsamongvariousteamsinthenewsroom.Similarly,cross-
departmentcollaborationwasseenasnecessaryforachievingeffectiveAIadoption.
14ThechallengeofkeepingpacewiththerapidevolutionofAIwasconsistently
mentionedthroughoutthesurvey.
15About40%ofrespondentssaidtheirapproachtoAIhasnotchangedoverthepast
fewyears,eitherbecausetheyarestillinthebeginningoftheirAIjourneyorbecauseAIintegrationremainslimitedintheirnewsrooms.Concurrently,arounda1/4said
theirorganisation’sapproachtoAIhasevolved;theyhavegainedhands-onexperiencethathelpsthemthinkmorerealisticallyaboutAI.
16Morethan60%ofrespondentsareconcernedabouttheethicalimplicationsofAI
integrationforeditorialqualityandotheraspectsofjournalism.JournalistsaretryingtofigureouthowtointegrateAItechnologiesintheirworkupholdingjournalistic
valueslikeaccuracy,fairness,andtransparency.
17RespondentscalledfortransparencyfromthedesignersofAIsystemsand
technologycompanies,andtheusers,namelynewsrooms,withtheiraudiences.
18Journalistsandmediamakerscontinuedtostresstheneedfora‘humanintheloopapproach,’inlinewiththeresultsinour2019survey.
19TherearefearsthatAItechnologieswouldfurthercommercialisejournalism,
boostingpoorqualityandpolarisingcontent,leadingtoafurtherdeclineinpublictrustinjournalism.
20TechcompaniesaredrivinginnovationinAIandothertechnologies,butsurveyparticipantsvoicedconcernsabouttheirprofit-drivennature,theconcentrationofpowertheyenjoy,andtheirlackoftransparency.
21Around80%oftherespondentsexpectalargerroleforAIintheirnewsrooms
inthefuture.
22SurveyparticipantsexpectAItoinfluencefourmainareas:
1Fact-checkinganddisinformationanalysis
2Contentpersonalisationandautomation
3Textsummarisationandgeneration
4Usingchatbotstoconductpreliminaryinterviewsandgaugepublicsentiment
onissues
7
8
23ThereareconcernsthatAIwillexacerbatesustainabilitychallengesfacingless-
resourcednewsroomswhicharestillfindingtheirfeet,inahighlydigitisedworldandanincreasinglyAI-poweredindustry.
24Almost43%ofresponsesemphasisedtheimportanceoftrainingjournalistsandotherpersonnelinAIliteracyandothernascentskillslikepromptengineering.
25Thevastmajoritywelcomedmorecollaborationbetweennewsroomsandothermediaorganisationsandacademicinstitutions,hopingitwouldhelplessenthedisparitybetweensmallandlargenewsrooms,aswellasregionallybetween
newsroomsinGlobalNorthandGlobalSouthcountries.
26Theneedforabalancingactbetweentechandjournalism,athemethatalsoemergedinour2019survey,remainsimperativetoafuturewhereAItechnologiesareleveragedtoservejournalismanditsmission.
27Thevastmajorityofrespondents,around85%haveatleastexperimentedwith
generativeAI(genAI)technologiesinarangeofwayssuchaswritingcode,imagegeneration,andauthoringsummaries.
28SomeareapprehensiveaboutusinggenAIineditorialtasks,whileothersareusing
themregularlyincoding,headlinegeneration,andsearchengineoptimisation.
29TherewasahighlevelofagreementamongparticipantsthatgenAIpresenteda
newsetofopportunitiesnotprovidedbytraditionalAI.TheyhighlightedsomeoftheaffordancesofgenAI,suchasaccessibilityandlowrequirementsforadvancedtechnicalskills.
30Respondentsweremuchmoredivided–almost1/2werenotsure–astowhethergenAIalsopresentedanewsetofchallenges.SomebelievegenAIpresentssimilarchallengestotraditionalAI,suchasalgorithmicbias,butraisestheriskceilingtoanewlevel.
31NewsroomsgloballycontendwithchallengesrelatedtoAIintegration,butthe
challengesaremorepronouncedfornewsroomsintheGlobalSouth.Respondentshighlightedlanguage,infrastructural,andpoliticalchallenges.
Introduction
HowDidWeGetHere?
ArtificialIntelligenceinjournalismhasbeensignificantforsomeyears.TheLSE
JournalismAIprojectstartedbackin2019andourfirstglobalreportpublishedinthesameyearshowedthatitwasakeyemergingsetoftechnologies.AIwasproducingefficienciesfornewsworkanditwasalsocreatingopportunitiesfornewpracticesandproductsorservices.
WeshowedinthatpreviousreportthatarangeofnewsorganisationswereusingAI
acrossthejournalismprocessfromnewsgathering,contentcreationanddistribution,tomarketingandrevenue-gathering.Avariedsetoftechnologieswerebeingused,withprogrammesbasedontrainingsoftwaretomanipulatedata.Advancesinmachine-
learningandNaturalLanguageProcessing(NLP)enablednewsroomstobuildoradapttoolsandsystemstosupporttheirjournalism.
Generally,thesewerelarge-scalebutrelativelybasicfunctionssuchasscraping
socialmediaorautomatingverysimplecontentcreation.Itwasusedbyinvestigativejournaliststocombthroughlargedocumentleaksortohelpautomatepaywallsandtopersonalisecontentinstraightforwardways.Someusesofmachinelearning–suchassearch–weresoroutineanduniversaltheyweretakenforgranted.
In2019wefoundthatnewsorganisationswerefacingvariouschallengesinadoptingAI.Therewasalackofgeneralknowledge,specificskills,andresources.Therewerealso
inequalitiesbetweenbigneworganisationsandsmallerones,especiallythoseinnon-Englishspeakingorlessdevelopedmarkets.
Workingwithnewsorganisationsoverthelastfiveyears,wecouldseethattheimpactofAIwassystemicandaccelerating,justasitwasinotherindustriesandsectors.
Themostsuccessfulorganisationswerethosethattookastrategic,holisticapproachandwhorecognisedthatthesetechnologiesrequiredfundamentalself-analysisoftheorganisation’scapabilitiesandfutureplanning.
InthewidercontextitispossibletoseeAIasathirdwaveoftechnologicalchange
forjournalism.Thefirstwavewasgoingonline,accompaniedbythedigitalisationoftoolsandtheshifttomobile.Thesecondwavewasthearrivalofsocialmediaandtheimpactthathadoncontentcreation,consumptionandcompetition.Thetechnologyplatformsnowprovidedmuchoftheinfrastructureforjournalismandthe‘user’wascentraltoitsdissemination.
9
ThearrivalofgenerativeAI(genAI)inthelastyearhasacceleratedallthesetrends
andcreatednewdisruptions.Thisreportisasurveyofhownewsorganisationshave
continuedtodevelop‘traditional’AIandhowtheyareapproachingthenewchallengesofgenAI.Clearly,itpresentsfreshopportunities,butithasspecialrisksandcharacteristics.Therearecontinuities.Mostnewsorganisationswespoketoweretakingamore
strategicapproachtogenAI,oftenbasedonthelessonsfromdealingwithAIandothertechnologybeforehand.
ItisimportanttostressthatgenAIisprobablythemostrapidlyemergingtechnologyformediainthisdigitalera.Someofthemoreextremedystopiancritiquesandover-heatedmarketinghypehavedistractedfromaproperdebateaboutimmediateconcerns.It
isgoodthatwearenowallawareofAIandabletointeractdirectlywithitandexploreitsforceandflaws.Itishopedthatwewillhaveamoreinclusivedebateaboutwhatitmeansforsocietyingeneralandjournalisminparticular.
Journalismisaspecialpractice.Ontheonehanditisaroundtheworldasectorundergreatcommercial,politicalandcompetitivepressure.Itisweakinresourcescomparedtothegiantcorporationsdevelopingthistechnology.Thepotentialfordeepstructuralthreatstojournalisminthefuturemustbepartofourthinkingnow.Ontheotherhand,newsorganisationshaveshownremarkableresilienceandinnovationinsustainingand
sometimesthrivingdespitethechallengestheyhavefaced.ItmightevenbethatinaworldwheregenAIissuchapower,forillaswellasgood,publicinterestjournalismwillbemoreimportantthanever.
.NewsroomDefinitionsofAI+GenerativeAI
WecontinuetorefertoAIasanumbrellatermforawidevarietyofrelatedtechnologiesandtoacknowledgethatmanyprocessesdescribedasAIoftenincorporatemore
conventionaltechnologies.WeborrowedthesamesimpledefinitionofAIweusedinour2019report:
Artificialintelligenceisacollectionofideas,technologies,andtechniquesthatrelatetoacomputersystem’scapacitytoperformtasksnormallyrequiringhumanintelligence.1
AsforgenerativeAI(genAI),whichwediscussindetailinChapter5:
ItisasubfieldwithinMachineLearning(ML),asubfieldofAIinitsownright,thatinvolvesthegenerationofnewdata,suchastext,images,orcode,basedonagivensetofinputdata.2
10
WewantedtoknowifourrespondentshadanoperationaldefinitionofAI.Astheydidin2019,theresponsesreflectedquitevariedunderstandingsofAI,echoingonceagainthefluidityofthetermandthecomplexityofthetopic.
SomerespondentsofferedaclearoperationaldefinitionofAIastheuseofmachinesorcomputersystemstoperformtasksthattraditionallyrequiredhumanintelligence.Manyofferedtechnicaldefinitionsthatcentredaroundtheconceptsof“automation”,“machinelearning”and“algorithms.”Almosthalftherespondentsusedoneormoreofthosetermsintheirdefinitions:
Itentailsthecreationofalgorithmsandmodelsthatallowmachinestocarryoutoperationslikespeechrecognition,visualperception,problemsolving,anddecision-makingthatordinarilyrequirehumanintelligence.
OtherrespondentsrelatedtheiroperationaldefinitionsofAItoitspotentialbenefitsandtheirmotivesforintegratingitinthenewsroom,suchasincreasingefficiency,orbetterservingthenewsroom’saudienceandmission:
Forus,AIrepresentsagroupoftechnologiesthatcanassistandempower
[ourteam]byprovidinginsightsandautomatedsupportacrossarangeof
editorial,operationalandcommunicationstasks.
Technologiesusedtoautomategatheringandanalysisofdatathatserveoureditorialnicheandmission.
SomehighlightedthecapacityofAItechnologiesto“l(fā)earn”orimprovethemselves:
AIistheuseofadvancedalgorithmsthatareabletoprocess,interpret,
classifyandfindpatternsincomplexand/orlargeamountsofdatainsuchawaythatinfers‘intelligence’or‘human-like’learning.
11
SeveralrespondentsemphasisedtheimportanceofethicalconsiderationsinAI
development,whileothersmentionedconcernsabouttheopacityofAIsystemsortheneedforhumanoversight:
Thesetoftechnologies,tools,processes...thatmakeitpossibletoemulate
humancapabilitiesinordertoautomateorimprovethem,notalwaysforan
ethicalorlawfulpurpose.
AfewrespondentssaidtheydidnothaveaworkingdefinitionofAIyet:
Wedonothaveacollectiveworkingdefinitionyet.Mine,asthepersoninchargeofexploringAIwithinthenewsroom,isthatAIisasetofprocessesthatacomputerdoestoaidandfacilitatehuman’swork,addingintelligencetoit.Bynomeansit
replaceshumanpresenceanditshouldalwaysbecheckedandaccompanied.
12
Thisreportispresentedinsevenchapters.Inordertofacilitatecomparisonsbetweenthisandthe2019report,wekeptthemajorityofthechaptersthesame,withthe
exceptionoftwonewchapters.
TheIntroductiongivesabriefbackgroundofthefindingsfromthe2019report,and
summativeoverviewofthetechnologicalchangesseeninthejournalismindustryoverthepastyears,todate.Wedefinekeyissuesandasummaryofwhatyoucanexpectinthisreport.
ChapterOnefocusesonhowAIiscurrentlybeingusedbynewsrooms.ThechapterlooksathownewsroomsareusingAIacrossthenewvaluechainaswellaswhathasbeenworkingandwhathasnotbeenworking.
ChapterTwounpackstheAIstrategyorlackof,innewsrooms.WelookatthetypesofAIapproachesnewsroomshaveundertaken,someofthekeychallengesandwhatimpactthetechnologycanhaveonthem.
ChapterThreeisalsosimilartothepreviousreportasweexpandonethicsand
editorialpolicy.
ChapterFourlookstothefutureandroleofAIinjournalism.
ChapterFivetouchesongenerativeAIandjournalism.ItisanewchapterthatlooksatthecurrentusecasesofgenAI,aswellasitsopportunitiesandchallenges.
ChapterSixreflectsontheglobaldisparityinAIdevelopmentandadoptionaswellasthechallengesfacedbythemajorityoftheworld’spopulationintheGlobalSouth.
TheConclusiontiesalltheabove-mentionedchapterstogetherandgivesabriefanalysisofwhatallthismeansforjournalism.Weconcludethemainbodyofthereportwithasix-steproadmaptowardsanAIstrategythatnewsroomscouldborrowfrom.Youwillalsofindaglossary,endnotes,referencesandalistofsuggestedreadingsandresources.
ThisworkwasfundedbytheGoogleNewsInitiativeandcarriedoutbyateamledby
ProfessorCharlieBeckett,directoroftheLSE’sinternationaljournalismthink-tank,Polis.
Wewouldliketothankallthejournalists,technologistsandresearcherswhotookpartintheproject.TheprojectwasmanagedbyTshepoTshabalalaandtheleadresearcherandco-authorwasMiraYaseen
13
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Chapter1
HowAIisBeingUsedinJournalismToday
1.0HowAreNewsroomsUsingAI?
WeaskednewsroomshowtheyareusingAItechnologiestoday.Theseareas–
newsgathering,newsproductionandnewsdistribution–coverallthecontentcreationstagesfromideationtopublishing.Thesethreeareasoftenintersectgiventhenatureof“contemporary‘networked’3or‘hybrid’4journalism.Forinstance,fact-checkingchatbotsareleveragedinnewsproductiontovalidateorrefutecertainclaims.Atthesametime,thedatacollectedcouldassistindetectingmisinformationtrendsandinspireatopicforafeaturearticle,thuscontributingtothenewsgatheringprocess.
90%
75%
80%
NewsgatheringNewsProductionNewsDistributi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年度農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)工人勞務(wù)合作合同示范
- 鄂爾多斯2024年內(nèi)蒙古鄂爾多斯市杭錦旗烏蘭牧騎引進3名專業(yè)技術(shù)人員筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 英德市四年級上學(xué)期11月期中語文試題(含解析)
- 玉溪云南玉溪市司法局招聘編外人員筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 煙臺2025年山東煙臺黃渤海新區(qū)教育體育局招聘高層次人才177人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 楚雄云南楚雄元謀縣消防救援局招聘9人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 杭州2025年上半年浙江杭州市衛(wèi)生健康委員會所屬九家事業(yè)單位招聘74人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 2025年中國學(xué)校課桌椅市場調(diào)查研究報告
- 2025年中國化工用電磁閥市場調(diào)查研究報告
- 2025至2031年中國黃桿皮頭鉛筆行業(yè)投資前景及策略咨詢研究報告
- 商業(yè)銀行的風(fēng)險審計與內(nèi)部控制
- 2024項目管理人員安全培訓(xùn)考試題及參考答案AB卷
- 2025年與商場合作協(xié)議樣本(5篇)
- 2024年12月青少年機器人技術(shù)等級考試理論綜合試卷(真題及答案)
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)與社交媒體管理制度
- 2025年安徽碳鑫科技有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 2025年寒假實踐特色作業(yè)設(shè)計模板
- 2024年福建漳州人才發(fā)展集團有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- JTGT F20-2015 公路路面基層施工技術(shù)細則
- 馬曉宏_《法語》_第一冊復(fù)習(xí)(課堂PPT)
- 道路環(huán)衛(wèi)清掃保潔項目應(yīng)急處置預(yù)案
評論
0/150
提交評論