GRE知識(shí)點(diǎn)分解對(duì)照練習(xí)_第1頁(yè)
GRE知識(shí)點(diǎn)分解對(duì)照練習(xí)_第2頁(yè)
GRE知識(shí)點(diǎn)分解對(duì)照練習(xí)_第3頁(yè)
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

SAT閱讀練習(xí)

ThecommonbeliefofsomelinguiststhateachlanguageisaprefectvehicleforthethoughtofthenationspeakingitisinsomewaystheexactcounterpartoftheconvictionoftheManchesterschoolofeconomicsthatsupplyanddemandwillregulateeverythingforthebest.

Tofightourselvesforwhatwearedailyrobbingandplunderingfromthosewhohaveasgoodarighttofreedomadswehave.

Adesiretothrowoverrealityalightthatneverwasmightgivewayabruptlytothedesireonthepartofwhatmightconsideranovelistscientisttorecordexactlyandconcretelythestructureandtextureofaflower.

Eachofthesecharacteristicssharplydistinguishesthe21,000peoplewholeftforNewEnglandinthe1630’sfrommostoftheapproximately377,000EnglishpeoplewhohadimmigratedtoAmericaby1700.

Noneofthesetranslationstoscreenandstage,however,dramatizetheanarchyattheconclusionofAConnecticutYankee,whichendswiththeviolentoverthrowofMorgan’sthree-year-oldprogressiveorderandhisreturntothenineteenthcentury,whereheapparentlycommitsuicideafterbeinglabeledalunaticforhisincoherentbabblingaboutdrawbridgeandbattlements.

FalloisproposedthatProusthadtriedtobeginanovelin1908,abandoneditforwhatwastobealongdemonstrationofSaint-Beuve’sblindnesstotherealnatureofgreatwriting,foundtheessaygivingrisetopersonalmemoriesoffictionaldevelopments,andallowedthesetotakeoverinasteadilydevelopingnovel.

Despitethesevaguecategories,oneshouldnotclaimunequivocallythathostilitybetweenrecognizableclassescannotbelegitimatelyobserved.

Theincreaseinthenumbersofmarriedwomenemployedoutsidethehomeinthetwentiethcenturyhadlesstodowiththemechanizationofhouseworkandanincreaseinleisuretimeforthesewomenthanitdidwiththeirowneconomicnecessityandwithhighmarriageratesthatshranktheavailablepoolofsinglewomenworkers,previously,inmanycases,theonlywomenemployerswouldhire.

Intheearly1950’s,historianswhostudiedpreindustrialEuropewhichwemaydefinehereasEuropeintheperiodfromroughly1300to1800began,forthefirsttimeinlargenumbers,toinvestigatemoreofthepreindustrialEuropeanpopulationthanthe2or3percentwhocomprisedthepoliticalandsocialelite:thekings,generals,judges,novels,bishops,andlocalmagnateswhohadhithertousuallyfilledhistorybooks.

Thispreferenceforexogamy,Gutmansuggests,mayhavederivedfromWestAfricanrulesgoverningmarriage,which,thoughtheydifferedfromonetribalgrouptoanother,allinvolvedsomekindofprohibitionagainstunionswithclosekin.

Therequestionsarepoliticalinthesensethatthedebateoverthemwillinevitablybelessanexplorationofabstractmattersinaspiritofdisinterestedinquirythananacademicpowerstruggleinwhichthecareersandprofessionalfortunesofmanywomenscholars-onlynowenteringtheacademicprofessioninsubstantialnumbers-willbeatstake,andwiththemthechancesforadistinctivecontributiontohumanisticunderstanding,acontributionthatmightbeanimportantinfluenceagainstsexisminoursociety.

TheappreciationoftraditionaloralAmericanIndianliteraturehasbeenlimited,hamperedbypoortranslationsandbythedifficulty,evenintherareculturallysensitiveandaestheticallysatisfyingtranslation,ofcompletelyconveyingtheoriginal’sversedstructure,toneandsyntax.

Yetthosewhostresstheachievementofageneralconsensusamongtheircolonistscannotfullyunderstandthatconsensuswithoutunderstandingtheconflictsthathadtobeovercomeorrepressedinordertoreachit.

Itwasnotthechangeinofficetechnology,butrathertheseparationofsecretarialwork,previouslyseenasanapprenticeshipforbeginningmanagers,formadministrativeworkthatinthe1880’screatedanewclassof“dead-end”jobs,henceforthconsidered“women’swork”.

Traditionally,pollinationbywindhasbeenviewedasareproductiveprocessmarkedbyrandomeventsinwhichthevagariesofthewindarecompensatedforbythegenerationofvastquantitiesofpollen,sothattheultimateproductionofnewseedsisassuredattheexpenseofproducingmuchmorepollenthanisactuallyused.

Notonlyarelivertransplantsneverrejected,buttheyeveninduceastateofdonor-specificunresponsivenessinwhichsubsequenttransplantsofotherorgans,suchasskin,fromthatdonorareacceptedpermanently.

Eventhe“radical”critiquesofthismainstreamresearchmodel,suchasthecritiquedevelopedinDividedSociety,attachtheissueofethnicassimilationtoomechanicallytofactorsofeconomicandsocialmobilityandarethusunabletoilluminatetheculturalsubordinationofPuertoRican

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論