




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
BloggingandthepublicsphereLifeOnlineBruceFerwerdaTommyvanderVorst31maart2021InthispresentationWhoarethosebloggers?Lenhart&Fox(2006):Aportraitoftheinternet’snewstorytellersWhatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):Whatdobloggersdo:anaveragedayonanaveragepoliticalblogThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007):Blogs,politicsandpowerInteractionsamongbloggers:theblogosphereHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007):Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggers/InnovationSciencesPAGE14/5/2024Weblogs/InnovationSciencesPAGE24/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Let’sthrowinsomestatistics.../InnovationSciencesPAGE34/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?BloggingisbringingnewvoicestotheonlineworldLenhart&FoxconductedasurveyintheUS:54%ofbloggershaveneverpublishedanywhereelse8%ofinternetusersmaintainsablog39%readblogsVarioustopics&motivesforbloggingHighpercentageofbloggersstop
afterawhile/InnovationSciencesPAGE44/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Thebloggingpopulation:Isyoung(54%is<30)ConsistsofasmanywomenasmenMostlyinurban/suburbanareas(13%inruralareas)Lesslikelytobewhitethanaverageinternetuser/InnovationSciencesPAGE54/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Blogscanbepersonalorbea‘publicendeavour’:55%ofbloggersuseapseudonymFor84%,bloggingisahobbyor“somethingIdo,butnotsomethingaspendalotoftimeon〞59%spendjustoneortwohoursperweekmaintainingtheirblog52%blogmostlyforthemselves,notforanaudience;32%blogmostlyfortheiraudience(Whyblog‘justforyourself’?)/InnovationSciencesPAGE64/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Bloggingvs.Journalism:34%considertheirblogaformofjournalism57%includelinkstooriginalsources‘often’/InnovationSciencesPAGE74/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):exploratoryempiricalstudyHowdopoliticalbloggersusetheirblogsCategorizationofbloggingactivities:InformeractivitiesWatchdogactivities(“keepinganeyeonmainstreammedia〞)PoliticalactivitiesPhilantropicactivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE84/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?Findingsaverageblogger≠averagecitizen
(DemographicsdifferfromLenhart&Fox:morewhites,moremales)Informeractivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE94/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsWatchdogactivities80%ofbloggersnotifytheirreadersaboutbiasoromissionsinthemediaClosesecondtoinformingactivitiesBloggersdonottrustmainstreammediaButalsorelyonit!Bloggingas‘first-ratejournalism’incountrieswithoutfreepressorinthecaseofevents(i.e.HurricaneKatrina)/InnovationSciencesPAGE104/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE114/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE124/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE134/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPhilantropicactivitiesAskingreaderstodonate(44%)(interestingly,thisislowerthanthe66%donatorsintheUS)Rarelypursuedactivity(i.e.notthe‘corebusiness’)/InnovationSciencesPAGE144/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007)Introduction:Blogs,politicsandpower:aspecialissueofPublicChoiceAreblogsindeedimportanttopolitics?Dotheyhaveabeneficialorharmfuleffect?/nameofdepartmentPAGE154/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDoblogsaffectpolitics?BlogscanbeimportantMoreimportantasreactorstothemediathanindependentagendasettersWhendoesblogshavepoliticalpower?Leasttrustedsourceofnews(BBC/Reuters/MediaCenter2006)/nameofdepartmentPAGE164/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsAreblogsgoodforpolitics?OngoingdiscussionCyberapartheid“...increasingpeople’sabilitytohearechoesoftheirownvoicesandtowallthemselvesofffromothers.〞(Sunstein2001,p.49)Linking&comments/nameofdepartmentPAGE174/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggersDopeopleabandonthereadingofdissentingpoliticalopinionsinfavorofmaterialthatiscloselyalignedwiththeirownideologicalposition?/nameofdepartmentPAGE184/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersH1BlogsaremorelikelytolinktoblogsthatmatchtheirideologicalpersuasionH2Theamountofcross-ideologicallinkingamongblogswilledeclineovertimeHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)/nameofdepartmentPAGE194/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereBlogrollconnections27%presentedinthewholenetwork91%resembleideologicalpositions9%differentviewpoints/nameofdepartmentPAGE204/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereLinksinpostsMorelikelytolinktoideologicalblogs12%conservativeliberal16%liberalconservative/nameofdepartmentPAGE214/5/2024Interactionsam
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025至2030中國環(huán)境美化及園藝服務(wù)行業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)運(yùn)行態(tài)勢及投資規(guī)劃深度研究報(bào)告
- 服務(wù)貿(mào)易統(tǒng)計(jì)培訓(xùn)課件
- 學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)風(fēng)格與個性化教學(xué)策略
- 教師職業(yè)發(fā)展與教學(xué)質(zhì)量的提升策略研究
- 退換貨培訓(xùn)課件
- 教育數(shù)字化轉(zhuǎn)型中的技術(shù)革新與挑戰(zhàn)
- 智慧城市公共服務(wù)平臺的數(shù)據(jù)管理與分析
- 鋼結(jié)構(gòu)焊接培訓(xùn)課件
- 教育大數(shù)據(jù)在教學(xué)管理中的創(chuàng)新應(yīng)用
- 抖音商戶短視頻播放量分析反饋制度
- 2025年廣州市事業(yè)單位教師招聘考試生物學(xué)科專業(yè)知識試題
- 幼兒小小運(yùn)動會活動方案
- C語言程序設(shè)計(jì)說課課件
- 2023年對外漢語教育學(xué)引論知識點(diǎn)
- 產(chǎn)權(quán)變更協(xié)議書范本
- 2024年荊州市江北地區(qū)檢察院招聘檢察輔助人員筆試真題
- 2025年四川省廣安市中考物理試題(原卷版)
- 高一下學(xué)期期末考模擬卷(第一、二冊綜合)(基礎(chǔ))- 《溫故知新》2025-2026學(xué)年高一數(shù)學(xué)下學(xué)期復(fù)習(xí)課(人教A版2029必修第二冊)(原卷版)
- 《文旅服務(wù)信息資源分類及編碼規(guī)范》
- 預(yù)防慢性病與健康生活指南
- 電解鋅車間管理制度
評論
0/150
提交評論