數(shù)學建?;疑P聯(lián)度分析英文版(共7頁)_第1頁
數(shù)學建模灰色關聯(lián)度分析英文版(共7頁)_第2頁
數(shù)學建?;疑P聯(lián)度分析英文版(共7頁)_第3頁
數(shù)學建?;疑P聯(lián)度分析英文版(共7頁)_第4頁
數(shù)學建?;疑P聯(lián)度分析英文版(共7頁)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩2頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、精選優(yōu)質(zhì)文檔-傾情為你奉上4.1 Grey Relational AnalysisFirst, select a reference sequence as shown below : And the other group of sequence is, Then the correlation degree of to is, In which, Then, we use to describe the correlation degree between and ,namely to describe the influence on caused by the change of .

2、In general, Practical problems often have different numbers of different dimension , but when we calculate the correlation degree, it requires the same numbers of same dimension . So we want to carry out a variety of data processing dimensionless.in addition , For comparison easily, all the sequsece

3、s are required to have a common point .In order to solve these two problems, we transform the given sequences. The given sequence we name as initialization sequence of Original sequence 4.2 Water resources carrying capacity evaluation indexes and classification indexesThe establishment of evaluation

4、 index system of water resources carrying capacity is a key issue in the study of water resources carrying capacity. Regional water resources carrying capacity is influenced by many factors, Should be selected according to the requirements of the specific regional social development backlog of socia

5、l - economic index system response - natural compound ecosystem development scale and quality, reference existing literature results, through the grey correlation analysis, the bearing capacity of water resources evaluation index are shown in table 1. Approach A : Weighted Average Evaluation Based M

6、odel Fig.1.The index system of water resources carrying capacityAgriculture investment Social economic indicatorindicatorsIndustry investment Per GDPThe index system of water resources carrying capacity Water environment indicatorWater resources indicatorsIndustrial sewage treatmentIrrigation displa

7、cementPer capital emissionLife water leverWater resource quantityComprehensive analysis of water resources carrying capacity of main influencing factors and performance system, with reference to the evaluation index system of water resources carrying capacity at home and abroad to select the followi

8、ng 6 main factors as evaluation factors, The meaning of the factors as follows:Water resource utilization ratio(): water and the ratio of the total population();water utilization rate(): The ratio of the available water quantity and water resources (%);utilization rate of arable land (): Irrigation

9、area and more on the ratio of the area(%);The modulus of water supply(): water and the ratio of the land area();modulus of water requirement(): The total water demand and the ratio of the land area();Life water use ratio(): Domestic water amount and the ratio of the total water demand(%)According to

10、 the above six evaluation factors on the influence degree of the regional water resources carrying capacity Will the influence of these factors are divided into three levels, Each factor, the number of each level indicators are shown in table 2. The said condition is bad, water resources carrying ca

11、pacity is close to saturation value, further development and utilization of potential is smaller, develop water shortages will occur;Membership condition is good, said there are still large carrying capacity of water resources in this area, water resource utilization degree of development in this ar

12、ea are small, water supply situation more optimistic;Level is between the above two levels, which indicates that this area has a scale development for the supply of water resources development, but still has a certain ability of development and utilization of local economic development and people ha

13、ve certain guarantee survival. The evaluation factorsPer capita water supply />22502250-1000<1000Water resources utilization %<3030-60>60The modulus of water supply /<8080-100>100Farmland irrigation rate /%<2020-50>50Water demand modulus /<6060-100>100Domestic water rat

14、e /%>44-2<2Scores 0.950.50.05Table 2: classification index comprehensive evaluation factors4.3 The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model Because of the bearing with uncertainty and fuzziness, the fuzzy evaluation model can be well carried out on the water resources carrying capacity multi-facto

15、r and multi-level comprehensive evaluation, comprehensive to reflect the status of the regional water resources carrying capacity.Fuzzy evaluation for B=AR finite field, With U on behalf of the comprehensive evaluation factors of collection, V on behalf of the evaluation of collection. Type A is U i

16、n the fuzzy subsetA= ,0 for U for A membership.It marked the single factor evaluation factors in the role of size, To a certain extent, also on behalf of the ratings; The evaluation result B is the fuzzy subset of V .B=, 0, for the level of comprehensive evaluation the membership degree of fuzzy sub

17、set B, they say the result of comprehensive evaluation. Evaluation matrix Among forevaluation of grade membership degree, Matrix of the ith line is the single factor evaluation results of the ith a factor.Evaluation computer matrix A representative of the various factors on the comprehensive evaluat

18、ion of the importance of weight coefficient, thus satisfy, fuzzy transform AR also can be degraded for common matrix is calculated.4.3.1 The calculation of matrix R Corresponds to the evaluation sets of evaluation factors, and can be through the evaluation factors in the evaluation matrix R the actu

19、al numerical control classification indexes of various factors to analysis and calculation. In order to make the membership function can smooth transition between at all levels, the blur processing. Of V2 point of membership degree is 0.5, the midpoint to according to linear regressive processing. F

20、or V1 and V3 on both sides of the interval, then make the farther away from the critical value of range on either side of the membership degree, the greater the belong to both sides on the critical level of membership you 0.5 according to the grades of the above ideas to construct a evaluation the c

21、alculation formula of subordinate function. V1 and V2 level threshold for K1, V2 and V3 threshold for K3, V2 mid-range level interval for K2.K2.For evaluating factors u3 u4 u5 u6 and comments and calculating formula for relative membership degree function:Calculate the relative membership degree of

22、evaluation factors according to the type, For evaluation factors in the evaluation and the calculation of the relative membership degree function simply type (1) (3) the right end of type UI interval good "" instead of" " And "<" instead of ">" after the calculation formula of the same 4.3.2 Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation According to the evaluation factors influence the size of

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論