伴有C型腰彎的特發(fā)性青少年脊柱側凸的選擇性胸椎融合:鉤與椎弓根螺釘比較課件_第1頁
伴有C型腰彎的特發(fā)性青少年脊柱側凸的選擇性胸椎融合:鉤與椎弓根螺釘比較課件_第2頁
伴有C型腰彎的特發(fā)性青少年脊柱側凸的選擇性胸椎融合:鉤與椎弓根螺釘比較課件_第3頁
伴有C型腰彎的特發(fā)性青少年脊柱側凸的選擇性胸椎融合:鉤與椎弓根螺釘比較課件_第4頁
伴有C型腰彎的特發(fā)性青少年脊柱側凸的選擇性胸椎融合:鉤與椎弓根螺釘比較課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩11頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、Selective Thoracic Fusion For AIS With Lumbar “C” Modifier Curves: Comparison of Hooks Versus Pedicle ScrewsIntroductionClassification schemes for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis have attempted to identify patients with major thoracic and compensatory lumbar curves that are amenable to selective tho

2、racic fusion in order to preserve lumbar motion segments. Improper patient selection may lead to postoperative coronal decompensation (C7 plumb line deviation from CSVL). IntroductionAdolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. Lenke L, Betz R, Har

3、ms J, Bridwell K, Clements D, Lowe T, Blanke K.; JBJS 2001:83A, 1169-1181Lenke “C” curves (lumbar apical vertebra translated lateral to CSVL) are considered greatest risk of postoperative coronal decompensationIntroductionRecent study has reported success with selective thoracic fusion in 44 patient

4、s with Lenke “C” curvesCorrection of apical translation was inconsistent: some remained “C” type curves while others corrected to “A” or “B” Preoperative global imbalance was a predictor of postoperative imbalanceSelective thoracic fusion for AIS with “C” lumbar modifier curves: 2-16 year radiograph

5、ic and clinical results. Dobbs, MB, Edwards CC, Lenke LG, Peelle MW, Sides B, Rinella A, Bridwell KH. Spine 2004; 29(5):536-546.COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW VS HOOK INSTRUMENTATION IN POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS:A Matched Cohort AnalysisYongjung J. Kim, MD Law

6、rence G. Lenke, MDSamuel K. Cho, MD Keith H. Bridwell, MDSpinal Deformity ServiceWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis Shriners HospitalSt. Louis, MissouriSRS 2003/AAOS 2004/POSNA 2004/Spine, SRS issue 29S(18):2040-2058, 2004 METHODSWell Matched Cohorts Op.Methods# ofFused VBLenke CurveT

7、ypeAge at SurgeryTPSN=26PSF+TPL 18PSF+ICBG 4PSF+Ant BG 411.7 Type 1: 14 Type 2: 7Type 3: 1Type 4: 2Type 6: 214.8YHookN=26PSF+TPL 18PSF+ICBG 4PSF+Ant BG 411.7 Type 1: 14Type 2: 7Type 3: 1Type 4: 2Type 6: 214.2Y Apples to Apples Comparison RESULTSComparison of Coronal Plane Change 1 Major Cobb Angle C

8、hange (Overall p value0.0001)(degree)IntroductionAnother study suggested the correction of the thoracic curve should mimic the push-prone radiograph Perhaps aggressive curve correction with pedicle screws may be contra-indicatedDobbs MB, Lenke LG, Corley CL, Bridwell KH, Peelle MW, Steger-May K. Can

9、 We Predict the Ultimate Lumbar Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Patients Undergoing a Selective Fusion With Undercorrection of the Thoracic Curve? Spine 2004; 29(3):227-85.4121Push/Prone1 year post opC7 4330PurposeTo compare the results of selective posterior thoracic fusion using an all hook constru

10、ct versus an all pedicle screw construct in AIS major thoracic (Lenke 1C & 2C) curve types.Determine if the use of pedicle screws resulted in overcorrection of the thoracic curve and hence increased risk of lumbar Cobb decompensation.Methods66 consecutive AIS patients treated by two surgeons at a si

11、ngle institution from 1987-2001. All underwent selective thoracic fusions for Lenke 1C and Lenke 2C (major thoracic) curvesLowest instrumented vertebra T12 (30), L1 (36)Local bone and iliac crest graftComprehensive radiographic evaluationResultsHookPedicleScrewSignificanceAge (yrs)13.913.8NS% female

12、7879NSRisser2.11.9NSFollow-up(yrs)10 (2-12)6 (2-8)NS (p=.36)Results Preoperative CobbCobb angle (degrees)Thoracic MeasurementsLumbar Measurementsp=.74 p=.54 p=.63 p=.59 p=.47 p=.83 No difference in hook vs. pedicle screw groups in preoperative static or bending Cobb measurementsResults Thoracic Corr

13、ectionPedicle screw correction greater than hook correction ( 44% vs. 33% ) (p0.004)p=0.74 p0.004Results Lumbar CorrectionPedicle screw correction greater than hook correction ( 38% vs. 32% ) (p0.005)p=0.59 p 2cm) was higher in the hook group (13 patients) as compared to the pedicle screw group (4 patients) The lowest instrumented vertebrae was on average 1 level shorter for the pedicle screw group (p0.001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that pedicle screw fixation has the following advantages over hook constructs in AI

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論