版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、精選優(yōu)質(zhì)文檔-傾情為你奉上精選優(yōu)質(zhì)文檔-傾情為你奉上專心-專注-專業(yè)專心-專注-專業(yè)精選優(yōu)質(zhì)文檔-傾情為你奉上專心-專注-專業(yè)聲明:The study complied with the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local research ethics committee. All subjects gave written informed consent.All animal experimentation was approved by the St. Louis VA Animal Care Committee
2、and conducted in conformity with the Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals and Human Beings.The study was carried out with institutional review board approval. Informed consent was obtained from patients to perform for study purposes.The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review
3、Board (IRB) of The Mount Sinai School of Medicine.This study was conducted in accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act, and the University of Missouri Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) approved the protocol. All animals were housed and cared for at the Univer
4、sity of Missouri-Columbia animal research facilities.The study protocols and informed consents were approved by the Institutional Review boards and Institutional Biosafety committees of all participating institutions. (TS)The study design and study protocols, approved by the US Food and Drug Adminis
5、tration (FDA), were performed in accordance with FDA regulations CFR Title21,applicable International Conference on Harmonization guidelines, and National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules.This study was approved by our institutional ethical committee.T
6、he study was approved by the institutional review board of the Mayo Foundation, and all subjects gave written informed consent. The study was designed and conducted entirely by the study team without industry support. Randomization schedules were prepared by study statisticians.The Animal Care Commi
7、ttee of the Toronto General Research Institute approved all procedures performed on animals. All experiments were performed according to the Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publica
8、tion 85-23, revised 1985).This study was performed with informed consent, HIPAA compliance, and institutional review board approval.All other study participants gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the local research ethics committee.The study protocols and informed consents were
9、 approved by the Institutional Review boards and Institutional Biosafety committees of all participating institutions. (TS)The study design and study protocols, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), were performed in accordance with FDA regulations CFR Title21,applicable Internation
10、al Conference on Harmonization guidelines, and National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules.標(biāo)題:Statistical analysisStatistical considerationsStatistics employedStatistics and data analysisData analysisStatistical MethodsStatistical analysis of the dataSta
11、tistics樣本含量估計(jì)On the basis of preliminary estimates of the corresponding standard deviations, we determined that 30 subjects would be required in each group for the study to have a statistical power of 90% to detect clinically meaningful differences between groups.Prior to the study, power calculatio
12、ns were made based on systolic and diastolic blood pressure values. Published results of blood pressure in subjects with OSA commonly reported a standard deviation of 14 mmHg for systolic and 7 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. With this information, a power calculation indicated that we would need
13、 32 patients per group to detect a 10-mmHg difference in systolic blood pressure and a 5-mmHg difference in diastolic blood pressure with a power of 80% at a 0.05 significance level.統(tǒng)計(jì)描述:Data are reported as meanSD.Data are expressed as meanSD.Data are presented as meanSEM for continuous variables,
14、with n indicating the number of patients.Normally distributed data were presented as means standard error of the mean, logarithmically transformed data as the geometric mean (95% confidence interval for the mean), skewed data as the median (interquartile range), and categorical data as the number (p
15、ercentage).假設(shè)檢驗(yàn)方法:Statistical testing utilized non-parametric tests with MannWhitney U test and KruskalWallis test for continuous variables and 2 test and Fishers exact test for categorical variablesCategorical variables were compared using Fishers exact test and, for continuous variables, the non-p
16、arametric MannWhitney test.Differences between groups in (variables) were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni or Fisher LSD post hoc tests. was/were not normally distributed and therefore the Mann-Whitney U test was used. ANOVA and t testing were used for other paramete
17、rs.Statistical comparisons for percentages were performed using 2 analysis in each case. Comparisons between means were performed using a two-tailed t-test.Multivariable analysis utilized logistic/linear regression with backward/forward/stepwise variable selection.Comparisons of continuous variables
18、 were made by means of the unpaired Students t test. Bonferronis correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Correlations between targeted contrast ultrasound signal and blood volume were made by linear regression analysis.Differences in T-cell responses between patient groups or time points we
19、re tested by the Fisher exact test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were tested by the nonparametric Spearmans rank test.Unpaired t-tests and x2 tests were used to study the clinical profile of EC donors. Two-tailed paired t-tests were used to compare NAC-treated and matchedcontrol unt
20、reated cells. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare data in EC responding positively or not to the antioxidant treatment.In order to predict whether risk factors for CVD could have an impact on the response to NAC (dependent dichotomic variable), we used logistic regression models. Only univariate a
21、nalyses could be performed because of the small n (26 patients: 11 with negative response and 15 with positive).Time-course and multigroup analyses were carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA).Bonferroni and Newman-Keuls post test analysis was used to detect differences between groups. A t te
22、st with Welch correction was used to compare groups at a single time point.Dichotomous variable group differences between patients with and without old microbleeds were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Group differences for continuous variables between patients with and without old microbleeds
23、were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.Comparisons within groups to investigate differences between pre- and postaugmentation were undertaken using paired t-tests after appropriate analyses had shown that the Central Limit Theorem applies and that parametric statistics could be used. Analysi
24、s of variance was used to investigate differences between groups numbering more than two. To investigate association between variables, Spearmans rank correlation statistic was used.We then used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding factors.Statistically significant d
25、ifferences before and after treatment were evaluated using the paired Students t test, with statistical significance established at p0.05.Proportions were compared by 2. Correlations were performed using the Spearman rank test.We performed multivariable unconditional logistic regression analyses to
26、estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor using maximum likelihood estimation. All AORs (95% CIs) were adjusted for age, sex, race, education level, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, family history of cancer, and HBV/HCV in
27、fection. The final model was chosen on the basis of biological plausibility and the lowest -2 log likelihood function.Differences between groups in (variables) were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni or Fisher LSD post hoc tests. Correlation between and was calculated
28、using the Pearson product-moment correlation.確定檢驗(yàn)水準(zhǔn):P-values 0.05 were considered statistically significant and p values of 0.05) were compared using with a significant difference determined at P0.05.This null hypothesis was rejected with statistical significance assigned for values of P0.05.Differences were consid
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 四川省瀘州市瀘州高級中學(xué)校2024-2025學(xué)年七年級上學(xué)期1月期末道德與法治試卷(含答案)
- 湖北省武漢市部分重點(diǎn)中學(xué)2024-2025學(xué)年高二上學(xué)期期末生物答案
- 2024琴行演奏員勞動合同范本發(fā)布3篇
- 2024上音樂教學(xué)計(jì)劃(32篇)
- 2024版房地產(chǎn)鋼筋材料采購協(xié)議版B版
- 2024貨車運(yùn)輸承包合同
- 福建省南平市嵐谷中學(xué)高三語文測試題含解析
- 2025年賓館租賃經(jīng)營權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓及收益分成合同3篇
- 2024招投標(biāo)與合同管理實(shí)戰(zhàn)案例分析習(xí)題集3篇
- 2024用人單位二零四年度勞動合同解除與補(bǔ)償協(xié)議3篇
- 《報(bào)任安書》優(yōu)秀-課件
- 曼陀羅中毒課件
- (新版)焊工(初級)理論知識考試200題及答案
- 滿堂腳手架計(jì)算書
- MRAS系統(tǒng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)用戶手冊
- HAPS系統(tǒng)實(shí)現(xiàn)協(xié)同仿真驗(yàn)證-基礎(chǔ)電子
- 歐洲地下車庫誘導(dǎo)通風(fēng)系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)手冊
- 現(xiàn)代文答題技巧課件2023年中考語文二輪復(fù)習(xí)
- YS/T 673-2013還原鈷粉
- TY/T 3001-2006中國青少年兒童 手腕骨成熟度及評價(jià)方法
- GB/T 32545-2016鐵礦石產(chǎn)品等級的劃分
評論
0/150
提交評論