環(huán)球律師事務所-國際調(diào)查評論

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

the

International

Investigations

Review

TwelfthEdition

Editor

NicolasBourtin

Contents

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

the

International

InvestigationsReview

TwelfthEdition

ReproducedwithpermissionfromLawBusinessResearchLtd

ThisarticlewasfirstpublishedinJuly2022

ForfurtherinformationpleasecontactNick.Barette@thelawreviews.co.uk

Editor

NicolasBourtin

lawreviews

B

Contents

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

PUBLISHER

ClareBolton

HEADOFBUSINESSDEVELOPMENT

NickBarette

TEAMLEADER

KatieHodgetts

SENIORBUSINESSDEVELOPMENTMANAGER

RebeccaMogridge

BUSINESSDEVELOPMENTMANAGERS

JoeyKwokandJuanHincapie

BUSINESSDEVELOPMENTASSOCIATE

ArchieMcEwan

RESEARCHLEAD

KieranHansen

EDITORIALCOORDINATOR

IsabelleGray

PRODUCTIONANDOPERATIONSDIRECTOR

AdamMyers

PRODUCTIONEDITOR

CarolineHerbert

SUBEDITOR

JaneVardy

CHIEFEXECUTIVEOFFICER

NickBrailey

PublishedintheUnitedKingdom

byLawBusinessResearchLtd,London

MeridianHouse,34–35FarringdonStreet,London,EC4A4HL,UK

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

www.TheLawReviews.co.uk

Nophotocopying:copyrightlicencesdonotapply.

Theinformationprovidedinthispublicationisgeneralandmaynotapplyinaspecificsituation,nor

doesitnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsofauthors’firmsortheirclients.Legaladviceshouldalways

besoughtbeforetakinganylegalactionbasedontheinformationprovided.Thepublishersaccept

noresponsibilityforanyactsoromissionscontainedherein.Althoughtheinformationprovidedwas

accurateasatJuly2022,beadvisedthatthisisadevelopingarea.

EnquiriesconcerningreproductionshouldbesenttoLawBusinessResearch,attheaddressabove.

Enquiriesconcerningeditorialcontentshouldbedirected

tothePublisher–clare.bolton@

ISBN978-1-80449-091-4

PrintedinGreatBritainby

EncompassPrintSolutions,Derbyshire

Tel:08442480112

C

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thepublisheracknowledgesandthanksthefollowingfortheirassistance

throughoutthepreparationofthisbook:

ANAGNOSTOPOULOS

BAKERMCKENZIE

BDOLLP

CEREBRACPAS&ADVISORS

DAVIESWARDPHILLIPS&VINEBERGLLP

DEBEVOISE&PLIMPTONLLP

GLOBALLAWOFFICE

KOLCUO?LUDEM?RKANKO?AKLI

LATHAM&WATKINS

MORAISLEIT?O,GALV?OTELES,SOARESDASILVA&ASSOCIADOSMORIHAMADA&MATSUMOTO

NYMANGIBSONMIRALIS

PERUNCONSULTANTS

SCHELLENBERGWITTMERLTD

SHIN&KIM

STUDIOLEGALEPULITANò-ZANCHETTI

SULLIVAN&CROMWELLLLP

WONGPARTNERSHIPLLP

i

Contents

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

CONTENTS

PREFACEv

NicolasBourtin

Chapter1

THEEVOLUTIONOFTHEROLEOFTHEFORENSICACCOUNTANTIN

INTERNATIONALINVESTIGATIONS1

StephenPetersandNatalieButcher

Chapter2

BIGDATA,TECHNOLOGYANDTHECHANGINGFACEOF

FORENSICACCOUNTING8

GwynnHopkinsandTavishMacLean

Chapter3

AUSTRALIA16

DennisMiralis,PhillipGibson,JasminaCeicandKartiaZappavigna

Chapter4

CANADA30

LéonHMoubayedandCoreyOmer

Chapter5

CHINA45

AlanZhou,JackyLiandJennyChen

Chapter6

COLOMBIA55

CarolinaPardo,AngelicaNavarroandLuisCastell

Chapter7

ENGLANDANDWALES66

StuartAlfordQC,MairWilliamsandHarrietSlater

Chapter8

FRANCE83

AlexandreBisch

Chapter9

GREECE93

IliasGAnagnostopoulosandJerinaZapanti

ii

Contents

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

Chapter10

ITALY101

MarioZanchetti

Chapter11

JAPAN121

YasuhikoFujitsuandChihiroTsukada

Chapter12

PORTUGAL131

Jo?oMatosViana,Jo?oLimaClunyandTiagoCoelhoMagalh?es

Chapter13

SINGAPORE146

JoyTan,JennyTsinandOngPeiChin

Chapter14

SOUTHKOREA161

Seong-JinChoi,Tak-KyunHongandKyleJChoi

Chapter15

SWITZERLAND170

PeterBurckhardt,GeorgeAyoub,NinaLPakaandMariamOueslati

Chapter16

TURKEY181

FikretSebilcio?lu,OkanDemirkanandBegümBi?er?likay

Chapter17

UNITEDSTATES190

NicolasBourtinandSteveAHsieh

Appendix1

ABOUTTHEAUTHORS207

Appendix2

CONTRIBUTORS’CONTACTDETAILS223

iii

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

PREFACE

Initssecondyear,theBidenadministrationhasmadeclearitsprioritisationofwhite-collarprosecutions.Thisincludeschangesinpolicyandguidance,suchasarenewedfocusonindividualaccountability,anincreasedconcernwithcorporaterecidivism,andgreaterscrutinyoftheuse,andrepeateduse,ofdeferredprosecutionagreements(DPAs)andnon-prosecutionagreements(NPAs).Theadministrationhasannouncedplansnotonlytoredistributeexistingresourcestoprosecutionsofcorporatecrimebuttoincreaseresources,particularlythroughthehiringofmorewhite-collarprosecutorsandinvestigativeagents.Althoughrecoveryfromthecovid-19pandemicandmorerecentlytheconsequencesoftheRussia–Ukrainewarhaveslowedtheadministration’simplementationofthesecorporateenforcementpriorities,USandnon-UScorporationsalikewillcontinuetofaceincreasingscrutinybyUSauthorities.

ThetrendtowardsmoreenforcementandharsherpenaltieshasbynomeansbeenlimitedtotheUnitedStates;whiletheUSgovernmentcontinuestoleadthemovementtoglobalisetheprosecutionofcorporations,anumberofnon-USauthoritiesappeardeterminedtoadopttheUSmodel.Parallelcorporateinvestigationsinseveralcountriesincreasinglycompoundtheproblemsforcompanies,asconflictingstatutes,regulations,andrulesofprocedureandevidencemakethepathtocomplianceatreacherousone.Whatismore,governmentauthoritiesforgetheirownprosecutorialalliancesandshareevidenceor,conversely,havetheirownrivalriesandblocktheexportofevidence,furthercomplicatingacompany’sdefence.Thesetrendsshownosignofabating.

Asaresult,corporatecounselaroundtheworldareincreasinglycalledupontoadvisetheirclientsontheimplicationsofcriminalandregulatoryinvestigationsoutsidetheirownjurisdictions.Thiscanbeadauntingtask,asthepracticeofcriminallaw–particularlycorporatecriminallaw–isnotoriousforfollowingunwrittenrulesandpracticesthatcannotbegleanedfromasimplereviewofacountry’scriminalcode.Ofcourse,nothingcanreplacetheconsideredadviceofanexpertlocalpractitioner,butacomprehensivereviewofcorporateinvestigativepracticesaroundtheworldwillfindawideandgratefulreadership.

TheauthorswhohavecontributedtothisvolumeareacknowledgedexpertsinthefieldofcorporateinvestigationsandleadersoftheBarsoftheirrespectivecountries.Wehaveattemptedtodistiltheirwisdom,experienceandinsightaroundthemostcommonquestionsandconcernsthatcorporatecounselfaceinguidingtheirclientsthroughcriminalorregulatoryinvestigations.Underwhatcircumstancescanthecorporateentityitselfbechargedwithacrime?Whatarethepossiblepenalties?Underwhatcircumstancesshouldacorporationvoluntarilyself-reportpotentialmisconductonthepartofitsemployees?Isitarealisticoptionforacorporationtodefenditselfattrialagainstagovernmentagency?Andhowdoesacorporationmanagethedelicateinteractionswithemployeeswhoseconductis

v

Preface

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

atissue?TheInternationalInvestigationsReviewanswersthesequestionsandmanymore,andwillserveasanindispensableguidewhenyourclientsfacecriminalorregulatoryscrutinyinacountryotherthanyourown.Andwhileitwillnotqualifyyoutopractisecriminallawinaforeigncountry,itwillhighlightthemajorissuesandcriticalcharacteristicsofagivencountry’slegalsystemandwillserveasaninvaluableaidinengaging,advisinganddirectinglocalcounselinthatjurisdiction.Weareproudthat,inits12thedition,thispublicationfeaturestwooverviewsandcovers15jurisdictions.

Thisvolumeistheproductofexceptionalcollaboration.Iwishtocommendandthankourpublisherandallthecontributorsfortheirextraordinarygiftsoftimeandthought.Thesubjectmatterisbroadandtheissuesraisedaredeep,andaconcisesynthesisofacountry’slegalframeworkandpracticewaschallengingineachcase.

NicolasBourtin

Sullivan&CromwellLLP

NewYork

July2022

vi

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

Chapter5

CHINA

AlanZhou,JackyLiandJennyChen1

IINTRODUCTION

GovernmentinvestigationsinChinacanbegenerallydividedintotwomajorcategories:criminalinvestigationsandadministrativeinvestigations,withtheinvestigativepowerbeingvestedamongmultipleauthorities.Fromacriminalperspective,authoritieswithcriminalinvestigativepowersinclude:

apublicsecuritybureaus(PSBs),responsibleforinvestigations,criminaldetentions,the

executionofarrestsandpreliminaryinquiriesincriminalcases;2

bthepeople’sprocuratorates(procuratorates),responsibleforprosecutions,theapproval

ofarrestsandconductinginvestigationsintocriminalviolationsrelatingtojudicialfunctionaries’infringementoncitizens’rightsorjudicialjustice;

csupervisorycommissions,whichsuperviseallpublicofficials,investigateduty-related

illegalactivitiesandoffences,andcarryoutanti-corruptionwork;

dnationalsecurityauthorities,whichinvestigateandhandlecasesofcrimesthat

compromisenationalsecurity,performingthesamefunctionsandwiththesamepowersasPSBs;

emilitarysecurityauthorities,whichmayexercisetherighttoinvestigatecriminalcases

occurringinthemilitary;

ftheChinaCoastGuard,alawenforcementbodythatsafeguardsmarinerightsand

exercisestherighttoinvestigatecriminalcasesoccurringatsea;and

gprisons.

Fromanadministrativeperspective,authoritieswithinvestigativepowersinclude:atheStateAdministrationforMarketRegulation(SAMR),whichoverseesmarket

regulation,foodsafety,healthcarecompliance,advertisementviolations,competitionviolations,commercialbribery,anti-monopoly,etc.;anditssubsidiarybureaus,includingadministrationsformarketregulations(AMRs)attheprovincial,municipalandcountylevels;

btheNationalDevelopmentandReformCommissionanditssubsidiarybureaus,

responsibleforoverallplanningandcontrolofthenationaleconomy,andinvestigatingprice-relatedviolations;

ctheChinaSecuritiesRegulatoryCommission(CSRC)anditssubsidiarybureaus,

responsiblefortheadministrationofsecuritiesandinvestigatingsecuritiesfraud;

1AlanZhouandJackyLiarepartnersandJennyChenisofcounselatGlobalLawOffice.

2PSBsareempoweredwithdualinvestigativeauthoritiesatbothcriminalandadministrativelevels.

45

China

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

dPSBs,whicharealsoresponsibleforinvestigatingadministrativeviolationsimpacting

publicsecurity;

ethePeople’sBankofChina(PBOC)anditssubsidiaries,responsibleforcarrying

outmonetarypolicyandregulationoffinancialinstitutionsinmainlandChina,andregulatingmoneylaunderingactivities;and

fotheradministrativeauthorities,suchastheStateTaxationAdministration,the

Customs,andtheEnvironmentalProtectionBureaus.

Forcriminalinvestigations,theauthoritiesareempoweredto:

ainterrogatethecriminalsuspect;

binterviewwiththewitnesses;

cinspectorexaminethesites,objectsandpersonsrelevanttoacrime(including

dawnraids);

dsearchthecriminalsuspectandtheirbelongingsandresidence,andanyonewhomight

behidingacriminalorcriminalevidence,aswellasotherrelevantplaces;

esealuporseizethepropertyanddocuments;and

faccessorfreezeacriminalsuspect’sdeposits,remittance,bonds,stocks,shares,funds

orotherproperty.

Foradministrativeinvestigations,theauthoritiesaregenerallyempoweredto:aconducton-siteinspections(includingdawnraids);

binterviewthepartiesinvolvedinthesuspectedviolation;

crequirethepartiesinvolvedinthesuspectedviolationtoproducerelevant

supportingdocuments;

dreviewandreproducedocumentsandmaterials;

esealuporseizeproperty;and

faccessbankaccounts.

Governmentinvestigationsmaybetriggeredbyroutineinspections,whistle-blowingreports,accusations,complaints,self-disclosure,transfersofcasesbetweenauthoritiesorevenmediaexposurerelatedtocertaintypesofmisconduct.Onceagovernmentinvestigationhascommenced,theresponsibleauthoritieswillexercisetheirdiscretionastotheinvestigationmethods,dependingonthenatureoftheallegedmisconductandtheresourcesavailableforinvestigation.

Amongtheenumeratedinvestigationmethods,dawnraidsareadoptedquitefrequentlybygovernmentauthorities.Adawnraidmaybecarriedoutiftheauthoritiesbelievethatpriornoticeorwarningcouldpossiblyleadtothedestructionorfalsificationofevidence.Duringagovernmentdawnraid,theofficerswillshowupwithoutpriornotice,usuallyinthemorningatthestartoftheworkingdayatthepredeterminedsites.Severalsitescanbetargetedsimultaneouslywithinoracrossprovincesandadawnraidcanlastforseveraldays.Governmentauthoritiesmayhavealreadycollectedevidencethroughperipheralinvestigationsbeforeinitiatingadawnraidorsometimesadawnraidcouldbetriggeredunderexigentcircumstances.

Thetimeframesforgovernmentinvestigationsareusuallysetintherespectivelawsandregulationsofthedifferentauthorities.Companiesunderinvestigationareobliged

46

China

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

tocooperatewiththeauthoritiesanditiscrucialtotimelyevaluatethepotentiallegalimplicationsandconductnecessaryinteractionswiththeauthoritiestocontainthelegalriskexposuresandtoachieveafavourableresult.

IICONDUCT

iSelf-reporting

Article110oftheCriminalProcedureLawimposesageneralobligationonindividualsandentitiestoreportanysuspectedcrimesorcriminalactivity,butonliteralinterpretationandfromageneralpublicperspective,therequirementisconstruedtomeanreportingthecriminalactivitiesofothers,ratherthanself-reporting,andnolegalconsequencesareclearlystipulatedforfailingtoself-report.Article67oftheCriminalLawtosomeextentencouragesself-reportingofcriminalactivitybystipulatingmitigationorevenexemptionfromthecriminalpenaltiesundercircumstancesofvoluntaryconfession.SimilarprinciplescouldalsobereflectedinsomeotherprovisionsprescribedintheCriminalLaw.Forexample,Article164oftheCriminalLawprovidesthat‘a(chǎn)nybriberwhoconfessesthebriberyvoluntarilypriortoprosecutionmaybegivenamitigatedpunishmentorbeexemptedfrompunishment’.Article28oftheCounter-EspionageLawprovidesthat:

whoeverjoinsahostileorespionageorganisationabroadunderduressorinducementtoengageinactivitiescompromisingthenationalsecurityofChina,butthathonestlystatesthefacttoamissionofChinaabroadinatimelymanneror,afterhisorherreturnfromabroad,honestlystatesthefactdirectly,orthroughhisorheremployer,toanationalsecurityauthorityorapublicsecurityauthorityinatimelymannerandshowsrepentance,maybeexemptedfromlegalliability.

Fromtheadministrativelawperspective,self-reportingobligationsarescatteredinvariouslawsandregulations,mostlyrelatedtoviolationsthatmighthaveimpactonsocialsecurityandpublicwelfare,suchasfoodanddrugsafety,environmentalprotectionandcybersecurity.Forexample,Article47oftheFoodSafetyLawrequiresfoodmanufacturersorbusinessoperatorstoceasefoodmanufacturingorfoodbusinessoperations,andreporttothefoodsafetysupervisionandadministrationdepartmentsintheeventofafoodsafetyincidentwithpotentialrisks.Forotheradministrativeviolations,self-reportingisnowappearingmoreoftenasaprerequisiteincertainleniencyprogrammesforcompaniestoreceiveself-disclosureorcooperationcredit.Atypicalsituationisahorizontalmonopolyagreementcase,wherebusinessoperatorscouldchoosetoself-disclosetheviolationandprovideimportantevidenceinexchangeforlenienttreatment.

iiInternalinvestigations

Ingeneral,conductinginternalinvestigationsisnotastatutoryobligationinChina,unlessprescribedintheapplicableindustry-specificlegislation(mostlyinresponsetosafetyincidents).Forinstance,theAdministrativeMeasuresforMedicalDevice-RelatedAdverseEventMonitoringandRe-evaluationprovidesthat,afteridentifyingamedicaldevice-relatedadverseevent,marketingauthorisationholdersmustimmediatelyceasesalesandoperations,notifytheuser,inparallelwithconductinganinvestigationandself-inspectionofmanufacturingqualitycontrolsystems,andreportthefindingstothesupervisionauthorities. Inaddition,Chineseauthorities(oftenindustrysupervisionauthorities)mayinitiateenforcementactionsandrequirecompaniestoconductself-inspectionsandreport

47

China

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

non-compliantactivities.Forinstance,inanadhocenforcementagainstcommercialbriberyinthehealthcareindustry,initiatedbytheAMRsinTianjinin2017and2018,companiesandmedicalinstitutionswererequiredtoconductself-inspectionsoncommercialbriberyandtakecorrespondingremedialactionsinthisregard.

Inpractice,internalinvestigationsareincorporatedintotheinternalcontrolmechanismbycompaniesforcompliancepurposes.Thecauseoftheactionsvariesineachcompanybutwhite-collarcrimeandfraud(e.g.,commercialbribery,bid-riggingandembezzlement)areusuallyamongthefocusesforthemajorityofcompaniesinChina.

Commonly,internalinvestigationsareundertakenbyin-housecounselsinthecompanyorexternallocalcounselsdependingonthenatureandseverityoftheissuesunderinvestigation.Themethodologyandprocessfortheseinternalinvestigationsusuallyincludedocumentreview,financialreviewandinterviewswithemployeesandotherpersonnel.Thekeyissuesduringinternalinvestigationsinvolvethelegalissueidentification,designandimplementationoftheinvestigationprocessanalysisbasedonthefindingsanddeterminingthesolutions.Notably,dueprocessandevidencepreservationareoftenoverlookedbycompanies,asitisverylikelythatthefactsandevidencegatheredunderinternalinvestigationmayendupinlabourarbitrationtribunalsorcourtforlitigationpurposesorbesubmittedtotheChineseauthorities.Therefore,howtopreservetheintegrityoftheinternalinvestigationandensuretheadmissibilityoftheevidenceshouldbecarefullyevaluatedduringthepreparationandimplementationoftheinternalinvestigation.

CompaniesinChinaalsocommonlyconductinternalinvestigationsinrelationtoforeignlawconsiderations,suchastheForeignCorruptPracticesAct(FCPA),butthispracticehasbeensubstantiallyimpactedbythenewlyenactedInternationalCriminalJudicialAssistanceLaw(ICJAL)inOctober2018,whichexpresslystipulatesthatinstitutions,organisationsandindividualsinChinamustnotprovidetoforeigncountriesevidencematerialsorassistanceprovidedforinthisLawwithouttheconsentofthecompetentChineseauthority.TheICJALappliestocriminalproceedingswithawidecoverageofactivitiespotentiallydeemedasassistingthecrimesprovidedfor.AnalysisofdifferenttypesofFCPAinvestigationsinChinaindicatesthat,aslongastheinvestigationcouldpotentiallyleadtoacriminalresolutionwiththeUSauthorities,theinvestigationremainswithinthezoneofdanger;further,thelikelihoodoftheapplicabilityoftheICJALonthecurrentFCPAinvestigationsissubstantiallyhighwithlegalimplicationstobeascertained.Therefore,itissuggestedthatcompaniesconsultwithcompetentlocalcounselinadvancetoaccessthelegitimacyofinternalinvestigationsandtoproperlyinteractwiththerelevantChineseauthorities.

iiiWhistle-blowers

CompaniesinChinaarenowbeingexposedtotherisksarisingfromthehighfrequencyofwhistle-blowercomplaints.Therighttoreportcrimesandotherlegalviolationsbycitizensiswellestablishedinprincipleinthelawsandregulations,suchastheConstitution,theCriminalProcedureLawandtheAnti-UnfairCompetitionLaw.Althoughthereiscurrentlynoconsolidatedlegalregimetoregulatewhistle-blowingreports,variousauthoritieshaverespectivelypromulgatedlegislationtoregulatewhistle-blowingreportsagainstcertaintypesofmisconductintheirdomain.Forinstance,theformerChinaFoodandDrugAdministration(nowtheSAMR)promulgatedtheMeasuresforRewardingWhistle-BlowingReportsAgainstFoodandDrugViolationsin2013,whichwaslaterrevisedin2017toincreasetheawardamountandclarifytherelevantproceduresandscope.

48

China

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

Inpractice,toencouragereportingmisconduct,multipleauthoritieshavesetupreportinghotlinesandonlinegatewaystoreceivewhistle-blowingreportsfromthepublic.Forinstance,theStateSupervisoryCommissionisnowoperatinganadhoconlinechannelandhotline(12388)3forreceivingwhistle-blowingreportsagainstgovernmentofficials’duty-relatedcrimesormisconducteitherbyrealnameoranonymity(real-namereportingishighlyencouraged).Thenationalsecurityauthoritiesalsoencouragewhistle-blowingreportsmadetothedesignatedonlineplatformandhotline(12339).4Similarly,AMRsatalllevelshaveprovidedonlineandofflinechannelstoencouragethepublictoreportleadsregardingcompanymisconduct,andthehandlingproceduresandspecifictimelinesarepublishedandwellimplemented.On30July2021,theSAMRandtheMinistryofFinancejointlyissuedtheInterimMeasuresforRewardsforWhistle-blowerReportsofMajorViolationsintheFieldofMarketRegulation(effectivesince1December2021)toimprovethesystemofrewardingwhistle-blowingagainstmajorviolationsinthemarketregulationfield.

Withrespecttowhistle-blowers’protection,somespecificrules,suchastheRulesoftheSupremePeople’sProcuratorateonProtectingtheCitizens’Tip-offRights,wereformulatedtoprovideacomprehensivemechanismonbothsubstantiveandprocedurallevels,andtheSupremePeople’sProcuratorate,theMinistryofPublicSecurityandtheMinistryofFinancejointlyissuedtheSeveralProvisionsonProtectingandRewardingWhistle-BlowersofDutyCrimesin2016.

Strictconfidentialitythroughoutthehandlingprocessisthefoundationalrequirementimposedonauthoritiesthatreceiveanyreporting.Further,theauthoritiesneedtotakemeasures(i.e.,restrictingphysicalaccesstothereporterbythosebeingreported)toensurethesafetyofreportersandtheircloserelativeswhenevernecessary.Retaliationtowardswhistle-blowersisforbiddenandincursliabilityfortheimpositionoflegalpenaltiessuchasadministrativesanctions,criminaldetentionorimprisonment.

IIIENFORCEMENT

iCorporateliability

AdministrativeandcriminalcorporateliabilitiesarestipulatedintheCriminalLawandrelevantadministrativelawsandregulations.Forcriminalliabilities,amongthe469crimesprescribedbytheCriminalLaw,thereareapproximately150unitcrimesforwhichacompanycouldbequalifiedastheperpetrator,andfortheseunitcrimesacompanywillbeheldcriminallyliableif:

aacollectivedecisionhasbeenmadebythemanagementofthecompany,oranindividual

decisionbytherelevantresponsiblepersonnelonbehalfofthecompany,suchasthelegalrepresentative;and

bthecrimeiscommittedinthenameofthecompanyandtheillegalproceedsgoto

thecompany.

TheCriminalLawadoptsadualpunishmentsystemforunitcrime,whichmeansboththecompanyandtheresponsiblepersonsaresubjecttocriminalliability,withonlyafewexceptionsotherwiseprescribedintheCriminalLaw.

3Seewww.12388..

4Seewww.12389..

49

China

?2022LawBusinessResearchLtd

Asforadministrativecorporateliability,thisderivedfromtheprovisionsoftherelevantadministrativelawsandregulations,suchastheUnfairCompetitionLaw,theAnti-MonopolyLawandtheAdvertisementLaw,coveringviolationssuchascommercialbribery,monopoly,companyillegaloperationandillegaladvertising.

Notably,forthesamemisconductcommittedbyacompany,thecriminalandadministrativeregimesaremutuallyexclusive.TheRegulationsontheTransferofSuspectedCriminalCasesbyAdministrativeLawEnforcementAgenciespromulgatedbytheStateCouncilin2001settheregulatoryframeworkfortheconversionbetweenadministrativeandcriminalcases.Aseriesofotherregulationshavebeenpromulgatedinthefollowingyearstofurtheraddresstheprocedureofconversion.Accordingtotheseregulations,whileinvestigatinganadministrativecase,iftheagencysuspectsthatthecaseshouldbeprosecutedasacriminalcasebasedonelementssuchasthemonetaryamountinvolved,thespecificfactpatternsortheconsequences,thenthecasemustbetransferredtoaPSBandthePSBwillexaminethecasestransferred.IfcriminalfactpatternsareidentifiedandthePSBdecidestoinvestigatethecaseforcriminalliability,itshallnotifytheadministrativeagencythattransferredthecaseinwriting.Ifthereisnocriminalfactpatternorthefactsareinsignificantandtheagencydecidesnottoprosecutethecase,itwillstatethereasons,notifytheadministrativeagencyandreturnthecase.Ontheotherhand,ifaPSBdiscoversthatacaseitisinvestigatingshouldnotbecriminallyprosecutedbuttheremaybeadministrativeliability,itshalltransferthecasetotherelevantadministrativelawenforcementagency.

iiPenalties

UndertheCriminalLaw,theonlysanctionapplicabletoacompanyisthemonetarypenalty,butanindividual’sliabilitiesforaunitcrimeincludepublicsurveillance,criminaldetention,imprisonment,themonetarypenalty,thedeprivationofpoliticalrights,deportation(inthecaseofforeignnationals)andeventhedeathpenalty.5

Penaltiesf