趴gmat og閱讀中文解析GMAT備考咨詢系統(tǒng)課小精準(zhǔn)1V1集訓(xùn)營(yíng)

OfficialGuide2018ReadingComprehensionDay10Q530-第一段：Burckhardt的觀點(diǎn),文藝復(fù)興時(shí)期的歐洲女性“站在一種完全 看到Krontiris這個(gè)人名定位到TinaKrontiris,forexample，問(wèn)的是例子的作用，那就回的研究都給女人disproportionaterepresentation，而Krontiris他卻把不同 都合并為一個(gè)概念，符合選項(xiàng)D的意思CE與Krontiris定位：“Thetrendisalsoevident,however,inworksfocusingonthosemiddle-andupper-classEuropeanwomenwhoseabilitytowritegivesthemdisproportionaterepresentationinthehistoricalrecord.”這句話中意思是說(shuō)：上段末句了對(duì)upper-classItalianwomen的generalizations的問(wèn)題，而這句話在說(shuō)對(duì)middleandupper-classEuropeanwomengeneralizations（這里generalizationsdisproportionaterepresentation念。）那么這個(gè)however是轉(zhuǎn)折“observationsaboutupper-classItalianwomen”與“worksfocusingonthosemiddleandupper-classEuropeanwomen”，即不僅品”(居然)也有相同問(wèn)題。因此選E.文章開(kāi)頭，Burckhardt覺(jué)得歐洲文藝復(fù)興時(shí)期的女人是standonafootingofperfectequality的，而feministscholar是要強(qiáng)調(diào)女人的inequality的，兩者意思相反， Burckhardt的意見(jiàn)的作用肯定是要反駁的，因此選CABurckhardt和Kelly之間的view并沒(méi)有formbasisDThesescholarsstressthewaysinwhichdifferencesamongRenaissancewomen，是為了B&K的generalization（建立在upper-classwomen）。Scholar認(rèn)為B&K風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的。所以S認(rèn)為B&K的研究不具有代表性，B選項(xiàng)。AAssumingthatwomenwritersoftheRenaissancearerepresentativeofRenaissancewomeningeneral第二段中K的觀點(diǎn)，非scholarBDrawingconclusionsthatarebasedonthestudyofanatypicalgroupofCFailingtodescribeclearlytherelationshipbetweensocialstatusandlicyamongRenaissancewomenKrontiris的觀點(diǎn)，題干無(wú)關(guān)DFailingtoacknowledgetheroleyedbyRenaissancewomeninopposingculturalstereotypesKrontiris的觀點(diǎn)，題干無(wú)關(guān)。而且文中無(wú)涉及到Failingtoacknowledge這一點(diǎn)EFailingtoacknowledgethewaysinwhichsocialstatusaffectedthecreativeactivitiesofRenaissancewomen無(wú)涉及定位：TinaKrontiris,forexample,inherfascinatingstudyofsixRenaissancewomenwriters,doestendattimestoconflatewomen”and“womenwriters,”assumingthatwomen’sgender,irrespectiveofothersocialdifferences,includinglicy,allowsustoviewwomenasahomogeneousgroupandmakethatgroupanobjectofB原文沒(méi)有提到licy問(wèn)Cshesuggeststhatsuchverbaloppositiontoculturalstereotypeswashighlycircumscribed，opposition收到了限制，可見(jiàn)opposition沒(méi)有成功DculturalstereotypegenderEwomenseldomattackedthebasicassumptionsintheideologiesthatoppressedAsuggestthatKrontiris’sworkisnotrepresentativeofrecenttrendsamongfeministscholarsBunderminetheargumentthatli tewomenoftheRenaissancesoughttoopposesocialconstraintsimposedonthem原文相反：Krontirisisconcernedtoshowwomenintentionallynegotiatingsomepowerforthemselvesatleastintherealmofpublicdiscourseagainstpotentiallyconstrainingideologies,butinhersoberandthoughtfulconcludingremarks,shesuggeststhatsuchverbaloppositiontoculturalstereotypeswashighlycircumscribed，作者說(shuō)女性在socialconstraintsimposedonthem是有限制的，C正確，showawayinwhichKrontiris’sworkillustratesaoptimistic"assessmentofRenaissancewomen’s的cautiouslyoptimisticDsummarizeKrontiris’sviewoftheeffectofli cyonthelivesofupper-andmiddle-classRenaissancewomenEillustratethewayinwhichKrontiris’sstudydiffersfromthestudiesdonebyBurckhardtandKelly文章問(wèn)的是Krontiris的不同之處，定位到原文TinaKrontiris,forexample,inherfascinatingstudyofsixRenaissancewomenwriters,doestendattimestoconflate“women”and“womenwriters,...前文提到了歷史記載的女人具體的社會(huì) 括，隨后引出Kroniris這個(gè)人很特別地把不同 A文章提到thesocialobstaclesRenaissancewomenfacedKronirisBC文章沒(méi)有提到accurateE和B選項(xiàng)同義，原沒(méi)有提Q537-Q537- Ifasteroidsarerubblepiles,however,thetailrepresentingtheveryfastrotatorswouldbemissing,becauseanylooseaggregatespinningfasterthanonceeveryfewhours(dependingontheasteroid'sbulkdensity)wouldflyapart.那么從文章中我們可以知道,是rubblepile形態(tài)的asteroids體積都比較大。邏輯鏈?zhǔn)牵篿f....rubblepiles...-->fastrotatorswouldbemssing--->because...不會(huì)fasterthanONCEEVERYFEWHOURS.所以找超過(guò)200meter的然后轉(zhuǎn)速還比onceeveryfewhours快的就可以。asteroid，如果轉(zhuǎn)快過(guò)onceeveryfewhours，則"wouldcallintoquestionstheconclusion"C-250meters大的，一星期轉(zhuǎn)一 好慢啊排D500metersonceeveryfewhours快（正確答案E1000meters24onceeveryfewhoursAAcollisioncanblastalargeasteroidtobits,butafterthecollisionthosebitswillusuallymoveslowerthantheirmutualescapevelocity.Overseveralhours,gravitywillreassembleallbutthefastestpiecesintoarubblepile.原文這里的內(nèi)容主要是想講，collisionbitsescapevelosity和它們后來(lái)為了說(shuō)明大的小行星在撞擊之后，如何保持，選EQ541-通過(guò)文章結(jié)構(gòu)，我們知道計(jì)算tunnelingtimeandbarrierthicknessWignerAsuggestthattunnelingtimeisunrelatedtobarrierthickness原文相反，文中是thetimeittakesaparticletotunnelthroughabarrierincreaseswiththethicknessofthebarrieruntiltunnelingtimereachesaum，時(shí)間是BexintheevidencebywhichWignerandEisenbuddiscoveredthephenomenonoftunnelingCdescribedatarecentlychallengedbyRaymondChiaoand原文相反。Raymond也是支持W&EDquestionwhyparticlesengagedinquantumtunnelingrarelyachieveextremelyhighspeedsEex inthebasisforWignerandEisenbud’shypothesis定位：Thiswouldimplythatumtunnelingtimeisreached,tunnelingspeedwillincreasewithoutlimitasbarrierthicknessincreases.文中說(shuō)的 定位：Thiswouldimplythattunnelingtimereached AtunnelingspeedwouldincreasewithbarrierthicknessBtunnelingspeedwoulddeclinewithbarrierthicknessCtunnelingspeedwouldvarywithbarrier DtunnelingspeedwouldnotbeexpectedtoincreasewithoutEsuccessfultunnelingwouldoccurevenlessfrequentlythanitdoes定位句：Thoughtheextremerapidityofquantumtunnelingwasnotedasearlyas1932,notuntil1955wasithypothesized－byWignerandEisenbud－thattunnelingparticlessometimestravelfasterthanlight.1932investigatorsQTextremerapidity1955子速度大于光速。根據(jù)邏輯，investigators當(dāng)時(shí)沒(méi)有承認(rèn)：例子速度大于光速。符合