我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務之重構

我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務之重構一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle本文旨在探討我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務的重構問題。真實陳述義務作為民事訴訟中的一項基本制度，對于確保訴訟公正、維護法律秩序、提高訴訟效率具有重要意義。然而，隨著我國法治建設的深入推進和司法實踐的發(fā)展，現行真實陳述義務制度已逐漸暴露出一些問題，如義務范圍不明確、制裁措施不完善、當事人權益保障不足等。因此，有必要對真實陳述義務進行重構，以適應新的司法實踐需求。ThisarticleaimstoexplorethereconstructionoftheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina.Theobligationoftruthfulstatement,asafundamentalsystemincivillitigation,isofgreatsignificanceinensuringlitigationfairness,maintaininglegalorder,andimprovinglitigationefficiency.However,withthedeepeningofChina'sruleoflawconstructionandthedevelopmentofjudicialpractice,thecurrentsystemoftheobligationtotruthfullystatehasgraduallyexposedsomeproblems,suchasunclearscopeofobligations,imperfectsanctionsmeasures,andinsufficientprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofpartiesinvolved.Therefore,itisnecessarytoreconstructtheobligationoftruthfulstatementtomeetthenewdemandsofjudicialpractice.本文首先將對真實陳述義務的基本概念進行界定，明確其內涵和外延。通過對我國民事訴訟中真實陳述義務的現狀進行梳理，揭示其存在的問題和困境。在此基礎上，本文將借鑒國外相關立法和司法實踐經驗，結合我國實際情況，提出重構真實陳述義務的具體路徑和措施。這些措施包括明確真實陳述義務的范圍、完善制裁機制、加強當事人權益保障等方面。本文將對重構后的真實陳述義務制度進行展望，以期為我國民事訴訟制度的完善和發(fā)展提供參考和借鑒。Thisarticlefirstdefinesthebasicconceptoftheobligationtotruthfullystate,clarifyingitsconnotationandextension.BysortingoutthecurrentsituationoftheobligationtotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina,weaimtorevealtheexistingproblemsanddifficulties.Onthisbasis,thisarticlewilldrawonrelevantforeignlegislationandjudicialpracticeexperience,combinedwiththeactualsituationinChina,andproposespecificpathsandmeasurestoreconstructtheobligationoftruthfulstatement.Thesemeasuresincludeclarifyingthescopeoftheobligationtotruthfullystate,improvingthesanctionsmechanism,andstrengtheningtheprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofthepartiesinvolved.Thisarticlewillprovideanoutlookonthereconstructedsystemoftheobligationoftruthfulstatement,inordertoprovidereferenceandinspirationfortheimprovementanddevelopmentofChina'scivillitigationsystem.二、真實陳述義務的理論基礎Thetheoreticalbasisoftheobligationoftruthfulstatement真實陳述義務，作為民事訴訟中的一項重要原則，其理論基礎深厚且多元。其核心在于確保訴訟的公正、高效進行，同時保護當事人的合法權益。Theobligationtotruthfullystate,asanimportantprincipleincivillitigation,hasaprofoundanddiversetheoreticalfoundation.Itscoreliesinensuringthefairnessandefficiencyoflitigation,whileprotectingthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofthepartiesinvolved.真實陳述義務源于民事訴訟的本質要求。民事訴訟作為一種解決民事糾紛的法律程序，其目的在于查明事實真相，實現公正裁判。為了實現這一目標，必然要求當事人在訴訟過程中如實陳述事實，不得隱瞞、歪曲或捏造事實。只有這樣，法院才能根據真實的事實情況作出公正的裁判，從而維護當事人的合法權益。Theobligationoftruthfulstatementoriginatesfromtheessentialrequirementofcivillitigation.Civillitigation,asalegalprocedureforresolvingcivildisputes,aimstouncoverthetruthandachievefairjudgments.Inordertoachievethisgoal,itisnecessarytorequirethepartiestotruthfullystatethefactsduringthelitigationprocess,andnottoconceal,distortorfabricatethefacts.Onlyinthiswaycanthecourtmakeafairjudgmentbasedonthetruefactualsituation,therebysafeguardingthelegitimaterightsandinterestsoftheparties.真實陳述義務也體現了誠實信用原則在民事訴訟中的適用。誠實信用原則作為民法中的“帝王條款”，同樣適用于民事訴訟領域。當事人在訴訟過程中應當遵循誠實信用原則，如實陳述事實，不得進行虛假陳述或濫用訴訟權利。只有這樣，才能維護訴訟秩序，保障訴訟的公正、高效進行。Theobligationtotruthfullystatealsoreflectstheapplicationoftheprincipleofgoodfaithincivillitigation.Theprincipleofgoodfaith,asanimperialclauseincivillaw,alsoappliestothefieldofcivillitigation.Thepartiesinvolvedinthelitigationprocessshallfollowtheprincipleofgoodfaithandtruthfullystatethefacts,andshallnotmakefalsestatementsorabusetheirlitigationrights.Onlyinthiswaycanwemaintaintheorderoflitigationandensurethefairnessandefficiencyoflitigation.真實陳述義務還體現了對當事人訴訟權利的尊重和保護。當事人在訴訟過程中享有陳述事實、提供證據等權利。這些權利的實現必須以真實陳述為前提。如果當事人可以隨意隱瞞、歪曲或捏造事實，那么這些權利就失去了存在的意義。因此，真實陳述義務是對當事人訴訟權利的一種保障和尊重。Theobligationtotruthfullystatealsoreflectsrespectandprotectionofthelitigationrightsofthepartiesinvolved.Partieshavetherighttostatefactsandprovideevidenceduringthelitigationprocess.Therealizationoftheserightsmustbebasedonatruestatement.Ifthepartiesinvolvedcanconceal,distortorfabricatefactsatwill,thentheserightslosetheirmeaningofexistence.Therefore,theobligationtotruthfullystateisaguaranteeandrespectforthelitigationrightsofthepartiesinvolved.真實陳述義務的理論基礎深厚且多元，它源于民事訴訟的本質要求，體現了誠實信用原則在民事訴訟中的適用，同時也體現了對當事人訴訟權利的尊重和保護。在民事訴訟中重構真實陳述義務，應當充分考慮這些理論基礎，確保重構后的制度能夠更好地實現其目的和價值。Thetheoreticalfoundationoftheobligationtotruthfullystateisprofoundanddiverse,originatingfromtheessentialrequirementsofcivillitigation,reflectingtheapplicationoftheprincipleofgoodfaithincivillitigation,andalsoreflectingtherespectandprotectionofthelitigationrightsoftheparties.Incivillitigation,thereconstructionoftheobligationtotruthfullystateshouldfullyconsiderthesetheoreticalfoundationstoensurethatthereconstructedsystemcanbetterachieveitspurposeandvalue.三、我國民事訴訟中真實陳述義務的現狀分析AnalysisoftheCurrentSituationoftheTrueStatementObligationinCivilLitigationinChina在我國的民事訴訟制度中，真實陳述義務作為訴訟參與人，尤其是當事人的一項基本義務，其確立和實施對于保障訴訟的公正和效率具有重要意義。然而，在現實中，我國民事訴訟中真實陳述義務的現狀卻存在一些問題，需要進行深入的分析和重構。InChina'scivillitigationsystem,theobligationoftruthfulstatementisafundamentalobligationoflitigationparticipants,especiallyparties,anditsestablishmentandimplementationareofgreatsignificanceforensuringthefairnessandefficiencyoflitigation.However,inreality,therearesomeproblemswiththecurrentsituationoftheobligationtotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina,whichrequirein-depthanalysisandreconstruction.我國民事訴訟法雖然規(guī)定了當事人有真實陳述的義務，但對于如何保障這一義務的履行，以及違反該義務應承擔的法律后果，卻缺乏明確和具體的規(guī)定。這導致在實踐中，真實陳述義務往往被當事人忽視，甚至被濫用，嚴重損害了訴訟的公正性。AlthoughtheCivilProcedureLawofourcountrystipulatestheobligationofpartiestomaketruthfulstatements,thereisalackofclearandspecificprovisionsonhowtoensuretheperformanceofthisobligationandthelegalconsequencesthatshouldbeborneiftheobligationisviolated.Thisleadstothefactthatinpractice,theobligationoftruthfulstatementisoftenoverlookedorevenabusedbythepartiesinvolved,seriouslydamagingthefairnessoflitigation.我國在民事訴訟中對于真實陳述義務的宣傳和教育不足。許多當事人對于真實陳述義務的重要性認識不足，缺乏遵守該義務的自覺性和主動性。同時，法院在審判過程中，也缺乏對真實陳述義務的充分釋明和引導，使得當事人難以理解和遵守該義務。Thereisinsufficientpromotionandeducationontheobligationoftruthfulstatementincivillitigationinourcountry.Manypartieshaveinsufficientawarenessoftheimportanceoftheobligationtotruthfullystate,andlacktheconsciousnessandinitiativetocomplywiththisobligation.Atthesametime,thecourtlackssufficientexplanationandguidanceontheobligationoftruthfulstatementduringthetrialprocess,makingitdifficultforthepartiestounderstandandcomplywiththisobligation.再次，我國在民事訴訟中對于真實陳述義務的監(jiān)督和執(zhí)行機制不完善。一方面，法院對于當事人違反真實陳述義務的行為缺乏有效的制裁手段；另一方面，當事人對于對方違反真實陳述義務的行為也缺乏有效的救濟途徑。這導致真實陳述義務在實踐中往往形同虛設，難以發(fā)揮其應有的作用。Onceagain,thesupervisionandenforcementmechanismfortheobligationoftruthfulstatementincivillitigationinChinaisnotperfect.Ontheonehand,thecourtlackseffectivesanctionsagainstpartieswhoviolatetheirobligationtotruthfullystatetheirinformation;Ontheotherhand,thepartiesalsolackeffectiveremediesfortheotherparty'sviolationoftheobligationtotruthfullystate.Thisleadstothefactthattheobligationtotruthfullystateisoftenamereformalityinpractice,makingitdifficulttoplayitsduerole.因此，為了保障我國民事訴訟的公正和效率，必須對真實陳述義務進行重構。具體而言，應當從以下幾個方面入手：一是完善民事訴訟法中關于真實陳述義務的規(guī)定，明確其內涵、外延以及違反該義務的法律后果；二是加強真實陳述義務的宣傳和教育，提高當事人對于該義務的認識和遵守意識；三是完善真實陳述義務的監(jiān)督和執(zhí)行機制，確保該義務在實踐中得到有效履行。通過這些措施的實施，可以有效提升我國民事訴訟中真實陳述義務的履行水平，為實現訴訟公正和效率提供有力保障。Therefore,inordertoensurethefairnessandefficiencyofcivillitigationinourcountry,itisnecessarytoreconstructtheobligationoftruthfulstatement.Specifically,weshouldstartfromthefollowingaspects:firstly,improvetheprovisionsontheobligationoftruthfulstatementintheCivilProcedureLaw,clarifyitsconnotation,extension,andthelegalconsequencesofviolatingthisobligation;Thesecondistostrengthenthepromotionandeducationoftheobligationoftruthfulstatement,andenhancetheawarenessandcomplianceofthepartiesinvolvedwiththisobligation;Thethirdistoimprovethesupervisionandenforcementmechanismoftheobligationtotruthfullystate,ensuringthatthisobligationiseffectivelyfulfilledinpractice.Throughtheimplementationofthesemeasures,theleveloffulfillmentoftheobligationtotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChinacanbeeffectivelyimproved,providingstrongguaranteesforachievinglitigationfairnessandefficiency.四、真實陳述義務重構的必要性Thenecessityofreconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatement在我國民事訴訟中，當事人真實陳述義務是確保司法公正、提升訴訟效率、保護當事人合法權益的重要法律原則。然而，隨著社會經濟的發(fā)展和司法實踐的不斷深化，現行真實陳述義務的規(guī)定逐漸顯露出其局限性和不足，因此，對其進行重構顯得尤為必要。Incivillitigationinourcountry,theobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateisanimportantlegalprincipletoensurejudicialfairness,improvelitigationefficiency,andprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofparties.However,withthedevelopmentofsocialeconomyandthecontinuousdeepeningofjudicialpractice,thecurrentprovisionsontheobligationoftruthfulstatementhavegraduallyrevealedtheirlimitationsandshortcomings.Therefore,itisparticularlynecessarytoreconstructthem.重構真實陳述義務是適應司法實踐發(fā)展的需要。隨著新型、復雜案件的增多，法官在審判過程中越來越依賴當事人的陳述和證據。如果當事人不能真實、完整地陳述事實，將給法官的判斷帶來困難，甚至導致誤判。因此，重構真實陳述義務，明確其內涵和外延，有助于指導當事人在訴訟中正確行使權利，提高訴訟效率。Reconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatementsisnecessarytoadapttothedevelopmentofjudicialpractice.Withtheincreasingnumberofnewandcomplexcases,judgesareincreasinglyrelyingonthestatementsandevidenceofthepartiesinvolvedinthetrialprocess.Ifthepartiesinvolvedcannottruthfullyandcompletelystatethefacts,itwillbringdifficultiestothejudge'sjudgmentandevenleadtomisjudgment.Therefore,reconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatement,clarifyingitsconnotationandextension,canhelpguidethepartiestoexercisetheirrightscorrectlyinlitigationandimprovelitigationefficiency.重構真實陳述義務是維護司法公正的必然要求。真實陳述義務的本質在于要求當事人誠信訴訟，不得故意隱瞞、歪曲事實。然而，在現實中，一些當事人出于各種利益考慮，往往選擇虛假陳述，這不僅損害了對方當事人的利益，也嚴重破壞了司法公正。因此，重構真實陳述義務，強化其法律約束力，對于維護司法公正具有重要意義。Reconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatementsisaninevitablerequirementformaintainingjudicialfairness.Theessenceoftheobligationtotruthfullystateliesinrequiringthepartiestofilealawsuitingoodfaithandnottointentionallyconcealordistortfacts.However,inreality,somepartiesoftenchoosetomakefalsestatementsoutofvariousinterests,whichnotonlydamagestheinterestsoftheotherpartybutalsoseriouslyunderminesjudicialfairness.Therefore,reconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatementandstrengtheningitslegalbindingforceisofgreatsignificanceformaintainingjudicialfairness.重構真實陳述義務是提升當事人法律意識的重要途徑。法律意識的提升需要法律制度的引導和保障。通過重構真實陳述義務，明確當事人在訴訟中的權利和義務，引導當事人誠信訴訟、尊重法律，有助于提升當事人的法律意識，促進法治社會的建設。Reconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatementsisanimportantwaytoenhancethelegalawarenessofthepartiesinvolved.Theenhancementoflegalawarenessrequiresguidanceandprotectionfromthelegalsystem.Byreconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatements,clarifyingtherightsandobligationsofthepartiesinvolvedinlitigation,guidingthemtoconducthonestlitigationandrespectthelaw,ithelpstoenhancetheirlegalawarenessandpromotetheconstructionofaruleoflawsociety.重構我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務具有必要性。這不僅是適應司法實踐發(fā)展的需要，也是維護司法公正、提升當事人法律意識的必然要求。通過重構真實陳述義務，我們可以進一步完善民事訴訟制度，提高司法效率和質量，為實現法治社會的目標提供有力保障。ItisnecessarytoreconstructtheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina.Thisisnotonlyarequirementtoadapttothedevelopmentofjudicialpractice,butalsoanecessaryrequirementtomaintainjudicialfairnessandenhancethelegalawarenessofthepartiesinvolved.Byreconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatement,wecanfurtherimprovethecivillitigationsystem,improvejudicialefficiencyandquality,andprovidestrongguaranteesforachievingthegoalofaruleoflawsociety.五、真實陳述義務重構的具體措施Specificmeasuresforreconstructingtheobligationoftruthfulstatement針對我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務存在的問題，我們提出以下具體的重構措施：WeproposethefollowingspecificrestructuringmeasurestoaddresstheissueswiththeobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina:強化法官對真實陳述義務的釋明。法官在庭審過程中，應明確告知當事人真實陳述的法律義務及其法律后果，引導當事人自覺履行真實陳述義務。同時，法官還應就如何進行真實陳述提供具體的指導，如明確陳述的內容、方式、時間等，確保當事人能夠全面、準確地履行真實陳述義務。Strengthentheinterpretationofthejudge'sobligationtotruthfullystate.Duringthetrialprocess,judgesshouldclearlyinformthepartiesoftheirlegalobligationtotruthfullystatetheiropinionsanditslegalconsequences,andguidethemtoconsciouslyfulfilltheirobligationtotruthfullystatetheiropinions.Atthesametime,judgesshouldalsoprovidespecificguidanceonhowtomaketruthfulstatements,suchasclarifyingthecontent,method,andtimeofthestatements,toensurethatthepartiescanfullyandaccuratelyfulfilltheirobligationtomaketruthfulstatements.完善對違反真實陳述義務的制裁機制。對于故意或重大過失違反真實陳述義務的當事人，應依法予以制裁。制裁措施可以包括警告、罰款、賠償損失等，以確保制裁的有效性和威懾力。同時，還應建立健全失信懲戒機制，將違反真實陳述義務的當事人納入失信名單，對其進行信用懲戒，提高其違法成本。Improvethesanctionsmechanismforviolatingtheobligationoftruthfulstatements.Forpartieswhointentionallyorgrosslyviolatetheobligationoftruthfulstatement,theyshallbepunishedinaccordancewiththelaw.Sanctionscanincludewarnings,fines,compensationforlosses,etc.,toensuretheeffectivenessanddeterrenceofsanctions.Atthesametime,asoundmechanismforpunishingdishonestyshouldbeestablished,andpartieswhoviolatetheirobligationtotruthfullystateshouldbeincludedinthedishonestylist,andcreditpenaltiesshouldbeimposedtoincreasetheirillegalcosts.再次，提升當事人的訴訟誠信意識。通過加強法制宣傳教育，提高當事人對訴訟誠信的認識和理解，引導其自覺遵守真實陳述義務。同時，還可以建立訴訟誠信檔案，記錄當事人的訴訟行為，作為其今后參與訴訟的重要參考。Onceagain,enhancetheawarenessoflitigationintegrityamongthepartiesinvolved.Bystrengtheninglegalpublicityandeducation,weaimtoenhancetheawarenessandunderstandingoflitigationintegrityamongpartiesinvolved,andguidethemtoconsciouslyabidebytheobligationoftruthfulstatements.Atthesametime,itisalsopossibletoestablishafileoflitigationintegritytorecordthelitigationbehavioroftheparties,asanimportantreferencefortheirfutureparticipationinlitigation.加強法官對真實陳述義務的審查和判斷能力。法官應不斷提升自身的專業(yè)素養(yǎng)和審判能力，提高對真實陳述義務的審查和判斷能力。在審理案件過程中，法官應認真分析當事人的陳述內容，判斷其是否真實、全面、準確，對于存在疑點的陳述，應及時進行詢問和核實。Strengthentheabilityofjudgestoreviewandjudgetheobligationoftruthfulstatements.Judgesshouldcontinuouslyenhancetheirprofessionalcompetenceandjudicialability,andenhancetheirabilitytoreviewandjudgetheobligationoftruthfulstatements.Duringthetrialofacase,thejudgeshouldcarefullyanalyzethestatementsmadebythepartiestodeterminewhethertheyaretrue,comprehensive,andaccurate.Forstatementswithdoubts,theyshouldbepromptlyquestionedandverified.通過以上措施的實施，我們可以有效重構我國民事訴訟中當事人的真實陳述義務，提高訴訟效率和質量，維護司法公正和權威。Throughtheimplementationoftheabovemeasures,wecaneffectivelyreconstructtheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina,improvetheefficiencyandqualityoflitigation,andmaintainjudicialfairnessandauthority.六、案例分析Caseanalysis在重構我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務的過程中，案例分析起到了至關重要的作用。這些案例不僅反映了當前司法實踐中存在的問題，也為我們提供了深入研究和改進的機會。IntheprocessofreconstructingtheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincivillitigationinChina,caseanalysisplaysacrucialrole.Thesecasesnotonlyreflecttheproblemsexistingincurrentjudicialpractice,butalsoprovideuswithopportunitiesforin-depthresearchandimprovement.案例一：張某訴李某合同糾紛一案中，原告張某在法庭上作出了與事實嚴重不符的陳述，試圖通過虛假陳述來獲得不正當的利益。然而，在被告李某提供充分證據后，法庭認定張某的陳述為虛假，并對其進行了相應的法律制裁。這一案例揭示了當前我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務的重要性，同時也指出了加強當事人誠信意識、完善相關制裁措施的必要性。Case1:InthecontractdisputecasebetweenZhangandLi,theplaintiffZhangmadeastatementincourtthatwasseriouslyinconsistentwiththefacts,attemptingtoobtainunduebenefitsthroughfalsestatements.However,afterthedefendantLiprovidedsufficientevidence,thecourtfoundZhang'sstatementtobefalseandimposedcorrespondinglegalsanctionsonhim.ThiscaserevealstheimportanceoftheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincurrentcivillitigationinChina,andalsopointsoutthenecessityofstrengtheningtheawarenessofpartyintegrityandimprovingrelevantsanctionsmeasures.案例二：王某訴趙某侵權糾紛一案中，被告趙某在法庭上拒不承認其侵權行為，并在整個訴訟過程中保持沉默。然而，在原告王某提供充分證據后，法庭認定趙某的沉默為默認，并對其進行了相應的法律制裁。這一案例強調了法官在判斷當事人陳述真實性時的關鍵作用，同時也提醒我們在民事訴訟中應當加強對當事人真實陳述義務的引導和監(jiān)督。Case2:InthecaseofinfringementdisputebetweenWangandZhao,thedefendantZhaorefusedtoadmithisinfringementbehaviorincourtandremainedsilentthroughouttheentirelitigationprocess.However,aftertheplaintiffWangprovidedsufficientevidence,thecourtdeterminedthatZhao'ssilencewasadefaultandimposedcorrespondinglegalsanctionsonhim.Thiscaseemphasizesthecrucialroleofjudgesindeterminingtheauthenticityoftheparties'statements,andalsoremindsustostrengthenguidanceandsupervisionoftheparties'obligationtotruthfullystateincivillitigation.通過對這些案例的分析，我們可以看到當前我國民事訴訟中當事人真實陳述義務存在的問題和不足。為了重構這一制度，我們需要從立法、司法和當事人三個層面入手，完善相關法律規(guī)定、加強法官的職業(yè)素養(yǎng)培訓、提高當事人的誠信意識等。只有這樣，我們才能確保民事訴訟的公正、高效和權威，維護社會和諧穩(wěn)定。Throughtheanalysisofthesecases,wecanseetheproblemsanddeficienciesintheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateincurrentcivillitigationinChina.Inordertoreconstructthissystem,weneedtostartfromthreelevels:legislation,judiciary,andpartiesinvolved,improverelevantlegalprovisions,strengthenprofessionaltrainingforjudges,andenhancetheintegrityawarenessofpartiesinvolved.Onlyinthiswaycanweensurethefairness,efficiency,andauthorityofcivillitigation,andmaintainsocialharmonyandstability.七、結論Conclusion在我國民事訴訟中，重構當事人真實陳述義務是一項必要且緊迫的任務。通過對現行法律制度的深入剖析，我們不難發(fā)現，現有規(guī)定在保障當事人陳述真實性的也存在諸多亟待改進之處。本文從理論層面和實務層面對此進行了系統(tǒng)探討，并提出了若干重構策略。Incivillitigationinourcountry,reconstructingtheobligationofpartiestotruthfullystateisanecessaryandurgenttask.Throughanin-depthanalysisofthecurrentlegalsystem,itisnotdifficulttofindthattherearealsomanyurgentimprovementsintheexistingregulationstoensuretheauthenticityofthestatementsmadebythepartiesinvolved.Thisarticlesystematicallyexploresthisfromboththeoreticalandpracticalperspectives,andproposesseveralreconstructionstrategies.重構當事人真實陳述義務的核心在于平衡當事人訴訟權利與義務的關系，確保訴訟的公正與