版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries
FederalReserveBoard,Washington,D.C.
ISSN1936-2854(Print)
ISSN2767-3898(Online)
HowPrivateEquityFuelsNon-BankLending
SharjilHaque,SimonMayer,TengWang
2024-015
Pleasecitethispaperas:
Haque,Sharjil,SimonMayer,andTengWang(2024).“HowPrivateEquityFuelsNon-BankLending,”FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries2024-015.Washington:BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,
/10.17016/FEDS.2024.015
.
NOTE:StafworkingpapersintheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(FEDS)arepreliminarymaterialscirculatedtostimulatediscussionandcriticalcomment.TheanalysisandconclusionssetfortharethoseoftheauthorsanddonotindicateconcurrencebyothermembersoftheresearchstafortheBoardofGovernors.ReferencesinpublicationstotheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(otherthanacknowledgement)shouldbeclearedwiththeauthor(s)toprotectthetentativecharacterofthesepapers.
HowPrivateEquityFuelsNon-BankLending*
SharjilHaquetSimonMayer?TengWang§
January26,2024
Abstract
Weshowhowprivateequity(PE)buyoutsfuelloansalesandnon-bankparticipa-tionintheU.S.syndicatedloanmarket.Combiningloan-leveldatafromtheSharedNationalCreditregisterwithbuyoutdealsfromPitchbook,wefindthatPE-backedloansfeaturelowerbankmonitoring,lowerloansharesretainedbytheleadbank,andmoreloansalestonon-bankfinancialintermediaries.ForPE-backedloans,thespon-sor’sreputationandthestrengthofitsrelationshipwiththeleadbankfurtherreducetheleadbank’sretainedshareandmonitoring.OurresultssuggestthatPEsponsorengagementsubstitutesforbankmonitoring,allowingbankstoretainlessskin-in-thegameintheloanstheyoriginateandtosellgreaterloansharestonon-banks.
Keywords:SyndicatedLoans;PrivateEquity;LBO;BankMonitoring;CLO;Securi-tization;LoanSales
JELCodes:G00;G10;G30;G32;G33;
*TheviewsexpressedinthispaperarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheFederalReserveBoardortheFederalReserveSystem.WeareespeciallygratefultoJohanCassel,QuirinFleckenstein,IvanIvanov,andRalfMeisenzahlfordetailedcomments.WewouldliketothankFernandoAvalos,BrunoBiais,YongqiangChu,HansDegryse,JenniferDlugosz,SebastianDoerr,MatthiasEfing,AndrewEllul,FiorelladeFiore,ThierryFoucault,LeonardoGambacorta,SebastianGryglewicz,SebastianHillenbrand,JohanHombert,C′edricHuylebroek,JessicaJeffers,MarcinKacperczyk,JohnKrainer,DavidMauer,DanielNeuhann,JacquesOlivier,StevenOngena,SophieRotermund,FarzadSaidi,AntoinetteSchoar,LukasSchmid,Hyun-SongShin,ChesterSpatt,JaredStanfield,AnnetteVissing-J?rgensen,MikeWeisbach,andKairongXiaoaswellasseminarandconferenceparticipantsattheFederalReserveSystemBankingConference,BIS,ParisDecemberFinanceMeeting2023,PERCConference2023,theFederalRe-serveBoard,KULeuven,andHECParisforusefulcommentsanddiscussions.WealsothankRobertCote
forfoS.rlaaque@
?CarnegieMellonUniversity,TepperSchoolofBusiness.Email:simonmay@§BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem.Email:teng.wang@
1
Tworecentcapitalmarkettrendsaretheriseofprivateequity(PE)andleveragedbuyouts(LBOs),andthegrowingparticipationofnon-bankfinancialintermediaries(suchasCLOsorprivatedebtfunds)increditmarkets,notably,theU.S.syndicatedloanmarket.Thesetwotrendsarenaturallyrelated,asLBOdealsarefinancedtoalargeextentwithsyndicatedloans(
ShivdasaniandWang,
2011)
.Importantly,bothbanks(specifically,leadbanksinsyndicatedlending)andPEsponsorsareactiveintermediaries.PEsponsorsconductduediligence,engagewiththemanagement,andinitiateoperationalorcapitalstructurechangesintheirportfoliocompanies(
KaplanandStromberg,
2009)
.Banksscreenandmonitorborrowers(
Gryglewicz,Mayer,andMorellec,
2024),whileretainingashareoftheloansthey
originatetomaintainsufficientincentives(
GortonandPennacchi,
1995
).
Thispapershowsthataloan’sPEbackingsubstitutesforbankmonitoring,allowingbankstoretainlessskin-in-the-gameintheloanstheyoriginateandtosellgreaterloansharestonon-bankfinancialintermediaries.RelativetocomparablenonPE-backedloans,PE-backedloansfeature(i)lowerbankmonitoring,(ii)lowerloansharesretainedbyleadbanks,and(iii)largerloansharesheldbynon-bankfinancialintermediaries(e.g.,CLOsorprivatedebtfunds).ForPE-backedloans,boththereputationofthePEsponsorandthestrengthofitsrelationshipwiththeleadbankcausefurtherreductionsinmonitoringandloansharesretainedbytheleadbank.OurfindingssuggestthatPEsponsors’actionsandengagementwithportfoliocompaniesreducetheleadbank’s(perceived)expectedlosses,hencereducingthenecessityofbankmonitoring.Overall,PEbuyoutsappeartostimulatenon-bankparticipation,liquidity,andloansalesinthesyndicatedloanmarket.
Forourempiricalanalysis,wecombineadministrativeloan-leveldatafromtheSharedNationalCredit(SNC)register,containingextensiveinformationaboutU.S.syndicatedloanswithaminimumcommitmentof$20Mn,withbuyoutdealsfromPitchbook,allowingustoidentifyPE-backedborrowersandloans.IntheSNCregister,theleadbank(orleadarranger)ofasyndicatedloanisrequiredtoreportdetailedinformationabouttheloan,includingloanownershipshares.Thus,ourcombineddataallowustoobserveloancharacteristics(includinginternalriskassessment),lenderidentity,collateral,leadbanks’estimatesofdefaultprobabilityandlossgivendefault,thedynamicsofbanks’andnon-bankintermediaries’loanownershipshares,andwhetheraloan/borrowerisPE-backed.
Crucially,bankexaminersobtainadditionalinformationforasubsampleofloans,whichallowsus,following
Gustafson,Ivanov,andMeisenzahl
(2021),toconstructatime-varying
measureofactivebankmonitoringusingtextualanalysis.Specifically,aloanisactivelymonitoredifthereisanaudit/inspection/appraisalbyabankinthesyndicateoranexternal
2
firmhiredbythelenders.Ourmeasureindicatesthat,inagivenyear,about20-25%oftheoutstandingloansareactivelymonitoredbybanks.Consistentwithmoralhazardinmonitoring,ahigherloanshareretainedbytheleadbank,referredtoasleadshare,isassociatedwithincreased(active)bankmonitoring.
Wedocumentthreenovelfacts.First,PE-backedloans(i.e.,loanstoPE-backedborrow-ers)aremonitoredlessthannon-PE-backedloans.Second,theleadbankretainsasmallerloanshare(i.e.,leadshare)andsellsagreatershareoftheloanwhentheloanisPE-backed.Themedianleadshareisabout20%forPE-backedloansand25%fornonPE-backedloans.Whenrestrictingthesampletotermloans(astheyaremorecommonlysoldthanotherloantypes(
Blickle,Fleckenstein,Hillenbrand,andSaunders,
2023)),wefindthattheme
-dianleadshareis13%forPE-backedtermloansand22%fornonPE-backedtermloans.Third,greaterloansharesaresoldtoandheldbynon-bankfinancialintermediaries(inshort,non-banks),whentheborrower/loanisPE-backed.Amongloanswithnon-zeronon-bankholdings,themedian(aggregate)loanshareheldbynon-banksiscloseto65%forPE-backedandabout23%fornonPE-backedloans.
Toguideourempiricalanalysis,wedevelopasimplemodelinwhicha(lead)bankoriginatesaloanthatitcanselltonon-bankinvestors.Thebankreducestheexpectedlossassociatedwiththeloan—thatis,theproductofdefaultprobability,lossgivendefault,andexposureatdefault—viamonitoring,butmonitoringiscostlyandsubjecttomoralhazard.Hence,monitoringincreaseswiththebank’sretainedloanshare(“l(fā)eadshare”),capturingitsskin-in-the-game.WeconsiderthatPEsponsors’actions(e.g.,duediligence,engagementwithmanagement,orgovernanceengineering)substituteforbankmonitoringincontainingcreditrisk,whichreducestheoptimallevelofmonitoringforPE-backedloans;ourempiricalanalysisvalidatesthisassumption.Thus,whenaloanisPE-backed,thebankrequireslessmonitoringincentivesviatheretentionofaloanshare.Insummary,themodelpredicts,inlinewithaforementionedempiricalfacts,thatPEsponsorengagementsubstitutesforbankmonitoring,therebyloweringleadshareandspurringloansalestonon-banks.
Motivatedbythetheory’spredictions,weregressourmeasureofbankmonitoring,theleadshare,andmeasuresofnon-bankparticipationonanindicator,capturingwhethertheloanisPE-backed.Wecontrolforloancharacteristics,includingloansize,loantype,matu-rity,utilizationrate,originationdate,andex-antemeasuresofcreditrisk.Additionally,weincludevariousfixedeffects,suchasborrowersector-time(i.e.,industry-time)andimpor-tantly(lead)bank-time.Thus,inourbaselineloan-levelregressions,weeffectivelycompare,atagivenpointintime,observablysimilarloansofthesametypeandsimilarrisklevelis-
3
suedbythesameleadbanktoPE-backedandnonPE-backedborrowersinthesamesector.OurfindingsrevealthatrelativetocomparablenonPE-backedloans,PE-backedloansareassociatedwithlowerbankmonitoringandleadshare,andmoreloansalestonon-banks.
Theeconomicmagnitudeimpliedbyourestimatesisparticularlysignificantwhenfocus-ingontermloans,whicharemorecommonlysoldthanotherloantypes.Fortermloans,aloan’sPEbackingisassociatedwithareductionintheleadsharebyabout2.5percentagepoints,whichcorrespondstoa11%reductionintheleadshare,givenamedianleadshareof22%fornonPE-backedtermloans.Whenassessingtheeffectofprivateequityonnon-bankparticipation,werestrictoursampletoloansthathavenon-zeronon-bankholdings,meaningthatweexcludeilliquidloantypesandloansthatarenotsold.Thesamplethenprimarilyconsistsoftermloans.WefindthatPE-backedloansfeatureapproximately10%highernon-bankparticipation,asmeasuredbythetotalloanshareheldbynon-banksorbyitsdollarvalue,relativetocomparablenon-PE-backedloans.
Accordingtoourtheoryanditsproposedmechanism,PEsponsorengagementshouldreducebankmonitoringandleadsharemoresignificantly,whentheleadbankhasgreaterexpectationsortrustinthesponsor’scapabilitiestosubstituteforitsmonitoring.Consistentwiththisidea,wefindthat(i)highsponsorreputation(basedonpastdeals)anda(ii)stronglender-sponsorrelationship(throughrepeatedlender-sponsorinteractionsinpastLBOdeals)areassociatedwithlowerbankmonitoringandleadshare.
Following
DemirogluandJames
(2010),wecreateameasureofPEsponsorreputation
basedonpastdealvolume.Intuitively,high-reputationsponsorsshouldbemoreexperienced,skilled,orlesscapital-constrained,enhancingtheircapabilitiestoreducethenecessityofbankmonitoringthroughtheirengagement.OurempiricalfindingsrevealthatrelativetootherPE-backedandnonPE-backedloans,loansbackedbyhigh-reputationsponsorsfeaturelowermonitoringandleadshare.AmongPE-backedtermloans,highsponsorreputationisassociatedwithareductioninleadsharebyabout6percentagepoints,whichiseconomicallylargegivenamedianleadshareofabout13%forPE-backedtermloans.
PEsponsorsandlendersofteninteractrepeatedlyinbuyoutdeals,creatingalender-sponsorrelationship(
MalenkoandMalenko,
2015
).Intuitively,astronglender-sponsorrelationshipshouldmitigatelender-sponsorinformationasymmetriesorinducethesponsortoperformactionsthatsubstituteformonitoring.Consequently,thisshouldreducetheleadbank’smonitoringandretainedshare.Totestthishypothesis,wedeviseforagivenlender-sponsorpaira(binary)measureofthestrengthoftheirrelationship.Thismeasureisbasedontheirinteractionsinpastbuyoutdealsand,moreconcretely,onthepasttotal(dollar)
4
loancommitmentsofthelendertofirmsbackedbythesponsor(
IvashinaandKovner,
2011
).Inourloan-levelregressions,weregressourmeasureofmonitoringandleadshareonthemeasureoflender-sponsorrelationshipstrength,whilecontrollingforloancharacteristicsandincludingvariousfixedeffects.Inparticular,weincludefirm-timefixedeffects(
Khwajaand
Mian
,
2008
)toeffectivelycompareataspecificpointintimeobservablysimilarloanstothesamePE-backedborrowermadebydistinctlenders,whodifferintheirrelationshipwiththesponsor.Asfirm-timefixedeffectsaccountforanytime-varyingborrowercharacteristics,includingitsPEbacking,wesidestepissuesrelatedtothenon-randomselectionofPEtargetsandidentifytheeffectsoflender-sponsorrelationshipsonloan-specificoutcomevariables.
OurfindingsconfirmthatforPE-backedloans,astrongerlender-sponsorrelationshipisassociatedwithbothlowermonitoringandleadshare,andaccordinglymoreloansalestonon-banks.AmongPE-backedtermloans,astronglender-sponsorrelationshipcausesareductioninleadsharebyabout6percentagepoints;givenamedianleadshareof13%forPE-backedtermloans,theeconomicmagnitudeislarge.Onecanviewthestrengthofthelender-sponsorrelationshipasameasureoftheintensivemargineffectsofaloan’sPEbacking.Intuitively,alendershouldexpecttheactionsofaPEsponsortomoresignificantlyreducetheneedforitsmonitoringwhenastrongrelationshipwiththesponsorismaintained.Underthisinterpretation,ourresultsshowthataloan’sPEbackingreducesmonitoringandleadshareontheintensivemargin.ThisalsosuggeststhatourbaselinefindingsontheeffectsofprivateequityontheextensivemargindonotmerelyreflectselectionofPEtargetsand,tosomepart,capturethe(causal)effectsofPEsponsorengagement.
Inourtheory,PEsponsors’actionsincreasetheexpectedrecoveryvalueoftheloanandreducebanks’expectedlosses.This,inturn,lowerstheleadbank’sperceivedex-antecreditriskandcurbsitsmonitoringefforts.Empirically,weconfirmthatPE-backedloansareassociatedwithbothlower(i)lossgivendefault,whichisinverselyrelatedtoaloan’srecoveryrate,and(ii)expectedlossesforlenders.Aloan’sexpectedlossistheproductoftheleadbank’sestimatesofprobabilityofdefault,lossgivendefault,andexposureatdefault.ThesequantitiesarereportedbytheleadbankintheSNCdatabaseandthuscaptureitsexpectationsabout(ex-ante)creditrisk.Ourfindingssuggestthatlendersperceive(andreport)lowerex-antecreditriskandexpectedlossesforPE-backedloans.
AlthoughPE-backedloansareassociatedwithlowermeasuresofex-antecreditrisk,theycouldstillperformworseex-post.Interestingly,wefindthatPE-backedloanstendtodefaultmoreoftenthannonPE-backedloans,buttheseeffectsvanishoncewecontrolforaloan’sex-anteprobabilityofdefaultorfirmfixedeffects.WhencomparingPE-andnonPE-backed
5
loanswithsimilarex-antecreditrisk,wedonotfindanysignificantdifferencesindefaultrates.Theworseex-postperformanceofPE-backedloansseemsthereforeattributabletoselectionandnotrelatedtoPEsponsors’engagementassuch.
ProvidedthatPEsponsorengagementsubstitutesforbankmonitoring,theseeffectsshouldbestrongerforloansthatareriskierandmoreinformation-sensitive.Totestthishypothesis,wefollow
Gustafsonetal.
(2021)andusecollateralinformationintheSNCdata
toidentifyloansbackedbyvolatilecollateral(suchasaccountsreceivable,inventories,andsecurities).Allelseequal,theseloansshouldberiskierandmoreinformation-sensitiveandsorequiremoremonitoring.Asexpected,wefindthatthenegativeassociationbetweenaloan’sPEbackingandbankmonitoringisstrongerforloansbackedbyvolatilecollateral.Thisobservationlendsfurthersupporttothemechanismproposedinourtheory.
Ourtheoryalsopredictsthatthesensitivityofmonitoringtoleadsharereflectstheseverityofthemoralhazardproblemregardingbankmonitoring.WeshowthatPE-backedloansareassociatedwithbothlowermonitoringandalowersensitivityofmonitoringtoleadshare.ThisfindingindicatesthatPE-backedloansfeaturelessseveremoralhazardandasymmetricinformationproblemsinloansales.Consequently,PEsponsorsappeartostimulateloansalesbymitigatingmoralhazardandasymmetricinformationinloansales.
Whilealoan’sPEbackingreducesactivebankmonitoring,itcouldbethatPE-backedloansaresimplymonitoredinadifferentway,i.e.,viacovenants(
WangandXia,
2014)
.Importantly,wedonotfindevidencethatforPE-backedloans,thereismorecovenant-basedmonitoringorthatcovenant-basedmonitoringsubstitutesforactivebankmonitoring.Inparticular,PE-backedtermloansevenhavealowernumberofcovenantsandaremoreoftencov-litethancomparablenonPE-backedloans,whilethedifferenceislesspronouncedforcreditlines.ThissuggeststhatthereislessoverallmonitoringforPE-backedloans.
Finally,wehighlighttherobustnessofourfindingsbyemployingcoarsenedexactmatch-ing(CEM),as,e.g,in
Davis,Haltiwanger,Handley,Jarmin,Lerner,andMiranda
(2014).We
matchPE-backedandnonPE-backedloansthataresimilaralongvariousloancharacteristics(loansize,collateraltype,collateralvaluation,maturity,loanrisk)andfirmcharacteristics(industryandlocation).Ourkeyfindingsremainrobustinthematchedsampleanalysis,inthataloan’sPEbackingisassociatedwithbothlowermonitoringandleadshare(i.e.,moreloansalestonon-banks).Inaddition,wedemonstratethatourresultsremainrobusttocontrollingfortheleadbank’sestimateoftheloan’sprobabilityofdefault.Interestingly,whenincludingtheestimatedprobabilityofdefaultinourregression,wefindthatriskierloansareassociatedwithincreasedmonitoringandahigherleadshare,i.e.,fewerloansales.
RelatedLiterature.First,ourworkcontributestotheextensiveliteratureonsyndicated
lendingandloansales.
Sufi
(2007)and
Ivashina
(
2009
)showthattheretentionbytheleadarrangermitigatesasymmetricinformationproblemsinsyndicatedlending
.1
Recentempiricalstudieshighlightthatbankssellsyndicatedloansafterorigination(
Druckerand
Puri
,
2009
;
BordandSantos,
2012;
IraniandMeisenzahl,
2017;
Irani,Iyer,Meisenzahl,and
Peydro
,
2021;
Blickleetal.,
2023;
Chen,Lee,Neuhann,andSaidi,
2023).
Chernenko,Erel,
andPrilmeier
(2022)and
Jang
(2023)studynon-bankdirectlenders
.Non-bankfinancialintermediariesbuysyndicatedloansinthesecondarymarket(
IvashinaandScharfstein,
2010;
Lee,Li,Meisenzahl,andSicilian,
2019;
Lee,Liu,andStebunovs,
2022)
.Related,
Berlin,
Nini,andEdison
(2020)and
Beyhaghi,Nguyen,andWald
(2019)identifyfactorsthathave
contributedtotheriseofnon-banklending,while
Fleckenstein,Gopal,GutierrezGallardo,
andHillenbrand
(2020),
Fleckenstein
(2022),and
Aldasoro,Doerr,andZhou
(2022)focuson
itscyclicality.Theimplicationsofloansalesandsecuritizationonleadbankincentivesandloantermsarestudiedempiricallyin
Benmelech,Dlugosz,andIvashina
(2012),
Bordand
Santos
(2012),
NadauldandWeisbach
(2012),and
WangandXia
(2014),andtheoreticallyin
Gryglewiczetal.
(2024).2
Bruche,Malherbe,andMeisenzahl
(2020)analyzepipelineriskin
loansyndication.Wecontributetothisliteraturebyshowingthatprivateequitystimulatesloansalesandnon-bankparticipationinthemarketforsyndicatedloans.
Ourworkalsorelatestotheliteratureonbankmonitoring,pioneeredbyseminalthe-oreticalwork(see,e.g.,
Diamond
(
1984
)).
Gustafsonetal.
(
2021
)constructameasureofactivebankmonitoringandshowthatmonitoringincreaseswithleadshare,while
Kundu,
Jiang,andXu
(2023)identifylenders’rentextractionduringrenegotiationasamonitor
-ingincentivemechanism.
Cerqueiro,Ongena,andRoszbach
(2016)analyzetherelationship
betweencollateralvaluesandmonitoring.
Heitz,Martin,andUfier
(2022)studythede
-terminantsofbankmonitoringforconstructionloans.
WeitznerandBeyhaghi
(2022)and
Claessens,Ongena,andWang
(2023)provideevidenceforbankinformationproduction,
e.g.,viamonitoring.
WeitznerandHowes
(
2021
)analyzethecyclicalityofbankinforma-tionproduction.
Wang
(2019)demonstratesthatlocalinformationaffectsbanks’decisions
toexpandthroughM&Aorbranching,whichinturnimpactslendingoutcomes.
Blickle,
1Theoreticalworkpredictsthatinsyndicatedlending,theleadarranger(orleadbank)retainsashare
oftheloantomaintainsufficientincentivestoscreenandmonitoringborrowers(see,e.g.,(Diamond,1984;
HolmstromandTirole,1997;Hartman-Glaser,Piskorski,andTchistyi,2012;Gryglewiczetal.,2024))orto
mitigateasymmetricinformationproblemsassociatedwithloansales(Fuchs,Gottardi,andMoreira,2022).
2Focusingonmortgagemarkets,Keys,Mukherjee,Seru,andVig(2010),Purnanandam(2011),Demiroglu
andJames(2012),andBegleyandPurnanandam(2017)study,amongothers,theeffectsofskin-in-the-game,
securitization,andloansalesonoriginatorincentivesandmortgagequality.
6
7
Parlatore,andSaunders
(2021)findthatbanksspecializeandgainindustry-specificinfor
-mationaffectingloantermsandperformance.WeaddtotheliteratureonbankmonitoringandinformationproductionbyshowingthatPEsponsors’actionssubstituteforbankmon-itoringandinformationproduction.Abroaderimplicationisthat,withtheriseofprivateequity,informationproductioninprivatemarketsmayshiftfrombanks(traditionally,themostimportantfinanciersforprivatefirms)towardPEinvestors.
Weaddtotheliteratureontheeffectsofprivateequity.
Axelson,Jenkinson,Str¨omberg,
andWeisbach
(2013)studythedeterminantsofbuyoutleverage.
Fahlenbrach,Rotermund,
andSteffen
(2023)analyzehowLBOfundingstructurechangedaftertheglobalfinancial
crisis.
KaplanandStromberg
(2009)andrecenttheoriesonprivateequity(Malenkoand
Malenko
,
2015;
GryglewiczandMayer,
2022)highlightthatPEsponsorsaffectfirmvalue
andoutcomesthroughoperational,governance,andfinancialengineering
.3
Ivashinaand
Kovner
(2011),
DemirogluandJames
(2010),
ShiveandForster
(2021),
Achleitner,Braun,
Hinterramskogler,andTappeiner
(2012),and
HaqueandKleymenova
(2023)examinehow
PEsponsorsandtheirreputationaffectthetermsofdebtfinancinganddebtcovenants(andtheirviolation)inLBOs.WecontributebyshowingthatPEsponsorengagementreducesexpectedlossesforlendersandthereforesubstitutesforbankmonitoring.
1DataandFacts
Inthissection,wedescribeourdatasources.Wealsoestablishnovelempiricalfactsabouthowbankmonitoring,loansalesandnon-bankparticipationdifferacrossPE-backedandnonPE-backedloans.Inwhatfollows,weusethetermbank,lender,orleadbankinter-changeably.Appendix
A
presentsanoverviewofthevariabledefinitions.
SNCDatabase.Ourprimarydataisloan-leveldatafromtheSharedNationalCredit(SNC)register,whichismaintainedbytheBoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSys-tem,theFederalDepositInsuranceCorporation,andtheOfficeoftheComptrolleroftheCurrency.ThedataprovidesinformationforallsyndicatedloansintheU.S.withamini-mumtotalcommitmentof$20millionandatleastthreefederallysupervisedinstitutionsparticipatinginthesyndicate.Theadministrativeagentofaloan—-theleadarranger
3AlargeempiricalliteraturethenstudiestheeffectsofPEsponsors’actionsonfirmoutcomesandvaluecreation(see,amongothers,
Boucly,Sraer,andThesmar
(2011);
CronqvistandFahlenbrach
(2013);
Harford
andKolasinski
(2014);
BernsteinandSheen
(2016);
Antoni,Maug,andObernberger
(2019);
Aldatmazand
Brown
(2020);
Cohn,Hotchkiss,andTowery
(2022);
Fracassi,Previtero,andSheen
(2022))
.
8
orleadbank—isrequiredtoreportdetailedinformationabouttheloanatregularinter-
vals.Inparticular,itreportstheleadshare(i.e.,theloanshareheldbytheleadbank),theloansharesheldbyallmembersandbanksofaloansyndicate,andtheloanshares
heldbynon-bankfinancialintermediaries.4
TheSNCdatacontaindetailedinformationonlenderidentity,loanterms,loantype,maturity,loanoriginationdate,borrowercharacter-istics,collateral,andloanshares.WeemphasizethattheSNCdatadonotreportloanspreadsorfirm-levelfinancialinformationinasystematicway,sotheyarenotavailableforouranalysis;importantly,neitherloanspreadsnorfirmfinancialinformationarenecessaryforourresearchquestion
.5
Inaddition,aseparatescheduleofSNCdatacontainsinfor-mationonloancovenantsandcovenantcompliance.Ofparticularinterestforouranalysisistheso-calledleadarrangershareorleadshare,whichwedenoteforloanlattimetbyLeadSharel,t.Theleadshareistheshareoftheloan(commitment)retainedbytheleadbank.Itthuscapturestheleadbank’sexposuretoloanperformanceandskin-in-the-game,whichdeterminestheleadbank’smonitoringincentives.Notethattheleadbankistypicallyinchargeofscreeningandmonitoring(
Gustafsonetal.,
2021
),whereasothermembersofthesyndicatetypicallytakeamorepassiverole.Importantly,foragivenloan,weobservetheleadshareateveryreportdatebeforematurity,i.e.,atseve
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年超額保險(xiǎn)合同賠付限制
- 2025版城市更新改造項(xiàng)目投標(biāo)承諾書規(guī)范范本3篇
- 2025版木雕工藝品制作木工分包合同范本4篇
- 2025版企業(yè)銷售業(yè)務(wù)員合作協(xié)議范本3篇
- 2025年度豬圈建造與農(nóng)業(yè)循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)合同4篇
- 二零二五版電影院裝修升級(jí)合同范本3篇
- 2025版學(xué)校教師聘用合同范本:職稱晉升條款詳解3篇
- 2025年度體育場(chǎng)館草坪鋪設(shè)與維護(hù)服務(wù)合同4篇
- 2025年度貨車司機(jī)勞動(dòng)合同(附交通事故責(zé)任及賠償)
- 2025年度智能科技股權(quán)眾籌協(xié)議書模板
- 高考語(yǔ)文復(fù)習(xí)【知識(shí)精研】《千里江山圖》高考真題說(shuō)題課件
- 河北省承德市2023-2024學(xué)年高一上學(xué)期期末物理試卷(含答案)
- 高中物理斜面模型大全(80個(gè))
- 012主要研究者(PI)職責(zé)藥物臨床試驗(yàn)機(jī)構(gòu)GCP SOP
- 農(nóng)耕研學(xué)活動(dòng)方案種小麥
- 2024年佛山市勞動(dòng)合同條例
- 污水管網(wǎng)規(guī)劃建設(shè)方案
- 城鎮(zhèn)智慧排水系統(tǒng)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 采購(gòu)管理制度及流程采購(gòu)管理制度及流程
- 五年級(jí)美術(shù)下冊(cè)第9課《寫意蔬果》-優(yōu)秀課件4人教版
- 節(jié)能降耗課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論