




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
PUBLICVERSUSPRIVATE
INVESTMENTMULTIPLIERSINEMERGINGMARKETANDDEVELOPINGECONOMIES
CROSS-COUNTRYANALYSISWITHAFOCUSONASIA
Jo?oTovarJalles,DonghyunPark,andIrfanQureshi
NO.737
ADBECONOMICS
August2024
WORKINGPAPERSERIES
ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK
ADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries
PublicversusPrivateInvestmentMultipliers
inEmergingMarketandDevelopingEconomies:Cross-CountryAnalysiswithaFocusonAsia
Jo?oTovarJalles,DonghyunPark,andIrfanQureshi
No.737|August2024
TheADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries
presentsresearchinprogresstoelicitcommentsandencouragedebateondevelopmentissuesinAsiaandthePacific.Theviewsexpressed
arethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesofADBor
itsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
Jo?oTovarJalles(joaojalles@)isaseniorassociateprofessorofeconomicsattheUniversityofLisbon.DonghyunPark(dpark@)
isaneconomicadvisorattheEconomicResearchandDevelopmentImpactDepartment,
AsianDevelopmentBank(ADB).IrfanQureshi
(iqureshi@)isapublicmanagementspecialistintheSectorsGroupofADB.
ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK
CreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)
?2024AsianDevelopmentBank
6ADBAvenue,MandaluyongCity,1550MetroManila,PhilippinesTel+63286324444;Fax+63286362444
Somerightsreserved.Publishedin2024.
ISSN2313-6537(print),2313-6545(PDF)PublicationStockNo.WPS240372-2
DOI:
/10.22617/WPS240372-2
TheviewsexpressedinthispublicationarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesoftheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)oritsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
ADBdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracyofthedataincludedinthispublicationandacceptsnoresponsibilityforany
consequenceoftheiruse.ThementionofspecificcompaniesorproductsofmanufacturersdoesnotimplythattheyareendorsedorrecommendedbyADBinpreferencetoothersofasimilarnaturethatarenotmentioned.
Bymakinganydesignationoforreferencetoaparticularterritoryorgeographicareainthisdocument,ADBdoesnotintendtomakeanyjudgmentsastothelegalorotherstatusofanyterritoryorarea.
ThispublicationisavailableundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)
/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
.Byusingthecontentofthispublication,youagreetobeboundbythetermsofthislicense.Forattribution,translations,adaptations,andpermissions,pleasereadtheprovisionsandtermsofuseat
/terms-use#openaccess
.
ThisCClicensedoesnotapplytonon-ADBcopyrightmaterialsinthispublication.Ifthematerialisattributed
toanothersource,pleasecontactthecopyrightownerorpublisherofthatsourceforpermissiontoreproduceit.ADBcannotbeheldliableforanyclaimsthatariseasaresultofyouruseofthematerial.
Pleasecontactpubsmarketing@ifyouhavequestionsorcommentswithrespecttocontent,orifyouwishtoobtaincopyrightpermissionforyourintendedusethatdoesnotfallwithintheseterms,orforpermissiontousetheADBlogo.
CorrigendatoADBpublicationsmaybefoundat
/publications/corrigenda
.
ABSTRACT
Thispaperanalyzesthegrowthimpactofpublicandprivateinvestmentshocksbasedon
alargesampleofemerginganddevelopingcountriesovertheperiod1980–2021withaparticularfocusontheAsianregion.Wedevelopnewmeasuresofinvestmentshocksbasedoncyclicallyadjustedinvestmentdata.Estimationsusinglocalprojectionssuggestthatpublicinvestmentshocksplayamuchgreaterroleinboostingeconomicgrowthincomparisonwithprivateinvestmentshocks.Inemergingmarketanddevelopingeconomies(EMDEs)(includinginAsia),thegrowthresponsetoinvestmentshocksispositiveandmuchstrongerinrecessionsrelativetoeconomicexpansions.Finally,publicinvestmentshocksinEMDEandAsiansamplescrowd-inprivateinvestmentandprivateconsumption.
Keywords:fiscalmultipliers,publicinvestment,privateinvestmentJELcodes:C33,E22,H30,H50
1.Introduction
Publicinvestmentisconsideredoneofthekeypolicyleverstofostereconomicgrowth,particularlyinemergingmarketanddevelopingeconomies(EMDEs),asitplaysavitalroleindevelopinginfrastructure,suchasroadsandutilities,whichiscriticalforreducingtransactioncostsandimprovingefficiency(WorldBank2017).Italsoaddressesthemarketfailureofunder-investmentinareaswheretheprivatesectormayhesitatetoinvestduetohighrisksorlowprivatereturns.Moreover,governmentinvestmentinhealth,education,andsocialservicesispivotalforbuildinghumancapital,akeyingredientforaproductiveworkforceandsustainableeconomicgrowth.
Ontheotherhand,privateinvestmentisdrivenbyprofitmotive,withefficiencyandinnovationleadingtoenhancedproductivityandcompetitiveness.Privateinvestmentinnewventuresandexpansionprojectscreatesjobsandincreasesincomes,which,inturn,stimulatefurtherconsumptionandinvestment.Additionally,privateinvestmentplaysasignificantroleinthedevelopmentoffinancialmarkets,improvingaccesstofinanceandfosteringmoreinvestments.DeGregorio(1992)hasshownitspositiveimpactoneconomicgrowththroughmechanismslikecapitalaccumulationandefficiencygains.
Againstthisbackdrop,itisnotsurprisingthatalargeeconomicliteraturehasemergedtoevaluatethemacroeconomiceffectsofinvestmentingeneralandpublicinvestmentinparticular.First,publicinvestmentinbuildingandmaintainingkeyinfrastructuresuchasroads,bridges,ports,airports,andenergyfacilitiesisessential.Thisinfrastructurereducestransportationcosts,improvesconnectivity,andenhancestheoverallbusinessenvironment.Forexample,theextensivehigh-speedrailnetwork
2
expansionofthePeople’sRepublicofChina(PRC)hasnotonlyimprovedconnectivitybutalsospurredeconomicactivityacrossthecountry(Liu,Niu,andHan2019).
Second,publicinvestmentineducationandhealthcarecontributesgreatlytohumancapitaldevelopment.Suchinvestmentsenhancethequalityandproductivityoftheworkforce,contributingtoeconomicgrowth(HanushekandWoessmann2012).PublicinvestmentsineducationplayedamajorroleinfosteringahighlyskilledlaborforceandinnovationinhighlysuccessfulAsiancountriessuchastheRepublicofKorea.
Third,publicinvestmentbenefitstechnologyandinnovation.GovernmentsacrossAsiahaverecognizedtheimportanceofsupportingtechnology-intensiveindustriesthroughresearchgrantsandsubsidies(AsianDevelopmentBank[ADB]2018).ThisapproachhelpedcountriessuchasSingaporebecomeglobaltechnologyhubs.
Fourth,publicinvestmentcanstrategicallyaddressregionaldisparities.Bypromotingthedevelopmentofless-developedareas,itcanalleviatepoverty,stimulateeconomicactivity,andreducerural–to–urbanmigration(WorldBank2016).Forinstance,India'sinvestmentinruralinfrastructureandemploymentgenerationprogramsaimstoaddressregionalimbalances.
Fifth,inaneraofclimatechangeanddisasters,publicinvestmentindisasterpreparedness,environmentalsustainability,andcleanenergyinfrastructureisessentialforlong-termsustainabledevelopment.Asianeconomiesincreasinglyacknowledgetheimportanceofinvestinginrenewableenergysourcesandclimateresiliencemeasures(ADB2017).
Sixth,publicinvestmentactsasacatalystforprivatesectordevelopment.Governmentscaninvestinvitalinfrastructureorprovideincentivesforprivatefirms,
3
encouragingthemtoinvest,expand,andcreatejobs(WooandKumar2015).Thissynergybetweenpublicandprivateinvestmentcanbeapowerfuldriverofeconomicdevelopment.
Seventh,publicinvestmentinsocialsafetynets,healthcare,andeducationdirectlyimpactspovertyreductionbyimprovinglivingstandardsandcreatingopportunitiesfordisadvantagedgroups(Koseetal.2017).ProgramslikeconditionalcashtransfersincountrieslikeIndonesiaandthePhilippineshavedemonstratedthepoverty-reductionpotentialofpublicinvestment.
Finally,asAsianeconomiesheavilyrelyoninternationaltrade,publicinvestmentintrade-relatedinfrastructure,suchasportsandlogisticsfacilities,enhancesanation'sabilitytoengageinglobaltradeandattractforeigninvestment(ADB2018).Examplesincludethedevelopmentofexport-processingzonesinBangladeshandthePRC.
Theempiricalestimatesofpublicinvestmentmultipliersreportedtodate,however,differsignificantly,dependingonthesampleofcountriesandtimelineinvestigated,estimationmethodology,incorporationofnon-lineareffects,andfiscalshockidentificationstrategies(Section2).Themainprobleminperformingsuchresearchrestsinthedifficultyofidentifyingexogenouschangesinpublicspendingthatareuncorrelatedwithcontemporaneousmacroeconomicshocks.
Consideringthesecaveats,weaimtocontributetothisliteratureinseveralways.First,weuseupdateddataonpublic(andprivate)investmentcoveringalargesampleof98EMDEs,including20Asianeconomies,overalong-timespan,from1980to2021.Previousgeneralizationsofresearchthatonlylookedatsamplesofemergingmarketeconomiesto“developingcountries”weremisleading.Ourresultsarethusbasedona
4
broader,moreheterogeneoussampleofcountriesandoveralongertimespancomparedtopreviousstudies,whicheitherfocusedonspecificgeographicalregions,singlecountries,orovershorterandlessrecenttimehorizons.Interalia,ourbroadersampleallowsustoexploreheterogeneityacrossEMDEs.Second,weintroduceanewapproachtomeasuringspendingshocksforpublic(andprivate)investment.Underthisapproach,weconstructameasureofcyclicallyadjustedrealpublicinvestment(CAPubI)andcyclicallyadjustedrealprivateinvestment(CAPriI).Spendingshockscanthenbemeasuredaslargedeviationsfromthevariationinthesevariables.
Afteridentificationoftheinvestmentshocks,weusethelocalprojectionsapproachofJordà(2005)totraceouttheshort-andmedium-runresponsesofrealgrossdomesticproduct(GDP).Analysesbasedonlocalprojectionsindicatethatpublicinvestmentshocksenhanceeconomicgrowthsignificantlymorethanprivateinvestmentshocks.InEMDEs,particularlyinAsia,theimpactofinvestmentshocksongrowthismorepronouncedandpositiveduringdownturnsthanupturns.Moreover,inEMDEsoverallandespeciallyAsianEMDEs,publicinvestmentshockstendtostimulatebothprivateinvestmentandconsumption.
Therestofthepaperisstructuredasfollows.Section2reviewstheempiricalliterature,withanemphasisoncross-countrystudiesdiscussingtheassociationbetweenpublicandprivateinvestmentshocksandmacroeconomicconditions.Section3presentstheframeworkfortheidentificationofpublicandprivateinvestmentshocks,discussesthedataandestimationmethodology,andcomparesourapproachtothatofpreviousscholarlywork.Section4reportsthestylizedfactswhileSection5presentstheempiricalresults.Section6concludes.
5
2.LiteratureReview
Theresearchongovernmentspendingmultipliersand,moregenerally,fiscalmultipliers,
isvoluminous(Batinietal.2014;Galí2020;GhassibeandZanetti2022;Barnichon,Debortolo,andMatthes2022).Ourpaperismostcloselyrelatedtotheliteraturethatestimatesgovernmentspendingmultipliersforpublicinvestment.1Whileestimatesvaryfromstudytostudy,thereappearstobeanemergingconsensusthatpublicinvestmentmultipliersarelargerthanpublicconsumptionmultipliers,owingtotheformer’spositiveimpactontheproductivityoflaborandprivatecapital,aswellastheproductivecapacityoftheeconomyoverthemediumterm.
Inthisrespect,andconsistentwiththislineofargument,theearlyliteratureontheimpactofpublicinvestmentoneconomicgrowthwasmodeledinthecontextoftheendogenousgrowthframeworkinBarro(1990),BarroandSala-i-Martin(1992),Futagami,Morita,andShibata(1993),GlommandRavikumar(1994),andTurnovsky
(1997).2Theimplicationsofpublicinvestmentforgrowthanddevelopmenthavealsobeenmodeledwithmorecompleximpactchannels,includingmodelsincorporatingforeignaidandaid-fundedpublicinvestment(AdamandBevan2006;Cerra,Tekin,andTurnovsky2008;Berg,Gottschalk,etal.2010;Berg,Mirzoev,etal.2010;ChatterjeeandTurnovsky2007),infrastructurenetworks(Agénor2010),andpublicdebtaccumulation(Buffieetal.2012;Greiner,Semmler,andGong2005;Greiner2007),anddynamic
1Furcerietal.(2022),forexample,useprojectionsfromIMFWorldEconomicOutlookpublicationstomeasurepublicinvestmentshocksasthedifferencebetweenthegrowthrateofactualrealpublicinvestmentandtheratefromanalysts’forecastasofOctoberofthesameyear.
2SeealsoGramlich(1994)forareviewoftheearlierliteratureonpublicinvestmentanditsmacroeconomicimplications.
6
stochasticgeneralequilibrium(DSGE)modelsthatendogenizepublicsectorinefficiencies(GanelliandTervala2020).
Thegrowingavailabilityofdatahasfacilitatedthesurgeinempiricalstudiesinvestigatingtheinvestment-growthnexus.PereiraandAndraz(2013),RompandDeHaan(2007)andBomandLigthart(2014)providecomprehensiveoverviewsoftheliteratureestimatingthegrowtheffectsofpublicinvestment.BomandLigthart(2014)reportthattheestimatesoftheoutputelasticityofpubliccapitalrangewidely,from–1.7to2.04,withtheaverageelasticityvalueof0.106.Inalargesampleof102developingcountriesovertheperiod1970–2010,Kraay(2014)findthatthe1-yearspendingmultiplierisreasonablypreciselyestimatedtobearound0.4.Related,Gbohoui
(2021)investigatehowincreasesinpublicinvestmenthavelargerandlonger-lastingeffectsonoutput,investment,andemployment,withmultipliersabove2duringperiodsofhighuncertainty.
TheempiricalliteratureonpublicinvestmentmultipliersinEMDEsismorelimitedbutalsofindssignificantgrowthimpactsofpublicinvestmentintheshortandmediumrun(Furcerietal.2022,Miyamotoetal.2020).Ramey(2019)reviewsestimatesoffiscalmultipliersintheliterature,mostlyforadvancedeconomies,andreportsthattheytendtofallintherangeof0.6to1.Despiteheterogeneityinestimationmethodsacrossstudies,DeJongetal.(2017)noteseveralcommonresults.First,publiccapitalcontributespositivelytooutput,witharelativelystrongerimpactofcoreinfrastructuresuchasroads,railways,andtelecommunications.Second,theaggregatecountry-levelimpactofpublicinvestmentisstrongincomparisonwithintra-countryregionalimpacts,implyingsignificantspilloverandnetworkeffectsacrossregionsofacountry.Third,theimpactof
7
publiccapitalongrowthmaydeclineovertime.EconometricandDSGE-basedestimatesalsoconsistentlyfindthatpublicinvestmentmultipliersarelargerthanthoseforgovernmentconsumption(Coenen,Straub,andTrabandt2012,AuerbachandGorodnichenko2013,LeducandWilson2012,EdenandKraay2014,Calderonetal.2015,Furcerietal.2022,Izquierdoetal.2019,GanelliandTervala2020).
GivenAsia’schangingdynamics,includingincreasingopenness,theriseofmanufacturing,andshiftingeconomicstructures,theregionmightprovideinterestinginsightsintotherelationshipbetweenpublicinvestmentandgrowth.Inthisconnection,GaoandZhang(2018)assessedfiscalpolicy,greengrowth,andtheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsinAsiaandthePacific.Atabroaderlevel,Clements,Sanjeev,andJalles(2022)discusshowfiscalpolicycanhelpfostermoreinclusivegrowthindevelopingAsia,lookingbothviaacomparativeanalysiswithLatinAmericaandalsothroughdifferenttypesofspending.Thepaperfindsthateliminatinginefficienciesinhealth,education,andpublicinvestmentwouldgeneratetheequivalentof3%ofGDP.Curtailingfossilfuelsubsidiescouldalsogenerateresourcesformoreredistributivespending.Heshmati,Kim,andPark(2015)contendthatAsiancountriesemployedfiscalpolicytostrengthenthefundamentalsformacroeconomicstabilityand,asaresult,economicgrowthbyavoidingbudgetdeficits.
FiscalpolicyhasalsocontributedtoAsianprosperitythroughmassiveexpendituresingrowth-promotinginfrastructureandeducation,whichhaveincreasedthestockofphysicalandhumancapital.Somecountry-specificstudiesexaminetheimpactofpublicinvestmentmultipliersinvariousAsiannations.Ilzetzki,Mendoza,andVégh
(2013)exploredthesizeoffiscalmultipliersofthePRC.
8
TheIndianexperiencewithpublicinvestmentanditseffectsoneconomicgrowthhasbeenasubjectofinterest.AMallick(2016)studyshocksingovernmentinvestmentonprivateinvestmentandnationalincome,focusingonthe“crowding-in”or“crowding-out”effectinIndia.Theanalysisfindsevidenceofacrowding-outimpactofgovernmentspending,mostlyowingtothenon-infrastructurecomponent.Privateinvestmenthasagreaterimpactonincomethaneitherformofgovernmentalinvestment.Intheshortandmediumrun,theinfrastructurecomponentofpublicinvestmenthasagreaterimpactonincomethanthenon-infrastructurecomponentdoes.However,governmentinvestmentinnon-infrastructureremaineddominantintheinfrastructurecomponent.RangarajanandSrivastava(2008)examinedfiscalpolicyandeconomicgrowthinIndia.
VariousstudiesinvestigatetheimpactofJapanesepublicinvestment.Forinstance,FurukawaandNaoi(2016)examinedthemacroeconomicimpactofpublicinvestmentonJapan'sregionaleconomies.ChoiandSon(2016)investigatehowexpansionarygovernmentspendingshocksintheRepublicofKoreainfluencedGDPgrowthsincethe1980sthroughthelensesoftime-varyingparameterstructuralvectorautoregression(TVP-SVAR)approach.Haughton,Jitsuchon,andRukumnuaykit(2016)examinetheeffectivenessofThailand'spolicyresponsetotheglobalfinancialcrisis,focusinginparticularongovernmentspending.
Theobservedheterogeneityintheestimatesofgovernmentspendingmultipliersacrosscountriespromptedadditionalempiricalinquiryintothefactorsthatcanexplainthesedifferences.Therecouldbeseveralnonlinearitiesatplay.Inasynthesisreview,Izquierdoetal.(2019)notethatcyclicalconditions,exchangerateflexibility,debtlevels,monetarypolicystance,publicinvestmentefficiency,institutions,andtradeopennessare
9
importantdeterminantsofthesizeofmultipliers.Furthermore,theliteratureclearlypointstolargerfiscalmultipliersduringrecessions(AuerbachandGorodnichenko2012a,2012b,and2013;Riera-Crichton,Vegh,andVuletin2015;alsothemeta-analysisinGechertandRannenberg2018);duringperiodsofeasiermonetarypolicy(Christiano,Eichenbaum,andRebelo2011;Coenenetal.2012);incountrieswithfixedexchangerateregimes(Ilzetzki,Mendoza,andVégh2013);inlow-debtcountries(Ilzetzki,Mendoza,andVégh2013;Huidrometal.2020);andcountrieslessopentotrade(Ilzetzki,Mendoza,andVégh2013;Gonzalez-Garcia,Lemus,andMrkaic2013).
Inaddition,recentempiricalevidencesuggeststhatthesizeoffiscalmultipliersmayalsobepositivelyassociatedwithmacroeconomicuncertainty(Gbohoui2021),financialdevelopment(Koh2017),aswellasoveralleconomicdevelopment(Ilzetzkietal.2013),andnegativelyassociatedwiththedegreeofinformalityintheeconomy(Colomboetal.2022).Barnichon,Debortolo,andMatthes(2022)alsoarguethatthedirectionoffiscalinterventionsiscritical.Morespecifically,theyfindthatthecontractionarymultiplierisabove1,reachinghighermagnitudesinrecessions.Ontheotherhand,theexpansionarymultiplierissignificantlybelow1,regardlessofthecyclicalpositionoftheeconomy.AccordingtoGasparetal.(2015),economieswithstrongerinfrastructuregovernancetendtohaveloweraverageincrementalpublic-capital-to-outputratios,resultinginmoregrowth“bang”fortheirinvestment“buck.”Theyalsofoundthateconomieswithhigherpublicinvestmentefficiencyreceivegreateroutputdividends.Incontrast,poorinfrastructuregovernancemightresultinincreasedpublicdebtwithoutanygrowthdividend.Governanceissuesinprojectexecutioncanlimittheamountofpublic
10
capitalcreatedbyaunitofpublicinvestment,whileapoorprojectselectionprocesscanresultinthecreationof“whiteelephants”thathavemarginalcontributiontotheeconomy.
Moregenerally,theliteraturesuggeststhatastrongcost-benefitanalysisisneededtoselectandprioritizeprojectsthatwouldmeaningfullyraisegrowthwithoutjeopardizingfiscalsustainability.Anotherimportantfactorthatmayexplaintheproductivityofpublicinvestmentistheinitialstockofpubliccapital.Amongtherecentstudies,Izquierdoetal.(2019)findthatpublicinvestmentmultipliersarehigherincountrieswitharelativelylowlevelofinitialpubliccapitalstock(asashareofGDP).Thelevelofpublicinvestmentandpubliccapitalcanbeexcessiveifresourcesaredivertedawayfromothermoreproductiveusesorcrowdoutprivateinvestment(Devarajan,Swaroop,andZou1996;CanningandPedroni2008).
Thislineofargumentisrelatedtothemoregeneralstrandoftheliteratureemphasizingthecriticalroleofpublicinvestmentefficiencyindeterminingitsmacroeconomiceffects.Dabla-Norrisetal.(2012)findthatthequalityofpublicinvestmentmanagementpracticesvarieswidelyinaglobalsampleof71countries.Guptaetal.(2014)compute“efficiencyadjusted”publiccapitalstocksandfindthatthegrowtheffectsofefficientpublicinvestmentarehigher.TheimpactofefficiencyontheproductivityofpublicinvestmentisalsoevaluatedempiricallyinLeeper,Walker,andYang(2010);CavalloandDaude(2011);LeducandWilson(2012);Izquierdoetal.
(2018);Bergetal.(2013);Miyamotoetal.(2020);andFurcerietal.(2022).
Finally,itshouldbenotedthattheobservedheterogeneityintheestimatesoffiscalspendingmultipliersalsoreflectsdifferencesinthemethodologiesusedtoidentifyexogenousshocksinpublicinvestment.Thesealternativeshockidentificationstrategies
11
arediscussedinmoredetailinthenextsection,alongwiththenewmethoddevelopedinthispaper.
3.MethodologyandData
3.1.ConstructingGovernmentSpendingShocks
Areviewofexistingpublicspendingshockidentificationframeworks.Severalstrategieshavebeendevisedintheliteraturetoidentifygovernmentspendingshocks.Amongthemostwidelyappliedmethods,anapproachbasedon(structural)vectorautoregressionframeworksreliesonrecursiveidentificationschemesandotherparameterrestrictionswiththeassumptionthatgovernmentspendingdoesnotrespondtomacroeconomicshocksinthesameperiod(BlanchardandPerotti2002,Ilzetzkietal.
2013).BesidesthetimingassumptionsbehindtheunderlyingCholeskyidentificationscheme,whicharelesscompellingforannual-frequencydata,thisapproachisagonisticaboutanticipationeffectsoffiscalspending.
Asecondapproach,byKraay(2012,2014),istoinstrumentgovernmentshockswithpredicteddisbursementsfromapprovedloansfromofficialcreditors—suchastheWorldBankandothermultilateralandbilateralaidagencies—asexogenoussourcesoffluctuationsingovernmentspending.Thisapproachisdifficulttoreplicate,asitrequiresacalculationof“predicted”disbursementsforeachloan,whichcanthenbeconsideredasexogenousspendingshocks.
Athirdapproachisthe“naturalexperiment”approachproposedbyBarro(1981)andfurtherdevelopedbyRameyinsubsequentpapers(RameyandShapiro1998,RameyandZubairy2018).Thisframeworkusesfluctuationsinmilitaryexpenditurestoidentifygovernmentspendingshocks.Thisapproach,however,wouldnotworkwellfor
12
EMDEs,asthemilitaryspendingvariabledoesnotchangemuchfromoneyeartothenext.
Finally,inmorerecentempiricalresearch,AuerbachandGorodnichenko(2012a,2012b)useforecasterrorstoexaminehowthefiscalmultipliervarieswiththebusinesscycleinOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)economies.Thismeasureofgovernmentshocksiscomputedasthedifferencebetweentheactualpublicspendingandthepublicspendingexpectedpreviouslybyprofessionalforecasters.Usingforecasterror-basedshocks,Abiad,Furceri,andTopalova(2016)identifythecausalimpactofhigherpublicinvestmentonoutput,privateinvestment,unemployment,andpublicdebtratios.Theauthorsarguethatthismethodologyovercomestheobstaclesthatoftenconfoundthecausalestimationoftheeffectoffiscalpolicyoneconomicperformance.TheAuerbachandGorodnichenko(AG)approachwasutilizedalsoinHonda,Miyamoto,andTaniguchi(2020);Miyamotoetal.(2020);andFurcerietal.(2022).Thismethodologyhastheadvantageofovercomingtheproblemof“fiscalforesight”(ForniandGambetti2010;Leeper,Richter,andWalker2012,Leeper,Walker,andYang2013;andZeevandPappa2017).
Public(andprivate)spendingshocksbasedoncyclicallyadjustedpublicvariables.InthispaperwebuildontheworkofAlesinaandArdagna(2010)andothersthatassesstheeffectsofchangesincyclicallyadjusted(fiscal)variablesongrowth.Whatisnewinourapproachisthewayinwhichweidentifyspendingshocksforpublic(andprivate)investment.Theshockidentificationframeworkinvolvesseveralsteps.
First,weestimateoutputelast
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年漳州危運(yùn)駕駛員考試題
- 2025年重慶客運(yùn)從業(yè)資格證考試試題庫(kù)答案大全解析
- 某咨詢魯能物資集團(tuán)公司戰(zhàn)略咨詢報(bào)告
- 描述成長(zhǎng)的經(jīng)歷作文7篇
- 醫(yī)學(xué)遺傳學(xué)遺傳病研究試卷分析題目集合
- 品牌建設(shè)與合作協(xié)議書(shū)
- 公司出資證明書(shū)與股東出資詳表(6篇)
- 2025年配氣機(jī)構(gòu):進(jìn)排氣門項(xiàng)目申請(qǐng)報(bào)告
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全維護(hù)與保障協(xié)議條款
- 2025年注冊(cè)稅務(wù)師稅法一模擬試卷:歷年真題與實(shí)戰(zhàn)應(yīng)用
- 隆鼻術(shù)后護(hù)理查房
- 關(guān)于進(jìn)境食用水生動(dòng)物指定監(jiān)管場(chǎng)地名單
- 新版譯林高中英語(yǔ)必修一單詞表默寫(xiě)版(直接打印)
- 2023年主任醫(yī)師(正高)-中醫(yī)內(nèi)科學(xué)(正高)考試歷年真題集錦附答案
- 農(nóng)村分家協(xié)議書(shū)4篇
- 2023-2024學(xué)年江蘇省江都市小學(xué)語(yǔ)文三年級(jí)期末高分測(cè)試題詳細(xì)參考答案解析
- 森林區(qū)劃-小班區(qū)劃(森林資源經(jīng)營(yíng)管理)
- 產(chǎn)時(shí)子癇應(yīng)急演練文檔
- 安全事故應(yīng)急響應(yīng)程序流程圖
- 開(kāi)標(biāo)一覽表(格式)
- 一起學(xué)習(xí)《數(shù)字中國(guó)建設(shè)整體布局規(guī)劃》
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論