論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)以中國古代帝王為例（可編輯）

1、 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文2011屆博士研究生學(xué)位論文 學(xué)校代碼:10269 學(xué)號:52080102026華東師范大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi) ?以中國古代帝王為例kingship: its gaining & guarding ? with case study of kings in ancient china院 系:教育科學(xué)學(xué)院/教育學(xué)系 專 業(yè): 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)研究方向:中國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育理論及實(shí)踐 博導(dǎo)教授:奚潔人 博 士 生: 楊丹(澳大利亞籍)博 士 點(diǎn):中國浦東干部學(xué)院聯(lián) 絡(luò): sydneydan1632011-01-10 華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)

2、院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文dissertation for phd degreeuniversity code: 10269 sid: 52080102026phd final dissertation kingship: its gaining & guarding ? with case study of kings in ancient china thby dan yang, jan 10 2011 overseas phd-candidate from australiamajor

3、 of leadership educationecnu/celaporiginal edition institute: east china normal university, ecnu college: the college of educational study faculty: the faculty of pedagogy major: leadership pedagogy research field: kingship in ancient china phd-tutor: prof. mr. xi, jie-ren phd-candidate: mr. yang, d

4、an phd-training site china executive leadership academy pudong celapthjan 10 2011華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明鄭重聲明:本人呈交的學(xué)位論文中國民營企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力研究?以“新浙商”為例,是在華東師范大學(xué)攻讀博士學(xué)位期間,在導(dǎo)師奚潔人教授指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外,本論文不包含其他個人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果。對本文的研

5、究做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個人和集體,均已在文中作了明確說明并表示謝意。作者簽名:日期: 年月日 華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)位論文著作權(quán)使用聲明中國民營企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力研究?以“新浙商”為例系本人在華東師范大學(xué)攻讀學(xué)位期間在導(dǎo)師奚潔人教授指導(dǎo)下完成的博士學(xué)位論文,本論文的研究成果歸華東師范大學(xué)所有。本人同意華東師范大學(xué)根據(jù)相關(guān)規(guī)定保留和使用此學(xué)位論文,并向主管部門和相關(guān)機(jī)構(gòu)如國家圖書館、中信所和“知網(wǎng)”送交學(xué)位論文的印刷版和電子版;允許學(xué)位論文進(jìn)入華東師范大學(xué)圖書館及數(shù)據(jù)庫被查閱、借閱;同意學(xué)校將學(xué)位論文加入全國博士、碩士學(xué)位論文共建單位數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行檢索,將學(xué)位論文的標(biāo)題和摘要匯編出版,采用影印、縮印或者其它方式合理復(fù)

6、制學(xué)位論文。 本學(xué)位論文不保密,適用上述授權(quán)。導(dǎo)師簽名本人簽名 年 月 日年 月 日 i 華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文博士學(xué)位論文答辯委員會成員名單姓名 職稱 單位 備注教授 教授 教授 教授 教授 教授 教授 教授ii華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文目 錄001 摘要中/英 【緒論】 005 i. 關(guān)于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán) 005 一、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的強(qiáng)制屬性

7、006 二、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的危機(jī)屬性 007 三、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的權(quán)爭屬性 008 ii. 學(xué)術(shù)假說 009 一、學(xué)術(shù)假說的定位 010 二、學(xué)術(shù)假說的泛在 011 三、學(xué)術(shù)假說的意義 012 iii. 技術(shù)路線 013 一、實(shí)然研究 014 二、中國樣本 015 三、學(xué)術(shù)取證 016 四、史料抓手 017 五、熟案精選021 【第一章 中外歷代王權(quán)學(xué)說管窺】 021 第一節(jié) 西方先哲觀點(diǎn)歸納 023 第二節(jié) 中國先哲觀點(diǎn)歸納 029 第三節(jié) 以上觀點(diǎn)的綜合討論 【注:部分小節(jié)以下,不設(shè)“目”。下同?！?030 【第二章 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)與王權(quán)】 030 第一節(jié) 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)學(xué)說綜述 一、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)主體與領(lǐng)導(dǎo)客體 031 032

8、二、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的起源 033 三、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán):自然屬性和社會屬性 034 第二節(jié) 窮盡探索 034 一、追溯本原 039 二、事實(shí)起點(diǎn)與邏輯起點(diǎn) 044 第三節(jié) 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的其它方面 044 一、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)團(tuán)隊(duì)與領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán) 046 二、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)應(yīng)用 047 三、君權(quán)與相權(quán) 051 【第三章 王權(quán)的基本矛盾】 051 第一節(jié) 基本矛盾概說 054 第二節(jié) 基本矛盾定位 059 第三節(jié) 基本矛盾運(yùn)動 iii 華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 061 【第四章 列王觀點(diǎn)】 062 第一節(jié) 全景把握

9、063 第二節(jié) 樣本細(xì)分 065 第三節(jié) 掌政經(jīng)驗(yàn) 067 【第五章 a組君主】 067 第一節(jié) 在位 50年以上 067 一、康熙皇帝:本朝家法,惟以愛民為事 069 二、乾隆皇帝:普免天下錢糧 075 三、漢武帝:朕即位以來,所為狂悖 078 第二節(jié) 在位 45-50年 078 一、萬歷皇帝:天下之財(cái),皆朕之財(cái) 081 二、嘉靖皇帝:恭穆獻(xiàn)皇帝為皇考 084 三、唐玄宗:吾家朝堂,干汝何事 086 第三節(jié) 在位 40-45年 086 一、宋仁宗:朕未嘗詈人以死,況敢濫用辟乎 088 二、宋理宗:非知之艱,行之為艱 093 【第六章 b1-開國君主】 094 第一節(jié) 在位 30年以上 094

10、 一、梁武帝蕭衍 095 二、秦始皇嬴政 101 三、光武帝劉秀 103 四、明太祖朱元璋 107 第二節(jié) 在位 20-30年 107 一、唐太宗李世民 110 二、元太祖成吉思汗 113 第三節(jié) 在位 20年以下 113 一、宋太祖趙匡胤 116 二、清太祖努爾哈赤 118 三、漢高祖劉邦 122 【第七章 b2-繼位君主】 122 第一節(jié) 在位 30年以上 122 一、宋高宗趙構(gòu) 124 二、唐高宗李治 125 三、清光緒載? 127 第二節(jié) 在位 20-30年 127 一、清嘉慶?琰 132 二、明成祖朱棣 134 第三節(jié) 在位 20年以下 134 一、漢景帝劉啟 137 二、唐朝武則天

11、 iv華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 141 三、隋煬帝楊廣 143 四、金主完顏亮 148 【第八章 權(quán)爭管窺】 148 第一節(jié) 幾點(diǎn)回顧 148 一、正史三部 149 二、商君書 151 三、韓非子 152 四、君主論 154 五、權(quán)力的 48條法則 157 第二節(jié) 儒術(shù)與法術(shù) 159 第三節(jié) 弄權(quán)與干政 162 第四節(jié) 權(quán)爭態(tài)勢判斷 164 【第九章 案例選評】 165 第一節(jié) 兩漢權(quán)殤 165 一、太后呂雉 170 二、新政王莽 174 第二節(jié) 司馬滅魏 17

12、6 一、司馬懿?蟄伏 179 二、司馬師?過渡 180 三、司馬昭?萌動 184 四、司馬炎?滅魏 186 第三節(jié) 玄武春秋 186 一、玄武四變一覽 188 二、初唐宮禁制度一覽 188 三、李淵二十二王子一覽 189 四、李淵立儲猶豫事跡一覽 190 五、內(nèi)寵參與權(quán)爭事跡一覽 191 六、李建成集團(tuán)謀刺事跡一覽 193 七、玄武門政變決策事跡一覽 195 八、李世民政變計(jì)劃一覽 198 九、政變現(xiàn)場關(guān)鍵人物一覽 199 十、李世民滅殺二王后人一覽 【結(jié)論】 201 i. 再談學(xué)術(shù)假說 202 ii. 本論核心觀點(diǎn) 203 iii. 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)的史觀思想 【參考資料】 【后記-鳴謝】 v華東師范

13、大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi) ?以中國古代帝王為例 楊丹 2011-01-10華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè) 博士學(xué)位論文kingship: its gaining & guarding ?with case study of kings in ancient china thby dan yang, jan 10 2011 overseas phd-candidate from australiamajor of leadership e

14、ducation, ecnu/celap phd final dissertation【摘要】沒有領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)就沒有領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的一切;甚至沒有生命。因此,關(guān)于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)安危的研究,是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)的重要研究范疇。古代帝王的王權(quán),是古典領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的最高形態(tài),也是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)奪取與捍衛(wèi)最激烈的平臺。中國古代帝王的王權(quán)奪取與捍衛(wèi)實(shí)踐,基于數(shù)千年一氣呵成的厚重積淀,是世界范圍內(nèi)同類研究的典型樣本。實(shí)然研究,是理論與實(shí)踐結(jié)合得最緊密的研究路徑。鑒于以上基本認(rèn)識,本篇博士學(xué)位論文(下稱,本文),旨在從領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)的視角汲取多學(xué)科的既有成果,對中國古代的王權(quán)奪取與捍衛(wèi)進(jìn)行實(shí)然研究。 本文認(rèn)為,王權(quán)的歷史地位在于,它是有組織文明進(jìn)程的最高統(tǒng)馭形態(tài)

15、。歷史一再證明,沒有可持續(xù)的王權(quán),就沒有可持續(xù)的有組織文明進(jìn)程。如今,雖然作為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)形態(tài)的王權(quán)已成為歷史,但其“統(tǒng)馭文明進(jìn)程有組織向前發(fā)展”的基本功能或者邏輯起點(diǎn),卻在以現(xiàn)代的最高集體領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的方式得以轉(zhuǎn)型和延續(xù)。未來,除非文明不再需要有組織的發(fā)展進(jìn)程,否則,這一基本功能將會恒常存在。 本文還認(rèn)為,王權(quán)的基本矛盾,在于國家元首與股肱重臣之間圍繞“權(quán)力屬1華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 于誰”的矛盾;矛盾的主導(dǎo)方面是元首本人。這一認(rèn)識來自尚書?益稷的啟示,“元首明,股肱良,

16、庶事康”;這個表述在二十五史(含,清史稿)中歷經(jīng)兩千多年而只字不改。歷代先王曾經(jīng)試圖解決這個問題,不幸的是結(jié)果卻經(jīng)常相反,他們中的許多人被問題解決了。大量歷史證據(jù)顯示,在元首的非正常死因中,眾多股肱直接或間接扮演過置元首于死地的角色;相應(yīng)地,在股肱的非正常死因中,歷代先王的作法可以歸納為:凡覬覦王權(quán)者,無論敵友,殺無赦。關(guān)于事物基本矛盾的判斷,本文認(rèn)為判斷要素包括:(一)題旨性。隨著研究題旨的改變,人們對同一事物基本矛盾的認(rèn)知會出現(xiàn)多樣性;換言之,單一事物并非只能有單一的基本矛盾。(二)發(fā)軔性。在給定的研究題旨中,基本矛盾是事物最本原、最徹底的矛盾,并且由此衍生大量的次生矛盾。(三)全息性?；?/p>

17、本矛盾在同類事物中是無所不在的,并且表現(xiàn)為空間的泛在和時間的常在。(四)不滅性。除非這類事物先消失,否則,其基本矛盾不會消失。例如,除非生命現(xiàn)象消失,否則,生與死的矛盾不會消失。通常,同時具備以上要素的矛盾,可被判斷為某種基本矛盾。然而,在研究人際之間的基本矛盾時,還應(yīng)考慮一個附加的判斷要素:傷害性(或者,第五要素)。在王權(quán)基本矛盾的研究中,這種傷害性達(dá)到極致(即,致死性)在本文中表現(xiàn)為元首的非正常死因。 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者與被領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者之間的矛盾,是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)研究的基本矛盾。從領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)的這一研究題旨可以看到,元首(領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者)與股肱(被領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者)的矛盾,同時具備了以上判斷要素,因此被本文界定為王權(quán)的基本矛盾。 本文并且

18、認(rèn)為,盡管王權(quán)實(shí)踐內(nèi)涵深宏,但核心內(nèi)涵可歸納為:王權(quán)認(rèn)知、王權(quán)奪取、王權(quán)運(yùn)行、王權(quán)捍衛(wèi)。史料證據(jù)顯示,歷代先王的個性化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能力優(yōu)勢以及領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式特色,或反映在四大內(nèi)涵其中之一、或在其中數(shù)項(xiàng),進(jìn)而形成因人而異的王權(quán)生態(tài)。然而,王權(quán)奪取與王權(quán)捍衛(wèi)的問題是最多數(shù)先王們最關(guān)注最共同的話題。此二者,構(gòu)成了本文的核心內(nèi)容。 本文主張實(shí)然的研究?！皩?shí)然”者,是指實(shí)時實(shí)態(tài)地正在或曾經(jīng)存在的事實(shí);并依此建構(gòu)特定研究所需的正確性圭臬。在本文中,“實(shí)然”的內(nèi)涵包括,1)實(shí)例的:可信度在學(xué)術(shù)上沒有爭議的、關(guān)于中國古代王權(quán)奪取與捍衛(wèi)實(shí)踐的歷史記述;2)實(shí)效的:注重歷代先王經(jīng)驗(yàn)的實(shí)踐有效性,而非歷代文人想象的理念完美性;3

19、)實(shí)用的:從先王的實(shí)踐中汲取歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn),形成適用于當(dāng)代領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)實(shí)踐的有價值參考;所謂“有價值”,必須是切實(shí)可用乃至立竿見影的。這些內(nèi)涵,將被應(yīng)用于論證本文的學(xué)術(shù)假說:王權(quán)的威脅在團(tuán)隊(duì)。本文理論基礎(chǔ)來自領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)研究中的三個學(xué)說范疇,此即,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)力學(xué)說、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)團(tuán)隊(duì)學(xué)說、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能力學(xué)說。在本文中,權(quán)力學(xué)說聚焦于王權(quán),團(tuán)隊(duì)學(xué)說聚焦于掌政班子,能力學(xué)說聚焦于帝王對掌政班子的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)本領(lǐng)或技能。2華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 博士論文的信息承載力有限,無法包羅萬象。為此,與王權(quán)相關(guān)的中外

20、比較研究不得不從本文中整體移除,留待日后另議。特此說明。 最后要說的是,作為一名在二十一世紀(jì)歸國求道的華僑學(xué)生,謹(jǐn)以本文寄托筆者走遍天涯而持守不渝的中國情結(jié)。【關(guān)鍵詞】王權(quán);領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán);領(lǐng)導(dǎo)學(xué);權(quán)爭技擊。abstract a leader will lose every thing even his life, if he loses his leadership. thus, the research on the safety of leadership is rightly an important study category in the domain of the study of l

21、eadership sol. kingship, applied by ancient kings, is the upmost form of classic leadership as well as an arena of the most intense fighting for leadership. in ancient china, kings practice of gaining and guarding their kingships had been richly storing up without letup during thousand years in the

22、last. such practice, as a whole, is a typical sample for similar research in the world. reality-oriented study is a kind of research path by which theory can be extremely aligning with practice. with these fundamental understandings, this phd final dissertation the paper, in short is designed to, by

23、 drawing existent academic achievements from multi-disciplines and using them under the perspective of sol, carry out a reality-oriented study of multi-generational practice of kingships gaining and guarding in ancient chinait is the papers last opinion that kingships gaining-&-guarding power-strugg

24、le, in short is a complicatedly immaterial systems engineering. it involves taking power before taking title and five preparations for power-struggle. so, the paper initially constructs its doctrine of professional power-struggle dpps. by this way, leaders will be advised to concern the multi-accide

25、nt area, where the harmony of his core team may be jeopardized, and try to avoid power-struggle crisis in advance, rather than doing nothing until the crisis coming truethe paper argues that the historic value of kingship is that it had been a supreme reining-form of organized civilization course. h

26、istory proved that there would be no a continuable organized civilization course if there was no continuable kingship. although kingship, as a form of classic leadership, has nowadays turned into a historic story, yet its initial function and/or original logic of reining a civilization course to go

27、ahead in an organized way is rightly transformed into and surviving with a modern form of supremely collective leadership. in the future, this initial function of kingship will have been presenting abidingly, unless civilization no longer demands an organized developmentthe paper also argues that a

28、basic contradiction involved in kingship is the contradiction focusing on whom does the power belong to and occurring between a head-of-state and his vital ministers. in this contradiction, the head-of-state is certainly the primary part of contradictionsuch argument is illuminated by chapter yi-ji

29、in the book of shang. it says, wise king, nice ministers, and then fair everywhere 元首明,股肱良,庶事康. by thoroughly reviewing the volumes of twenty five histories including the history of dynasty qing 清史稿, what can be found is that no any word of this sentence in chinese characters was changed in more tha

30、n two thousand years. over time, kings tried to settle this problem, but unfortunately, the result was often reverse: many of them were settled by the problem itself. plenty of historic evidences show that, in the abnormal death of king, many vital ministers directly or indirectly played the role of

31、 pushing their king into a lethiferous position; while, in the abnormal death of vital ministers, kings action can be summarized of any one who covets kingship, no matter enemy or friend, should be killed with no assoilingabout elements applying for identifying a basic contradiction, the paper argue

32、s that they are:the subjective:with the change of subject from one to another during a research, people will have various identification of basic contradiction of same thing. in other words, a single thing does not involve a singly basic contradiction onlythe original:under a given subject during re

33、search, a basic contradiction is the targeted things most primary and most thorough contradiction and, consequently, from which plenty of sub-contradictions are derivedthe holographic:a basic contradiction should be the contradiction presenting, with a3華東師范大學(xué)/中國浦東干部學(xué)院,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)教育學(xué)專業(yè)。楊丹,學(xué)號:52080102026 2011-

34、01-10 論王權(quán)的奪取和捍衛(wèi)?以中國古代帝王為例 博士學(xué)位論文 holographic method, among all things in a single category. holographic, here, means a basic contradiction must be ubiquitous in any place, frequent in any time and visible in each thing in in this categorythe eternal:basic contradiction never disappears, unless the c

35、ategory of those things disappears in preceding. for example, the basic contradiction of to-be or not-to-be never disappears, unless the phenomenon of life has disappeared first and already normally, a contradiction, if simultaneously having these four elements, can be identified of a basic contradi

36、ction. however, in the research on interpersonal contradiction, a supplementary element should be paid attention, that is the harmful or, the fifth element. in the research on the basic contradiction of kingship, harmfulness achieves its extreme status ? that is to say, the lethiferous ? and present

37、ing, in this paper, as the abnormal death of kingcontradiction between leader and be-leaded person has been always the basic contradiction researched by sol. from this perspective we can see that, between a head-of-state leader and his vital ministers be-leaded, their contradiction has five elements

38、 mentioned above at same timethus, this contradiction is identified, by the paper, of a basic contradiction of kingshipfurther argument is that although practice of kingship composes of plentiful meanings, yet its vital meanings can be summarized into four implications, which are, respectively, unde

39、rstanding a kingship, gaining a kingship, running a kingship and guarding a kingship. strongly historical evidences show that, both in the advantage of leadership-ability and in the feature of leadership-manner, multi-generational kings individuation performs either in one of the implications or in

40、some of these four implications, and consequently, bringing up a picture of different king experiencing a different kingship condition. however, the issue of kingships gaining and guarding is the most concerned and most common topic for the most kings. so, kingships gaining and guarding become the c

41、ore of the paperthe paper demonstrates a reality-oriented research. the reality-oriented, means facts those exist and/or existed in a real time and a real situation and, further, basing on these facts, setting up a correctness benchmark for a certain specialized research. in this paper, the implicat

42、ion of the reality-oriented is broken down into three parts:real case:the historic record, with an undisputed credibility in academy, of kings practice about their kingships gaining and guarding in ancient chinareal efficiency: focusing on practical efficaciousness in multi-generational kings experi

43、ence, rather than on multi-generational scholars idealistic perfectness from their fancyingreal value:subliming historical experience form multi-generational kings practices and turning them into valuable advices for the leadership practice in todays world. so the value, here, means these advices mu

44、st be strongly useful in a real situation and getting effect instantlysuch meanings will be applied for demonstrating the papers academic hypothesis: team is the threat to kingshipthree categories of doctrine involved in sol lay the papers theoretic foundation, which are the doctrines of leadership-

45、power dlp, leader-team dlt and of leadership-ability dla. in the paper, however, dlp is designed to focus on kingship, dlt on the supreme authority-board and dla on kings capability and skills for how to lead his supreme authority-boarda necessary declare is that due to limited information-involing capacity of a phd final dissertation, it is impossible for t