【精品】汽車站設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)例

1、a new infrastrueture, los angeles17apr 2009under: awarded,infrastructurc,urban design ,by marco castroni filed competitions ,competitions structures ,sustainability,politics ,refurbishment , cars, los angele radicalcraft, trains, usalos angeles is often portrayed as the example of the car-friendly c

2、ity. the traditional image of the tow n is an en dless pat tern of single family dwel1ings, interconnected by traffic-clogged freeways, where transit is undeveloped and the air is choked with smog.however, los angeles is changing. the city" s twnsport authority has planned in the last years a s

3、eries of measures aiming to improve quality of life through improving transit and walking and providing alternative to car commuting.the last measure of this series is measure r，approved in november 2008, whose aims are:1. expand los angeles railway system, and connect it to the airport2. improve ro

4、ads, making them safer for cyclist and pedestrians3. reduce higway congestion and improve highway safety4. expand the bus network, without increasing fares5. improve quality of life, trough better transportation options.measure r is a perfect occasion to rethink the image of the city, getting rid of

5、 its stereotypes, and in this direction goes the competition "a new infrestructure “， organized by scifi (southern california institute for future initiativcs) and the architcct， s newspaper, whose results have been published on march 21, 2009here are the results.professional winners.1st prize:

6、 mas transitradical craft: joshua g stein, jacob m brostoff, jaclyn thomforde, aaron wheltonmas is regional high-speed rail for los angeles with a landscape to match. it diversifies the communities in the built environment, making travel less necessary, easier and more predictable, and bypassing roa

7、dway congestion through a new raised infrastructure. a partnership betvveen the public and private sectors creates varied opportunities for organic development.travel times improve over time with the addition of new trains- mas also links local and intcr-rcgional commuting; providing frequent servic

8、e that will sync up with the california high speed rail network. san diego via mas is less than an hour away, including transfer times; san francisco is less than three hours away.2nd prize: infrastructural armaturefletcher studio: dylan barlow, ryan chandler, daniel phillips, tobi adamo1ekunrecogni

9、zing the vital role that mobility, water, and sewage will play in los angeles future, the city must beg in to in vest in a core armature of new bundled infrastructures which will allow the city to survive the impending reality of peak water and peak oil.ithe city must reorganize along the matrices o

10、f transportation, water and sewer n etworks, and grow inf rastructural ten taeles out into lhe world to ship and receive.3rd prize: mag luvosborn architects: holly chisholm, kate harvey, armen isagholi, takeshi kobayashi,michael pinto, jared sopko, esmeralda ward, yuju yeothe scheme proposes eroding

11、 a portion of the freeway and supplanting it with a new object, mode, and form for adoration mag luv.the high speed magnetic levitation peripheral train appropriates freeway, right of way and dream spacen to become the mega structure of the losangeles transit system. the loop circumnavigates the cit

12、y providing 12 hubs of activity, transportation, and power production.student winners1st prize: glocalizing los angelesryan lovettuniversity of california, berkeleythe physical separations between places of work and play have become outdated and burdensome. meanwhile the divide between commercial, r

13、esidential, agricultural, and manufacturing zones have become so exaggerated that the infrastructures needed to connect and sustain them crumble in lack of upkeep and congestion.in conjunction with newer, faster transit systems, this plan proposes a simple development strategy that collapses the dis

14、tances between all the elements needed to support our 1ifestyles by suggesting that workplaces, as well as production of food and goods, be within walking distancc.2nd prize: modular diffusionalan lu, yan-ping wanguniversity of california, berkeleyin a car, the passenger can go from any given point

15、to another in one continuous trip. to achieve this 1evel of mobility in tandem with an increase in roadway capacity, we introduce a mass transit system based upon a modular transit vehicle (mtv for short).this modular system wou 1 d allow passengers to (1) board from a wide range of street stops, (2

16、) travel along the freeway, and (3) take the freeway exit closest to the des tin at ion drop passengers off there, al 1 in one ride.sajuamfcmr d <ccvo »3rd prize: freeways are for trainsben abeiman, vivian ngo, julia siedlecolumbia universityj 1. lxjstmg highway2.twouvm£sof localtraimsj

17、. local & £xprc$. new olhsjty 4. linear mrk & density on hwythis team believes that los angeles need not invest in a “new” public transportation system blit transform its existing transportation system of freeways into "trainways” by taking over freeways" with rail tracks, a c

18、omprehensive expansion of the la metro will respond to the projects that are indicated in measurer and will commence at a much lower cost due to taking advantage of the rights of ways establ ished by the freeway.professional honorable mentionsmobility on demandrsa: dwight bond, diane tadena, james w

19、onga combination of rail, light-rail, smart cars, bike share, and different bus systems will provide easy connection in and between cities. multiple vehicle types provide users with choices among combinations of cost, comfort, and functionality.a commuter might choose to ride the train to work, pick

20、 up a smart car to attend a meeting, go to the gym, pick up groceries before going back home in creating a dense commercial and residential environment to support and foster the inevitable expansion of the transit system, the scheme also investigates alternative development strategies theit are adap

21、table to the ever changing conditions of our urban culture.green tech citynbbj: harry bairamian, hrant bairamian, so eun cho, tony choi, scott hunter, byoungkweon, anthony manzo, nnamdi ugenyi, jonathan ward, tim zamorathis scheme created green tech districts along the westside expansion corri dor s

22、tretching from downtown to santa monica.the plan likened itself to a living organism, including a skeletal system composed of new green districts between stations; a respiratory system that included a 2. 5 mile green peirk along the length of the transit system; and tendons, which were linkages to t

23、he community, like freeway bridges, human-scaled densities, walkability plans, urban parks, and agricultural zones.go mixed-modaltom beresfordin 2000, la metro gambled that it could increase both ridership and transit efficiency by making a bus a little more like a subway: the metro rapid. mixed-mod

24、al goes even further to suggest that any bus has the potential to go ulocal, ” "rapid” or "express” at coordirmted points along its route to flexibly serve transit demand.a bus may go "express" by entering grade-separated express lanes shared with planned or existing rail modes,

25、with the help of new friction-less electric power-transfer technologies and hybrid rail/road drive surfaces.lam “car space" is woefully underutilized2009opwderwkl2011hot lakes easepwckg. allcwms 觀農(nóng) 火門.心2030eckjw 映尺 wtstno electric wf 岀 tons or nf rfaesta1e fo otvuopwext anothe mixed-modal proje

26、ct offers a vision of what the expo line might look like if it operated as the "trunk” of a regional transit tree with ubranches” extending up and down existing metro rapid lines.student honorable mentionsfeeding community and the gold lineroe goodmanuniversity of british columbiaif we are to d

27、evelop along a freeway we need to keep in mind that the surrounding residential neighborhoods need to access the train in a way that encourages a shift away from car dependency.this entry proposes a string of micro-scale infill developments along a bus 1ine that feeds into the eastside transi t corr

28、idor.posi tioned along newly developed commercial corridors, stops have waiting rooms that store bikes, serve as markc ts，and create a center of comm unity.interstate 10tim do, george labeth, randy stogsdillthis scheme proposes a a reconsideration of the existing freeway corridor as a multi-function

29、 transit corridor. the existing freeway would be retrofitted with a new structure above that over a series of stages adds layers of public and environmental friendly transit options.stage 003x 2 命 ywr l*ur«(«r*r eww 命 f « h bar h* m e j -*.stage 004>> o»»wvwm w»l

30、io whsfl* *fstage 002maha*vw «m w4>wb 14 e«am.bm * 細(xì)as this second tier becomes more populated, greenscaping is added, converting the freeway corridor into a vibrant public space.cross-link/ cross-programminjeong gweoncal poly pomonalos angeles' current subway network relies too muc

31、h on a centralized spoke network approach. a more effective subway system should also include cross-linkages. this subway design project looks to develop a new cross-link between the existing red line (which conncct hollywood and downtown) and the future purple westside extension line.the proposed c

32、onnecting line would add three new stops: the first at santa monica blvd, and highla nd ave, the seco nd at santa monica and fairfax and the third at la cienega. the cormecting point to the red line would be at hollywood and highland, and the cormccting point to the future purple line wou 1 d be loc

33、ated at the beverly center.organizers selectionfast, fluid and freeodbq/odile decqthis project takes advantage of la" s polycentric character, developing a grid of multimodal transit systems, articulated on different levels within the existing city. on the scale of the city, the plan proposes a

34、 free car transport system, on the model of free bike systems largely developed in europe today. electrie cars will be available for hire throughout the city.other proposals include smooth jumps over motorways: stations that combine the urbem proposal of green park links between the two sides of the

35、 freeways by building a station over them, and containing contain carparks, commerce, free car and free bikestations.the answer is not mass(ive) transitwes jonesinstead of the massive, resource-intensive, and inflexible infrastructure that resuits from top-down approaches to planning, this proposal

36、argues, why not consider a flexible, pragmatic, small-scale, bottom-up approach?tntroducing the elov, a smal 1, pod-1 ike vehicle that fits into less space than a smart car and reduces the volume of traffic by serving the seime number of occupants in only one quarter of the space. because of its lig

37、ht weight and micromotor efficiency, the elov can be charged overnight using home outlets, further reducing the required infrastructure.tw «u4 . o«r mo n« mp 1am vmm foh vmm. a «atf 3op-*«rrptrtju/nwwo d*r x rut ww qw ”y of n* vatr d<wrwr*r, cwtap "a ftmpo* g gwwf ffwe, amp fcult a om-tlm afomr 7x “ *c心 tm4t if fhc m4«t cwt 8 tmt ktftlp-x a5<cp an fx hag g jtzgzaq amp tfaac ffq 魏"參 m “r w 皿“ rc“ rwr w«