污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)行研究(1)ppt課件

1、World Bank 世界銀行 Ministry of Construction PRC 中國建立部Component B 部分Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Wastewater Study Team污水工程組2005/06/21North China Water Quality Study Program中國北方城市水管理研討工程.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Objectives 目的 - Improving Investment & Operation Effi

2、ciencies 提高投資和運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)效率Approach 研討方法 - General Investment Survey and Forecasting 總體投資分析和預(yù)測 - Identify Key Issues and Constraints 確認(rèn)關(guān)鍵問題與制約要素 - Initiate Benchmarking System for WW Utilities 建立污水行業(yè)績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng)Outputs 研討成果 - Recommend Practical Options for Improvement 引薦實(shí)踐可行的方案以提高投資和運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)效率.Wastewater Utility Perfor

3、mance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Study Geographic Area 研討區(qū)域 - Northern China cities in 14 provinces / municipalities above Yangtze River 長江以北中國北方14個省/市Study Tasks 研討義務(wù) - Investment Survey and Forecasting 投資調(diào)研與預(yù)測 - Case Studies 案例分析 - Initiate Benchmarking System 建立績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng).Investment Survey & Forecasting 投資分析與預(yù)測

4、中國人民大學(xué)環(huán)境學(xué)院School of Environment and Natural ResourcesRenmin University of China馬中 Ma ZhongJune 21，2005.Investment Survey & Forecasting 投資分析與預(yù)測Data Sources 資料來源：China Urban Construction Statistics YearbookIndexes 投資目的：Sewerage Fixed-asset Investment 排水固定資產(chǎn)投資Concentrated Sewage Treatment Rate 污水集中處置率

5、.Total Investment 投資總量：19982003Sewerage fixed-asset Investment in 14 Provinces: 49.05 Billion RMB北方十四省排水固定資產(chǎn)投資總額: 490.5億元.2003年14省平均污水集中處置率：29.71% Average Concentrated Sewage Treatment Rate 2003 in 14 Provinces: 29.71%.14省污水處置投資與人均GDP: 2003Investment vs GDP per capita: 2003.污水處置投資和流域地理位置Investment v

6、s Location of Riverbasin.投資研討發(fā)現(xiàn)Main Findings投資總量穩(wěn)步增長 Steady Growth of Investment處置率不斷提高 Increased Treatment rate有些城市超方案完成義務(wù) Some cities over comply with the target.投資研討發(fā)現(xiàn)Main Findings地域、城市間差別很大 Big Gaps between Cities投資相對集中在經(jīng)濟(jì)興隆地域、大城市和流域下游 Capitals concentrate in developed regions, large cities and

7、down streams城市污水處置投資任重道遠(yuǎn) Huge demands for the future.2021年投資預(yù)測Investment Forecasting: 2021新增污水處置才干: 億元New Treatment Capacity：100 M RMB 目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)程度低中高污水集中處理率（%）556065污水處理廠建設(shè)投資額（億元）173.699226.599279.5.2021年新增污水管網(wǎng)投資: 億元New Sewers upto 2021：100 M RMB 目標(biāo)達(dá)到程度低中高污水集中處理率（%）556065污水管網(wǎng)投資額139.89 178.02216.27 .2004-

8、2021年污泥投資預(yù)測Sludge Treatment年份污泥處理投資（億元）200479.39200581.69200683.99200786.29200888.59200990.89201093.19總計(jì)604.04.建議Recommendations基于各地十五的實(shí)踐程度和十一五目的規(guī)劃投資：如黑龍江和北京 Planning investments based on both the local reality in 2005 and targets in 2021根據(jù)商業(yè)資金、財(cái)政資金和國際資金的不同功能和性質(zhì)規(guī)劃投資 Planning investment in accordance

9、 with various roles & purposes of commercial, international and financial capitals.建議Recommendations以同時(shí)提高運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)才干和處置才干為目的規(guī)劃投資 Planning investments to promote both operational & treatment capacities結(jié)合價(jià)錢、稅收、財(cái)政政策改革規(guī)劃投資 Planning investment in association with ongoing pricing, taxation and fiscal policy refo

10、rm.建議Recommendations 國家的城市污水處置投資規(guī)劃應(yīng)充分思索各地經(jīng)濟(jì)開展程度、城市規(guī)模和流域上下游差別 More attention on the differences in economic development, citys size and locations of riverbasin.建議Recommendations城市污水處置投資規(guī)劃該當(dāng)與流域綜合治理規(guī)劃、污染控制規(guī)劃相結(jié)合，特別留意同流域城市的投資和建立進(jìn)度的同步，尤其是上下游城市污水處置設(shè)備投資和建立的協(xié)調(diào) Integration in riverbasin planning and coordinat

11、ion with cities in same riverbasin十一五投資規(guī)劃該當(dāng)立足當(dāng)?shù)?，照顧?quán)従?，統(tǒng)籌流域，改善全國 Local base, neighbor care, watershed planning, country target.北方主要河流水質(zhì)情況：類及以下水質(zhì)Water Quality in Main North Rivers：IV and Worse黃河 Yellow River：2000年：28.6%2003年：69.2%，其中劣類水添加了13.6%淮河 Huai River：1998年：72%2003年：81.4% 海河 Hai River：1999年：58.5%

12、,類及劣類水一共為49.7%2003年：類及以下水質(zhì)上升到了78.5%，僅劣類水就占到53.9%。 注：數(shù)據(jù)來源：，1999-2004年。.污水處置投資與城市規(guī)模Investment vs Cities Size城市類別超大城市特大城市大城市中等城市小城市污水集中處理率（%）42.6241.7719.3618.0715.66.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Case Study案例分析(1/12) Objectives 目的To identify the key issues and constraints inhibiting i

13、nvestment and operation efficiencies through detailed case studies 經(jīng)過詳細(xì)的案例分析識別制約投資和運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)效率的關(guān)鍵問題和限制要素Case Study Cities 案例分析城市 9 cities with 11 WWTPs selected at different locations and populations in Hai & Huai River Basins 淮河流域和海河流域不同地域和人口規(guī)模的9 個城市的11個污水處置廠 Tianjin (天津), Shijiazhuang (石家莊) ( 2 million 百

14、萬) Handan (邯鄲), Huainan (淮南), Tangshan (唐山) (1 2 million 百萬) Bengbu (蚌埠), Fuyang (阜陽) (0.5-1.0 million 百萬) Luan (六安) (0.2 0.5 million百萬) Guoyang (渦陽) (0.2 million) .Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Case Study案例分析(2/12) Case Studies in 2001 2001年研討案例分析9 cities with 16 WWTPs selected cou

15、ntrywide 在全國范圍內(nèi)調(diào)研了9個城市的16個污水處置廠 .Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Case Study 案例分析 (3/12) 11WWTPs visited in 2005 2005年調(diào)研的11個污水處置廠8 OXD 100 to 150 kcu m/d2 AS 160-260 kcu m/d 1 CASS 100 kcu m/day 16 WWTPs visited in 2001 2001年研討案例分析3 OXD 100 to 150kcu m/d4 A/O 100 to 200 kcu m/d2 A2/O 1

16、00 to 300 kcu m/d1 A/B 80 kcu m/d1 SBR 150 kcu m/d1 BIO 120 kcu m/d 8 個氧化溝工藝 10萬- 15萬 m3/天 2 個活性污泥法 16萬-26萬 m3/天 1 個CASS工藝 10萬 m3/天 3 個氧化溝工藝 10萬- 15萬 m3/天 4 個A/O工藝 10萬- 20萬 m3/天 2 個A2/O工藝 10萬- 30萬 m3/天 1 個A/B工藝 8萬 m3/天 1 個SBR工藝 15萬 m3/天 1 個BIO工藝 12萬 m3/天.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)

17、研討Case Study 案例分析 (4/12) Methodology of Case Study 研討方法Questionnaires distributed and collected 分發(fā)調(diào)查詢詢表Interviews and site visits conducted 現(xiàn)場調(diào)研Performance Indicators (PI) used for assessment of WWTP and WWC performance 運(yùn)用績效目的分析污水公司和污水處置廠的運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn).Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Case Study

18、案例分析 (5/12) Findings 調(diào)查結(jié)果Nutrient removal problematic at 5 of 23 WWTPs, 3 WWTPs in non-compliance for class II discharge standards 23個污水處置廠之中有5個氮磷去除尚未達(dá)標(biāo)，3個污水處置廠尚未到達(dá)國家二級排放規(guī)范Average hydraulic loading for 23 WWTPs at 70% of design capacity nonworking capital USD100-200m 23個污水處置廠的水力負(fù)荷約為設(shè)計(jì)才干的70%-閑置固定資產(chǎn)約為

19、1-2億美圓Nearly all sludge dewatered and sent to landfill 污泥處置工藝根本采用脫水后填埋處置.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討Case Study 案例分析 (6/12) Findings (continued) 調(diào)查結(jié)果續(xù)30% or 7 of 23 WWTPs receiving low strength influent with BOD80mg/l as low as 30mg/l 30% 或23個污水處置廠中的7個進(jìn)水水質(zhì)濃度低于設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范，BOD or average超越

20、平均值2倍的規(guī)范偏向較好.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (3/14)Performance Indicator績效指標(biāo)City/WWC城市/污水公司W(wǎng)WTP污水處理廠Environmental PI 環(huán)境指標(biāo)Personnel PI 人員指標(biāo)Physical PI 物理指標(biāo)Operational PI 運(yùn)行指標(biāo)Quality of Service PI 服務(wù)質(zhì)量指標(biāo)Financial PI 財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)Total 總計(jì)4 6 114593955616.Wastewater Util

21、ity Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (4/14)Key PI Comparisons主要績效目的比較 PI 11.6 - WW Operating Costs PI 11.6 單位營業(yè)費(fèi)用.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (5/14)Key PI Comparisons主要績效目的比較PI 12.6 Staff WW Pop Served PI 12.6 任務(wù)人員/排水效力人口 .Wastewate

22、r Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (6/14)Key PI Comparisons主要績效目的比較PI wPh3 Treatment Utilization (%/year) PI wPh3 二級污水處置廠利用率 (%/年).Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (7/14)Key PI Comparisons主要績效目的比較PI wEn6 Sludge Production (KgDS/1

23、000 p e) PI wEn6 人均污泥產(chǎn)量 (Kg干重/1000 p.e).Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (8/14)Key PI Comparisons主要績效目的比較PI wOp44 WW Quality Tests (#/month) PI wOp44 水質(zhì)檢測頻率 (#/月).Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (9/14)Key PI Compariso

24、ns主要績效目的比較PI 24.1 Working RatioPI 24.1 運(yùn)營資金比率.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (10/14)Key PI International Comparisons績效目的國際比較PI 2.1 Sewage Coverage PI 2.1 排水普及率.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (11/14)Key PI International Comparisons績效目的國際比較 PI 17.1 Wastewater Treatment PI 17.1 污水處置.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污水行業(yè)投資與運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)研討B(tài)enchmarking System 績效評價(jià)系統(tǒng) (12/14)Key PI International Comparisons績效目的國際比較 PI 24.1 Working Ratio PI 24.1 運(yùn)營資金比率.Wastewater Utility Performance Study污