寫作高分班-lesson4-版

ToTowhatextentdoyouagreeor3.(寫了100詞以后！寫不下去4.！我到底贊不贊同6.段只能講解段只能講解你自己的觀點(diǎn)或者陳述事實(shí)絕對(duì)不要 (出現(xiàn)的幾率最低，因?yàn)轭}目中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)限定詞(比較高的可能性，懟起來很爽。但是你的懟人能力有限。一分為二地來看問題(其實(shí)相當(dāng)于部分贊同partly但我要求盡可能是一個(gè)明確的個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)，要求比較高的掌控力①.雖然我承認(rèn)……,但是我認(rèn)為(必須確認(rèn)題目能被分出清晰的兩部分，一部分對(duì)，一部分錯(cuò)②.我認(rèn)為是否應(yīng)該……取決于(別亂用，一定要確保有明確的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)完全贊同贊同理由-贊同理由-贊同理由-Inconclusion,重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn)SomeSomepeoplethinkthatunpaidcommunityserviceshouldbeacompulsorypartofhighschoolprogrammes(suchasworkingforacharity,improvingtheneighbourhoodorteachingsportstoyoungchildren).TowhatextentdoyouagreeorSomepeoplehavebenefitedfrommoderncommunicationSomepeoplehavebenefitedfrommoderncommunicationtechnology,butsomegroupsofpeoplehavenotbenefitedatall.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?The21stcenturyhasseenalargenumberofchangesthatare ourwildestexpectations.Oneoftheseadvancesistherapiddevelopmentofcommunicationstechnology.Theadvantagesofconvenienceandhighefficiencybroughtbydigitalcommunicationareobvious,butIdonotthinkthateveryonehasaccesstothesebenefits.Digitalformsofcommunicationenablemanypeople,mainlyincludingstudents,familiesaswellasentrepreneurs,toreapthe umbenefits.Fromaneducational ,learningcanbeincrediblyefficientandeffective,asstudentshavingtheinternetconnectioncanvirtuallysolvealltheirpuzzlesbybrowsingteachingwebsitesoraskingforhelpfromteacherssimultaneously.Internet-basedcommunicationalsocontributespositivelytostrengtheningfamilyrelationshipsandincreasingclosenessbetweenfamilymembers.Forexample,studentswhoattendboardingschoolsorstudya reabletokeepindailycontacteasilywithparentsbysendinggreetingmessagesorcamerachatting.Whatismore,companiescanberunatamuchlowercostbecausetheinternetandcomputershelptoexpandbusinesscheaplyandbecauseinformationtechnologyallowsemployeestoworkathome,whichsavesmostoftherentsforofficespace.However,Iwouldarguethatthebenefitsofinformationandcommunicationtechnologyarerestrictedtocertaingroupsofusers.Inotherwords,somepeople,particularlytheoldandthepoor,arenotbeneficiariesofmodernwaysofcommunication.Withregardtotheformer,alargepercentageofelderlypeopleareunableandreluctanttoadapttonewtechnology,whi eansthattheybarelyenjoytheconvenienceandfunbroughtbythedevices.Asforpeoplelivinginextremepoverty,mobilephones,computersandanyotherelectronicdevicesareluxuries.Allweb-basedactivitiesmeannothingtothem,neithermakingthemrelaxednorprovidingthemwithcareeropportunities.Inconclusion,Iagreewiththeideathattechnologicaladvancesininformationandcommunicationhaveonlybroughtbenefitstoacertaingroupofpeople,eventhoughitisalargegroup.完全不贊同邏輯的使用比例比完全贊同多得多，這是因完全不贊同邏輯的使用比例比完全贊同多得多，這是因?yàn)橛械念}目讀起來簡直喪心病狂。作為作者，只想懟死這個(gè)提出觀點(diǎn)的人，所以就直接針對(duì)題目里的各個(gè)點(diǎn)進(jìn)行反駁就好。改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)完全不贊同不贊同理由-不贊同理由-不贊同理由-Inconclusion,重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn)SomeSomepeoplebelievethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury,soprotectingthemisawasteofresources.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Somepeoplearguethatitispointlesstospendmoneyontheprotectionofwildanimalsbecausewehumanshavenoneedforthem.I ydisagreewiththispointofInmyopinion,itisabsurdtoarguethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury.IdonotbelievethatplanetEarthexistsonlyforthebenefitofhumans,andthereisnothingspecialaboutthisparticularcenturythatmeansthatwesuddenlyhavetherighttoalloworencouragetheextinctionofanyspecies.Furthermore,thereisnocompellingreasonwhyweshouldletanimalsdieout.Wedonotneedtoexploitordestroyeverylastsquaremetreoflandinordertofeedor modatetheworld’spopulation.Thereisplentyofroomforustoexistsidebysidewithwildanimals,andthisshouldbeouraim.IalsodisagreewiththeideathatIalsodisagreewiththeideathatprotectinganimalsisawasteofresources.Itisusuallytheprotectionofnaturalhabitatsthatensuresthesurvivalofwildanimals,andmostscientistsagreethatthesehabitatsarealsocrucialforhumansurvival.Forexample,rainforestsproduceoxygen,absorbcarbondioxideandstabilisetheEarth’sclimate.Ifwedestroyedtheseareas,thecostsofmanagingtheresultingchangestoourplanetwouldfaroutweighthecostsofconservation.Byprotectingwildanimalsandtheirhabitats,wemaintainthenaturalbalanceofalllifeonEarth.Inconclusion,wehavenorighttodecidewhetherornotwildanimalsshouldexist,andIbelievethatweshoulddoeverythingwecantoprotectthemSomeSomepeoplethinkthatcompaniesshouldhavethesamenumberofmaleandfemaleemployees.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Itisundeniablethatmenandwomenshouldhaveequalaccesstojobopportunities.However,Icomple yItisundeniablethatmenandwomenshouldhaveequalaccesstojobopportunities.However,Icomple ydisagreewiththeideathatthenumberofmalesandfemalesinacompanyshouldbeexactlythesame.ofall,manycompaniesaremoreattractivetoonegenderthantheother,sothenumberofjobapplicantsishighlylikelytobeone-sided,meaningthatitisalmostimpossibletorecruitthesamberfrombothsexes.Forexample,acompanyengagingintheconstructionindustrywillreceivemostofapplicationsfrommen,withfewwomeninterestedinitspositions.Asaresult,havingthesamberofmenandwomeninsuchacompanyseemsunrealistic.AnotherreasonwhyIamagainstthegivenopinionisthatitissimplyunfairtobaseemploymentforapositionont derofanapplicant.Ifamalecandidateisthebestchoiceforapositioninacompany,itissurelywrongtorejecthiminfavourofafemalewithlowercompetenceandfewerqualifications.Companiesshouldtreatallcandidatesfairlybyconsideringtheirworkexperience,expertiseandsocialskills,etc.,ratherthantheirgender.Finally,althoughanequalnumberofemployeesofeachsexseeminglymakespositivecontributionstoimprovinggenderequalityinjobmarket,itislikelythatworkefficiencyofacompanyadoptingsuchapolicywillbenegativelyaffected.Thisisbecausemalesoutperformfemalesincertainjobs,andviceversa.Forexample,ifaprivatehospitalhada50:50splitofmaleandfemalenurses,therewouldbealotofcomplaintsasaresultofthesignificantdifferencebetweenmenandwomenintermsoftheirabilitiestotakecareofpatients.Inconclusion,theselectionofemployeesshouldbebasedonfactorsInconclusion,theselectionofemployeesshouldbebasedonfactorsthatrepresentacandidate’squalitiesandqualifications.ItwouldbecounterproductivetomakeaselectiondecisiononIndividualsIndividualscandonothingtochangesociety.developmentscanbeonlybroughtaboutandlargeinstitutions.Towhatextentdoyouagree.Opinionsaredividedonwhetheritispossibleforindividualstomakechangestosociety.Ibelievetherearemanyexamplesofindividualscientists,inventorsorevenpoliticalactivistswhohavemadesignificantcontributionswhichhavebenefitedtheirsocietiesormankindingeneral.Therefore,Icomple ydisagreewiththegivenstatement.Onefieldinwhichindividualshavemadepositivechangesisthatofscience,examplesofwhicharemedicineandelectricity.Withregardtotheformer,aBritishscientistcalledSirAlexanderFlemingaccidentallydiscoveredpenicillinwhenhenoticedthatbacteriacouldnotsurvivenearcertainfungi.Thisdiscovery,the antibiotic,hassavedmillionsoflives.Asfaraselectricityisconcerned,perhapsthegreatestscientistofallwasNicolaTesla,withoutwhoseinventionsinthisfieldwemightnothavethesafesystemofdistributingelectricitybyalternatingcurrentthatwehavetoday.AmonghisotherinventionswereradiowaveswhichareusedtobroadcastTVandradio,andofcoursewifi.Apartfromscience,anumberofpoliticalactivistshavealsomadesignificantcontributionstotheirsocieties,andhavehelpedtowinfreedomfortheirpeople.PerhapsthemostfamousofthesewasMahatmaGandhi,an nlawyerwhohelpedtowinindependenceforhisnationfromtheBritishwithhisuniquestyleofpeaceful,whichwaslateraninspirationtootherleadersinthe20thcentury.Forexample,intheUS,ablackcivilrightsleadercalledMartinLutherKingacknowledgedtheinfluenceofGandhi.King’spassionatestyleandnon-violent sagainstsegregationhelpedtobringaboutpoliticalchangeforblackpeopleinthatcountry.Inconclusion,thescientists,inventors,andactivistsmentionedaboveshowclearlythatindividualscancontributegreatlytotheirsocieties,soitisnottruethattheycannotchangesociety.思思考這個(gè)問在歷史者帶來了很多和。有人認(rèn)為如果女性來承角色的話，她們能創(chuàng)造更和平的世界。你是否贊同此觀點(diǎn).占到占到80%以上的覆覆蓋更全面的一分為二邏改寫陳述題目觀點(diǎn)。Ibelievethat一句話寫出你的清晰觀(前面所提到的兩種一分為二方法Itistruethat…/Iacceptthat…/Iadmitthat…(這里有n種方法來寫topicHowever/Nevertheless,IwouldarguethatInconclusion,重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn)和看法Schoolsshouldstopteachingchildrenwithbooksstudentsthinkboring,anduse,gamescomputerinstead.Towhatextentdoyouagreeor“雖然…但是…”的一分Itisbelievedthattraditionaltextbooks,whichappeartobelessappealingtostudents,shouldgivewaytovariouselectronicteachingtools,suchas gamesorfi ally,IpartlyagreewiththisOntheonehand,theintroductionoftechnologicalteachingmethodscouldcontributepositivelytoimprovinglearningeffects.Theprocessofimpartingknowledgeintheformofsoundsandmotionscanbefarmoreeffectivethanthatdonewithwordsandillustrations.Forexample,pupilsexposedtounconventionalwaysofteaching,whetheritisafilmintroducingthehistoryofScotlandoracomputergamedesignedtoenhancemathematicalskills,aremorelikelytoeasilyunderstandwhattheteacheristeachingthanthosewhoaretaughtwithprintedmaterials.“雖然…但是…”的一分Ontheotherhand,despitetheadvantageofteachingwithelectronicdevices,Idonotthinkthatcomple yremovingtextbooksfromtheclasscanbejustified.Forsomesubjects,suchasliteratureandphilosophy,usingtextbooksisasuperiorwayofstudyingbecausewordsbetterstimulatestudents’imagination.Thisability,however,wouldbeunderminediftheclasswastaughtwithTVdramasorfi asalltheinformationisalreadyavailableandseeninthesamewaybyallviewers.Inconclusion,Iagreethatitisentirelyreasonableforschoolstoapplytechnologyineducationduetoitsadvantagesintermsofbeingvisuallyandaudiblyappealing.However,Iamnotinsupportofstop theuseoftraditionaltextbooksbecausetheyplaysignificantrolesincertainsubjectsthatrequireconcentrationandimagination.““取決于”的一分Task2：Toooneyisspentlookingafterandoldbuildings.Weshouldknockthemdownandbuildonesinstead.Doyouagreeor“取決于”的一分 ernmentsarefacedwiththedilemmaofwhethertospendahugeamountofmoneyprotectingoldbuildingsorsimplyknockthemdown.Inmyopinion,whetheranoldbuildingshouldbetorndownandmakewayforanewonemainlydependsonitsvalueintermsofartandhistory.Ontheonehand,itisnotwiseforthe ernmenttoinvestfinancialandotherresourcesinprotectingsomevaluelessoldbuildingsinspiteoftheircenturialexistence.Ifahouseortowercloselyresembleshundredsofotherbuildingsintermsofdesignandfunction,thenitwouldbeawasteofmoneytokeepitalive.The ernmentinsteadshouldconsidermakingspaceformodernbuildings,especiallythosehigh-riseones,whichwillbefollowedbyarangeofbenefits,suchasincreasingaffordablehousingsupplyandimprovinglivingconditions.“取決于”的一分Ontheotherhand,itisundoubtedlyworthwhiletopreservebuildingswithhistoricandartisticmeaningsevenatasignificantcost.The reasonisthatthesebuildingsattractpeoplefromdomesticcitiesandallovertheworld.Whetherthefeelingispatrioticorexotic,visitorstothesemeaningfulsitescanbespirituallysatisfiedandatthesametimemakeeconomiccontributionstothecity.Inaddition,today'sdesignersmaybeabletolearnfromsomecreativelydesignedandwellerectedbuildings.Forexample,acentury-oldmansionmaybeatextbookteachingmoderndevelopershowtoconstructhousesthatcouldwithstandthefiercestofhurricane.Inconclusion,Idonotagreethatalloldbuildingsshouldbedemolishedwithouttakingtheiruniquemeaningsintoconsideration.Culturallyandhistoricallyvaluableoldarchitecturalworksareworthpreservingandprotecting.1.改寫原題觀點(diǎn)2.改寫原題觀點(diǎn)3.事實(shí)背景+是是否贊同的介紹Increasingthepriceofpetrolisthebestwaytosolvegrowingtrafficandpollutionproblems.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisopinion?版本一：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.Icomple ydisagreewiththis版本二：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.AlthoughIbelievethathigherfuelpricescanreducethenumberofcarsonthestreet,Idonotagreethatasimpleriseinthepriceisenough.SomeSomepeoplethinkthatinsteadofpreventingclimatechange,we/