考試預(yù)測沖刺群-大作文題補充

補充題1：Somepeoplethinkthatadvertisingdiscouragesusfrombeingdifferentindividuals,asallpeoplewanttodothesameandlookthesame.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?（話 版本參考Asadvertisinghasaffectedeveryaspectofourlives,somepeopleclaimthatwearelosingindividualitybecausewewatchthesameadvertisementsandbuythesamegoods.Thisviewpointsoundsreasonable.Thereisnodoubtthatadvertisingaffectspeople’sdecision-makingintheirdailyconsumption.Asmostconsumershavelittlespecializedknowledgeaboutthegoods,theytendtobelievewhattheyseeandhearfromtheadvertisements.Whenapieceofadvertisementappearseverywhereinourlives,peoplearelikelytobebrainwashedandmaylosetheirownjudgment.Moreover,itishumannaturetofollowthetrendoutofvanityorpeerpressure.Inthisfast-changingworld,manypeopleworrythattheyareoutoffashionandtheadvertisingcompanymaytakeadvantageofthistoboostthesalesoftheirproducts.However,itisnottruetocometotheconclusionthatthisworldethesameduetoadvertisingns. ly,people’spurchasingpowerandspendinghabitsdependontheireconomicconditions,soitishardtosaythatonlyadvertisingcanpromptpeopletomakethefinaldecision.Theyhavetoconsiderotherfactorsandtrytoallocatetheir e.Secondly,thecompetitionbetweenmanufacturerswouldmotivatethemtolaunchnewproductsthataredifferentfromtheirrivals’andthiswouldcontributetothediversityofcommodities.Ifconsumersarefacedwithmultiplechoices,theywouldchoosetheproductsthatbestsuittheirownindividuality.Tosumup,advertisingwouldmakemanypeopleusethesamebrandsandthesametypeofproducts,butthereisnoneedtoworryaboutthelossofdiversityinthecommercializedworld.補充題2：Inmanycountriespeoplecanbuyawiderangeofhouseholdgoods(forexample, TV,microwaveovensandricecookers).Isitapositiveornegativedevelopment? 版本參考TheincreasinglivingstandardmakesitpossibleforpeopletoaffordvariousconsumergoodssuchasTV,microwaveovens,etc.Whenweenjoythebenefitsbroughtbythemoderntechnology,thereisawideconcernthatthismayhavedetrimentaleffectsontheenvironment.Forindividualhouseholds,thereisnodoubtthatusinghomeappliancesbringsmorecomfortandconvenience.Watchinisarelaxingwayforpeopletospendtheirleisuretimeandbroadentheirscopeofknowledge,withinformativeandamusingprogramsavailableonthescreenanytime.Electricappliancesinthekitchencanassisthousewivestocooktastyandnutritiousfood,makingthetiringtaskmoreenjoyableandefficient.Also,theriseinconsumptionofhomeappliancescanboostthemanufacturingindustryandthereforemanycountriesencouragepeopletobuythesegoods,asthiscanstimulatetheeconomyandprovideemployment.However,therearenegativerepercussionstothispatternofworldwidegrowthofelectricproducts.Theproductionanduseofthesegoodsconsumeahugetyofenergyandresources,whichwouldputastrainontheenvironment.Whatisworseisthatmanufacturerskeeplaunchingnewproductsandconsumersconstantlyreplacetheoldones,sotonsofwasteproductsandcomponentsareproducedeveryday.Disposalofitemssuchasfridgesandairconditionersisparticularlytroublesome,becausetheycontaindangerouschemicalsandtakeupspaceinlandfillsites.Overall,itisapositivetrendthatpeoplecanaffordvariouskindsofelectricproducts,whichindicatesthattheirlivingconditionshaveimproved.However,somemeasuressuchasenergy-savingandrecyclingtechnologiesneedtobeadoptedforprotectingtheenvironment.補充題3：Somepeoplethinkthatchildrenshouldobeytherulesdisagree（ 版本參考Itiscommonforparentstosetrulestoregulateandcontrolchildren'sbehavior.Thispracticecanhelpchildrendevelopgoodhabitsandavoidmakingmistakes,buttoomanyrulesmayaffectchildren'sgrowth.Thereisnodenyingthatmanychildrendonothaveself-controlandtheyneedadults'interventionintheirbehavior.Forexample,somechildrengetaddictedtowatchinandplaying games.Bysettingsomerules,parentscanrestricttheamountoftimechildrenspendontheseactivities,whichenableschildrentoconcentrateontheirstudies.However,ifparentssettoomanyrules,childrentendtofollowtheirparents'instructionsineveryaspectoftheirlives.Theymay dependent,withouttheabilitytomaketheirowndecisions.Suchchildrenmayhavedifficultyinadaptingtothesocietywhentheygrowup.Also,toomanyrulescanleadtotensionbetweenfamilymembers,aschildrenmaycomplainthattheirparentsareinterferingintheirlives.Agoodexampleisthatsomeparentsmayrestrictchildren'ssociallives,notallowingchildrentoassociatewithsomepeople.Someteenagersmay erebelliousandshowbehaviorproblems.Forinstance,someofthemmaylearntosmokeordrinkjustbecausetheywanttodefytheirparents'ordersortheyfeeldepressedathome.Overall,rulesanddisciplinesarenecessaryathome,particularlyforthoseyoungchildrenwhocannotdistinguishrightfromwronganddonothavetheabilitytocontroltheirbehavior.However,aschildrengrow,parentsneedtolearntocommunicatewiththemandgivethemmorefreedomintheirlives.補充題4：Somepeoplethinkalllawbreakersshouldbeputintoprison,whileothersbelievethattherearebetteralternatives.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion. 版本參考Itiscommonpracticeallovertheworldtosendcriminalstoprisonandthisisconsideredasthebestwaytodealwiththem.However,somepeoplesuggestthatalternativesolutionsaremoreeffective.Thisessaywilldiscusstheissuefrombothsides.Accordingtomostpeople,itisnecessarytosendcriminalstojailforpublicsecurityandjustice.Itwouldhaveadeterrenteffectonthosewhointendtocommitcrimes.Bycontrast,ifcriminalscanesc thepunishment,thereisariskthatthecrimeratewouldincreaseandthesocietywouldeunstableanddangerous.Inaddition,itisfairforvictimsandtheirrelativestoseethecriminalsimprisoned;otherwisepeoplewouldandlosetheirconfidenceinthe ernmentandonthelaw.However,somepeoplebelievethattorehabilitatecriminalsislikelytoneedmorethanasimpleimprisonment.ly,alargenumberofpeopleperpetratedcrimesbecausetheyknowlittleaboutthelawandlackbasicskillstoearnaliving.Therefore,trainingclassesseemtobeabettersolution,whichcanraisetheirawarenessaboutthelawandteachthempracticalskills.Secondly,somelawviolatorsareverytalentedandtheyaretheexpertsincertainareas.Iftheywereallowedtocontinuetoworkandmakecontributiontothesociety,itwouldbebeneficialforthemandforthesocietyaswell.Inmypointofview,thereisnodoubtthatcriminals,particularlythosechargedwithgraveoffenses,mustbesenttoprison,astheirbehaviorsaredangerous.Bycontrast,ifthelawbreakersrealizetheirmistakesandtheconsequencesarenotserious,theycanbeexemptedfrompunishmentandalternativewaysshouldbeused.補充題5：Somepeoplethinkyoungpeoplearenotsuitableforimportantpositionsinthe ernment，whileotherpeoplethinkitisagoodideaforyoungpeopletotakethesepositions.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion. 版本參考Thereisadebateaboutwhetheryounggenerationisqualifiedforimportantpositionsinthe ernment.Inthisessay,Iwilldiscusstheviewpointsofbothsupportersandopponentsandgivemyownopinion.Itisgenerallybelievedthatyoungpeopleareimmatureandinexperienced.Theytendtomakedecisionswithoutenoughconsideration,whi ayleadtoseriousconsequencesiftheyareinchargeofimportantdepartmentsof ernment.Manyyoungpeoplearespoiltbytheirparentsintheirchildhoodandadolescence,sotheyarelessconsiderateandresponsiblethantheirparentsandgrandparents.As ernmentpositionsconcernthewelfareofcitizensandrequireseriouscommitment,youngpeopleseemtobeunsuitableforthesepositions.However,somepeoplearguethatyoungpeopleshouldbegivenmoreopportunitiestodo ernmentwork.Theyhavemoreenergyandenthusiasmfortheirjobsthantheoldergeneration.Whatismoreimportantisthatyoungpeoplearereceptivetonewideasandnewtechnology.Theyareexpectedtobringinnovativestylestotheernmentworkwhichisconsideredasrigidandconservative.Forexample,insomecities,youngofficialsofthe ernmentuseonlinesocialnetworkingtointeractwithlocalresidentsandimprovetherelationshipof ernmentandthepublic.Inmyview,youngpeopleshouldbeencouragedtotakemoreresponsibilitiesf overnmentwork.Thisisagoodwaytoaddnewideastothe ernment'sservices.Consideringtheirlackofexperience,jobtrainingmaybeneededbeforeyoungpeopletaketheirpositions.Theyarelikelytomakemistakes,butinthisprocesstheycanlearnand competentfortheirjobs.補充題6：Somepeoplethinkthattoomuchattentionandtoomanyresourceshavebeengiventotheprotectionofwildanimalsandbirds.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree? 版本參考Weoftenhearaboutthenewsreportsthatpeoplemakeanefforttoprotectwidebirdsandanimals.Althoughsomepeoplethinkitisawasteofpeople'sresources,Ibelievethisactionbenefitsmankindinthelongterm.Thereisnodenyingthathumanbeingsaresuperiortoanimalsandthereforeitseemsmoreurgentfortheernmenttousepublicresourcestoimprovepeople’swelfare.Also,somemeasuresforprotectingbirdsandanimalsmay withhumans’interests.Forinstance,establishingnaturereservesiseffectiveinprotectingrarespecies,butitalsomeansthatmanyfarmerswouldlosetheirlandfrowingfood.Despitethefactsmentionedabove,wehavetoseethatwildbirdsandanimalsplayanimportantroleinmaintainingtheecologicalbalance.Forexample,somebirdsfeedoninsectsandtheseusefulbirdshelptoprotectthegrainsfrombeingdestroyedbypests.Therefore,thedeclineinthenumberofsomekindsofbirdsandanimalsmayleadtoenvironmentalproblemsandeconomiclosstohumanbeings.Inaddition,somebirdsandanimalsareendangeredspeciesandtheyarevaluableinngscientificresearch.Bystudyingthesespecies,scientistscangainagreatdealofinformationaboutbiologicalevolutionandtheoriginofmankind.Thiswouldhelppeoplebetterunderstandthediversityandhistoryofnature,andadoptappropriatestrategiestotackletheenvironmentalproblemsmankindisfacing.Overall,itistruethatprotectingbirdsandanimalsdrawspeople’sattentionandconsumespublicresources,butweshouldalsoseethevalueofbirdsandanimalsinenvironmentalprotectionandscientificresearch.補充題7：Somepeopleclaimthatitisacceptabletouseanimalsinmedicalresearchforthebenefitsofhumanbeings,whileotherpeoplearguethatitiswrong.Discussbothviewsandgiveyour 版本參考Nowadays,itiscommonformedicalcompaniestouseanimalsformedicaltest.However,whetherthispracticeisjustifiedhaslongbeenacontroversialissue.Somepeoplebelievethatitisreasonabletouseanimalsinmedicalresearch,althoughthispracticeseemscrueltoanimals.Everyyear,alargenumberofpeoplesufferfromvariouskindsofdiseasesandnewmedicinesneedtobedevelopedtocuretheirdiseases.Bytestingthesemedicinesin ,wecanfindoutwhethertheyaresafeforhumanbeings.Iftheanimal banned,thepatientswouldbeatahighriskwhentheytakethenewmedicines.Thisisunacceptable,ashumanbeingsaresuperiortoanimals.However,somepeopleobjecttoanimaltestsandtheybelievemostofsuchtestsarenotnecessary.Forexample,inordertoreducethecostofproductionandmakemoreprofits,somemedicalcompaniesdoexcessiveanimaltests.Suchtestshavecausedtoomuchpainandsufferingtoanimalsandtheseshouldbecriticized.Itisalsoarguedthattheresultsofanimaltestsareunreliable,asanimals’reactiontothemedicineisdifferentfromhumanbeings’.Therefore,usinganimalsinmedicalresearchcannotguaranteethesafetyofsickpeople.Inmypointofview,itseemstobeunavoidabletouseanimalsinmedicaltestswhenweneednewmedicinetorescuethosesickpeople.However,Ialsoopposeanycrueltytoanimals.Therightofanimalsshouldberespectedandtheirpainshouldbereducedtoaminimum.補充題8：Somepeoplebelievethatthebestwaytobuildahappiersocietyistoensurethatthereareonlysmalldifferencesbetweentherichestandthepoorestmembers.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree? 版本參考Itseemsthatthegapbetweenrichandpoorpeopleexistsinallsocietiesandthereisabeliefthatreducingthisgapcanenhancethesenseofhappinessofallcitizens.Ithinkthatfairdistributionofsocialwealthisimportanttobuildinganidealsociety,butthisissueisnotsimplykeetheedisparityminimum.Itistruethatrich-po apisthecausebehindmanysocialproblems,includingmoraldeclineandsomecrimes.Thedisadvantagedgroupmayfeelasenseofinferiorityandenvy,orevenresentwealthypeople.Theymaychoosetostealorrob,astheyconsiderthisgapunjustified.Also,richpeoplemaynotfeelgenuinehappinessastheylackthesenseofsecurity.Narrowingrich-po apmeansthematerialwealthcouldbedistributedmoreevenly,forexamplebytaxationpolicy.Asaresult,moremoneywouldbespentinimprovingthelivingconditionsofpoorpeopleandprovidingthemwithbetterpublicservices.However,itisunwisetoeliminatethedifferencebetweentherichandpoorbecausethispracticemayhurtthemotivationofinligentandtalentedpeople.Fairnessisanattractiveidea,butitcannotbeachievedbysimplynarrowing edisparity.Acertaindegreeofdisparitycanmotivatepeopletoworkharderandpursuematerialwealth,whichisconsideredasthedrivingforceofasociety.Overall,thekeytobuildingahappysocietyistoensurefairnessforallsocialmembersandthe ernmentneedstokeeptherich-poordifferenceatareasonablelevel.補充題9：Somepeoplethinkthatpollutionanddamageofenvironmentareresultingfromacountry’sdeveloand richer,andthisishardtobeavoided.Towhatextentdoyouagreeor 版本參考Manycountriesarefacedwithaseriesofenvironmentalproblemsandsomepeoplebelievethisisinevitableintheprocessoffasteconomicdevelopment.Thisviewpointseemstobereasonable,butIthinkpollutionanddamagetotheenvironmentshouldbepreventedandaddressed.Thereisnodenyingthattherapideconomicgrowthandtechnologicaladvancehavecausedseriousdamagetotheenvironment.Themodernmanufacturingindustryproduceslargetiesofgoods,makingourlivesmorecomfortableandconvenient,whileitincreasestheconsumptionofenergyandresources.Besides,duetotheimprovedlivingstandard,moreandmorepeoplebuyprivatecarsandtheexhaustfumesemittedbycarsleadtoairpollutioninthecity.Peopleenjoybettermateriallifenow,buttheythrowawayahugenumberofwasteproducts,whicharehardtodealwith.Despitethefactthatourenvironmentisdeteriorating,Idonotagreethatenvironmentalproblemscannotbeavoided.Instead,thereismuchthatwecandotosolvetheseproblems.Forinstance,theresearchanddevelopmentofcleanerfuelssuchassolarandnuclearenergyhasbeenputonndainmanycountries.Wecanexpectthesenewformsofenergytoreplacefossilfuelsstepbystep.Recyclingtechnologyalsoneedstobeimprovedandpromoted,sothewasteproductscouldbereusedandtheirharmfuleffectsontheenvironmentwouldbeminimized.Moreover,anybehaviorthatdamagestheenvironmentshouldbestrictlypunished,includingdischargingwastewater,poaching,deforestation,etc.Inconclusion,itisjustifiedforacountrytopursuefasteconomicdevelopmentandbetterlivingconditions,butitshouldalsotakemeasurestoprotecttheenvironmentandtrytoachieve