![糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c37/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c371.gif)
![糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c37/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c372.gif)
![糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c37/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c373.gif)
![糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c37/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c374.gif)
![糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c37/67f2a5657b7dfe991b2cbffc4ae06c375.gif)
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
AimsWhatistheidealHbA1c?LegacyeffectBloodPressure:canwegotoolow?Cholesteroltargets,andtheroleofFibratesWhoshouldhaveaspirin?CaseScenariosWhatdrugstouseaftermetformin?Whentouseinsulinandwhichone?Anythingelse?AimsWhatistheidealHbA1c?LWhatistheidealHbA1cUKPDSdataDCCTandEDICtrialADVANCEACCORDSTENOVADT
WhatistheidealHbA1cUKPDSdHbA1c
cross-sectional,medianvaluesHbA1ccross-sectional,median糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件UKPDS80–LegacyofLong-termGlycaemicControl(30YearFollowUpData)UKPDS80–LegacyofLong-termAftermedian8.5yearspost-trialfollow-up
AggregateEndpoint
1997
2007Anydiabetesrelatedendpoint RRR:
12%
9%
P:
0.029
0.040
Microvasculardisease RRR:
25%
24%
P:
0.0099
0.001Myocardialinfarction RRR: 16% 15%
P:
0.052
0.014All-causemortality RRR: 6% 13%
P:
0.44
0.007RRR=RelativeRiskReduction,P=LogRankLegacyEffectofEarlierGlucoseControlAftermedian8.5yearspost-trACCORDADVANCEandVADT-NoSignificantEffectonMacroVascularOutcomesACCORDADVANCEVADTNo.ofparticipants10,25111,1401791Participantage,years626660Durationofdiabetesatstudyentry,years10811.5HbA1CatBaseline,%8.17.59.4Participantswithpriorcardiovascularevent,%353240Durationoffollow-up,years3.45.06ACCORDADVANCEandVADT-NoSiSummaryofACCORD,ADVANCEandVADT:Outcomes,intensivevs.standardACCORDADVANCEVADTHbA1c,%6.4vs.7.5*6.5vs.7.3*6.9vs.8.4*Deathfromanycause,%
5.0vs.4.0*8.9vs.9.6NADeathfromcardiovascularevent,%
2.6vs.1.8*4.5vs.5.22.1vs.1.7NonfatalMI,%
3.6vs.4.6*2.7vs.2.86.1vs.6.3Nonfatalstroke,%
1.3vs.1.23.8vs.3.82.0vs.3.1Neworworseningnephropathy,%
NA4.1vs.5.2*NAMajor/severehypoglycemia,%
10.5vs.3.5*2.7vs.1.5*21.1vs.9.7*Weightgain,kg3.5vs.0.4*0.0vs.-1.0*NA*p≤0.05
SummaryofACCORD,ADVANCEand糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件ACCORDRetinalConclusionIntensiveglycemiccontrolandintensivecombinationtreatmentofdyslipidemia,butnotintensiveblood-pressurecontrol,reducedtherateofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathy.(FundedbytheNationalHeart,Lung,andBloodInstituteandothers;ClinicalTnumbers,NCT00000620fortheACCORDstudyandNCT00542178fortheACCORDEyestudy.)?ACCORDRetinalConclusionIntenADVANCE4.3yearsoffollow-up:Perindopril/indapamideBloodpressurereduced7.1±0.3mmHgsystolicand2.9±0.2mmHgdiastolic(P<0.001).135/75:140/77(baseline145/81)HbA1Cwasreducedby0.61±0.02%after4.3years(P<0.001).GlicazideMRADVANCE4.3yearsoffollow-up:糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件VADTConclusionIntensiveglucosecontrolinpatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabeteshadnosignificanteffectontheratesofmajorcardiovascularevents,death,ormicrovascularcomplications,withtheexceptionofprogressionofalbuminuria(P=0.01)VADTConclusionIntensiveglucoVADTintheContextofthe“NaturalHistory”ofType2DiabetesTime(yearssincediagnosis)HbA1c(%)6.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.512345678910111213141516DrivetheriskforcomplicationsVADTintheContextofthe“NaMeanSystolicBlood-PressureLevelsatEachStudyVisitTheACCORDStudyGroup.NEnglJMed2010;362:1575-1585MeanSystolicBlood-PressureLACCORDBPConclusionInpatientswithtype2diabetesathighriskforcardiovascularevents,targetingasystolicbloodpressureoflessthan120mmHg,ascomparedwithlessthan140mmHg,didnotreducetherateofacompositeoutcomeoffatalandnonfatalmajorcardiovasculareventsACCORDBPConclusionInpatientACCORDlipidConclusionThecombinationoffenofibrateandsimvastatindidnotreducetherateoffatalcardiovascularevents,nonfatalmyocardialinfarction,ornonfatalstroke,ascomparedwithsimvastatinaloneTheseresultsdonotsupporttheroutineuseofcombinationtherapywithfenofibrateandsimvastatintoreducecardiovascularriskinthemajorityofhigh-riskpatientswithtype2diabetesACCORDlipidConclusionThecomHazardRatiosforthePrimaryOutcomeinPrespecifiedSubgroupsTheACCORDStudyGroup.NEnglJMed2010;362:1563-1574HazardRatiosforthePrimary糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件DiabetesandAspirinGuidanceYesinsecondarypreventionPrimarypreventionshouldbeonanindividualbasiswithconsiderationofthebenefitsandharmsofaspirin,takingintoaccountthepresenceofriskfactorsforvasculardisease(includingconditionssuchasdiabetes)andtheriskofgastrointestinalbleeding..MHRADrugSafetyUpdate.October2009.DiabetesandAspirinGuidanceYDiabetesandAspirinGuidancePrimaryprevention:over50,smoker,treatedforhypertensionandhighcholesterol:yesUnder50withallfactorsandFH:yesfromage40Under50:noOver50non-smokeronlyDM:noOver50treatedforhypertension,andhighcholesterol:probablyyesDiabetesandAspirinGuidancePAspirinandDiabetesTheASCENDStudyisalargemultisitestudyrecruiting10,000patientsover40withtype2diabetesdesignedtoanswerthequestionwhetheraspirinshouldbeprescribedroutinelyindiabeticpatients.(2011)ACCEPT-DItalianstudy5000patients,greaterthan50.(aspirin/placebo)2007startedAspirinandDiabetesTheASCENDNICEGuidelines:GeneralRecommendations
Structureddiabeteseducation,andaimforgoodglucosecontrolearlyoninthediagnosis(metforminearly).TargetHbA1cof6.5%forType2Diabetesingeneral,butavoidpursuinghighlyintensivemanagementoflevelslessthan7%inthosewithlimitedlifeexpectancy5years),especiallyifusingdrugswhichcangeneratehypoglycaemiaBloodpressuretargetoflessthan140/80mmHg(Nolegacyeffect)Simvastatin40mgorequivalentforallpatientswithType2diabetesagedover40,irrespectiveofexperienceofCVdisease.NICEGuidelines:GeneralRecomMonotherapywith1stor2ndGenerationSUswasAssociatedwith24-61%ExcessRiskForAllCauseMortalityComparedwithMetforminMonotherapy(P<0.001)2.01.51.00.51stGenerationsulphonylureasvmetformin2ndGenerationsulphonylureasvmetforminAllrosiglitazone*vmetforminAllpioglitazone*vmetforminAllrosiglitazone*vallpioglitazone*Othercombinations?vmetforminTzoulakietal.,BMJ2009;339:b4731HazardRatio(95%CI)(LogScale)*Anytherapy(monotherapyandcombinations).?OtherdrugsandcombinationsofanyoralantidiabetesdrugsexcludingrosiglitazoneandpioglitazoneModel2resultsMonotherapywith1stor2ndGeACCORD:MortalityHRforIndividualAgents1ACCORDStudyGroup.EffectsofIntensiveGlucoseLoweringinType2Diabetes.NEnglJMed2008;358:2545-592.ACCORDWebcastpresentedattheAmericanDiabetesAssociation,6-10June2008.Availableat:/StoreTemplate/default.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fDefault.aspx5.Cefalu,WT.NEnglJMed2008;358(24):2633-2635.6.AvandiaSPCMarch2008ACCORD:MortalityHRforIndivA40yearoldSupermarketWorkerA40yearoldladyhasa2yearhistoryoftype2diabetes.Herglycaemiccontrolisconsistentlypoor.Sheisanex-smokerwithaBMIof49.HercurrentmedicationincludesAspirin75mgOD,Lisinopril20mgOD,Simvastatin20mgOD,Metformin850mgBD.ExaminationrevealBPof175/70mm/hg,peripheralpulsesarenormalwithnoevidenceofneuropathy.Fundoscopyrevealsearlybackgroundretinopathy.Hba1c-8.5%TC-5.7mmol/lLDL-C-3.5mmol/lHDL-C-0.9mmol/lPlasmaTG-2.6mmol/lU/E-NormalLFT-NormalMicroalbuminuriascreen-positiveHowwouldyoufurthermanagethispatient?A40yearoldSupermarketWorkPATIENTMRSX78type2DMBMI28HbA1C8.5%,nocomplicationsMetforminintolerant?MetforminMRBP145/89,NormalACR,Chol6.5,Hdl1.3SUs,PioGlitazone,or(Sita)gliptinTargetHbA1c?PATIENTMRSX78type2DMBMI糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件OPTionsBMI>35gliptin?Exenatide,avoidsulphonylureasearlyElderlyavoidsulphonylureasearly,aimforreasonablecontrolHbA1c7.5%BMI<30SusafterMetforminBMI30-35age,renalfunction,weightchanges,?SU,gliptinorPioglitazonesecond.KnownIHDconsiderPioglitazoneaftermetforminunlessheartfailureOPTionsBMI>35gliptin?ExenInsulinCostsMixtures:HumanversusanaloguesNoevidenceofdifference,?IncreasedriskofHypoglycaemia.90%oftype2patientsdoaswelloncheaperhumanmixtureSAVINGS:100patientsaround£15/month/patient=£20000peryearInsulinCostsMixtures:InsulinsandCostsNighttimeinsulin:NPH-noevidenceofdifferenceincontrol,weightgain,?Increasedhypoglycaemia£20permonthdifference:100patients£24,000perannumInsulinsandCostsNighttimeiAmberyPetal.PosterpresentedatDiabetesUKannualprofessionalconference,2005.P120.Approximately60%ofMonotherapyPatientsareMissingGlycaemicTargetsHbA1c<7%HbA1c710%HbA1c>10%40%7%53%AmberyPetal.PosterpresentAimsWhatistheidealHbA1c?LegacyeffectBloodPressure:canwegotoolow?Cholesteroltargets,andtheroleofFibratesWhoshouldhaveaspirin?CaseScenariosWhatdrugstouseaftermetformin?Whentouseinsulinandwhichone?Anythingelse?AimsWhatistheidealHbA1c?LWhatistheidealHbA1cUKPDSdataDCCTandEDICtrialADVANCEACCORDSTENOVADT
WhatistheidealHbA1cUKPDSdHbA1c
cross-sectional,medianvaluesHbA1ccross-sectional,median糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件UKPDS80–LegacyofLong-termGlycaemicControl(30YearFollowUpData)UKPDS80–LegacyofLong-termAftermedian8.5yearspost-trialfollow-up
AggregateEndpoint
1997
2007Anydiabetesrelatedendpoint RRR:
12%
9%
P:
0.029
0.040
Microvasculardisease RRR:
25%
24%
P:
0.0099
0.001Myocardialinfarction RRR: 16% 15%
P:
0.052
0.014All-causemortality RRR: 6% 13%
P:
0.44
0.007RRR=RelativeRiskReduction,P=LogRankLegacyEffectofEarlierGlucoseControlAftermedian8.5yearspost-trACCORDADVANCEandVADT-NoSignificantEffectonMacroVascularOutcomesACCORDADVANCEVADTNo.ofparticipants10,25111,1401791Participantage,years626660Durationofdiabetesatstudyentry,years10811.5HbA1CatBaseline,%8.17.59.4Participantswithpriorcardiovascularevent,%353240Durationoffollow-up,years3.45.06ACCORDADVANCEandVADT-NoSiSummaryofACCORD,ADVANCEandVADT:Outcomes,intensivevs.standardACCORDADVANCEVADTHbA1c,%6.4vs.7.5*6.5vs.7.3*6.9vs.8.4*Deathfromanycause,%
5.0vs.4.0*8.9vs.9.6NADeathfromcardiovascularevent,%
2.6vs.1.8*4.5vs.5.22.1vs.1.7NonfatalMI,%
3.6vs.4.6*2.7vs.2.86.1vs.6.3Nonfatalstroke,%
1.3vs.1.23.8vs.3.82.0vs.3.1Neworworseningnephropathy,%
NA4.1vs.5.2*NAMajor/severehypoglycemia,%
10.5vs.3.5*2.7vs.1.5*21.1vs.9.7*Weightgain,kg3.5vs.0.4*0.0vs.-1.0*NA*p≤0.05
SummaryofACCORD,ADVANCEand糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件ACCORDRetinalConclusionIntensiveglycemiccontrolandintensivecombinationtreatmentofdyslipidemia,butnotintensiveblood-pressurecontrol,reducedtherateofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathy.(FundedbytheNationalHeart,Lung,andBloodInstituteandothers;ClinicalTnumbers,NCT00000620fortheACCORDstudyandNCT00542178fortheACCORDEyestudy.)?ACCORDRetinalConclusionIntenADVANCE4.3yearsoffollow-up:Perindopril/indapamideBloodpressurereduced7.1±0.3mmHgsystolicand2.9±0.2mmHgdiastolic(P<0.001).135/75:140/77(baseline145/81)HbA1Cwasreducedby0.61±0.02%after4.3years(P<0.001).GlicazideMRADVANCE4.3yearsoffollow-up:糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件VADTConclusionIntensiveglucosecontrolinpatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabeteshadnosignificanteffectontheratesofmajorcardiovascularevents,death,ormicrovascularcomplications,withtheexceptionofprogressionofalbuminuria(P=0.01)VADTConclusionIntensiveglucoVADTintheContextofthe“NaturalHistory”ofType2DiabetesTime(yearssincediagnosis)HbA1c(%)6.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.512345678910111213141516DrivetheriskforcomplicationsVADTintheContextofthe“NaMeanSystolicBlood-PressureLevelsatEachStudyVisitTheACCORDStudyGroup.NEnglJMed2010;362:1575-1585MeanSystolicBlood-PressureLACCORDBPConclusionInpatientswithtype2diabetesathighriskforcardiovascularevents,targetingasystolicbloodpressureoflessthan120mmHg,ascomparedwithlessthan140mmHg,didnotreducetherateofacompositeoutcomeoffatalandnonfatalmajorcardiovasculareventsACCORDBPConclusionInpatientACCORDlipidConclusionThecombinationoffenofibrateandsimvastatindidnotreducetherateoffatalcardiovascularevents,nonfatalmyocardialinfarction,ornonfatalstroke,ascomparedwithsimvastatinaloneTheseresultsdonotsupporttheroutineuseofcombinationtherapywithfenofibrateandsimvastatintoreducecardiovascularriskinthemajorityofhigh-riskpatientswithtype2diabetesACCORDlipidConclusionThecomHazardRatiosforthePrimaryOutcomeinPrespecifiedSubgroupsTheACCORDStudyGroup.NEnglJMed2010;362:1563-1574HazardRatiosforthePrimary糖尿病研究最新進展(2011年)課件DiabetesandAspirinGuidanceYesinsecondarypreventionPrimarypreventionshouldbeonanindividualbasiswithconsiderationofthebenefitsandharmsofaspirin,takingintoaccountthepresenceofriskfactorsforvasculardisease(includingconditionssuchasdiabetes)andtheriskofgastrointestinalbleeding..MHRADrugSafetyUpdate.October2009.DiabetesandAspirinGuidanceYDiabetesandAspirinGuidancePrimaryprevention:over50,smoker,treatedforhypertensionandhighcholesterol:yesUnder50withallfactorsandFH:yesfromage40Under50:noOver50non-smokeronlyDM:noOver50treatedforhypertension,andhighcholesterol:probablyyesDiabetesandAspirinGuidancePAspirinandDiabetesTheASCENDStudyisalargemultisitestudyrecruiting10,000patientsover40withtype2diabetesdesignedtoanswerthequestionwhetheraspirinshouldbeprescribedroutinelyindiabeticpatients.(2011)ACCEPT-DItalianstudy5000patients,greaterthan50.(aspirin/placebo)2007startedAspirinandDiabetesTheASCENDNICEGuidelines:GeneralRecommendations
Structureddiabeteseducation,andaimforgoodglucosecontrolearlyoninthediagnosis(metforminearly).TargetHbA1cof6.5%forType2Diabetesingeneral,butavoidpursuinghighlyintensivemanagementoflevelslessthan7%inthosewithlimitedlifeexpectancy5years),especiallyifusingdrugswhichcangeneratehypoglycaemiaBloodpressuretargetoflessthan140/80mmHg(Nolegacyeffect)Simvastatin40mgorequivalentforallpatientswithType2diabetesagedover40,irrespectiveofexperienceofCVdisease.NICEGuidelines:GeneralRecomMonotherapywith1stor2ndGenerationSUswasAssociatedwith24-61%ExcessRiskForAllCauseMortalityComparedwithMetforminMonotherapy(P<0.001)2.01.51.00.51stGenerationsulphonylureasvmetformin2ndGenerationsulphonylureasvmetforminAllrosiglitazone*vmetforminAllpioglitazone*vmetforminAllrosiglitazone*vallpioglitazone*Othercombinations?vmetforminTzoulakietal.,BMJ2009;339:b4731HazardRatio(95%CI)(LogScale)*Anytherapy(monotherapyandcombinations).?OtherdrugsandcombinationsofanyoralantidiabetesdrugsexcludingrosiglitazoneandpioglitazoneModel2resultsMonotherapywith1stor2ndGeACCORD:MortalityHRforIndividualAgents1ACCORDStudyGroup.EffectsofIntensiveGlucoseLoweringinType2Diabetes.NEnglJMed2008;358:2545-592.ACCORDWebcastpresentedattheAmericanDiabetesAssociation,6-10June2008.Availableat:/StoreTemplate/default.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fDefault.aspx5.Cefalu,WT.NEnglJMed2008;358(24):2633-2635.6.AvandiaSPCMarch2008ACCORD:MortalityHRforIndivA40yearoldSupermarketWorkerA40yearoldladyhasa2yearhistoryoftype2diabetes.Herglycaemiccontrolisconsistentlypoor.Sheisanex-smokerwithaBMIof49.Hercurren
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 生物醫(yī)藥產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略研究
- 電商物流配送模式優(yōu)化研究
- 2025年山東貨運從業(yè)資格證模擬考試0題答案
- 電信號碼百事通從理論到實踐的全面解析
- 用戶心理在移動電商中的影響與應用
- 電子商務在醫(yī)療健康領(lǐng)域的應用及盈利前景
- 2025年恩施貨運從業(yè)資格證考試內(nèi)容
- 現(xiàn)代物流與供應鏈金融服務整合策略
- 現(xiàn)代工廠生產(chǎn)流程優(yōu)化實踐分享
- 物理教育的新篇章科技與教育的融合
- (2024年)肺栓塞的護理課件
- 小學數(shù)學三年級下冊第八單元《數(shù)學廣角-搭配(二)》大單元集體備課整體設(shè)計
- (高清版)TDT 1031.6-2011 土地復墾方案編制規(guī)程 第6部分:建設(shè)項目
- 2024年江蘇省高中學業(yè)水平測試生物試卷
- 露天采場危險有害因素辨識
- 食品感官評價員培訓方案
- 蘇教版一年級上、下冊勞動與技術(shù)教案
- 柔性生產(chǎn)線技術(shù)及其影響
- 智研咨詢發(fā)布:2023年中國醫(yī)院后勤服務行業(yè)市場現(xiàn)狀、發(fā)展概況、未來前景分析報告
- 七上-動點、動角問題12道好題-解析
- 《企業(yè)所得稅法稅法》課件
評論
0/150
提交評論