說(shuō)明教案成果finallili felix holt the radical

Title:Title:FelixHolt,theRadicalAuthor:GeorgeEliotceofPublication:Ontario,CanadaPublisher:BroadviewPress.DateofPublication:Pagenumbers:310-Name:Lili,LUStudentID:Course:Li ryTranslationTerm:Term2,2016/2017Teacher:Dr.CHANManSingFelixHolt,the0激進(jìn)分子Fancywhatagameatchesswouldbeifallthechessmenhad1andinlects,moreorlesssmallandcunning:ifyouwerenotonly2aboutyouradversary'smen,butalittleuncertainaboutyourown;if3knightcouldshufflehimselfontoanewsquarebythesly;ifyourbishop,4disgustatyourcastling,couldwheedleyourpawnsoutoftheirces;and5yourpawns,hatingyoubecausetheyarepawns,couldmakeawayfrom6appointedpoststhatyoumightgetcheckmateonasudden.Youmightbe7longest-headedofdeductivereasoners,andyetyoumightbebeatenby8ownpawns.Youwouldbeespeciallylikelytobebeat,ifyou9arrogantlyonyourmathematicalimagination,andregardedyourpassionatepieceswithcontempt.Yetthisimaginarychessiseasycomparedwiththegameamanhastoyagainsthisfellow-menwithotherfellow-menforhisinstruments.Hethinkshimselfsagacious,perhaps,becausehetrustsnobondexceptthatofself-interest:buttheonlyself-interesthecansafelyrelyoniswhatseemstobesuchtothemindhewoulduseorern.CanheeverbesureofknowingMatthewJermynwasundernomisgivingsastothefealtyofJohnson.Hehad"beenthemakingofJohnson";andthisseemstomanymenasareasonforexpectingdevotion,inspiteofthefactthattheythemselves,thoughveryfondoftheirown sandlives,arenotatalldevotedtotheMakertheybelievein.Johnsonwasamostserviceablesubordinate.Beingamanwhoaimedatrespectability,afamilyman,whohadagoodchurch-pew,subscribedforengravingsofbanquetpictureswheretherewereportraitsofpoliticalcelebrities,andwishedhischildrentobemoregenteelthantheirfather,hepresentedallthemorenumeroushandles然而，比起這假想棋局，更的游戲是：一人伙對(duì)于的忠心，·杰明毫不懷疑。他可“締卻根本不他們信奉的造物主。是最為殷勤周到worldlymotivebywhichajudicioussuperiormightgetaholdonhim.thisusefulregardtorespectabilityhaditsinconvenienceinrelationtosuch沖動(dòng)冒失、敏感多疑。己superior:itwasamarkofsomevanityandsomepride,which,ifthey nottouchedjustintherighthandling-ce,wereliable eraw不能依靠人的本性。薰衣草香水也sensitive.JermynwasawareofJohnson'sweaknesses,andthoughthe flatteredthemsufficiently.Butonthepointofknowingwhenwe人厭惡。就 的經(jīng)disagreeable,ourhumannatureisfallible.Ourlavender-water,oursourcompliments,andotherpolitefalsities,areconstantlyoffensive,when與一同進(jìn)餐；若在倫敦，他決不會(huì)去家用餐theverynatureofthemtheycanonlybemeanttoattractadmirationregard.JermynhadoftenbeenunconsciouslydisagreeabletoJohnson,地打斷的談話，拋個(gè)問(wèn)題轉(zhuǎn)向新話題。很能干andabovetheconstantoffenceofbeinganostentatiouspatron.HeneverletJohnsondinewithhiswifeanddaughters;hewouldnotdineatJohnson'shousewhenhewasintown.Heoftendidwhat對(duì)冷淡而寡言。若說(shuō)的器宇軒昂會(huì)挑起他人厭惡equivalenttopoohpoohinghisconversationbynotevenappearingtoandbysuddenlycuttingitshortwithaqueryonanewsubject.Jermynableandpoliticenoughtohavecommandedagreatdealofsuccessinlife,buthecouldnothelpbeinghandsome,arrogant,fondofbeing（或者斯爵士），很是唾棄，稱他這人“人indisposedtoanykindofcomradeship,amorousandblandtowardwomen,coldandself-containedtowardmen.Youwillhearverystrongdenialsthatanattorney'sbeinghandsomecouldenterintothedislikeheexcited;butconversationconsistsagooddealinthedenialofwhatistrue.FromtheBritishpointofviewmasculinebeautyisregardedverymuchasitisinthedraperybusiness:—asgoodsolelyforthefancydepartment—fornoblemen,s,poets,andtheclergy.Someonewho,likeMr.Lingon,disposedtorevileJermyn(perhapsitwasSirus),hadcalledhim"acursed,sleek,handsome,long-winded,overbearingsycophant";epithetswhichexpressed,ratherconfusedly,themingledcharacterofthedislikeheexcited.AndserviceableJohnJohnson,himselfsleek,andmindfulabouthisbroadclothandhiscambricfronts,hadwhatheconsidered"spirit"enoughwithinhimtofeelthatdislikeofJermyngraduallygatheringthroughyearsofobligationandsubjection,tillithad eanactuatingmotivedisposedtouseanopportunity;ifnottowatchforone.Itwasnotthismotive,however,butrathertheordinarycoursebusiness,whichaccountedforJohnson'syingadoublepartas在說(shuō)不清。而唯唯諾諾的·，這個(gè)油腔滑調(diào)、很是注意自己一身華服的人，在多年的束縛和下，心中對(duì)electioneeringagent.Whatmendoinelectionsisnottobeclassedeitheramongsinsormarksofgrace;itwouldbeprofanetoincludebusinessinreligion,andconsciencereferstofailure,nottosuccess.Still,thesenseofbeinggalledbyJermyn'sharnesswasanadditionalreasonforcultivatingallrelationsthatwereindependentofhim;andpiqueatHaroldTransome'sbehaviortohiminJermyn'sofficeperhapsgaveallthemorezesttoJohnson'suseofhispenandinkwhenhewroteahandbillintheserviceofGarstin,and parableagent,Putty,fullofinnuendoesagainstHaroldTransome,asadescendantoftheDurfey-Transomes.Itisanaturalsubjectofself-congratulationtoaman,whenspecialknowledge,gainedlongagowithoutanyforecast,turnsouttoaffordaspecialinspirationinthepresent;andJohnsonfeltanewpleasureintheconsciousnessthatheofallpeopleintheworldnexttoJermynhadthemostintimateknowledgeoftheTransomeaffairs.Stillbetter—someoftheseaffairsweresecretsofJermyn's.IfinplimentaryspirithemighthavebeencalledJermyn's"manofitwasasatisfactiontoknowthattheunrealityofthemanJohnJohnsonwasconfinedtohisappearanceinannuitydeeds,andthatelsewherehewas理人陽(yáng)奉陰違。人們?cè)谧髯镄校荒芤暈槎鞯?；把生意摻進(jìn)當(dāng)，但良知只能導(dǎo)致失敗，不會(huì)帶來(lái)成功。不過(guò)，屈辱，給了 ；羅德·特朗松 在料得的奇聞，竟在眼下變成觸動(dòng)的妙想，這自然讓人沾聞得特朗松的 ，這里還夾雜著的。若要貶損他，或稱他是的otive,andcapableofrememberinganythingforhisownpleasureandbenefit.Toactwithdoublenesstowardsamanwhoseconductwasdouble,wassonearanapproachtovirtuethatitdeservedtobecalledbynomeanernamethandiplomacy.BysuchcausesitcametopassthatChristianheldinhishandsabillinwhichJermynwasyfullyalludedtoasMr.GermanCozen,whowongamesbyclevershufflingandoddtrickswithoutanyhonor,andbackedDurfey'scribagainstBycliffe—inwhichitwasadroitlyimpliedthatthesaidtheDurfeyswouldhavediedoutandlefttheirnestemptyifithadnotbeenfortheirGermanCozen.Johnsonhadnotdaredtouseanyrecollectionsexceptsuchasmightcrediblyexistinothermindsbesideshisown.Inthetruthofthecase,noonebuthimselfhadthepromptingtorecalltheseout-wornscandals;butitwaslikelyenoughthatsuchfoul-wingedthingsshouldberevivedbyelectionheatsforJohnsontoescapeallsuspicion.局，卻是靠著狡猾的洗牌和各類把戲，毫不光彩曾幫所謂的特朗松家當(dāng)家人，不過(guò)是德?tīng)柗萍业母ㄏx(chóng)據(jù)說(shuō)，要不是有吉爾曼·柯贊，德?tīng)柗萍以缇推茢≡俣缺惶崞?，讓擺脫所有嫌疑Christiancouldgatheronlydimanduncertaininferencesfromthisflatironyandheavyjoking;butonechiefthingwascleartohim.HehadbeenrightinhisconjecturethatJermyn'sinterestaboutBycliffehaditssourceinsomeclaimofBycliffe'sontheTransomeproperty.Andthen,therewasthatstoryoftheoldbill-sticker's,which,closelyconsidered,indicatedthattherightofthepresentTransomesdepended,or,atleast,haddependedonthecontinuanceofsomeotherlives.Christianinhistimehadgatheredenoughlegalnotionstobeawarethatpossessionbyonemansometimesdependedonthelifeofanother;thatamanmightsellhisowninterestinproperty,andtheinterestofhisdescendants,whileaclaimonthatpropertywouldstillremaintosomeoneelsethanthepurchaser,supposingthedescendantsbecameextinct,andtheintereststheyhadsoldwereatanend.Butunderwhatconditionstheclaimmightbevalidorvoidinanyparticularcase,wasalldarknesstohim.SupposeBycliffehadanysuchclaimontheTransomeestates:howwasChristiantoknowwhetheratthepresentmomentitwasworthanythingmorethanabitofrottenparent?OldTommyhadsaidthatJohnsonknewallaboutit.ButevenifJohnsonwerestill克里斯琴?gòu)倪@又是挖苦又是戲謔的里，只得出模糊細(xì)，貼老頭兒說(shuō)的話，透露了德?tīng)柗?特朗松家的財(cái)益賣掉了，但假如繼承人皆不在人世，所售權(quán)益終羅森曾，知曉一切。但即便還沒(méi)入土——名為的人也不過(guò)凡胎——可能也還是的仆的主意。克里斯琴當(dāng)前最急迫的，定是全力搜尋的ground—andallJohnsonsaremortal—hemightstillbeanunderstrapperofJermyn's,inwhichcasehisknowledgewouldbeonthewrongsideofthehedgeforthepurposesofHenryScaddon.HisimmediatecaremustbetofindoutallhecouldaboutJohnson.HeblamedhimselffornothavingquestionedTommyfurtherwhilehehadhimatcommand;butonthisheadthebill-stickercouldhardlyknowmorethanthelessdilapidateddenizensofNowithadhappenedthatduringtheweeksinwhichChristianhadbeenatworktryingtosolvetheenigmaofJermyn'sinterestaboutBycliffe,Johnson'smindalsohadbeensomewhatoccupiedwithsuspicionandconjectureastonewinformationonthesubjectoftheoldBycliffeclaimswhichJermynintendedtoconcealfromhim.Theletterwhich,afterhisinterviewwithChristian,JermynhadwrittenwithasenseofperfectsafetytohisfaithfulallyJohnson,was,asweknow,writtentoaJohnsonwhohadfoundhisself-love patiblewiththatfaithfulnessofwhichitwassupposedtobethefoundation.Anythingthatthepatronfeltitforhisobligedfriendandservanttoknow,becamebythatveryfactan疑，不斷揣測(cè)——伯克利夫的事會(huì)見(jiàn)克里斯琴后，放心大膽寫給他忠實(shí)盟友的信，諸位ofpeculiarcuriosity.Theobligedfriendandservantsecretlydotedonhispatron'sinconvenience,providedthathehimselfdidnotshareit;andconjecturenaturallybecameactive.Johnson'slegalimagination,beingverydifferentlyfurnishedfromChristian's,wasatnolosstoconceiveconditionsunderwhichtheremightariseanewclaimontheTransomeestates.HehadbeforehimthewholehistoryofthesettlementofthoseestatesmadeahundredyearsagobyJohnJustusTransome,entailingthem,whilstinhispossession,onhissonThomasandhisheirs-male,withremaindertotheBycliffesinfee.HeknewthatThomas,sonofJohnJustus,provingaprodigal,had,withouttheknowledgeofhisfather,thetenantinpossession,soldhisownandhisdescendants'rightstoalawyer-cousinnamedDurfey;that,therefore,thetitleoftheDurfey-Transomes,inspiteofthatoldDurfey'strickstoshowthecontrary,dependedsolelyonthepurchaseofthe"basefee"thuscreatedbyThomasTransome;andthattheBycliffeswerethe"remaindermen"whomightfairlyousttheDurfey-TransomesifevertheissueoftheprodigalThomas要求拿回？一百年前，·賈斯特·特朗松分配財(cái)產(chǎn)的事他已爛熟于心?！べZ斯特將財(cái)產(chǎn)傳給兒子托馬斯和其他。知道，·賈斯特的兒子托馬斯揮霍無(wú)度，特朗松”。但盡管老德?tīng)柗剖钩鲈幱?jì)，買到的也只有托cleanoutofexistence,andceasedtorepresentarightwhichhehadbargainedawayfromthem.Johnson,asJermyn'ssubordinate,hadbeencloselycognizantofthedetailsconcerningthesuitinstitutedbysuccessiveBycliffes,ofwhomMauriceChristianBycliffewasthelast,onthepleathattheextinctionofThomasTransome'slinehadactuallycometopass—awearysuit,whichhadeatenintothefortunesoftwofamilies,andhadonlymadethefat.ThesuithadclosedwiththedeathofMauriceChristianBycliffeinprison;butbeforehisdeath,Jermyn'sexertionstogetevidencethattherewasstillissueofThomasTransome'slinesurviving,asasecurityoftheDurfeytitle,had