2023年全球慈善追蹤完整報告（英）

GlobalPhilanthropyTracker

2023ContentsTables

andFiguresIntroduction0102040608KeyFindingsSuggestionsWhatDoestheReportMeasure?DatainContext:SettingtheStage1214SpotlightonGivingtoUkrainePartI:Total

Cross-BorderResourceFlowsATotal

Cross-BorderResourceFlows202026B.Of?cialandPrivateForeign

AssistancePartII:Cross-BorderPhilanthropy283033363839424346A.LegalEnvironmentforCross-BorderPhilanthropyB.PhilanthropicOut?owsbyDonorCountries’

IncomeLevelC.UnitedNationsSustainableDevelopmentGoalsDCross-BorderPhilanthropybyCharitableCausesSpotlightonGlobalPhilanthropicResponsestowardstheFightagainsttheCOVID-19PandemicERecipientsofCross-BorderPhilanthropybyRegionSpotlightonCross-BorderPhilanthropyandClimateChangeF

Cross-Border

VolunteeringPartIIIOtherCross-BorderResourceFlowsA.Of?cialDevelopment

AssistanceB.Remittances5252555962SpotlightonDiasporaPhilanthropyC.PrivateCapitalInvestmentLooking

AheadMethodologyReferences64666876AcknowledgmentsTables

andFiguresFiguresFigure1.

Total

cross-borderresourcesfrom47countriesby?ow,

2020(inbillionsofin?ation-adjusted2020USdollars)20Figure2.

Total

cross-borderprivateresource?ows(philanthropicout?ows,remittances,andprivatecapitalinvestment),comparedwithof?cialdevelopmentassistance,1991–2020(inbillionsofcurrentUSdollars)2223242526272833343552545657Figure3.

Total

cross-borderresourcesby?ow,

1991–2020(inbillionsofcurrentUSdollars)Figure4.

Total

cross-borderresourcesby?owandbycountry,2020(inmillionsofin?ation-adjusted2020USdollars)Figure5.

Total

cross-borderresourcesasapercentageofgrossnationalincomeby?owandbycountry,

2020Figure6.Of?cialandprivateforeignassistancebycountry,

2020(inmillionsofin?ation-adjusted2020USdollars)Figure7.Of?cialandprivateforeignassistanceasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebycountry,

2020Figure8.Philanthropicout?owsasapercentageofgrossnationalincomein47countries,2020Figure9.Philanthropicout?owsfromlow-incomeandlower-middleincomecountries,2020Figure10.Philanthropicout?owsfromupper-middleincomecountries,2020Figure11.

Philanthropicout?owsfromhigh-incomecountries,2020Figure12.Netof?cialdevelopmentassistancebycountry,

2020(inmillionsofin?ation-adjusted2020USdollars)Figure13.Netof?cialdevelopmentassistanceasashareofgrossnationalincomebycountry,

2020Figure14.Remittanceout?owstoallcountriesbysendingcountry,

2020(inmillionsofUSdollars)Figure15.Remittanceout?owstoallcountriesasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebysendingcountry,

2020Figure16.Remittanceout?owstolow-andmiddle-incomecountriesbytop10sendingcountriesacrossincomegroups,2020(inmillionsofUSdollars)58Figure17.Remittanceout?owstolow-andmiddle-incomecountriesasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebytop10sendingcountriesacrossincomegroups,2020586263Figure18.Privatecapital?owsbycountry,2020(inmillionsofUSdollars)Figure19.Privatecapital?owsasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebycountry,

2020TablesTable

1.

World

Bankcountryincomeclassi?cation,20201011Table

2.Basicfactsofcountriescoveredinthe2023GPT,

2020Table

3.

Total

cross-borderresourcesfrom47countriesby?ow,

2018and2020(inbillionsofin?ation-adjusted2020USdollars)22384247Table

4.Dataoncross-borderphilanthropicout?owsbytopcharitablecauseTable

5.Dataoncross-borderphilanthropicout?owsbytoprecipientregionTable

6.Dataavailabilityoncross-bordervolunteeringbycountryG

L

O

B

A

L

P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

Y

T

R

A

C

K

E

R

2

0

2

30

1IntroductionTheGlobalPhilanthropy

Tracker

(GPT)

isa

?rst-of-its-kindresearchefforttomeasurecross-borderdonationsfromindividuals

and

organizations

around

theworld.

The

2023

GPT,

the11theditionoftheindex,

bridges

thegap

between

an

increasing

needforphilanthropy

and

thelackof

knowledgeaboutthescope

ofcross-bordergiving.

Findings

presented

in

this

reportarebased

on

philanthropicoutflowsfrom47

countries

in2020,or

themostrecently

availableyear,

as

wellas

threeexternally

tracked

resourceflows:

official

developmentassistance(ODA),remittances,

and

privatecapitalinvestment(PCI).By

reportingonthese?ows,the

GPTdemonstrates

how

civilsocieties,

governments,businesses,and

individuals

collaboratetoaddress

societalissuesaround

theglobeThe47countriesincludedinthereportcontributedUSD70billioninphilanthropicout?owsin2020,showingthatdespitethenegativeeconomic,health,andsocialconsequencesoftheCOVID-19pandemic,philanthropywasa

resilientcross-borderresourceflow

Theothertwoprivatecross-borderresource?owsweremorealteredbyglobalcrises.Specifically,

whileremittancessawa

large

increasein2020asmigrantssentmoremoneybackhometosupporttheirfamiliesduringthepandemic,PCIsuffered

froma

severedeclineastheglobaleconomywashithardfromnearly680,000individualsandorganizations

aroundtheworldbetweenMarch2020andDecember2021(WHO,2021).Philanthropyservesasaninnovator,promoter,andcross-sectorcollaboratoratthelocalandgloballevel,yetthe?ndingsofthe2023GPTindicatethatthereareavenuesforimprovement.Basedonthe?ndingsofthisreport,the2023GPTsuggests:theenhancementoflocalphilanthropicecosystemsthroughregionalcollaborations,theestablishmentofmechanismstomobilizelocalphilanthropy

inaddressing

globalchallenges,andthedevelopmentofinternationalstandardsfor

datatrackingandthepromotionofdatatransparencyonspeci?cissueareas,especiallyclimateandracialjustice.Leveragingthe

lessons

from

2020

will

determine

the

success

of

our

responsestocurrentandfutureglobalissuesTheglobalchallengesof2020,fromsocialinjusticetotheCOVID-19pandemicandclimatedisasters,putthephilanthropicsectortothetestandprovidedanopportunitytoreconceptualizetheroleofphilanthropyinforeignaidandsustainabledevelopment.Forexample,thehealthcrisisinspiredgenerosityworldwideaspeoplemobilizedtohelpothersinneed.

Technology-enabled

formsofgivinglikecrowdfunding,cryptodonations,andmobilegivingoffered

instantandcontact-freewaysforpeopletosupportothersdespitelockdowns(IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,

2022).Internationalorganizationsinitiatedfundstocombatthepandemic,suchastheWorld

HealthOrganization’s

(WHO)COVID-19SolidarityResponse

Fund,whichraisedoverUSD256million0

2Key

FindingsThe47countriescoveredin

the

2023GPThave

varyinglevelsofeconomic

developmentandrepresenteveryworldregion.

Together,

they

accountedfor22

percentofallcountries

and

economies

worldwide,61percentoftheglobalpopulation,and85percentofglobalgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)in2020.47

countriesatallstages

ofeconomic

developmentUSD

70

billionincross-borderphilanthropic

outflows

in20208

percentof

worldwide

cross-border

resourcesCountries

includedinthe2023

Global

Philanthropy

TrackerCompared

with2018,

thetotal

amountof

thefour

cross-border

resource

flows

fromthe47

countries

declinedslightlyby

2

percent

in2020.-1%-0.5%PhilanthropicOut?ows-100%Private

CapitalInvestment+19%RemittancesO?cialDevelopmentAssistance

(ODA)THE

L

ANDSCAPE

OF

CROSS-BORDER

PHIL

ANTHROPICOUTFLOWS

AMONG

47

COUNTRIES2.In2020,ofthe47countries,the?veinthelow-incomeandlower-middle

incomegroupsdonateda

totalofUSD42milliontoothercountries(seeFigure9);the10upper-middle

incomecountriescontributedaroundUSD644million(seeFigure10);andthe32high-incomecountriescontributednearlyUSD70billion(seeFigure11)ofcross-borderphilanthropy1.In2020,these47countriescontributedUSD70billioninphilanthropicout?ows,1

andUSD841billionwhenaddingtogether

all

four

cross-border

resource

?ows—philanthropicout?owsaswellasODA,individualremittances,andPCI(seeFigure1).Philanthropicout?owsrepresent8

percentofthetotalcross-borderresources1Thedataonphilanthropicout?owsfromthe47countriesincludedinthisreportvaryintermsofdataquality.Thedatadiscussedinthisreport,therefore,mayunderestimatethetruescopeofphilanthropicout?owsinsomecases.0

4CHANGES

IN

PHIL

ANTHROPIC

OUTFLOWS

SINCE

2018C

R

O

S

S

-

B

O

R

D

E

R

P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

I

C

O

U

T

F

L

O

W

S

B

YC

AU

S

E

A

N

D

R

EC

I

P

I

E

N

T

R

EG

I

O

N3.

Thecombinedlevelofcross-borderphilanthropicout?owsandtheotherthreeresource?owsfromthe47countriesdeclinedslightlyby2

percentwhenadjustedforin?ation,fromUSD859billion2

in2018toUSD841billionin2020(seeTable

3).4.Educationandhealthremainedthetoptwomostsupportedcharitablecauses,asin2018,eachreceivingcross-borderdonationsfrom9countriesin2020,basedonasubgroupof14countrieswithavailabledata.

ThesecausesdirectlyalignwithUNSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs)4

and3

(QualityEducationandGlobalHealthand

Well-Being,respectively).MostcountrieswithavailabledatadidnotdetailhowtheircausesalignedwiththeSDGs,andonlya

portionofthosecausescouldbecategorizedwithintheSDGframework.?

Philanthropyprovedtoberesilientduringtheyear2020,withonlya

smalldeclineof0.5percentfromUSD71billionin2018.

About60percentofthe47countrieshadupdateddatathataredirectlycomparabletotheamountin2018.

Amongthissubgroupofcountries,philanthropicout?owswentupmodestlybyaround4

percent,thoughthechangevariedgreatlybycountry5.Africawastheregioncitedmostfrequentlyasa

toprecipientofphilanthropicsupport,accordingtocountriesthatreporteddataon

this

matter.

Among

the

subgroup

of

countries

that

reported

dataonrecipientcountriesorregions,15cited

Africa,9

cited

Asia,and9

citedEurope.Comparedwith2018,

Africa

and

Asia

remainedthetoptworegionssupportedbycross-borderphilanthropy,

whilethenumberofcountriesthatgavetoEuropeincreasedin2020.?

ODA

remainedata

similarlevelin2018and2020,droppingbyonly1

percent?

Remittancessawthelargest

increaseandremainedthelargest?ow,

growingby19percentbetween2018and2020,fromUSD496billiontoUSD590billion.

Thiscanbeattributedtotheircounter-cyclical

nature,tostimuluspackagesfromhost-countrygovernmentsleadingtofavorableeconomicconditions,aswellastomovementstowarddigitalandformalwaysofmoneytransferthatcouldbetrackedbygovernmentsduetoCOVID-19restrictionswhichincreasedthevisibilityofpreviouslyun-trackedremittances,and?uctuationsinoilpricesandexchangesrates(Kpodaretal.,2022).T

H

E

F

U

T

U

R

E

O

F

C

R

O

S

S

-

B

O

R

D

E

R

P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

Y6.

Technological

innovationsandinnovativewaysofgivinghavethepotentialtorevolutionizecross-borderphilanthropy.

The

proliferationof

emerging

giving

vehicles,

such

as

crowdfunding,

crypto

donations,andcollaborativeglobalfundshavefacilitatedandacceleratedbothlocalandglobalphilanthropyduringtheCOVID-19pandemic.7.

The?ndingsemphasizetheneedforincreasedcollaborationbetweencountries,sectors,andphilanthropicactors,andhighlighttheimportanceofimproveddatacollectiononnewareasofgiving,a

betterreportingstructuretocapturegivingthatsupportstheSDGs,andmoreintentionaldatatrackingefforts

toenhancediversity,

equity,

andinclusioninglobalgiving.?

PCIshoweda

drasticdeclinefromUSD112

billionin2018toUSD0.4billionin2020.

Thisisduetothecombinedeffects

oftheglobaleconomicrecession,a

depreciationinthevalueofinvestments,andreducedlevelsofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)onprivatecapitalflows(UNCTAD,

2021).8.Cross-borderphilanthropycanbebolsteredbyhighlightingandutilizingtheexpertiseanddedicationofdiasporacommunitieswho,especiallyduringtimesofcrisis,rallyandprovidetargetedandinformedphilanthropicrelieftotheirhomecountries.TABLE

3.

TOTAL

CROSS-BORDER

RESOURCES

FROM

47

COUNTRIES

BY

FLOW,

2018

AND

2020

(in

billions

of

in?ation-adjusted

2020

US

dollars)FinancialFlowsfrom47Countries20202018%

Changefrom2018to2020R

E

M

I

T

TA

N

C

E

S$

5

9

0$

4

9

61

9

%O

F

F

I

C

I

A

L

D

E

V

E

L

O

P

M

E

N

T

A

S

S

I

S

TA

N

C

E

(O

D

A)P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

I

C

O

U

T

F

L

O

W

SP

R

I

VAT

E

C

A

P

I

TA

L

I

N

V

E

S

T

M

E

N

T

(

P

C

I

)T

O

TA

L$

1

8

0$

7

0$

1

8

1$

7

1-1%-

0.5

%-1

0

0

%-

2

%$

0

.

4$

8

4

1$

1

1

2$

8

5

92Inthisreport,allcurrencieswereadjustedinto2020USDvalues.G

L

O

B

A

L

P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

Y

T

R

A

C

K

E

R

2

0

2

30

5SuggestionsThe2023GPTidenti?esthreeopportunitiesfortheinternationalcommunitytobolstertheroleofphilanthropyinsustainabledevelopment.Byleveragingthelessonslearned,leaderscanrespondappropriatelytocurrentandfuturechallengesEnhance

Local?

Althoughthenon-discriminatoryprincipleshouldallowcross-borderphilanthropyintheEuropeanUnion(EU)(EuropeanUnion,2017),thecomparabilityproceduresanddifferent

taxregulationsimplementedbyeachmemberstateshavehistoricallyhinderedcross-borderphilanthropyamongthe27memberstates.Inordertofacilitatecross-bordergiving,the

Transnational

GivingEuropenetworkprovidessolutionsfortax-effectivecross-bordercashdonationsin19Europeancountries(TransnationalGivingEurope,2023).Since2021,thePhilanthropyEuropeAssociation(Philea)nurturesthephilanthropicecosysteminover30Europeancountriesbyknowledgesharing,networking,andadvocacywork(Philea,2023).Philanthropic

EcosystemsThrough

RegionalCollaborationsTheincreasingnumberofnaturalandhuman-madedisastershighlightstheneedforanimprovedecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropy,especiallythroughlocalgrassrootsorganizationsandtheirleadership,whichareoftenthe?rstrespondersintimesofcrisis.With

regionalcollaborations,philanthropicorganizations3

havethepotentialtoadvancethelocalandglobalphilanthropicecosystemwithknowledgesharing,localcapacitybuilding,andadvocacywork.

Theseorganizationscouldalsofacilitatetheconnectionsandcommunicationbetweeninternationaldonorsandlocalphilanthropicorganizationstoenhanceequityandculturalawarenessincross-borderphilanthropy.

Numerous

regional

and

international

collaborationscanserveasexamplesforgoodpractices,someofwhicharehighlightedbelowTheincreasingnumberofnaturalandman-madedisastersandcriseshighlightstheneedforanimprovedecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropyandtheenhancementoflocalphilanthropicorganizations.

Regionalcollaborationshavethepotentialtostrengthenthelocalandglobalphilanthropicecosystemwithknowledgesharing,localcapacitybuilding,andadvocacywork.Someoftheseorganizations

couldalsosupportdonorsnavigatetheregulatoryandadministrativerequirementsofforeigndonationsbyprovidingof?cialguidelinesandalternativechannelsforcross-bordergiving.Theseorganizations

couldalsoenhanceequityincross-borderphilanthropybyfacilitatingtheconnectionsandcommunicationbetweeninternationaldonorsandlocalphilanthropicorganizations.

Allthesestepsarenecessarytocreateamoreeffectiveenvironmentforandenhanceequityincross-borderphilanthropy?

Inthe

Asia-Paci?cregion,severalregional-levelcentersandnonprofitassociations,suchastheCentrefor

AsianPhilanthropyandSocietyandthe

AsiaPhilanthropyCircle,aimtoenhancethephilanthropicenvironmentintheregion,includingcross-bordergiving.

Thereporton

UnlockingCross-border

Philanthropy

in

Asia

publishedbyGive2Asia

highlights

that

it

is

crucial

to

create

a

more

cohesiveecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropyinthisregionbycultivatinga

regionallyfocusedgivingmindset,establishingtrustworthyintermediaryorganizations,

andadvocatingforanenablingenvironmentforcross-borderphilanthropy,whichwouldcreatea

morecohesiveecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropy(Tran&

Thai,2022).3“ThetermPhilanthropicOrganization(PO)referstoaformofnon-market,non-stateorganizationsoutsideofthefamilythatprovideservicesforthepublicgood.Itincludesthefollowing:foundations(grant-making,operating,corporate,community,

orgovernmentsponsored/created),

community-basedorganizationsandvillageassociations,professionalassociations,

environmental

groups,

advocacygroups,

co-operatives,

charitableorganizations,

faith-based

organizations,

mutualentities,

labor

unions,

societies,

researchinstitutes,diasporicorganizations,onlinesocial-purposeportals,transnationalandcross-sectoralcoalitions,andothertypesofnon-governmentalorganizationsthatare

relevantina

givencountry.”0

6EstablishMechanismsto

Mobilize

LocalPhilanthropyin

AddressingGlobal

ChallengesBasedona

scanof81countriesandeconomies,thisreportsharesdataoncross-bordergivingfrom47countrieswhereitwaspossibletogetbasicestimatesoncross-borderphilanthropy,

andonly14countrieshadavailabledataoncross-bordergivingbycharitablecause.?

Thereisa

generallackofdataoncross-bordergivingtospecificcauses(e.g.,climatechange,racialinjustice).Capturingthemagnitudeofgivingtotheserelativelynewandemerging

causesisstillchallenging,butseveralresearchcentersanddataprovidershavealreadystartedrevisingtheirmethodologiestofocusoncollectingandprovidingsuchdatatothepublic(Candid,n.d.;ClimateWorks

Foundation,2022;PhilanthropicInitiativeforRacialEquity,

2019).DuringtheCOVID-19pandemic,severalinnovativeinitiativesproactivelycultivateda

moreenablingenvironmentwhentraditionalchannelsofsendingandreceivingcross-borderphilanthropybecamemorechallenging,a

?ndingthatisreinforcedinthe2022GlobalPhilanthropyEnvironmentIndex(IndianaUniversityLillyfamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,

2022).4?

DuringthebeginningoftheCOVID-19pandemic,individualdonorswereunabletosupporttheglobalworkoftheWorld

HealthOrganization(WHO).

Thus,inpartnershipwiththeUnitedNationsFoundationandtheSwissPhilanthropyFoundation,

WHOestablishedtheCOVID-19SolidarityResponse

Fund

to

raise

funds

from

individuals,

companies,andphilanthropiesacrosstheworldforthe?rsttimeinitshistory(WHO,2020).

Thisinitiativenotonlyhelpedraisefundsfortheglobalworkof

WHObutalsoraisedawarenessoftheimportanceofpossiblenewwaysofglobalgiving.?

DataongivingtotheSDGsisalsoscarce,leadingtolimitedinformationonphilanthropiccontributionstodevelopment.To

facilitatetheusageoftheSDGlanguageandencourageSDGdatacollectionandreportingforphilanthropicorganizations,

theSDGPhilanthropyPlatformcreatedthe“SDGIndicator

Wizard”

totranslateandalignanorganization’s

achievementsandgoalsintothelanguageoftheSDGs.Recently,severalinternationalorganizationsanddataprovidershaveaimedtoprovidebetterinformationongivingtotheSDGsattheregionalandgloballevels(SDGFunders,n.d.;

ArabFoundationsForum,2023;East

AfricaPhilanthropyNetwork,2022).Philanthropicorganizations

couldimplementnovelwaysofgivingtoreinforcelocalphilanthropyandprovidemoreequitable,localizedfunding.

Additionally,local,regional,andglobalphilanthropicactorscouldsupportdonorsnavigatingtheregulatoryandadministrativerequirementsofforeigndonationsbyprovidingof?cialguidelinesandbestpracticesforcross-bordergiving.Thissignificantlackofpublicdatapresentsanongoingchallengetofullyunderstandingthepatternsandtrendsofcross-bordergenerosity.

Italsolimitsourunderstandingoftherolethatphilanthropyplaysglobally,

especiallyduringglobalcrisesliketheCOVID-19pandemic,whenallsectorsarecalledupontorespond.Promotingdatasharingand

transparency,

building

infrastructure

for

systematic

datacollection,andestablishinginternationalstandardsfordatareportingcouldhelpimprovedataavailabilityandqualityinthelongtermandsupportindividualandinstitutionaldonorstomakeinformed,data-drivendecisions.Develop

InternationalStandards

for

DataTracking

andPromoteData

TransparencyThereisa

dearthofdataoncross-bordergivingtospeci?ccauses,suchasgivingto?ghtclimatechangeorracialinjusticeandinequity.

Concernsrelatedtoclimatechangehavebecomeincreasinglyrelevantandnecessaryinthepastfewdecades,andracialjusticeandracialequityarelong-standingglobalconcerns,causedbypervasiveandsystemicracism,colonialism,andxenophobia.4PublishedbytheIndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,

theGlobalPhilanthropyEnvironment

Indexexaminestheenablingenvironment

forphilanthropywithina

countryandacross

countries.Formore

information,visit/index.html.G

L

O

B

A

L

P

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

Y

T

R

A

C

K

E

R

2

0

2

30

7WhatDoestheReportMeasure?TheGlobalPhilanthropyTracker

(GPT)

measurestheextentofglobalcross-borderphilanthropicout?owsof47countries.Byfocusingonallcross-borderphilanthropy—notjustphilanthropyfordevelopmentpurposes—itoffersa

holisticviewofthephilanthropicout?ows.Itfurthercomparescross-borderphilanthropytothreeotherresource?ows:ODA,remittances,

andPCI.Thissectionprovidesa

de?nitionofthesefourresources?owsaswellasanoverviewofthe47countriesP

H

I

L

A

N

T

H

R

O

P

I

C

O

U

T

F

L

O

W

SThisbroadde?nitioncoversassistancetomanyareas,suchaseconomicinfrastructure,governmentandcivilsociety,andwatersupplyandsanitation,aswellashumanitarianaid.Nuclearenergy

isalsoreportableasODA

ifitisforcivilianpurposes,andculturalprogramsalsocountiftheyincreasetheculturalcapacityoftherecipientcountries.However,

thecurrentODAguidelines

excludemoneyintheformofmilitaryaid,peacekeepingexpenditures,aswellasdealswithprimarilycommercialobjectives.

ThestatisticsonODA

publishedbytheOECDarealsothesoleveri?ed,of?cialnumbersforthe31DACmembersandthe80additionalprovidersofaid,includingnon-DACcountriesandorganizations

(OECD,n.d.-a).Theconceptof‘philanthropy’

hasevolvedovertimeandvariesacrosscultures,buttodayitisgenerallyseenasusinganytypeofprivateresources,suchasmoney,

time,speci?ctalents,andcollectiveaction,forthepublicgood(Phillips&

Jung,2016).Philanthropicout?owsreferto:a)thesumofcharitable?nancialcontributionssentbydonorswhenthedonor(individuals,corporations,foundations,orothergrantmakingorganizations)

andthebeneficiary(individuals,philanthropicorganizations,

orintermediaryorganizations)arelocatedindifferent

countries;orb)givingwithinacountrytodomesticphilanthropicorganizations

thatfocusonbroadcategoriesofinternationalcauses,suchasforeignaffairs,

humanitarianassistance,internationalrelations,promotionofinternationalunderstanding,andinternationalsolidarityR

E

M

I

T

TA

N

C

E

SVital

for

economic

development

around

the

globe,

remittancesaretransfersofmoneythattakeplacewhenindividualssenda

partoftheirearningstotheirfamilies,friends,andrelativesintheirhomecountry(Kretchmer,

2020).

Theycantaketheformofeithercashorgoods.

Typically,

thesender“paystheremittancetothesendingagentusingcash,check,moneyorder,creditcard,debitcard,oradebitinstructionsentthroughemail,phoneortheInternet.

Thesendingagencyinstructsitsagentintherecipient’s

countrytodelivertheremittance.

Thepayingagentmakesthepaymenttotheaddressedbene?ciary”(Ratha,2020).IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,

2020GlobalPhilanthropy

TrackerO

F

F

I

C

I

A

L

D

E

V

E

LO

P

M

E

N

T

A

S

S

I

S

TA

N

C

EOf?cialDevelopment

Assistance(ODA)isgovernmentaidthat“promotesandspeci?callytargets

theeconomicdevelopmentandwelfareofdevelopingcountries”(OECD,n.d.-b).

TheOrganisation

forEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)de?nitionincludes:IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,

2020GlobalPhilanthropy

Tracker[F]lowstocountriesandterritoriesontheDAC[DevelopmentAssistanceCommittee]ListofODA

Recipientsandtomultilateraldevelopmentinstitutionswhichare

providedbyof?cialagencies,includingstateandlocalgovernments,orbytheirexecutiveagencies…andeachtransactionofwhichisadministeredwiththepromotionoftheeconomicdevelopmentandwelfareofdevelopingcountriesasitsmainobjective;andisconcessionalincharacter(OECD,n.d.-a).Remittanceshavea

negativecyclicalpositionwiththe