菲沙研究所-加拿大搖搖欲墜的商業(yè)活力和落后的創(chuàng)新(英)-2021.9-54正式版_第1頁
菲沙研究所-加拿大搖搖欲墜的商業(yè)活力和落后的創(chuàng)新(英)-2021.9-54正式版_第2頁
菲沙研究所-加拿大搖搖欲墜的商業(yè)活力和落后的創(chuàng)新(英)-2021.9-54正式版_第3頁
菲沙研究所-加拿大搖搖欲墜的商業(yè)活力和落后的創(chuàng)新(英)-2021.9-54正式版_第4頁
菲沙研究所-加拿大搖搖欲墜的商業(yè)活力和落后的創(chuàng)新(英)-2021.9-54正式版_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩48頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

2021Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamismandLaggingInnovationPhilipCross2021?FraserInstituteCanada’sFalteringBusinessDynamismandLaggingInnovationbyPhilipCrossContentsExecutiveSummary/iIntroduction/1LaggingInnovationinCanada/4CapitalisminCanada/7CreativeDestruction/9Rent-SeekingintheCanadianEconomy/11FormsofRent-SeekinginCanada/16eLongHistoryofRent-SeekinginCanada/23Rent-SeekingandCanada’sPoliticalStructure/27BroaderMeasuresofBusinessMalaise/30Conclusion/35References/37Abouttheauthor/45Acknowledgments/45PublishingInformation/46SupportingtheFraserInstitute/46AbouttheFraserInstitute/47Purpose,Funding,andIndependence/47EditorialAdvisoryBoard/48fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?iExecutiveSummaryCanadadisplaysmanyofthesamesymptomsofbusinessmalaiseevidentinEuropeannations.RealGDPgrowthoverthepastdecadewastheslowestsincethe1930s,produc-tivityhasstalled,andreducedcompetitivenesshashamperedourabilitytocapitalizeontradedeals,allofwhichhavecombinedtolowerourshareofglobalGDP.Canada’ssluggisheconomicgrowthintheyearsbeforethepandemicre?ectsalackofinnovationandweakproductivitygrowththathaspersistedfordecades.eprolongedslumpcannotbefullyaddressedwiththecurrentapproachofpoliciestargetingspeci?csectorssuchashightechnologyorgreenenergy,orspurringresearchanddevelopmentinthehopeofboostingoneormoreofthesevariables.Worsewouldbeaccedingtotheendlessrequestsfromspeci?cgroups,industries,or?rmsforfavoursinthenameofjobcreationorhigherincomes.Instead,Canadaneedsaroot-and-branchre-examinationofitspublicpolicymixanditscommitmenttomarkets,competition,andcapitalism,withthegoalofcreatinganenvironmentmoreconducivetogreaterbusinessformationandinvestment.ComparedwiththeUnitedStates,Canadapossessesfewerofthesocietalvalueslinkedtotheinnova-tionanddynamismthatdriveeconomicgrowthoverthelongterm.elackofvaluesthatsupportinnovationandbusinessdynamismalsoisevidentintherelianceof?rmsongovernmentstoprotectthemfromcompetitioninthemarketplace.eresultingweakgrowthencouragespoliciestargetingthedistributionoverthecreationofincomes,whichaggravatestheshortfallofgrowth.ToomanybusinessmodelsinCanadaarebasedongovernmentsusingathicketofregu-lations,patents,tari?s,occupationallicensingrules,restrictionsonforeigninvestment,andprice-?xingtoshelter?rmsfromcompetition.esetoolstoobstructcompetitionaretooeasilysuppliedbygovernmentsinCanada’sdecentralizedfederation.eout-comehasbeenasigni?cantlossofbusinessdynamisminCanada,resultinginourlead-ingcorporationsbeingshuntedfromtheglobalstagewhilelowerratesof?rmentryandexitsignalaslowdownintheprocessofcreationanddestructionthatisfundamentaltoaninnovative,dynamiceconomy.Aneconomicdevelopmentmodelwheregovern-mentscatertotheinterestsofindividual?rmsandspeci?cindustriesultimatelyistheoppositeofonethatpromotesentrepreneurshipandbusinessgrowth,notleastbecauseitunderminesthepublic’sfaiththatincomesareearnedandnotgrantedandthatcap-italismcangenerateinnovationsthatbene?tCanadaasawhole.fraserinstitute.orgesuccessoftheUnitedStatesinmaintainingahighrateofinnovationdemonstratesCanada’slaggingperformanceisnottheinevitableresultofstructuralforcesthatarehardtocontrol.eyaremoretheproductofgovernmentpoliciesandsocietalattitudesthatarewithinourcontrol.However,Canada’sinnovationpolicycontinuestomistakenlyfocusoninputsofknowledgeintheerroneousbeliefthateducation,science,researchanddevelopment,andgovernmentsubsidiesfuelinnovation,despiteampleevidencethattheydonothaveasigni?cantimpact.fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?1IntroductionInitsrecentreviewoftrendsinglobalbusiness,eEconomistnotedthat?rmswithAmericanheadquartershavebeenabletomaintaintheirplaceamongtheglobaleliteinresponsetotherisingchallengefromChinese?rms,whileEuropehasgenerallyfailedtokeepup.esetrendsarere?ectedinglobalGDP,wherethegrowingshareofChinahasbeenlargelyattheexpenseofEuropeannationsandnottheUnitedStates.Startingin1978whenitbeganintegratingintotheglobaleconomy,China’sshareofGDProsefrom1.7%to17.4%in2020.1

Almosttwothirdsofthisincreasecameattheexpenseofthe?velargestEuropeannations,whoseshareofGDPfellfrom24.0%to14.5%,whiletheUSsharewaslittlechangedat24.7%in2020comparedto27.2%in1978.CanadabelongsinthesameclassasEurope,asitsshareofglobalGDPshranksteadilyfrom2.5%in1978to1.9%in2020,whileitsleading?rmsarenolongerworldclass.Moreover,CanadahasfallenbehindformanyofthesamereasonsasEurope.WhiletheUShas“aculturethatexaltsentrepreneurs”andits“politicssupportscreativedestruction,”Europesu?ersfrom“corporatemalaise”(Economist,2021a,2021b).ismalaiseexhibitschronicslowgrowth,poorlyfunctioningmarketsforkeyindustries,fewerstart-ups,highinternalbarrierstotrade,afractureddomesticEuropeanmarket,andonerousregulations,allofwhichcreate“alessfavourablebusinessenvironment”(Economist,2021a).EveryoneofthesehandicapsappliestoCanadaasmuchastoEurope.eresulthasbeenaretreatofCanadian?rmsfromtheranksofgloballeaders.eFinancialTimes’listoftheworld’s100leadingcompanieshadonlyoneCanadian?rmin2020(Shopify),atestamenttowhatoneanalysthascalled“Canada’svanishingcorporatetitans”(Kirby,2021).Smallercoun-trieslikeDenmark,Sweden,Spain,andSouthKoreaallhaveatleasttwocompaniesonthislist.Fortune’s100fastestgrowingcompaniesintermsofrevenueandpro?tsshowsasimilartrend.In2009,sixCanadiancompaniesmadethelist,butthatnumberfelltozeroin2015and2015,onein2016,andonlytwoin2018(GlobermanandEmes,2019:14)eNobel-winningeconomistEdmundPhelpsandhiscolleaguescon?rmedthatEuropehasfallenbehindtheUnitedStatesininnovationandgrowth.eirdiagnosisofwhatailsEuropeappliesequallytoCanada,including“theriseofcorporatismanditssetofsti?ingregulationsthatmakeitmorecostlytooperatebusinesses,consumerprotections,licensingrequirements,andtheprotectionoflong-livedpatents”(Zoega,2020:108).e1.edataoncurrentdollarGDPinUSdollarsarefromtheWorldBank,2020.e?velargestEuropeancountriesareFrance,Germany,Italy,Spain,andtheUnitedKingdom;theyaccountforovertwothirdsoftheGDPproducedintheEuropeanUnionandtheUnitedKingdom.fraserinstitute.org2?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?Crossoutcomeisthattheserulesandregulationsservethespecialinterestsofproducersratherthantheinterestsofconsumers,thereverseofwhatisbestforCanadians.Underlyingthesechangesisashi?invalues“inwhichprotectionofthevestedinterestsispriori-tizedoverinnovationandrisk-taking.ecorporatistsdonotapproveofuncertaintyanddisorder,somethingthatisingrainedinadynamic,innovativeeconomy.Instead,whatisvaluedisasteadyriseinconsumptionandleisurebroughtoutaboutbygradualgainsine?ciency”(Zoega,2020:108).Canada’seconomyisincreasinglyriddledwithinstitutionalcharacteristicsandprocessesthathinderthecreativedestructionthatisfundamentaltothegrowthofinnovation,pro-ductivity,andincomes.Rent-seekinghasalonghistoryinCanada,encouragedbycentralCanada’sdominanceofthefederalgovernmentandourhighlydecentralizedpoliticalstructurewhereweakprovincialandlocalgovernmentsenactpoliciesthatfavourtheentrenchedinterestsofproducersoverconsumers.Canada’s?rsteconomicblueprintwastheNationalPolicyoftari?protectionformanufacturers,mostlyinCentralCanada.Tentativemovestoopenportionsoftheeconomytofreetradeinthe1980sand1990swererewardedwithincreasedproductivityandhigherincomes.A?erfreetradewiththeUnitedStatesbegan,manufacturingproductivityinCanadaroseby“aspectacular1.0%peryear”(Tre?er,2001:2)However,largeportionsoftheeconomyremainedfullyorpartiallyshieldedfromforeigncompetition,notablytelecommunications,banking,broadcastingandotherculturalindustries,andlargepartsoftransportationandagri-culture,o?ena?erinvokingthecanardthattheirexistencesomehowisfundamentaltoCanada’sidentityandsovereignty.Worse,evenastari?scamedown,otherbarrierswereraisedtoprotectestablishedinterests—includingoccupationallicensingrequirements,intellectualpropertyprotections(suchaspatents),regulations,andrestrictionsonfor-eigntakeovers.eresulthasbeenapersistentandpronouncedslowdownofbusinessentryandexits—symptomaticoffalteringcreationanddestruction—lessinnovation,negligibleproductivitygrowth,andanaemicincreasesinrealGDPandincomes.ispublicationexaminesCanada’sdecliningbusinessdynamismandincentivestoinnovate.econsequenceofthishasbeentheonsetofaformofmalaiseinthebusi-nesssectorasre?ectedinchronicslowgrowth,fewerbusinessstart-ups,anddwindlingbusinessinvestment.Pervasiverent-seekinginCanadiansocietynotonlylowerseco-nomicgrowthbutalsoencouragesaharmfulfocusonzero-sumincomeredistributionthatfurtherdampensincomecreation.eonlysolutionistoenableandpromotemorecompetitionandarenewedcommitmenttothosevaluesthatsupportinnovationandultimatelycapitalisminthelongterm.22.erelationshipbetweeninnovationandcapitalismissodeepthatDeidreMcCloskeysuggestsusingtheterm“innovism”inplaceof“capitalism”(McCloskey,2010:76).fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?3Cultivatingthevaluesthatstimulateandrewardinnovationwouldleadtotheoppositeofgovernmentsfavouringparticular?rmsandcoddlingspecial-interestgroups,practi-cesthatarenotpro-businessbutanathematowellfunctioningcapitalism.isispartlybecauseindulgingrent-seekingencouragesbusinesstoaskformoreprotectionandhand-outs,whichfurtherunderminestrustthatbusinesspeopleearntheirincomesfairly.ejealousyandenvythatthisnurturesamongthepublicisthenusedtojustifyincreasingtaxesonhighincomesandcorporations,whichfurtherdepressesgrowth.eonlytrulypro-businesspoliciesarethosethatfostercompetitivemarketsandproduceamorelevelplaying?eldforall?rmsthroughreducingregulatorycontrols,cuttingtaxes,remov-ingtari?s,reininginoccupationallicensingrules,encouragingstart-ups,andboostingbusinessinvestment.Suchwidespreadreformscanonlyhappeninacountrythatsharesvaluesthatsupportbusinessdynamismandprivate-sectorinnovation.Canadatodayisalongwayfrombeingsuchanation.fraserinstitute.org4?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?CrossLaggingInnovationinCanadaEconomicgrowthinCanadahasbeendeceleratingfordecades.Itnowtrailsthegrowthofourmajortradingpartners:annualrealGDPgrowthpercapitainCanadaslowedmarkedlyto0.35%onaveragebetween1970and2013,mostlybecauseCanada’saver-agetotal-factorproductivitygrowthof0.16%wasthesecondlowestintheG7(Bojilov,2020a:42–43).Mostofthisslowdownhasitsorigininlagginginnovation.Whileinter-nationalcomparisonsa?er2013arenotyetavailable,weknowCanada’srecordontotal-factorproductivityremainedabysmal,withessentiallynogrowthbetween2009and2019despitehavingtheadvantageofnotbeinghamperedbythebankingcrisisthathamstrungtheUnitedStatesandmanycountriesinEurope.Furthermore,Canadaimportstwothirdsoftheinnovationtakingplaceinitseconomy,implyinghomegrowninnovationgrewbyacumulative0.11%from1970to2012,theworstperformanceofanyG7nation(Bojilov,2020b:73).Homegrowninnovationisde?nedas“innovationgeneratedbyagiveneconomyonitsown”asopposedtoinnov-ationsoriginatingabroadandimportedintotheeconomy(Bojilov,2020a:49).Mostofthedeclineinhomegrowninnovationhappeneda?er1990,withadropof1.11%inthe1990sfollowedbyarecoveryofonly0.36%inthe2000s.Whileproductivityinmanu-facturingdidrise“spectacularly”inthedecadea?erfreetradewiththeUnitedStateswasadopted,thebroaderslumpininnovationmayre?ectthatbusinessinvestmentinCanadalaggedsubstantially,risingonly15%involumebetween1988and1996com-paredtoagainofa74%intheUnitedStates(Tre?er,2001:28).However,thefailureofproductivityinCanadatorespondbettertotheadoptionofmajorpolicyinitiativessuchasfreetrade,in?ationtargets,andtheGoodsandServicesTaxremainsapuzzleforeconomists.DonDrummond?rstdrewattentionin2011tothepuzzlethat“despitemostofthepublicpolicyagendathatwasputforwardtoimproveproductivitybeingimplemented,productivitygrowthinthiscountrysince2000hasactuallydeterior-ated”(Drummond,2011:3).Hespeculatedtheproblemoriginatedinthebehaviourof?rmsatthemicrolevel.isisagoodexampleofwhatomasSowellmeantwhenheobservedthat,when“intellectualshavetheoriesthatdonot?ttherealworld…theyconcludethatitistherealworldwhichiswrongandneedschanging(quotedinRiley,2021:196).Forexample,themovetofreetradeinternationallywaso?setbyexemptinglargesectorsofCanada’seconomyandbyerectingotherbarrierssuchasrequirementsforoccupationallicensingandrestraintsoninterprovincialtrade.ispaperarguesthatCanada’sweakrecordoninnovationandproductivityhasmoretodowiththewordsthantheactionsofpoliticiansandthewillingnessofgovernmentstoaccommodaterent-seeking.fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?5WhileinnovationoriginatinginCanadafella?er1990,homegrowninnovationinsomeothercountriessoared:notably,theUnitedStateshadcumulativegainsofover6%perdecadeandtheUnitedKingdomwasnotfarbehindat4%(Bojilov,2020b:71).Canada’spoorperformanceinhomegrowninnovationa?er1990putsitinagroupwithFrance,Germany,andItaly,allofwhichpostednetdeclinesbetween1990and2010.Withhome-growninnovationdryingupinEuropeandCanadainrecentdecades,theUnitedStatesremainedtheglobalengineofinnovation.Whiletheinformationtechnology(IT)indus-tryledUSinnovation,IThasnotdriveninnovationinotherindustries.Inretail,forexample,itwasWalmart’smodeloflowcostsandpricesthatrevolutionizedthelandscape.Valuesareimportanttotheabilitytoinnovateemain?ndingofPhelpsandhiscolleagues“isthatpeoplefromallwalksoflife,notjustscientistsandlabtechnicians,possessinbornpowerstoconceive‘newthings’,whetherornotscientistshaveopenedupnewpossibilities…ewholenationmightbeon?rewithnewideas”(Phelps,2020a:5).evaluesmostconducivetoinnovationinclude“trust,thewillingnesstotaketheinitiative,thedesiretoachieveonthejob,teachingchildrentobeindependent,andtheacceptanceofcompetition”(Zoega,2020:105).Othershadwrittenabouttheimportanceofvalueslongbeforetheywererecentlyquanti?ed.Forexample,inherBourgeoistrilogy,DeidreMcCloskeyarguedthatgrowthtooko?ineighteenth-cen-turyEuropeasaresultoftwoideas:?rst“theideasintheheadsofentrepreneursforthebettermentsthemselves(theelectricmotor,theairplane,thestockmarket);andtheideasinthesocietyatlargeabout

thebusinesspeopleandtheirbetterments”(McCloskey,2016:xvi).MaxWeberlongagoarguedthatprotestantvalueswerefoundationaltocapitalism.PolicymakinginCanadacontinuestofocusoninputsofknowledgeandnotculturalvaluesinafutileattempttoboostinnovation.Canadianpolicymakersclearlyhavefallenunderthespellofwhatiscalledscientism—“thebeliefthatscientists,equippedwiththetoolsofscience,moree?ectivelyadvancethe?oweringofnewproductsandmethodsthandothedi?useandpoorlydirectedinitiativestakeninafreeenterpriseeconomy”(Phelps,2013:142).Canadaexcelsatmanyofthepresumedinputsintoinnovation,suchasR&D,fundingforscienceanduniversities,andgenerousgovernmentsubsidiesforinnovation.eproblemisthat,whilemoreeducation,science,andresearcharebene?cial,“theseelementsarenottobeconfusedwithinnovationpolicy”(Breznitz,2021:63).edamn-ingresult“isthatsince2007,themoretheCanadiangovernmenthasinvestedtaxpayers’moneyintryingtospurinnovation,thelessCanadianprivatebusinesseshavedoneso.Canadaeasilywinsthewooden-spoonawardfortheworstinnovationpolicyamongallthedevelopedeconomies”(Breznitz,2021:62).Governmentattemptstoboostinnovationhavenotpaido?becauseCanadiansocietydoesnotsubscribetoenoughofthevaluesthatincubateandchampioninnovation,preferringinsteadtoprotectincumbent?rmsandretardthereallocationofcapitalandlabourfromdecliningtoexpandingindustries.fraserinstitute.org6?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?Crossetraditionalviewineconomicsthatinnovationcanbecontrolledbygovernmentcalibrationofitspresumedinputs(suchasspendingonresearchanddevelopment)isgivingwaytoabroaderviewofthesocialandculturalcontextinwhichinnovation?our-ishes(Cross,2020).Innovationisassociatedwithculturalvaluessuchasindependence,self-expression,thewillingnesstocompete,andaninclinationtotaketheinitiative,showingthat“valuesandbeliefsmatter,includingthevaluesandresultingattitudesinstilledinchildrenandsociety’sattitudestowardinnovators,whichdictatewhethertheyareadmiredorenvied,andwhetherthecreativeindividualsreceivesupportfromtheircommunitiesorattemptsaremadeatrepressingthem,tonameafewexamples”(Zoega,2020:107).RecenthikesinCanadatotaxesonbothcorporationsandhigh-incomeearn-erssuggestswearemoredisposedtoenvythantoadmiresuccessandthatwedonotencouragecreativepeopleand?rms.WhilebusinessleadersintheUnitedStatessuchasthelateSteveJobs,BillGates,andWarrenBu?ettareo?en-admired?gures,itishardtonameanyCanadianbusinessleaderswhohavesuchiconicstatus.Canada’sabysmaltrackrecordoninnovationre?ectsalackofthoseculturalvaluesthatencourageinnovation.Canadafaredpoorlyinsurveysofthevaluesthatsupportinnov-ation,especiallytheacceptanceofcompetitionandteachingchildrentobeindependent(Zoega,2020:113).isiswhynoonetodaydescribesCanadaasanationon?rewithnewideas.eimportanceofvaluestoinnovationandgrowthisdemonstratedbyAlberta,whichhasachievedsuperiorgrowthwhiledemonstratingthemostpro-innovationvaluesandpoliciesinCanada(Cross,2021).ispapermakesthecasethatthevaluessharedbymostCanadiansencouragerent-seekingby?rmstoshelterthemselvesfromcompetitionratherthancompetingthroughinnovation.ItisnoteworthythatCanadianvaluesremainsodi?erentfromthoseofAmericans.Despitebeingsituatednexttotheworld’sleaderininnovationandhavingconstantexpos-uretoUSculturalvaluesthatencourageinnovation,Canada’svaluesremainsigni?cantlylesssupportiveofinnovation.Beyondalowercapacitytoinnovate,thepersistenceofdi?erencesinCanadianandAmericanvaluesdespiteCanada’sreadyaccesstoAmericanbroadcastingandsocialmediaimpliesthatourculturalindustrieswronglydiagnosedinaself-servingmannerthethreatposedtooursovereigntybyconstantexposuretoUSmessages.AstheGlobeandMail’sTVcriticJohnDoylewrotein2017abouttheCBC:“itisdangerousforthepublicbroadcastertothinkofitselfasde?ningthecountryanditsculture…itdoesnotde?neCanadaortheculture.Nobodydoesthat.ecountryistoomercurial,shi?ingandhappilyshapeless—it’sanideawithmanyhistoriesandcul-tures”(QuotedinTarasandWaddell,2020:145).Apparentlyourculturalindustriesdonotunderstandhowculturalvaluesaredeterminedandpropagated,implyingtheycano?erlittlehelpinprotectingCanadianvalues.fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?7CapitalisminCanadaedi?erencebetweenCanadianandAmericanvaluesisre?ectedinhowpoliticallead-erscommunicatewiththebusinesscommunity.ManyUSpoliticianstalktobusinessinawaythatapparentlyisunthinkableinCanada.McCloskeyhaslongmadethecasethatthemannerandthewordsasocietyusestodescribeitsbourgeoisarecriticallyimport-ant.FormerGeneralElectricCEOJackWelchrecountsmeetingwiththenPresidentTrumpattheWhiteHouse,saying:“I’vebeencomingtothisplacesince1980andI’veneverseenanythinglikethat.eycansaywhattheywantabouthim,butIdon’tknowifanypresidenthasbeenmorepreparedtositinthatroomandtalkbusiness.Itwasliketalkingtoapeer,notapolitician”(Sims,2019:131–132).Trump’sactionswerenotalwayspro-business,notablyhisproclivitytoraisetari?sorpunishindividual?rmsthato?endedhimpersonally.However,hiswordsandhisadoptionofkeypoliciessuchasreformingthecorporateincometaxandreducingregulationsclearlystimulatedbusi-nessinvestment.Beforethepandemicstruckin2020,businessinvestmentintheUnitedStateshadrisenby15.5%injustthreeyears,afasterratethangainsof23.4%and22.5%duringtheeightyearsoftheBushandObamaadministrations.OtherUSpoliticiansworkhardtocreateabusiness-friendlyenvironmentwithoutcater-ingtospeci?c?rmsorindustries.Eisenhowerexclusivelyappointedbusinesspeopletohiscabinet(includingthePresidentofGeneralMotorsasSecretaryofDefense)withtheexceptionofhisSecretaryofLaborwhowasheadoftheplumbers’union,leadingeNewRepublictocharacterizethecabinetas“eightmillionairesandaplumber”(quotedinLeuchtenburg,2015:341–342).PeteSessions,aRepublicanmemberofCongressfromTexas,recentlyopenedavirtualconferencebythanking“everyoneinthefreeenterprisesystem”(CanadaStrongandFreeNetwork,2021).ItisunimaginablethatapoliticianinCanadatodaywoulddemonstratesuchadmirationforbusiness.ManyCanadianpoliticalleadersseemtowantwhatPikettycalled“capital-ismwithoutcapitalists,oratanyrateastatecapitalisminwhichprivateownersnolongercontrolledthelargest?rms”whendescribingFrance’seconomy(Piketty,2014:138).Capitalismwithoutcapitalistsis,ofcourse,anincongruity.InhishistoryofAmericancapitalism,JonathanLevyemphasizestheimportanceofcapitalists,because“[i]nacap-italisteconomytheremustnotonlybecapital.eremustbecapitalists—theownersofcapital,whoarechargedwiththecriticaltaskofinvestingtheircapitalwhenandwheretheylikeandthusjump-startingthecapitalisteconomicprocess”(Levy,2021:xvi).However,havingcapitalistsimpliesacceptingcertainthingsthatseemanathematotheprevailingsentimentamongpolicyelitesinCanadatoday,suchasadistributionoffraserinstitute.org8?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?Crossincomeunequalenoughtocreateincentivestoachieveandexcelandthefreedomtodeploycapitalinvestmentwhereitearnsthehighestreturn,includingresourceextrac-tionandpipelines.Canadaseemstogrudginglyacceptentrepreneursandcapitalismwhiledoingeverythingpossibletothrowsandintheirgears.Whilecapitalismwithoutcapitalistsisnotpossible,socialismisachievablewithoutstateownershipofthemeansofproduction.Whatleyarguesthatsocialismalsoincludesstatecontrolovertheoperationsandnotjusttheownershipofanenterprise.Allowingpri-vateownershipbutdictatingorregulatingthedetailsofhowabusinessfunctionsisthesameasgovernmentcontrol.isisexempli?edinCanada’shealth-caresystemwhereprivateownershipofdoctor’so?cesissubjecttotightstatecontroloftheiroperationsandrenumerationsince“thestatedictateswhocanenteraclinic;whomdoctorscansee;whomustbereferred;whatkindsofcaremustbeo?ered;whatnotesmustbetaken;whatnotesmustnever

betaken;datatoreport;andhowtoreportthedata”(Whatley,2020:61).isechoesLudwigvonMisesobservationthatsocialistandplannedecon-omies“wanttomaintainprivatepropertyinnameandinlaw,butinfact,becausetheysubordinatethepowerofdisposingtoStateorders,wanttosocializeproperty,[andthus]aresocialistsystemsinthefullsense”(quotedinWhatley,2020:256).ecom-pletecontrolgovernmentsexercisedduringthepandemicoverwhenandhowmostbusinessesinCanadacouldopenandconductbusinessshowedthefullpowergovern-mentscanexertover?rms.fraserinstitute.orgCross?Canada’sFalteringBusinessDynamism?9CreativeDestructionCreationanddestructionarebothfundamentaltoinnovation.Everysuccessfulinnov-ationdestroysapartofsomeotherbusiness,eitherdirectlybywinningpartofitsclien-teleorindirectlybysyphoningo?customers’purchasingpower.Asaresult,entrenchedinterestsareadeptatusingprocessesandinstitutionstoblockchangeandpreservethestatusquo.Governmentistheinstitutionmosto?enusedtopreserveestablishedinter-estssinceithasatitsdisposalanextensivearrayof“regulations,grants,loans,guarantees,taxes,deductions,carve-outs,andpatentextensions”(Phelps,2013:314).Governmentsalsohavetheabilitytoconferspecialadvantagesonfavouredincumbentstocreatearti-?cialscarcityandrentsanderectbarrierstotheentryofnew?rms.Barrierstoentrycomeinmanyforms,includingmonopolyrights,occupationallicensingrequirements,restrictionsonthenationalityofinvestors,subsidiestoestablished?rms,andprivilegedaccesstogovernmentcontracts(Geloso,2021:18).Creativedestructionisvitaltothedynamismofcapitalism.Conventionalmeasuresincludetheturnoverof?rmsandtheentryandexitof?rms.Simplyassumingthatourleadingcompanieswillendureandcreatejobsandincomesinthefutureisnottenableintoday’sglobaleconomy.IntheUnitedStates,theturnoverof?rmsamongindus

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論