版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
Innovation
Wars:
How
China
Is
Gainingon
the
United
States
in
Corporate
R&DTRELYSA
LONGANDROBERTD.
ATKINSON
|
JULY
2023ChinawantstodisplacetheUnitedStatesas
the
world’sleadinginnovationeconomy.BusinessR&Dinadvanced,
traded-sectorindustriesisakeyindicatorofitsprogress—andit
is
catchinguprapidly.Congressand
U.S.state
governments
shouldrespondbyboostingR&Dtaxincentives.KEY
TAKEAWAYS...U.S.headquartered
firms’R&Dspendinginadvancedindustriesrose
from80percentabovetheglobalaveragein2013tonearly100percentmorein2021.Chineseadvanced
industrieswentfrom80percentbelow
theglobalaverageto30percentbelow.Leavingoutsoftware,theyshould
catchup
tothe
UnitedStatesby2034.In2013,U.S.advanced-technology
firms’size-adjustedR&DspendingexceededthatofChinese
firmsinnineadvancedsectors.By2021,
Chinese
firms’spendingwashigherintwoofninesectorsand
tiedinathird.....Inwage-adjustedR&Dspendingas
ashareofGDP,Chinaisnowabovethe
globalaverageinsixofnineadvanced
industries.Inseven
ofninesectors,
U.S.firms’size-adjusted
R&Dspendinghadeitherdeclinedorremained
stagnantwhileChinese
spending
rose.Chinese
firmsalsoinvestedmorethanU.S.
firmsintraded
sectors
thatare
notadvanced,investing
$34billionin
R&D,whileU.S.firmsinvested$19billion.U.S.firms
spent240percentmore
thanChinese
firms’spendingof$154
billion.Butadjusting
forChina’slowerR&Dsalaries,U.S.firmsonlyspent80percentmore
thanChinese
firms—$529billioncomparedtoChinese
firms’$295billion..Torespond,CongressshoulddoubletheAlternativeSimplifiedCreditrateto28percentandrestore
fullexpensingofR&Dexpenditures,andstatesshould
takesimilarsteps.CONTENTSKeyTakeaways
1Introduction
3ExaminingAdvancedSectors
3AerospaceandDefense
8ElectronicandElectricalEquipment
11GeneralIndustrials
13IndustrialEngineering
16PharmaceuticalandBiotechnology
18SoftwareandComputerServices
21TechnologyandHardwareEquipment
23AlternativeEnergy
26AutomobilesandParts
28AllOtherSectors
31NonadvancedTradedSectors
31NontradedSectors
32PolicyRecommendations
34Conclusion
35Appendix1:
IndustrySectorGroups
36Appendix2
37KeyDifferencesBetween
EUR&D2,500ScoreboardandBusinessEnterpriseR&DExpenditureEstimates
37LocationofR&DActivity
37NominalDollarFigures
37SectorClassification
37AdditionofAmazonintothe2021EUR&DScoreboard
37Endnotes
38INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE2INTRODUCTIONAdvanced,traded-sectorindustriespowertheU.S.
economy’s
globalcompetitiveness.1
Akeyindicatorofstrength
inthoseindustriesis
theamountfirmsinvestinresearchanddevelopment(R&D)toproducenewinnovations.As
China
vigorouslychallengestheUnitedStatesforgloballeadership
intheinnovationeconomy,it
isthereforeimportanttoassesswherethetwocountriesstand
intheiradvanced
industries’privateR&Dspending.2ThisreportusestheEU
R&D2,500Scoreboard,
whichcovers90percentoftheworld’sprivate-sectorR&Dspending,to
compareU.S.-andChinese-headquartered
firms’R&Dspendingin
threegroupsof
economicsectors.3
First,weexamine
nine
strategicallyimportantadvanced,
traded-sectorindustries.Second,wecompareU.S.andChinesefirmsacrossallnon-advancedtradedsectors.Finally,weexaminenon-tradedsectors.Thereare,however,some
caveatsaboutthisdataset:thecompanies’locationsarecategorizedbytheirheadquartersratherthanwhereR&Dinvestmentsoccurred;
theR&Dspending
isinnominaldollars,companysectorsareclassifiedbymainbusinessactivities,
andmostof
thedatapresentedheredoesnotattempttoadjustforpurchasingpowerparitytoreflectlowerR&DsalariesinChina.(Seeappendix2fordetails.)Eachsectionof
thereportexaminesU.S.andChineseprivate-sectorR&Din
those
sectorson
asize-adjusted
basis—firstrelativeto
the
sizeoftheirrespectiveeconomies;
thenasproportionsofglobalR&Dineach
sectororgroupof
sectors;and
finallyusinganindustrialconcentrationratioknownasalocationquotient(LQ),which
isR&Das
ashareof
acountry’snationaleconomyversustheglobalaverage.Wealsocomparetheextenttowhich
privateR&Disconcentratedamongeachcountry’stopfour
firmsontheEUR&D2,500Scorecard.ThedatashowsthatwhileU.S.firms’investmentinR&Disgrowing,Chinaiscatchingup.Onasize-adjusted
basis,U.S.
firms’R&Dinvestmentsinthenineadvancedsectorsin2013exceededthatof
Chinesefirms.4
Butby2021,U.S.firmshadlosttheirlead
intwoofthenine
sectors,whileChinaclosed
thegapinthe
otherseven.5
TheUnitedStatescouldpotentiallylose
globalmarketsharesin
theotherseven
sectorsasChinesecompaniescontinuallyexpandR&Dinvestmentwithgovernmentsupport.
Inaddition,
because
theybenefitfromextensiveintellectualpropertytheftandforcedtechnologytransfers,Chinesefirmsdo
nothave
to
investasmuchinR&Das
Americanfirms
togetthesameinnovationresults.6
Think
ofChinaasa
freerider,livingon
theR&Dinvestmentsof
U.S.andotherforeign
firms.Butin
additiontothatfree-ridingstrategyandthe
impactofhavingR&Dworkerswithlowersalaries,
Chinese
firmsalsoareinvesting
more
intheirownin-housecapabilities.Inresponse,
Washington
needstodo
abetterjob
of
incentivizingtheprivatesectorto
continueinvesting
inR&D.Thisshouldincludeexpandingprogramsthatfund
jointindustry-universityresearch,boostingtheAlternativeSimplifiedR&DCreditratefrom
14percenttoat
least28percent,andrestoringR&Dexpensing.
It’s
much
easierto
keepU.S.industries’globalmarketshares
throughsuchpoliciesthantolosethem
andlaterhavetoworkmuchhardertowinthemback,oftenin
vain.EXAMINING
ADVANCED
SECTORSThefollowingsubsectionscompare
theUnitedStates’andChina’sprivatebusinessR&Dspendingfromfirms
innineadvanced
sectors:
aerospaceanddefense,electronicandelectricalequipment,generalindustrials,
industrialengineering,pharmaceuticaland
biotechnology,INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE3softwareand
computerservices,
technologyandhardwareequipment,
alternativeenergy,andautomobilesandparts.Itisimportanttonote
thatthesampleoffirmsonlyincludesthe
top2,500R&Dspendersglobally.TheaverageU.S.firmin
advancedsectorsspendsmore
onR&DthandoestheaverageChinesefirm.
In2021,659U.S.
firms
and424Chinesefirmsin
theseninesectorsmade
theEUR&D2,500scoreboard.7
(Refertoappendix2ondetailaboutAmazon’saddition
into
the2021data.)Thisiscomparedwiththerestoftheworld’s618
firms.8
(See
table1.)The
averageU.S.firminvested$802
millionon
R&D,0.06standarddeviationsabovetheaverage
firm’sR&Dspendingof$655millionin
thesectorsglobally.9
Incomparison,theaverageChinesefirminvested$363milliononR&D,0.12standarddeviationsbelow
theaveragefirm.10Table
1:
Number
of
firms
in
nine
advanced
trade
sectors,
202111UnitedStatesRest
of
theWorldSectorChina79734710652455Total47833720724916714844Pharmaceuticals
andBiotechnologySoftwareandComputerServicesTechnologyHardwareand
EquipmentElectronicandElectricalEquipmentIndustrialEngineeringAutomobilesandPartsAerospaceandDefenceGeneralIndustrials2631977141282815152136678910287752433516164AlternativeEnergy8Total6604246181,702Collectively,U.S.firmsin
thesenineadvancedsectorscontinue
toinvestmoreinR&D
thandoChinese
firms.In2021,
U.S.firms
spent3.4
timesmorethanChinesefirms:$529billiononR&D,whileChinesefirms
spent$154billion.12
Asaresult,U.S.
firms’R&D
sharewas47.4percentcomparedwithChinesefirms’13.8percent.13
(See
figure1.)This
is
comparedwiththerestoftheworld’s39percent.14
Evenwhencontrollingfor
grossdomesticproduct(GDP),U.S.firms
stillspentmore
thanChinese
firms.Forevery$1,000ofGDP,U.S.firms
in
theseninesectorsspent$22.70on
privateR&D,whileChinesefirmsinvested$8.67.15
Therestoftheworld’sfirmsspent$7.80.16
Inotherwords,bothU.S.andChinesefirmsinvested
moreinR&Dasashareof
theirR&Dcomparedwiththe
restoftheworld,butU.S.
firmsstilloutperformChinese
firms.INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE4Figure
1:
R&D
spending
by
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms
in
all
advanced
sectors
(including
Amazon),
202117$30$529.3B$25$20$15$433.0B$153.8B$10$5$00%20%40%60%80%100%GlobalShareFigure
2:
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
wage-adjusted
R&D
spending,
all
advanced
sectors
(including
Amazon),
202118$4$3$529.3B$2$294.8B$1$00%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%ShareofGlobalR&DINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE5Whenadjustingforwagedifferences,Chinesefirmsare
rapidlycatchingup
toU.S.firms’spending.Althoughwagesaredifficultto
measure,PayScalehasestimated
thatresearchscientistsinChinaearned1.9times
lessthan
theirU.S.counterparts—$45,446comparedto$87,132intheUnitedStates.19
ThisdifferencemeansChinesefirms’R&Dspendinggoesfarther.
Whenwagedifferencesareadjusted
for,U.S.firmsonlyspent80percentmorethanChinese
firms—$529billioncomparedtoChinese
firms’$295billion.20
Moreover,adjustingforbothwagedifferencesandGDP,U.S.firms’spendingwasonly37percent
more
thanChinesefirms’—$1.74per
$1,000ofGDPcompared
to$1.28forChinesefirms.21
(Seefigure2.)U.S.firms’size-adjusted
R&DspendingwaslargerthanChinesefirms’in2021.Thesize-adjustedR&DspendingcomparesU.S.andChinesefirms’R&Dspendingasashare
oftheirrespectivecountry’sGDP
tothe
globalaverageR&Dspendingas
ashareoftheworld’sGDP.Thisresults
inan
industryconcentrationratio
knownas
anLQ,whichweexpressasamultiple.Forexample,
ifacountryhas
twice
theglobalaverage
corporateR&Din
agiven
sector,thenitsLQinthatsectoris
2x.TheLQ
isimportantin
thisanalysisbecauseitcomparestheperformanceoffirms
ineachcountrywiththeglobalaverageafteradjusting
for
thesizeofeachcountry’seconomy.Bythatmeasure,U.S.firms’size-adjustedR&DspendingwashigherthanChina’sinsixof
the
nine
sectors.Theseincluded
thesoftwareandcomputerservices,technologyandhardware,
andpharmaceuticalandbiotechnologysectors.22
However,in
threesectors—generalindustrials,
electronicandelectricalequipment,andindustrialengineering—U.S.firmseithertiedor
werelowerthan
Chinesefirms’size-adjustedR&Dspending.23
(Seetable2.)Moreover,Chinese
firmsare
closing
thesize-adjustedR&DspendinggapwithU.S.
firmsinadvancedsectors.
Insevenofninesectors,U.S.
firms’size-adjustedR&Dspendinghadeitherdeclinedorremained
stagnantwhileChinese
spending
rose
since2013.24Table
2:
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
size-adjusted
R&D
in
nine
advanced
sectors
(2021
LQs)25Chinese
LQ,SectorU.S.
LQ3.1x2.2x2.2x1.8x1.1x0.8x0.7x0.5x0.5xChinese
LQWage-AdjustedSoftwareandComputerServicesTechnologyHardwareand
EquipmentPharmaceuticals
andBiotechnologyAerospaceandDefenceGeneralIndustrials0.7x1.2x1.1x1.7x0.3x0.6x0.2x0.3x1.1x1.7xIndustrialEngineering1.6x2.4xAutomobilesandParts0.6x1.0xElectronicandElectricalEquipmentAlternativeEnergy1.3x2.0x0.3x0.6xINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE6U.S.firmshavehistoricallyexceededChinesefirms’R&Dinvestments,butChinese
firms’R&Dinvestmentsare
rapidlygrowing.From
2013to2021,U.S.firms’R&Dshareofthesenineglobalsectorsrose
from39.1percentto47.4percent.26
Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dsharerosefrom3percentto13.8percent.27Chinese
firms
in
advanced
sectors
are
heavily
investing
in
R&D
and
catching
up
to
U.S.
firms
tocompete
in
the
global
economy.AlthoughChinesefirms’R&DshareoftheglobaladvancedsectorsisstillbelowU.S.firms’becauseof
theirsmallereconomy,theirsize-adjustedR&Dinvestmentiscatchingup.Whencontrolling
forGDP,U.S.
firms’R&Dinvestmentrosefrom80percentto100percentmore
thantheglobalaverage(1.8xto2.0x).28
Incomparison,
Chinese
firms’rose
from80percentbelowtheglobalaverageR&Dinvestment(0.2x)to30percentbelow
theglobalaverage(0.7x).29
(Seefigure3.)Thisis
importantbecauseit
meansthatshould
this
trendcontinueonpace,Chinawouldcatchupto
theUnitedStates’currentlevelby2049.30Figure
3:
Projected
R&D
spending
by
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms
in
all
advanced
sectors3150%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%3.0x2.5x2.0x1.5x1.0x0.5x0.0x0%2013
2017
2021
2025
2029
2033
2037
2041
2045
2049
2053U.S.
Share
ChinaShare
U.S.
LQ
ChinaLQTheUnitedStatesreliesmore
onfirmsinthe
softwareandservicessectortomaintain
itsgrowthinsize-adjustedR&Dspendingforadvancedsectors.AccordingtoStatista,
theUnitedStatesisthelargestR&Dspenderinsoftware.32
From2013to2021,U.S.firms’R&D
spendinggrew
from80percent(1.8x)to
100percent(2.0x)abovethe
globalaverage.
Withoutthesoftwareandservices
sector,U.S.
firms’R&Dspendingremainedstagnantat
60percentabovetheglobalaverage.Incomparison,
Chinese
firms’R&Dspendinggrewaboutthesameevenwithoutthesoftware
thesector(0.26xto0.76x).Asaresult,
withoutthe
software
sector,Chinesefirmsareprojected
tocatchuptoU.S.firms’R&Dspendingby2034.(See
figure4.)INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE7Figure
4:
Projected
R&D
spending
by
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms
in
all
advanced
sectors,
excluding
software
andcomputer
services3340%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%3.0x2.5x2.0x1.5x1.0x0.5x0.0x0%2013
2017
2021
2025
2029
2033
2037
2041
2045
2049
2053U.S.
Share
ChinaShare
U.S.
LQ
ChinaLQAerospace
and
DefenseTheaerospaceanddefensesectorincludesmanufacturers,assemblers,
and
distributorsofaircraftparts,
aircrafts,andcommunicationsatellitesused
inbothcommercialandprivateairtransport.34
Thesectoralsoincludesproducersofmilitaryaircraft,
radarequipment,
andweaponsused
inthedefenseindustry.35In2021,15U.S.firmsinthis
sectormade
theEUR&D2,500list,
includingRaytheonTechnologies,Boeing,
andLockheed
Martin.36
Five
Chinese
firms,includingAVICElectromechanicalSystems,ChinaAerospaceTimesElectronics,
andChinaAvionicsSystems,also
made
thelist.37
In2021,theaverageU.S.
firminthe
sectorspent$626milliononR&D,a0.17standarddeviation
abovetheaverage
firm’s
R&Dspendingof
$495millionin
theaerospaceanddefense
sectorglobally.38
Incomparison,theaverageChinese
firminthe
sectorspent$144
million,0.46standarddeviationbelowtheaverage
firm’s.39U.S.firms
spentabout13
times
moreonR&DthandidChinesefirms:$9.4billion
comparedwith$721
million.40
Whencontrolling
forGDP,U.S.firms
spent10timesmorethanChinesefirms
($0.40onR&Dforevery$1,000
ofGDPcompared
with$0.04
inChina).41
Asaresult,U.S.firms’R&Dspendingmadeup43.2percentofthe
globalsector’sR&Dspendingcomparedwith3.3percentforChina.42
Thisiscomparedwith
therestof
the
world’s53.5percentandR&Dspendingof
$0.21forevery$1,000.43
(Seefigure
5.)Whenwagesareadjustedfor,U.S.
firmsstillspentabout
6.8
timesmorethanChinesefirms—$9.4billioncomparedtoChinesefirms’$1.4billion.44INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE8Figure
5:
R&D
spending
by
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms
in
the
aerospace
and
defense
sector,
202145$0.50$0.45$0.40$0.35$0.30$0.25$0.20$0.15$0.10$0.05$0.00$9.4B$11.6B$0.7B0%20%40%60%80%100%ShareofGlobalR&DU.S.firmshaveconsistentlyhadahigherglobalshareof
R&Dspending.
From2013to
2021,U.S.firms’shareof
globalR&Drosefrom35percentto43percent.46
Chinesefirms’sharesrosefrom0.1percentto3.3
percent.47Thetopfour
U.S.andChinesefirmswiththehighestR&Dspendinghaveconsistentlyplayedacrucialrole
indrivingbothU.S.andChinese
firms’
shareofglobalR&D.In
2013,thetop
fourU.S.firms
accountedfor81percentofthedomesticsector’sR&Dspending.48
Andin2021,thetopfourfirmsstillaccountedfor80percent,
meaningthesefirmsmadeup
34.4percentoftheglobalsector’sR&Dspending.49
Thisdecreased
relianceoccurreddespitethenumberofU.S.firmsdecliningfrom19
to15during
thisperiod.Similarly,the
top
fourChinesefirms’R&Dspendingaccountedfor100
percentoftheChinesesector’sR&Dspendingin2013.50
Andin2021,these
topfourChinesefirmsstillaccountedfor87percentofthecountry’sspendinginaerospaceanddefense.51
(Seefigure6.)Theslightdeclinein
reliance
ispartiallybecausethenumberofChinesefirmsincreased
fromone
tosix.Inotherwords,theUnitedStatesandChinadependontheirtop
fourfirms
to
maintaincurrentlevelsof
R&Dcompetitiveness.INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE9Figure
6:
Top
four
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
share
of
domestic
R&D
in
aerospace
and
defense52120%100%80%60%40%20%0%20132017UnitedStates2021ChinaU.S.firms’size-adjustedR&Dspendingwas60percenthigherthan
theglobalaverage
(1.6x)in2013,rising
to80percentabove
theglobalaverage(1.8x)in2021.53
Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dspendingwas
nonexistentin2013andwasstill80percentbelowtheglobalaverage(0.0xto
0.2x)in2021.54
(Seefigure7.)Figure
7:
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
shares
of
global
R&D
in
the
aerospace
and
defense
sectors5550%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%2.0x1.8x1.6x1.4x1.2x1.0x0.8x0.6x0.4x0.2x0.0x0%201320172021ChinaLQU.S.
ShareChinaShareU.S.
LQINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE10Electronic
and
Electrical
EquipmentTheelectronicand
electricalequipmentsectorincludesmakers
anddistributorsofelectricalparts
forradiosandotherconsumerelectronics,
including
cablesand
transistors.56
Thesectoralso
includescompaniesproviding
mechanicalandelectronicsecurity;
filtration
systems;productsused
inthemeasurementof
electric,gas,
andwater;
pollutioncontrolequipment;andelectricaldevicesandcomponentsmarked
tobusinesses.57In2021,41U.S.firms
made
theEUR&D2,500list,includingDanaher,
KeysightTechnologies,andNorthropGrumman,
while106Chinesefirms,
includingByd,BoeTechnologyGroup,andHangzhouHikvisionDigitalTechnology,
alsomadethelist.58
Thatsameyear,
theaverageU.S.firmspent$299
million
onR&D,whiletheaverageChinese
firmspent$228million.59
Thisiscomparedwiththe
globalaveragefirm’s$408million.60
Inotherwords,both
spentless
than
theaveragefirm
in
thesectoronR&D,meaningfirmsinothercountriesarebetteratpromotinginnovationwith
theirhigherR&Dspending.Despite
U.S.firms’higheraveragespendingonR&D,Chinesefirms
spend
more
onR&DthandoU.S.firms
collectively.
In
2021,U.S.firms
spent$12.3billion
onR&D,whileChinesefirmsspentalmostdouble,or$24.1billion.61
Duetothelargenumberof
Chinesefirms,
theirR&Dshareof
theglobalsectorwas23.8percent,while
U.S.firms’sharewasjust12.1percent.62Adjusting
forGDP,Chinesefirmsalsospentmore
thanU.S.firms.For
every$1,000ofGDP,Chinese
firmsspent$1.36onR&Dcomparedwith
$0.53forU.S.
firms.63
Thisiscomparedwiththerestof
the
world’sR&Dshareof
64.1percentandspendingof$1.17
forevery$1,000.64(Seefigure8.)Moreover,
whenadjusting
forwages,Chinese
firmsspent3.8
times
morethanU.S.firms—$46.3billioncomparedtoU.S.firms’$12.3billion.65Figure
8:
R&D
spending
by
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms
in
the
electronic
andelectrical
equipment
sector,
202166$1.60$1.40$24.1B$1.20$65.1B$1.00$0.80$0.60$12.3B$0.40$0.20$0.000%20%40%60%80%100%GlobalShareINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE11U.S.firms
inthesectorhavenotalwayslaggedbehindChinesefirmsinR&Dspending.
In2013,U.S.firms’shareof
R&Dspendingintheglobalsectorwas12.2percentcompared
withChinesefirms’2.5percent.67
(See
figure10.)However,U.S.
firmsdidnot
increasetheir
R&Dinvestmentinproportionalitytothe
growthof
R&Dspendingin
theglobalsector.
Incomparison,Chinesefirms’growthexceeded
theglobalsector’sgrowth.
Asaresult,Chinesefirms
caughtup
andwereroughlyonparwithU.S.firms
inR&Dinvestmentby2017,witheachholdingabout
11percentofthe
globalR&Dspending.68
Andby2021,ChinesefirmshadoutspentU.S.firms,holdingaglobalshareof23.8
percentcomparedwithU.S.
firms’
12.1
percent.69Chinese
firms
in
the
electronic
and
electrical
equipment
sector
not
only
caught
up
but
now
exceed
theUnited
States
in
promoting
R&D
and
competitiveness.Thetopfour
U.S.firms
with
thehighestR&Dspendinghave
consistentlyplayedakeyroleindrivingU.S.firms’shareofglobalR&D.In2013,
thetop
fourU.S.firmsaccounted
for44percentofthedomesticsector’sR&D.70
In2021,theystillaccounted
for37
percent,meaningthese
firmsmadeup4.5
percentoftheglobalsector’sR&Dspending.71
Thedecreasedrelianceoccurreddespite
thenumberofU.S.firmsinthesectordecliningfrom
54
to41in
thatperiod.Incomparison,Chinesefirms’shareofglobalR&Dhasbecomelessdependentonthetop
fourChinese
firms.72
In2013,
thetop
fourChinesefirmscomprised46percentof
thedomesticsector’sR&Dspending.73
Yet,by2021,
theleading
fourChinese
firmsaccountedforonly25percent.74
Thisdecreasedrelianceoccurredprincipallybecause
thenumberof
Chinesefirmsincreased
from28to
106.(Seefigure9.)Inotherwords,
theUnitedStatesdependsmoreonitstopfourfirmsto
maintaincurrentprivatesectorR&Dcompetitivenesslevels.Figure
9:
Top
four
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
share
of
domestic
R&D
in
electronics
and
electrical
equipment7550%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%0%20132017UnitedStates2021ChinaMoreover,comparedwith
theglobalaverage,U.S.
firms’size-adjustedR&D
investmentsworsened
from2013to2021,whenU.S.R&Dspendingdecreased
from60
percentto50INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION
|
JULY2023PAGE12percent
oftheglobalaverage(0.6x
to0.5x).76
Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dspendingincreased
from20percentto130percentofthe
globalaverage
(0.2x
to1.3x).77
Inthis
period,Chinese
firmsincreasedtheirR&Dspendingby$1.22forevery$1,000ofChina’sGDPcomparedwithU.S.firms’
growthof
$0.13.78
(See
figure10.)Inotherwords,Chinesefirmshavenotonly
caughtup
butnowexceedU.S.firms
inpromotingR&Dandcompetitiveness.Figure
10:
U.S.
and
Chinese
firms’
shares
of
global
R&D
in
the
electronic
and
electrical
equipment
sectors7925%20%15%10%5%1.4x1.2x1.0x0.8x0.6x0.4x0.2x0.0x0%201320172021ChinaLQU.S.
ShareChinaShareU.S.
LQGeneral
IndustrialsThegeneralindustrialssectorincludescompanies“engaged
inthreeor
moreindustrialbusinessactivities,noneof
which
isthedominantbusinessline.”80
Moreover,thesectoralsoincludescompaniesthatmanufacture,distribute,and/orproducepaint,
materialcoatings,resin,plasticproducts,chemicalsusedinplastic,structuralglassandotherglassproducts,andpackagingproducts.81In2021,15U.S.firmsmade
theEUR&D2,500list,includingGeneralElectric,Honeywell,and3M.SixteenChinesefirms,includingMetallurgicalCorporationofChina,ChinaInternationalMarineContainers,
andSunwodaElectronics,also
made
thelist.82
In2021,theaverageU.S.firminthissectorspent$457milliononR&D.83
In
comparison,the
average
Chinese
firmspent$308million,a0.15
standarddeviationbelowtheaveragefirmglobally.84
Thisiscomparedwiththeaverage
firm’sR&Dspendingof
$393million
globally.85U.S.firms
inthegeneralindustrialssectorspendmore
onR&DthandidChinesefirms.In2021,U.S.firms
spent$6.9billiononR&DcomparedwithChinesefirms’$4.9billion.86
DuetoU.S.firms’higherR&Dinvestments,theirR&Dspendingmadeup27.3percentoftheglobalsector’s.87
Incomparison,
Chinese
firms’spendingonlycomprised19.6percent.88
AdjustingforGDP,U.S.firmsdidnotspendalotmore
thanChinesefirmsonR&D.For
every$1,000of
GDP,U.S.firms
spent$0.19
onR&Dcompared
withChinesefirms’$0.18.89
This
iscomparedwiththerestof
the
world’sR&Dshareof
53.1percentandspendingof$0.24
forevery$1,000.90INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONF
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度設備租賃及融資租賃合同6篇
- 二零二五年度機械設備銷售代理合同范本2篇
- 二零二五年度個人對電信行業(yè)用戶信息保密合同
- 二零二五年度個人蝦池承包養(yǎng)殖市場推廣與合作合同3篇
- 二零二五年度配送人員福利保障合同2025年度4篇
- 2025版物業(yè)管理企業(yè)財務審計服務合同協(xié)議書3篇
- 鎮(zhèn)江隔熱夾芯板施工方案
- 發(fā)電機租賃合同
- 企業(yè)合同管理制度指南
- 財務制度保密協(xié)議
- 六年級上冊數(shù)學課件-第五單元 數(shù)據(jù)處理 北師大版
- YY/T 1496-2016紅光治療設備
- 鄭州小吃詳細地點
- 上海高考英語詞匯手冊
- 2021年江蘇省淮安市淮陰中學高一政治下學期期末試題含解析
- 2021年道路交通安全法期末考試試題含答案
- 自帶藥物治療告知書
- 建筑制圖與陰影透視-第3版-課件12
- 2023年最新的校長給教師春節(jié)祝福語
- 吞咽解剖和生理研究
- TSG11-2020 鍋爐安全技術規(guī)程
評論
0/150
提交評論