ITIF-創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)爭:中國在企業(yè)研發(fā)方面如何趕超美國(英)_第1頁
ITIF-創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)爭:中國在企業(yè)研發(fā)方面如何趕超美國(英)_第2頁
ITIF-創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)爭:中國在企業(yè)研發(fā)方面如何趕超美國(英)_第3頁
ITIF-創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)爭:中國在企業(yè)研發(fā)方面如何趕超美國(英)_第4頁
ITIF-創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)爭:中國在企業(yè)研發(fā)方面如何趕超美國(英)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩46頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

Innovation

Wars:

How

China

Is

Gainingon

the

United

States

in

Corporate

R&DTRELYSA

LONGANDROBERTD.

ATKINSON

|

JULY

2023ChinawantstodisplacetheUnitedStatesas

the

world’sleadinginnovationeconomy.BusinessR&Dinadvanced,

traded-sectorindustriesisakeyindicatorofitsprogress—andit

is

catchinguprapidly.Congressand

U.S.state

governments

shouldrespondbyboostingR&Dtaxincentives.KEY

TAKEAWAYS...U.S.headquartered

firms’R&Dspendinginadvancedindustriesrose

from80percentabovetheglobalaveragein2013tonearly100percentmorein2021.Chineseadvanced

industrieswentfrom80percentbelow

theglobalaverageto30percentbelow.Leavingoutsoftware,theyshould

catchup

tothe

UnitedStatesby2034.In2013,U.S.advanced-technology

firms’size-adjustedR&DspendingexceededthatofChinese

firmsinnineadvancedsectors.By2021,

Chinese

firms’spendingwashigherintwoofninesectorsand

tiedinathird.....Inwage-adjustedR&Dspendingas

ashareofGDP,Chinaisnowabovethe

globalaverageinsixofnineadvanced

industries.Inseven

ofninesectors,

U.S.firms’size-adjusted

R&Dspendinghadeitherdeclinedorremained

stagnantwhileChinese

spending

rose.Chinese

firmsalsoinvestedmorethanU.S.

firmsintraded

sectors

thatare

notadvanced,investing

$34billionin

R&D,whileU.S.firmsinvested$19billion.U.S.firms

spent240percentmore

thanChinese

firms’spendingof$154

billion.Butadjusting

forChina’slowerR&Dsalaries,U.S.firmsonlyspent80percentmore

thanChinese

firms—$529billioncomparedtoChinese

firms’$295billion..Torespond,CongressshoulddoubletheAlternativeSimplifiedCreditrateto28percentandrestore

fullexpensingofR&Dexpenditures,andstatesshould

takesimilarsteps.CONTENTSKeyTakeaways

1Introduction

3ExaminingAdvancedSectors

3AerospaceandDefense

8ElectronicandElectricalEquipment

11GeneralIndustrials

13IndustrialEngineering

16PharmaceuticalandBiotechnology

18SoftwareandComputerServices

21TechnologyandHardwareEquipment

23AlternativeEnergy

26AutomobilesandParts

28AllOtherSectors

31NonadvancedTradedSectors

31NontradedSectors

32PolicyRecommendations

34Conclusion

35Appendix1:

IndustrySectorGroups

36Appendix2

37KeyDifferencesBetween

EUR&D2,500ScoreboardandBusinessEnterpriseR&DExpenditureEstimates

37LocationofR&DActivity

37NominalDollarFigures

37SectorClassification

37AdditionofAmazonintothe2021EUR&DScoreboard

37Endnotes

38INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE2INTRODUCTIONAdvanced,traded-sectorindustriespowertheU.S.

economy’s

globalcompetitiveness.1

Akeyindicatorofstrength

inthoseindustriesis

theamountfirmsinvestinresearchanddevelopment(R&D)toproducenewinnovations.As

China

vigorouslychallengestheUnitedStatesforgloballeadership

intheinnovationeconomy,it

isthereforeimportanttoassesswherethetwocountriesstand

intheiradvanced

industries’privateR&Dspending.2ThisreportusestheEU

R&D2,500Scoreboard,

whichcovers90percentoftheworld’sprivate-sectorR&Dspending,to

compareU.S.-andChinese-headquartered

firms’R&Dspendingin

threegroupsof

economicsectors.3

First,weexamine

nine

strategicallyimportantadvanced,

traded-sectorindustries.Second,wecompareU.S.andChinesefirmsacrossallnon-advancedtradedsectors.Finally,weexaminenon-tradedsectors.Thereare,however,some

caveatsaboutthisdataset:thecompanies’locationsarecategorizedbytheirheadquartersratherthanwhereR&Dinvestmentsoccurred;

theR&Dspending

isinnominaldollars,companysectorsareclassifiedbymainbusinessactivities,

andmostof

thedatapresentedheredoesnotattempttoadjustforpurchasingpowerparitytoreflectlowerR&DsalariesinChina.(Seeappendix2fordetails.)Eachsectionof

thereportexaminesU.S.andChineseprivate-sectorR&Din

those

sectorson

asize-adjusted

basis—firstrelativeto

the

sizeoftheirrespectiveeconomies;

thenasproportionsofglobalR&Dineach

sectororgroupof

sectors;and

finallyusinganindustrialconcentrationratioknownasalocationquotient(LQ),which

isR&Das

ashareof

acountry’snationaleconomyversustheglobalaverage.Wealsocomparetheextenttowhich

privateR&Disconcentratedamongeachcountry’stopfour

firmsontheEUR&D2,500Scorecard.ThedatashowsthatwhileU.S.firms’investmentinR&Disgrowing,Chinaiscatchingup.Onasize-adjusted

basis,U.S.

firms’R&Dinvestmentsinthenineadvancedsectorsin2013exceededthatof

Chinesefirms.4

Butby2021,U.S.firmshadlosttheirlead

intwoofthenine

sectors,whileChinaclosed

thegapinthe

otherseven.5

TheUnitedStatescouldpotentiallylose

globalmarketsharesin

theotherseven

sectorsasChinesecompaniescontinuallyexpandR&Dinvestmentwithgovernmentsupport.

Inaddition,

because

theybenefitfromextensiveintellectualpropertytheftandforcedtechnologytransfers,Chinesefirmsdo

nothave

to

investasmuchinR&Das

Americanfirms

togetthesameinnovationresults.6

Think

ofChinaasa

freerider,livingon

theR&Dinvestmentsof

U.S.andotherforeign

firms.Butin

additiontothatfree-ridingstrategyandthe

impactofhavingR&Dworkerswithlowersalaries,

Chinese

firmsalsoareinvesting

more

intheirownin-housecapabilities.Inresponse,

Washington

needstodo

abetterjob

of

incentivizingtheprivatesectorto

continueinvesting

inR&D.Thisshouldincludeexpandingprogramsthatfund

jointindustry-universityresearch,boostingtheAlternativeSimplifiedR&DCreditratefrom

14percenttoat

least28percent,andrestoringR&Dexpensing.

It’s

much

easierto

keepU.S.industries’globalmarketshares

throughsuchpoliciesthantolosethem

andlaterhavetoworkmuchhardertowinthemback,oftenin

vain.EXAMINING

ADVANCED

SECTORSThefollowingsubsectionscompare

theUnitedStates’andChina’sprivatebusinessR&Dspendingfromfirms

innineadvanced

sectors:

aerospaceanddefense,electronicandelectricalequipment,generalindustrials,

industrialengineering,pharmaceuticaland

biotechnology,INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE3softwareand

computerservices,

technologyandhardwareequipment,

alternativeenergy,andautomobilesandparts.Itisimportanttonote

thatthesampleoffirmsonlyincludesthe

top2,500R&Dspendersglobally.TheaverageU.S.firmin

advancedsectorsspendsmore

onR&DthandoestheaverageChinesefirm.

In2021,659U.S.

firms

and424Chinesefirmsin

theseninesectorsmade

theEUR&D2,500scoreboard.7

(Refertoappendix2ondetailaboutAmazon’saddition

into

the2021data.)Thisiscomparedwiththerestoftheworld’s618

firms.8

(See

table1.)The

averageU.S.firminvested$802

millionon

R&D,0.06standarddeviationsabovetheaverage

firm’sR&Dspendingof$655millionin

thesectorsglobally.9

Incomparison,theaverageChinesefirminvested$363milliononR&D,0.12standarddeviationsbelow

theaveragefirm.10Table

1:

Number

of

firms

in

nine

advanced

trade

sectors,

202111UnitedStatesRest

of

theWorldSectorChina79734710652455Total47833720724916714844Pharmaceuticals

andBiotechnologySoftwareandComputerServicesTechnologyHardwareand

EquipmentElectronicandElectricalEquipmentIndustrialEngineeringAutomobilesandPartsAerospaceandDefenceGeneralIndustrials2631977141282815152136678910287752433516164AlternativeEnergy8Total6604246181,702Collectively,U.S.firmsin

thesenineadvancedsectorscontinue

toinvestmoreinR&D

thandoChinese

firms.In2021,

U.S.firms

spent3.4

timesmorethanChinesefirms:$529billiononR&D,whileChinesefirms

spent$154billion.12

Asaresult,U.S.

firms’R&D

sharewas47.4percentcomparedwithChinesefirms’13.8percent.13

(See

figure1.)This

is

comparedwiththerestoftheworld’s39percent.14

Evenwhencontrollingfor

grossdomesticproduct(GDP),U.S.firms

stillspentmore

thanChinese

firms.Forevery$1,000ofGDP,U.S.firms

in

theseninesectorsspent$22.70on

privateR&D,whileChinesefirmsinvested$8.67.15

Therestoftheworld’sfirmsspent$7.80.16

Inotherwords,bothU.S.andChinesefirmsinvested

moreinR&Dasashareof

theirR&Dcomparedwiththe

restoftheworld,butU.S.

firmsstilloutperformChinese

firms.INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE4Figure

1:

R&D

spending

by

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms

in

all

advanced

sectors

(including

Amazon),

202117$30$529.3B$25$20$15$433.0B$153.8B$10$5$00%20%40%60%80%100%GlobalShareFigure

2:

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

wage-adjusted

R&D

spending,

all

advanced

sectors

(including

Amazon),

202118$4$3$529.3B$2$294.8B$1$00%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%ShareofGlobalR&DINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE5Whenadjustingforwagedifferences,Chinesefirmsare

rapidlycatchingup

toU.S.firms’spending.Althoughwagesaredifficultto

measure,PayScalehasestimated

thatresearchscientistsinChinaearned1.9times

lessthan

theirU.S.counterparts—$45,446comparedto$87,132intheUnitedStates.19

ThisdifferencemeansChinesefirms’R&Dspendinggoesfarther.

Whenwagedifferencesareadjusted

for,U.S.firmsonlyspent80percentmorethanChinese

firms—$529billioncomparedtoChinese

firms’$295billion.20

Moreover,adjustingforbothwagedifferencesandGDP,U.S.firms’spendingwasonly37percent

more

thanChinesefirms’—$1.74per

$1,000ofGDPcompared

to$1.28forChinesefirms.21

(Seefigure2.)U.S.firms’size-adjusted

R&DspendingwaslargerthanChinesefirms’in2021.Thesize-adjustedR&DspendingcomparesU.S.andChinesefirms’R&Dspendingasashare

oftheirrespectivecountry’sGDP

tothe

globalaverageR&Dspendingas

ashareoftheworld’sGDP.Thisresults

inan

industryconcentrationratio

knownas

anLQ,whichweexpressasamultiple.Forexample,

ifacountryhas

twice

theglobalaverage

corporateR&Din

agiven

sector,thenitsLQinthatsectoris

2x.TheLQ

isimportantin

thisanalysisbecauseitcomparestheperformanceoffirms

ineachcountrywiththeglobalaverageafteradjusting

for

thesizeofeachcountry’seconomy.Bythatmeasure,U.S.firms’size-adjustedR&DspendingwashigherthanChina’sinsixof

the

nine

sectors.Theseincluded

thesoftwareandcomputerservices,technologyandhardware,

andpharmaceuticalandbiotechnologysectors.22

However,in

threesectors—generalindustrials,

electronicandelectricalequipment,andindustrialengineering—U.S.firmseithertiedor

werelowerthan

Chinesefirms’size-adjustedR&Dspending.23

(Seetable2.)Moreover,Chinese

firmsare

closing

thesize-adjustedR&DspendinggapwithU.S.

firmsinadvancedsectors.

Insevenofninesectors,U.S.

firms’size-adjustedR&Dspendinghadeitherdeclinedorremained

stagnantwhileChinese

spending

rose

since2013.24Table

2:

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

size-adjusted

R&D

in

nine

advanced

sectors

(2021

LQs)25Chinese

LQ,SectorU.S.

LQ3.1x2.2x2.2x1.8x1.1x0.8x0.7x0.5x0.5xChinese

LQWage-AdjustedSoftwareandComputerServicesTechnologyHardwareand

EquipmentPharmaceuticals

andBiotechnologyAerospaceandDefenceGeneralIndustrials0.7x1.2x1.1x1.7x0.3x0.6x0.2x0.3x1.1x1.7xIndustrialEngineering1.6x2.4xAutomobilesandParts0.6x1.0xElectronicandElectricalEquipmentAlternativeEnergy1.3x2.0x0.3x0.6xINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE6U.S.firmshavehistoricallyexceededChinesefirms’R&Dinvestments,butChinese

firms’R&Dinvestmentsare

rapidlygrowing.From

2013to2021,U.S.firms’R&Dshareofthesenineglobalsectorsrose

from39.1percentto47.4percent.26

Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dsharerosefrom3percentto13.8percent.27Chinese

firms

in

advanced

sectors

are

heavily

investing

in

R&D

and

catching

up

to

U.S.

firms

tocompete

in

the

global

economy.AlthoughChinesefirms’R&DshareoftheglobaladvancedsectorsisstillbelowU.S.firms’becauseof

theirsmallereconomy,theirsize-adjustedR&Dinvestmentiscatchingup.Whencontrolling

forGDP,U.S.

firms’R&Dinvestmentrosefrom80percentto100percentmore

thantheglobalaverage(1.8xto2.0x).28

Incomparison,

Chinese

firms’rose

from80percentbelowtheglobalaverageR&Dinvestment(0.2x)to30percentbelow

theglobalaverage(0.7x).29

(Seefigure3.)Thisis

importantbecauseit

meansthatshould

this

trendcontinueonpace,Chinawouldcatchupto

theUnitedStates’currentlevelby2049.30Figure

3:

Projected

R&D

spending

by

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms

in

all

advanced

sectors3150%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%3.0x2.5x2.0x1.5x1.0x0.5x0.0x0%2013

2017

2021

2025

2029

2033

2037

2041

2045

2049

2053U.S.

Share

ChinaShare

U.S.

LQ

ChinaLQTheUnitedStatesreliesmore

onfirmsinthe

softwareandservicessectortomaintain

itsgrowthinsize-adjustedR&Dspendingforadvancedsectors.AccordingtoStatista,

theUnitedStatesisthelargestR&Dspenderinsoftware.32

From2013to2021,U.S.firms’R&D

spendinggrew

from80percent(1.8x)to

100percent(2.0x)abovethe

globalaverage.

Withoutthesoftwareandservices

sector,U.S.

firms’R&Dspendingremainedstagnantat

60percentabovetheglobalaverage.Incomparison,

Chinese

firms’R&Dspendinggrewaboutthesameevenwithoutthesoftware

thesector(0.26xto0.76x).Asaresult,

withoutthe

software

sector,Chinesefirmsareprojected

tocatchuptoU.S.firms’R&Dspendingby2034.(See

figure4.)INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE7Figure

4:

Projected

R&D

spending

by

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms

in

all

advanced

sectors,

excluding

software

andcomputer

services3340%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%3.0x2.5x2.0x1.5x1.0x0.5x0.0x0%2013

2017

2021

2025

2029

2033

2037

2041

2045

2049

2053U.S.

Share

ChinaShare

U.S.

LQ

ChinaLQAerospace

and

DefenseTheaerospaceanddefensesectorincludesmanufacturers,assemblers,

and

distributorsofaircraftparts,

aircrafts,andcommunicationsatellitesused

inbothcommercialandprivateairtransport.34

Thesectoralsoincludesproducersofmilitaryaircraft,

radarequipment,

andweaponsused

inthedefenseindustry.35In2021,15U.S.firmsinthis

sectormade

theEUR&D2,500list,

includingRaytheonTechnologies,Boeing,

andLockheed

Martin.36

Five

Chinese

firms,includingAVICElectromechanicalSystems,ChinaAerospaceTimesElectronics,

andChinaAvionicsSystems,also

made

thelist.37

In2021,theaverageU.S.

firminthe

sectorspent$626milliononR&D,a0.17standarddeviation

abovetheaverage

firm’s

R&Dspendingof

$495millionin

theaerospaceanddefense

sectorglobally.38

Incomparison,theaverageChinese

firminthe

sectorspent$144

million,0.46standarddeviationbelowtheaverage

firm’s.39U.S.firms

spentabout13

times

moreonR&DthandidChinesefirms:$9.4billion

comparedwith$721

million.40

Whencontrolling

forGDP,U.S.firms

spent10timesmorethanChinesefirms

($0.40onR&Dforevery$1,000

ofGDPcompared

with$0.04

inChina).41

Asaresult,U.S.firms’R&Dspendingmadeup43.2percentofthe

globalsector’sR&Dspendingcomparedwith3.3percentforChina.42

Thisiscomparedwith

therestof

the

world’s53.5percentandR&Dspendingof

$0.21forevery$1,000.43

(Seefigure

5.)Whenwagesareadjustedfor,U.S.

firmsstillspentabout

6.8

timesmorethanChinesefirms—$9.4billioncomparedtoChinesefirms’$1.4billion.44INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE8Figure

5:

R&D

spending

by

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms

in

the

aerospace

and

defense

sector,

202145$0.50$0.45$0.40$0.35$0.30$0.25$0.20$0.15$0.10$0.05$0.00$9.4B$11.6B$0.7B0%20%40%60%80%100%ShareofGlobalR&DU.S.firmshaveconsistentlyhadahigherglobalshareof

R&Dspending.

From2013to

2021,U.S.firms’shareof

globalR&Drosefrom35percentto43percent.46

Chinesefirms’sharesrosefrom0.1percentto3.3

percent.47Thetopfour

U.S.andChinesefirmswiththehighestR&Dspendinghaveconsistentlyplayedacrucialrole

indrivingbothU.S.andChinese

firms’

shareofglobalR&D.In

2013,thetop

fourU.S.firms

accountedfor81percentofthedomesticsector’sR&Dspending.48

Andin2021,thetopfourfirmsstillaccountedfor80percent,

meaningthesefirmsmadeup

34.4percentoftheglobalsector’sR&Dspending.49

Thisdecreased

relianceoccurreddespitethenumberofU.S.firmsdecliningfrom19

to15during

thisperiod.Similarly,the

top

fourChinesefirms’R&Dspendingaccountedfor100

percentoftheChinesesector’sR&Dspendingin2013.50

Andin2021,these

topfourChinesefirmsstillaccountedfor87percentofthecountry’sspendinginaerospaceanddefense.51

(Seefigure6.)Theslightdeclinein

reliance

ispartiallybecausethenumberofChinesefirmsincreased

fromone

tosix.Inotherwords,theUnitedStatesandChinadependontheirtop

fourfirms

to

maintaincurrentlevelsof

R&Dcompetitiveness.INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE9Figure

6:

Top

four

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

share

of

domestic

R&D

in

aerospace

and

defense52120%100%80%60%40%20%0%20132017UnitedStates2021ChinaU.S.firms’size-adjustedR&Dspendingwas60percenthigherthan

theglobalaverage

(1.6x)in2013,rising

to80percentabove

theglobalaverage(1.8x)in2021.53

Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dspendingwas

nonexistentin2013andwasstill80percentbelowtheglobalaverage(0.0xto

0.2x)in2021.54

(Seefigure7.)Figure

7:

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

shares

of

global

R&D

in

the

aerospace

and

defense

sectors5550%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%2.0x1.8x1.6x1.4x1.2x1.0x0.8x0.6x0.4x0.2x0.0x0%201320172021ChinaLQU.S.

ShareChinaShareU.S.

LQINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE10Electronic

and

Electrical

EquipmentTheelectronicand

electricalequipmentsectorincludesmakers

anddistributorsofelectricalparts

forradiosandotherconsumerelectronics,

including

cablesand

transistors.56

Thesectoralso

includescompaniesproviding

mechanicalandelectronicsecurity;

filtration

systems;productsused

inthemeasurementof

electric,gas,

andwater;

pollutioncontrolequipment;andelectricaldevicesandcomponentsmarked

tobusinesses.57In2021,41U.S.firms

made

theEUR&D2,500list,includingDanaher,

KeysightTechnologies,andNorthropGrumman,

while106Chinesefirms,

includingByd,BoeTechnologyGroup,andHangzhouHikvisionDigitalTechnology,

alsomadethelist.58

Thatsameyear,

theaverageU.S.firmspent$299

million

onR&D,whiletheaverageChinese

firmspent$228million.59

Thisiscomparedwiththe

globalaveragefirm’s$408million.60

Inotherwords,both

spentless

than

theaveragefirm

in

thesectoronR&D,meaningfirmsinothercountriesarebetteratpromotinginnovationwith

theirhigherR&Dspending.Despite

U.S.firms’higheraveragespendingonR&D,Chinesefirms

spend

more

onR&DthandoU.S.firms

collectively.

In

2021,U.S.firms

spent$12.3billion

onR&D,whileChinesefirmsspentalmostdouble,or$24.1billion.61

Duetothelargenumberof

Chinesefirms,

theirR&Dshareof

theglobalsectorwas23.8percent,while

U.S.firms’sharewasjust12.1percent.62Adjusting

forGDP,Chinesefirmsalsospentmore

thanU.S.firms.For

every$1,000ofGDP,Chinese

firmsspent$1.36onR&Dcomparedwith

$0.53forU.S.

firms.63

Thisiscomparedwiththerestof

the

world’sR&Dshareof

64.1percentandspendingof$1.17

forevery$1,000.64(Seefigure8.)Moreover,

whenadjusting

forwages,Chinese

firmsspent3.8

times

morethanU.S.firms—$46.3billioncomparedtoU.S.firms’$12.3billion.65Figure

8:

R&D

spending

by

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms

in

the

electronic

andelectrical

equipment

sector,

202166$1.60$1.40$24.1B$1.20$65.1B$1.00$0.80$0.60$12.3B$0.40$0.20$0.000%20%40%60%80%100%GlobalShareINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE11U.S.firms

inthesectorhavenotalwayslaggedbehindChinesefirmsinR&Dspending.

In2013,U.S.firms’shareof

R&Dspendingintheglobalsectorwas12.2percentcompared

withChinesefirms’2.5percent.67

(See

figure10.)However,U.S.

firmsdidnot

increasetheir

R&Dinvestmentinproportionalitytothe

growthof

R&Dspendingin

theglobalsector.

Incomparison,Chinesefirms’growthexceeded

theglobalsector’sgrowth.

Asaresult,Chinesefirms

caughtup

andwereroughlyonparwithU.S.firms

inR&Dinvestmentby2017,witheachholdingabout

11percentofthe

globalR&Dspending.68

Andby2021,ChinesefirmshadoutspentU.S.firms,holdingaglobalshareof23.8

percentcomparedwithU.S.

firms’

12.1

percent.69Chinese

firms

in

the

electronic

and

electrical

equipment

sector

not

only

caught

up

but

now

exceed

theUnited

States

in

promoting

R&D

and

competitiveness.Thetopfour

U.S.firms

with

thehighestR&Dspendinghave

consistentlyplayedakeyroleindrivingU.S.firms’shareofglobalR&D.In2013,

thetop

fourU.S.firmsaccounted

for44percentofthedomesticsector’sR&D.70

In2021,theystillaccounted

for37

percent,meaningthese

firmsmadeup4.5

percentoftheglobalsector’sR&Dspending.71

Thedecreasedrelianceoccurreddespite

thenumberofU.S.firmsinthesectordecliningfrom

54

to41in

thatperiod.Incomparison,Chinesefirms’shareofglobalR&Dhasbecomelessdependentonthetop

fourChinese

firms.72

In2013,

thetop

fourChinesefirmscomprised46percentof

thedomesticsector’sR&Dspending.73

Yet,by2021,

theleading

fourChinese

firmsaccountedforonly25percent.74

Thisdecreasedrelianceoccurredprincipallybecause

thenumberof

Chinesefirmsincreased

from28to

106.(Seefigure9.)Inotherwords,

theUnitedStatesdependsmoreonitstopfourfirmsto

maintaincurrentprivatesectorR&Dcompetitivenesslevels.Figure

9:

Top

four

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

share

of

domestic

R&D

in

electronics

and

electrical

equipment7550%45%40%35%30%25%20%15%10%5%0%20132017UnitedStates2021ChinaMoreover,comparedwith

theglobalaverage,U.S.

firms’size-adjustedR&D

investmentsworsened

from2013to2021,whenU.S.R&Dspendingdecreased

from60

percentto50INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION

|

JULY2023PAGE12percent

oftheglobalaverage(0.6x

to0.5x).76

Incomparison,Chinesefirms’R&Dspendingincreased

from20percentto130percentofthe

globalaverage

(0.2x

to1.3x).77

Inthis

period,Chinese

firmsincreasedtheirR&Dspendingby$1.22forevery$1,000ofChina’sGDPcomparedwithU.S.firms’

growthof

$0.13.78

(See

figure10.)Inotherwords,Chinesefirmshavenotonly

caughtup

butnowexceedU.S.firms

inpromotingR&Dandcompetitiveness.Figure

10:

U.S.

and

Chinese

firms’

shares

of

global

R&D

in

the

electronic

and

electrical

equipment

sectors7925%20%15%10%5%1.4x1.2x1.0x0.8x0.6x0.4x0.2x0.0x0%201320172021ChinaLQU.S.

ShareChinaShareU.S.

LQGeneral

IndustrialsThegeneralindustrialssectorincludescompanies“engaged

inthreeor

moreindustrialbusinessactivities,noneof

which

isthedominantbusinessline.”80

Moreover,thesectoralsoincludescompaniesthatmanufacture,distribute,and/orproducepaint,

materialcoatings,resin,plasticproducts,chemicalsusedinplastic,structuralglassandotherglassproducts,andpackagingproducts.81In2021,15U.S.firmsmade

theEUR&D2,500list,includingGeneralElectric,Honeywell,and3M.SixteenChinesefirms,includingMetallurgicalCorporationofChina,ChinaInternationalMarineContainers,

andSunwodaElectronics,also

made

thelist.82

In2021,theaverageU.S.firminthissectorspent$457milliononR&D.83

In

comparison,the

average

Chinese

firmspent$308million,a0.15

standarddeviationbelowtheaveragefirmglobally.84

Thisiscomparedwiththeaverage

firm’sR&Dspendingof

$393million

globally.85U.S.firms

inthegeneralindustrialssectorspendmore

onR&DthandidChinesefirms.In2021,U.S.firms

spent$6.9billiononR&DcomparedwithChinesefirms’$4.9billion.86

DuetoU.S.firms’higherR&Dinvestments,theirR&Dspendingmadeup27.3percentoftheglobalsector’s.87

Incomparison,

Chinese

firms’spendingonlycomprised19.6percent.88

AdjustingforGDP,U.S.firmsdidnotspendalotmore

thanChinesefirmsonR&D.For

every$1,000of

GDP,U.S.firms

spent$0.19

onR&Dcompared

withChinesefirms’$0.18.89

This

iscomparedwiththerestof

the

world’sR&Dshareof

53.1percentandspendingof$0.24

forevery$1,000.90INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONF

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論