科技寫作和報(bào)告

科技寫作和報(bào)告

WritingandPresentingfor

ComputerScience

Class1IntroductionOutlineWhypublish?PublicationVenuesCyclesofPublicationPublicationLayoutEthnicsReferee課程考核/wiki/Publish_or_perish"Publishorperish"

referstothepressureto

publish

workconstantlytofurtherorsustainacareer

in

academia.

PublishorperishPublishandflourishTheimportanceofpublicationsAcademiccareerdependsonpublicationlistYoungPhDgraduate:afewpublicationsmayconvincepotentialemployerofresearchpotentialSomethingisbetterthannothingYet,avoidpublishingcrapStrategicplanisuseful:publishwhat,where,atwhatpace,withwhom?PublishorperishWriting,science,andskepticismWritingdefineswhatweconsidertobeknowledge.

ScientificresultsareonlyacceptedascorrectoncetheyarerefereedandpublishedAunifyingprincipleforthescientificcultureisskepticismWithinscience,skepticismisanopen-mindedapproachtoknowledgeWriting,science,andskepticismScienceisasystemforaccumulatingreliableknowledge.Theprocessofscience:speculation,observation,andagrowingunderstandingofsomeideaorphenomenon.Writingunderpinstheresearchcycle.thedisciplineofstatingideasasorganizedtextforcesyoutoformulateandclarifyyourthoughtsKindsofPublicationScientificresultscanbepresentedinAbookAthesisAjournalarticleAcompletepaperorextendedabstractinaconferenceorworkshopproceedingsAtechnicalreportoramanuscriptAposterinaconferenceorworkshopBooksvsPapersBookstendnottocontainnewresultsorprovethecorrectnessoftheinformationtheypresentcanrepresentanauthor'sopinionsaswellasestablishedscientificknowledgePapersmustbedefendedandjustifiedJournalvsConferenceTheoreticalresearchalongtraditionofcompleting,revising,andextendingconferencepapersforsubmissionandpublicationinarchivaljournalsExperimentalresearchconferencepublicationispreferredtojournalpublicationthepremierconferencesaregenerallymoreselectivethanthepremierjournals/sites/ccf/paiming.jsp

中國(guó)人工智能學(xué)會(huì)推薦國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議和

國(guó)際/國(guó)內(nèi)期刊目錄/index.php?s=/home/article/detail/id/3445.html智能科學(xué)與技術(shù)基礎(chǔ)理論智能科學(xué)與技術(shù)交叉腦認(rèn)知與類腦智能機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)器感知與模式識(shí)別自然語言處理知識(shí)工程與數(shù)據(jù)挖掘跨媒體智能與人機(jī)交互智能機(jī)器人與系統(tǒng)智能芯片與計(jì)算系統(tǒng)以及人工智能倫理安全與治理JournalAimforbalance:somequick“l(fā)ow”level:conferenceproceedings,web-basedjournals.Investtime&energyinatleastone/afew

prestigiouspublication/s“ifyoucandoone,youcandomore!”Getyourbestworkinthebestjournals(checkthemout:impactfactor?)Avoidnon-refereedjournals(unlessit’sreviewsoropinionpiecesforgeneralpublic)Avoideditorsthatworkslowly(youcan’twait3-4yrsforyourfirstpublicationtocomeout)ConferenceandWorkshopConferenceAlargeacademicmeetingWidescopeMoreattendanceLongerpaper(8-12pages)WorkshopAsmallermeetingNarrowscopeLessattendanceShorterpaper(6pages)CanbeheldtogetherwithaconferenceProceedingofConferenceorWorkshopPosterPostersessionseparateroomorareaofatradeshowfloorresearchersaccompanya

paperposterillustratingtheirresearchmethodsandoutcomesPosterSize:from2x3feetto4x8feetindimensionsDon’tchoosebogusconferencesEntomology-2013vsEntomology2013Don’tchoosebogusconferencesSCIgen:/scigen/WMSCI2005WorldMulticonferenceonSystemics,CyberneticsandInformaticsDon’tchoosebogusconferenceshttp://scigendetection.imag.fr/index.phpCyrilLabbéofJosephFourierUniversityinGrenoble,France,hascataloguedcomputer-generatedpapersthatmadeitintomorethan30publishedconferenceproceedingsbetween2008and2013.LabbédevelopedawaytoautomaticallydetectmanuscriptscomposedSCIgenLabbédoesnotknowwhythepapersweresubmitted—oreveniftheauthorswereawareofthem.MostoftheconferencestookplaceinChina,andmostofthefakepapershaveauthorswithChineseaffiliations.HowtogetpublishedIstheresearchtopichot?Doyoubelongtoanetworkofpeopleinterestedinthetopic?gotoconferencestalktomajorresearchersinthefield,contactauthorsifpaperisnoteasilyaccessible(alittleflatterycanhelp)KeepaneyeoncallforpapersofconferencesorspecialissuesoreditedbooksCyclesinwritingandpublicationDoingresearchShapingaresearchprojectsFindingandreadingliteratureResearchplanningHypothesesEvidenceExperimentWritingCyclesinwritingandpublicationDraftingRevisingProofreadingTypesettingSubmittingCyclesinwritingandpublicationPublicationNotificationRevisingagainbasedonthecommentsCopyrightformPrepareyourpresentationforaconferencepaperCosmeticworkforajournalpaperPaperStructure(1)TitleAuthor(s)Affiliation(s)andaddress(es)AbstractKeywordsNeedtobeaccurateandinformativeforeffectiveindexingandsearchingPaperStructure(2)IntroductionContentRelatedWorkConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesPaperStructure(3)

IntroductionProvidethenecessarybackgroundinformationtoputyourworkintocontextItshouldbeclearfromtheintroduction:Whythecurrentworkwasperformed–aims–significanceWhathasbeendonebeforeWhatwasdone(inbriefterms)Whatwasachieved(inbriefterms)PaperStructure(4)

AcknowledgementAcknowledgeanyonewhohashelpedyouwiththestudy,including:Researcherswhosuppliedmaterialsorsoftware,AnyonewhohelpedwiththewritingorEnglish,orofferedcriticalcommentsaboutthecontentAnyonewhoprovidedtechnicalhelpStatewhypeoplehavebeenacknowledgedandasktheirpermissionAcknowledgesourcesoffunding,includinganygrantorreferencenumbersPaperStructure(4)

Referencesthestyleandformatasrequired–itisnottheeditor’sjobtodosoforyouHarvardSystem(alphabeticalbyauthor/date)APA(AmericanPsychologicalAssociation)System(alphabetical)VancouverSystem(numberedinorderorcitation)Note:thereareanumberofothersystemsinuseandvariationsforallsystemsSupplementarymaterialInformationrelatedtoandsupportiveofthemaintext,butofsecondaryimportanceDataCodeVideodataWillbemadeavailableonlinewhenthemanuscriptispublishedEthicsScienceisbuiltontrustResearchersareexpectedtobehonest

ResearchisassumedtohavebeenundertakenethicallyNoPlagiarismFake-paperfactories–PaperMillIn2017,China’sMinistryofScienceandTechnology(MOST)saiditwouldcrackdownonmisconductafterascandalinwhich107paperswereretractedatthejournalTumorBiology<<科學(xué)技術(shù)活動(dòng)違規(guī)行為處理暫行規(guī)定>>“從事學(xué)術(shù)論文買賣、代寫代投以及偽造、虛構(gòu)、篡改研究數(shù)據(jù)等”EthicsChecklist(1)--AuthorshipIsallthetextyours?Areyouthecopyrightholderforallfiguresandillustrations?Haveanyauthorsbeenlistedwithouttheirknowledge?Haveotherpotentialauthorsbeenomitted?Dotheyknowthatpublicationisproceedingwithoutthem?Journalpullstwo-studiesthatlistedanauthorwithouthispermissionSpringerNaturehasremovedtwostudiesthatwerepublishedinitsjournalClusterComputingAFCMcluster:cloudnetworkingmodelforintelligenttransportationinthecityofMacauMobilenetworkintrusiondetectionforIoTsystembasedontransferlearningalgorithmDavidCox,theIBMDirectoroftheMIT-IBMWatsonAILabEthicsChecklist(2)Isthescopeofcitationandattributionclear?Isthereacleardistinctionbetweennewworkandpreviousknowledge?Hasotherworkwithsimilarresultsbeenappropriatelycitedanddiscussed?Ifanymaterialissharedwithanotherpaper,hasthesharingbeenexplainedtothereader?Hasitbeenexplainedtotheeditor?Doesthepaperincludematerialrecycledfromyourearlierwork?Areotherpapersaccuratelydescribed?EthicsReproducibilityinScience“non-reproduciblesingleoccurrencesareofnosignificancetoscience”--KarlPopper<TheLogicofScientificDiscovery>Reproducibleresearch:researchpaperalongwiththelaboratorynotebooksandfullcomputationalenvironmentusedtoproducetheresultsinthepapersuchasthecode,data,etc.around$28billionworthofresearchperyearinmedicalfieldsisnon-reproducibleEthicsChecklist(3)Reproducibility:Couldyouruntheexperimentsagainandgetthesameoutcome?Doyouknowwhichversionofthecodewasusedtoruntheexperiments?Arethereanyweaknessesorlimitationsintheexperimentsthatneedtobedescribed?Wouldyoubepreparedtoshowotherresearcherstherawexperimentalmaterials?Areanyclaimsoverstated?EthicsTheSouthernUniversityofScienceandTechnologyseveredtieswiththescientistwhorattledresearcherslastyearafterheclaimedtohaveengineeredtheworld’sfirstgene-editedbabiesRegulationsintheU.S.,U.K.,China,andelsewhererequiregenetically-modifiedhumanembryostobedestroyedafterafewdays.EthicalIssuesforAIPrivacy&Security:AIsystemsshouldbesecureandrespectprivacyReliability&Safety:AIsystemsshouldperformreliablyandsafelyTransparency:AIsystemsshouldbeunderstandableAccountability:AIsystemsshouldhavealgorithmicaccountabilityFairness:AIsystemsshouldtreatallpeoplefairlyEthicalIssuesforAIPrivacyProtectionDatacollectedfor‘BigData’originatesfrommanyaspectsofhumanactivitiesandmayinvolvecollectionofpersonaldataAvoidBiasandDiscriminationDataBalanceFacialRecognitionExamplesTwoscientistsfromChina'sShanghaiJiaoTongUniversityproducedastudythatclaimstobeabletotellacriminalfromalaw-abidingcitizensolelybasedonafacialrecognitionalgorithm.IEEEfoundthatpolicesurveillancecamerasusingfacialrecognitiontoidentifysuspectedcriminalsarefiveto10percentlessaccuratewhenidentifyingAfricanAmericans.AI’sUnethicalRoleinScholarlyWritingAItools

forAcademicWritingEthicProblemsinWritingwithGPTControversyoveroriginalityReferencesgeneratedbytheAIarefictiousScienceannouncedAIcannotbeanauthor.AItools

forAcademicWritingTopAIconferencebansuseofChatGPTandAIlanguagetoolstowriteacademicpapersClarificationonLargeLanguageModelPolicy2023(icml.cc)AItools

forReviewingEthicProblemsReviewingwithAItoolsLackofTransparency:underminetrustinthereviewprocessConfidentiality:confidentialinformationcouldbeleakedAccountability:whoisresponsiblefordecisionsmade?EthicalUseofAI:AItoolsareusedtoautomatedecisionsInformedConsent:affectauthor’strustinthereviewprocessQualityControl:unreliableassessmentsandcompromisethereviewprocess.AItools

forReviewingReviewingwithAItools'papercontributions'sectionofthereviewsubmittedbythereviewer:getstraightoutofChatGPT:IDENTICAL/posts/david-churchill-41171730_chatgpt-activity-7079567258854785025-mlwJ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktopIntroductiontoPeer-Review“Peerreviewistheassessmentbyanexpertofmaterialsubmittedforpublication.”PublicationprocessAwardingoffundingforresearchPatentsStandardsGalileo

PeerReview:Refereeing(1)Refereeingcanbeachore,butdeservesthesameeffort,care,andethicalstandardsasanyotherresearchactivityResonsibilitiesAuthorReferee:fair,objective,avoidconflictofinterestEditor:choosereferees,arbitratebasedonreferees’evaluationPeerReview:Refereeing(2)ContributionoriginalityandvalidityEvaluationofpapersIsthereacontribution?Isitsignificant?Isthecontributionofinterest?Isthecontributiontimelyoronlyofhistoricalinterest?Isthetopicrelevanttothelikelyreadership?Aretheresultscorrect?Aretheproposalsandresultscriticallyanalyzed?RefereeingChecklistAreappropriateconclusionsdrawnfromtheresults,orarethereotherpossibleinterpretations?Areallthetechnicaldetailscorrect?Aretheysensible?Couldtheresultsbeverified?Arethereanyseriousambiguitiesorinconsistencies?Whatismissing?Whatwouldcompletethepresentation?Isanyofthematerialunnecessary?Howbroadisthelikelyreadership?Canthepaperbeunderstood?Isitclearlywritten?Isthepresentationatanadequatestandard?Refereereport(1)10:Awardquality:TechnicallyflawlesspaperwithgroundbreakingimpactononeormoreareasofAI,withexceptionallystrongevaluation,reproducibility,andresources,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.9:VeryStrongAccept:TechnicallyflawlesspaperwithgroundbreakingimpactonatleastoneareaofAIandexcellentimpactonmultipleareasofAI,withflawlessevaluation,resources,andreproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.8:StrongAccept:Technicallystrongpaperwith,withnovelideas,excellentimpactonatleastoneareaofAIorhigh-to-excellentimpactonmultipleareasofAI,withexcellentevaluation,resources,andreproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.7:Accept:Technicallysolidpaper,withhighimpactonatleastonesub-areaofAIormoderate-to-highimpactonmorethanoneareaofAI,withgood-to-excellentevaluation,resources,reproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.6:WeakAccept:Technicallysolid,moderate-to-highimpactpaper,withnomajorconcernswithrespecttoevaluation,resources,reproducibility,ethicalconsiderations.Refereereport(1)5:Borderlineaccept:Technicallysolidpaperwherereasonstoacceptoutweighreasonstoreject,e.g.,limitedevaluation.Pleaseusesparingly.4:Borderlinereject:Technicallysolidpaperwherereasonstoreject,e.g.,limitedevaluation,outweighreasonstoaccept,e.g.,goodevaluation.Pleaseusesparingly.3:Reject:Forinstance,apaperwithtechnicalflaws,weakevaluation,inadequatereproducibilityandincompletelyaddressedethicalconsiderations.2:StrongReject:Forinstance,apaperwithmajortechnicalflaws,and/orpoorevaluation,limitedimpact,poorreproducibilityandmostlyunaddressedethicalconsiderations.1:VeryStrongReject:Forinstance,apaperwithtrivialresultsorunaddressedethicalconsiderations.Refereereport(1)SummaryofpaperGoodthingsaboutthepaper(oneparagraph)CommentsandRecommendationsRefereereport(2)StrongpointsThisisanexcellentanalysisoftheoryandpracticeinrelationto[...].Thismaterialshowshowpracticalexperiencecanprovidedirectionsfortranscendingsteriletheoreticaldebates.Thearticleisverywellwritten,logicallystructuredandapleasuretoread.Useofsourcesisappropriate.Refereereport(3)WeakpointsInsteadofthelasttwoparagraphsofthearticle,itwouldbemorehelpfultohaveaseparateconclusionsectionwithasummaryofthekeypointsmadeinthearticle,anassessmentof[...],andpossiblysomecommentsonhowinsightsfromthisassessmentmightbeusedinotherpartsoftheworld.ArefereeingchecklistConvinceyourselfthatithasnoseriousdefectsConvincetheeditorthatitisofanacceptablestandard,byexplainingwhyitisoriginal,valid,andclear.Listthechanges,majorandminor,thatshouldbemadebeforeitappears

inprint,andwherepossiblehelptheauthorbyindicatingnotjustwha