新教材適用2025版高考英語二輪總復(fù)習(xí)第2部分閱讀能力突破篇專題1閱讀理解專題模擬訓(xùn)練新聞報道類_第1頁
新教材適用2025版高考英語二輪總復(fù)習(xí)第2部分閱讀能力突破篇專題1閱讀理解專題模擬訓(xùn)練新聞報道類_第2頁
新教材適用2025版高考英語二輪總復(fù)習(xí)第2部分閱讀能力突破篇專題1閱讀理解專題模擬訓(xùn)練新聞報道類_第3頁
新教材適用2025版高考英語二輪總復(fù)習(xí)第2部分閱讀能力突破篇專題1閱讀理解專題模擬訓(xùn)練新聞報道類_第4頁
新教材適用2025版高考英語二輪總復(fù)習(xí)第2部分閱讀能力突破篇專題1閱讀理解專題模擬訓(xùn)練新聞報道類_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩3頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

新聞報道類A(2024·安徽省淮南市高三一模)Theworld'stopclimatescientistsoftheIPCChavejustreleasedalandmarkreport,warningaboutthefutureoftheplanet.Theheadline—burningfossilfuelsisalreadyheatinguptheplanetfasterthananythingtheworldhasseenin2,000years.TheIPCCisaU.N.bodyof195memberstatesthatassessesthesciencerelatedtotheclimatecrisisonbehalfofgovernmentseveryfewyears.Thisisthegroupthatdefinesthescientificconsensus.Hundredsofscientistsworkonaseriesofreports,whichtakeyearstoproduce.Governmentshavetosignoffonthem.AndthisoneisjustthelatestbigreassessmentoftheclimatethattheIPCChasdone,butit'sthefirstonethatisdoneineightyears.Italsohastheclearest,mostconfidentconclusionsthathaveeverbeenseeninanIPCCreport.Accordingtothereport,thegreenhousegasesthatwehavealreadyputintotheairhavewarmeduptheplanetsofarbyalmost2°Fcomparedtothepre-industrialtimes.Thiswarmingtrendappearstobeacceleratingasthegreenhousegasesaccumulateintheatmosphere.Andifwekeepburningfossilfuels,by2100—sowithinthelifetimeofachildthat'sborntoday—theplanetcouldbe5to7°Fhotter.Andonenewthinginthisreportisthatittriestoputnumbersonwhatthatmeans.So,forinstance,theysayheatwavessoextremeusedtoonlyhappenonceevery50years.Nowthey'rehappeningalmostfivetimesmoreoften.Extremedroughtscoulddoubleorfourtimesinfrequency.Insomecases,extremestormscouldbecomethreetimesmorefrequentanddrop30%morerainfallinaday.ThescientistssaypreventingtheworsteffectswilldemandaU-turnawayfromuseoffossilfuels.Anditdependsonuscollectively.Ifeverycountry,everybusinessshiftsawayfromburninggas,coalandoiloverthenext30yearsorso,wecouldprobablylimitthiswarmingtrendtoatotaloflessthan3.5°F.1.What'stheauthor'sprobablepurposeofintroducingtheIPCCinParagraph2?A.Tomakeitsworkbetterknown.B.Torespectthescientists'commitment.C.Tomakethereportmoreconvincing.D.Toappreciateitsgreatachievements.2.Whatdoyouthinkofthecurrentwarmingaccordingtothereport?A.Itresultsfromextremeweather.B.Itisrunningoutoffossilfuels.C.Itisbadlyspeedingup.D.Thereisnowaytoslowitdown.3.Howdothescientistssupporttheirconclusioninthereport?A.Bydefiningscientificconsensus.B.Byusingstatisticsandinference.C.Byquotingauthorityfigures.D.Bymodelingclimatechange.4.Whatdothescientistsexpectpeopletodo?A.Makejointeffortstostoptheuseoffossilfuels.B.Takepositiveattitudestoourplanet'sfuture.C.Followtheglobalwarmingtrendcollectively.D.Developnewapproachestousingfossilfuels.【語篇解讀】本文為一篇新聞報道。IPCC的氣候科學(xué)家們的報告指出,燃燒的化石燃料正在急劇加速地球變暖的速度,科學(xué)家們對人們發(fā)出了警告,提出了建議:為了防止最壞的影響,人類應(yīng)徹底放棄運用化石燃料。1.C寫作意圖題。依據(jù)其次段“TheIPCCisaU.N.bodyof195memberstatesthatassessesthesciencerelatedtotheclimatecrisisonbehalfofgovernmentseveryfewyears.Thisisthegroupthatdefinesthescientificconsensus.Hundredsofscientistsworkonaseriesofreports,whichtakeyearstoproduce.Governmentshavetosignoffonthem.AndthisoneisjustthelatestbigreassessmentoftheclimatethattheIPCChasdone,butit'sthefirstonethatisdoneineightyears.Italsohastheclearest,mostconfidentconclusionsthathaveeverbeenseeninanIPCCreport.(IPCC是一個由195個成員國組成的聯(lián)合國機構(gòu),每隔幾年頭表各國政府評估與氣候危機有關(guān)的科學(xué),這是定義科學(xué)共識的小組。數(shù)百名科學(xué)家致力于一系列報告,這些報告須要數(shù)年時間才能完成。政府必需在這些報告上簽字同意。而這個報告,只是IPCC最近一次對氣候的大規(guī)模重新評估,但這是八年來的第一次。它也有IPCC報告中所見過的最清楚、最自信的結(jié)論。)”可知,其次段中介紹了IPCC的性質(zhì)、功能、報告批準流程,目的是為了增加本文中的這篇氣候方面的評估結(jié)果的勸服力:這篇報道同其他的IPCC的報告一樣,曾經(jīng)有數(shù)百科學(xué)家耗時多年,之后才有政府簽字同意。故選C。2.C細微環(huán)節(jié)理解題。依據(jù)第三段“Thiswarmingtrendappearstobeacceleratingasthegreenhousegasesaccumulateintheatmosphere.(隨著溫室氣體在大氣中積聚,這種變暖趨勢好像正在加速。)”可知,目前的氣候變暖趨勢因為溫室氣體而正在加速。故選C。3.B推理推斷題。依據(jù)第四段“Andonenewthinginthisreportisthatittriestoputnumbersonwhatthatmeans.So,forinstance,theysayheatwavessoextremeusedtoonlyhappenonceevery50years.Nowthey'rehappeningalmostfivetimesmoreoften.Extremedroughtscoulddoubleorfourtimesinfrequency.Insomecases,extremestormscouldbecomethreetimesmorefrequentanddrop30%morerainfallinaday.(這份報告的一個新內(nèi)容是,它試圖用數(shù)字來說明這意味著什么。例如,他們說如此極端的熱浪過去每50年才發(fā)生一次?,F(xiàn)在它們發(fā)生的頻率幾乎是以前的五倍。極端干旱的頻率可能會增加一倍或四倍。在某些狀況下,極端風(fēng)暴的頻率可能會增加三倍,一天的降雨量會增加30%。)”可知,此處以酷暑、極端干旱和極端風(fēng)暴的三組數(shù)據(jù)為例,科學(xué)家們借助于統(tǒng)計和推理手法來說明這份報告中的結(jié)論。故選B。4.A細微環(huán)節(jié)理解題。依據(jù)最終一段“ThescientistssaypreventingtheworsteffectswilldemandaU-turnawayfromuseoffossilfuels.Anditdependsonuscollectively.(科學(xué)家們表示,為了防止最壞的影響,須要徹底放棄運用化石燃料。這取決于我們?nèi)咳恕?”可知,科學(xué)家們希望人們共同努力,徹底放棄運用化石燃料。故選A。B(2024·四川省成都市中學(xué)畢業(yè)班二模)In2007ateamledbyStefanRahmstorfcomparedactualobservationswithpredictionsmadebytheoreticalmodelsforthreekeyclimateindicators:carbondioxide,globaltemperatureandsea-levelrise.WhilethepredictionsgotCO2levelsright,theywerelowforrealtemperatureandsea-levelrise.Climatescientistshaveasurprisinghabit:Theyoftenunderestimatetheclimatethreat.Thearticlesreportingtheunderestimateshavebeenwidelycited,soonemightthinkthatscientistshavetakencorrectivesteps.ButrecentstudiesofArcticwarmingsuggestthattheproblemmaynothavegoneaway.Aspolaricemeltsbecauseofglobalwarming,theArcticOceanabsorbsmoreheat,whichcausestheArctictowarmevenmore.Itshouldsurprisenoonethattheareaiswarmingfast.Yetscientistshavebeencaughtoff-guardbyjusthowfasttheregionisheatingup.In2013,apaperwaspublishedpointingoutthattheseunderestimatesrepresentsubconsciousbias(偏向)causedbydefensiveness.Scientiststendedtowardlowerandmisleadingpredictionbecausetheydidnotwanttobeaccusedofmakingdramaticandoverstressedclaims.Evennowscientistscontinuetobeaccusedofoverestimatingclimaterisksbyworryingfigureswhichgetmuchmediaattention,thusbiasingtheirmodelstobeunrealisticallyconservative.IfscientistshaveunderestimatedArcticwarming,theyhavelikelyminimizedamountsofpermafrost(永久凍土)meltingandmethane(甲烷)releaseaswell.Andthatcouldbetrulydirebecausethepermafrostholdsabout1.5billiontonsoforganiccarbon,twiceasmuchasnowintheatmosphere.Werethatcarbontoberapidlyreleased,itcouldcauseapicture:arunawaygreenhouseeffect.Whateverthecause,it'stimethatscientistslookedseriouslyatwhethertheirmeasuringmodelscontinuetounderestimatecriticalaspectsoftheclimateproblem.Lowestimatescancreatethefalseimpressionthatwehavemoretimetofixtheproblemthanweactuallydo.5.WhyisRahmstorf'sresearchinParagraph1mentioned?A.Tohighlighttheurgencyinglobalwarming.B.Toshowtheinaccuracyofclimatepredictions.C.Tostatetheimportanceofprecisemeasurement.D.Toexpressthedifficultyinmakingrightpolicies.6.Whydoclimatescientistsalwaysunderestimateclimatethreats?A.Theyaremisledbythestatistics.B.Theirreportshavebeenwidelycited.C.Theywanttoavoidblameforcausinganxiety.D.Theyaimtodefendthemselvesfromfakeinformation.7.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“dire”inParagraph4probablymean?A.Disastrous. B.Confusing.C.Impressive. D.Discouraging.8.What'sthebesttitleofthistext?A.TheArcticOceanIsCallingforHelpB.ClimateScientistsAreUnderFireC.TheWarmingPaceIsUnderestimatedD.ClimatePredictionsProveCorrect【語篇解讀】本文是一篇新聞報道。文章主要介紹了探討表明,全球變暖的速度被低估了,而這會給人類帶來可怕的后果。5.B推理推斷題。依據(jù)第一段“In2007ateamledbyStefanRahmstorfcomparedactualobservationswithpredictionsmadebytheoreticalmodelsforthreekeyclimateindicators:carbondioxide,globaltemperatureandsea-levelrise.WhilethepredictionsgotCO2levelsright,theywerelowforrealtemperatureandsea-levelrise.(2007年,StefanRahmstorf領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的一個探討小組對三個關(guān)鍵氣候指標(二氧化碳、全球溫度和海平面上升)的實際觀測結(jié)果與理論模型的預(yù)料結(jié)果進行了比較。雖然預(yù)料的二氧化碳水平是正確的,但與實際溫度和海平面上升相比,這些預(yù)料都很低。)”可知,第一段提到Rahmstorf的探討結(jié)果是為了表明氣候?qū)W家對于氣候預(yù)料的不精準。故選B。6.C推理推斷題。依據(jù)第三段“Scientiststendedtowardlowerandmisleadingpredictionbecausetheydidnotwanttobeaccusedofmakingdramaticandoverstressedclaims.(科學(xué)家傾向于做出更低的、誤導(dǎo)性的預(yù)料,因為他們不想被指責做出夸張的、過度強調(diào)的斷言。)”可知,科學(xué)家們低估氣候威逼是為了不想被指責造成了恐慌。故選C。7.A詞句揣測題。依據(jù)“becausethepermafrostholdsabout1.5billiontonsoforganiccarbon,twiceasmuchasnowintheatmosphere(因為永久凍土含有大約15億噸有機碳,是現(xiàn)在大氣中有機碳含量的兩倍)”可知,假如放任這種狀況的發(fā)展,導(dǎo)致北極凍土溶化和甲烷的釋放,后果是恐怖的。故選A。8.C標題歸納題。依據(jù)第一段“In2007ateamledbyStefanRahmstorfcomparedactualobservationswithpredictionsmadebytheoreticalmodelsforthreekeyclimateindicators:carbondioxide,globaltemperatureandsea-levelrise.WhilethepredictionsgotCO2levelsright,theywerelowforrealtemperatureandsea-levelrise.(2007年,StefanRahmstorf領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的一個探討小組對三個關(guān)鍵氣候指標(二氧化碳、全球溫度和海平面上升)的實際觀測結(jié)果與理論模型的預(yù)料結(jié)果進行了比較。雖然預(yù)料的二氧化碳水平是正確的,但與實際溫度和海平面上升相比,這些預(yù)料都很低。)”以及其次段“Aspolaricemeltsbecauseofglobalwarming,theArcticOceanabsorbsmoreheat,whichcausestheArctictowarmevenmore.Itshouldsurprisenoonethattheareaiswarmingfast.Yetscientistshavebeencaughtoff-guardbyjusthowfasttheregionisheatingup.(由于全球變暖,極地冰溶化,北冰洋汲取了更多的熱量,這導(dǎo)致北極更加暖和。該地區(qū)正在快速變暖,這應(yīng)當不足為奇。然而,科學(xué)家們對該地區(qū)升溫的速度感到措手不及。)”及全文可知,文章主要講解并描述的是全球變暖速度被低估了。故選C。C(2024·遼寧省沈陽市高三一模)AfewdaysbeforeChristmas1944,PatriciaKruegerreceivedatelegramfromtheU.S.Army.Shehopeditwouldcontainabelatedbirthdaygreetingfromherhusband,anarmyflightengineer,CharlesKrueger,whomshehadnotheardfromfor2weeks.Instead,themessagesaidhewasn'tcominghome:HisB-29hadbeenlostoverMukdenandhewaslaterdeclaredMIA(missinginaction).Theirson,JohnKruegerofMiddleton,Wisconsin,now78,stilltearsupwhenherecountsthisstory.Decadeslater,themilitarycontinuestoworktobringbacktheremainsofsoldierslikeCharlesKrueger.ThejoboffindingthemfallstoDPAA(DefensePOW/MIAAccountingAgency),createdin2015aftercriticschargedthatthepreviousMIAsearchprocesswasslow,andbehindoninnovationsinscienceandtechnology.Between1973and2014,theremainsofonly1849missingservicememberswerereturnedtotheirfamilies;in2024,theagencyaccountedfortheremainsof141MIAs,accordingtoDPAAfigures.Toacceleratethework,CongressgaveDPAAtheauthoritytodeveloppublic-privatepartnershipswithscientistsandgroupsoutsidegovernment.“Teamingupwithacademicscientistsintroducesnewwaysofthinking,”saysmilitaryhistorianMichaelDolski.“Workingwithpartnersallowsustotapintotheirtechnologiesandcapabilitiesinwaysthatwejustcan'tmaintain.”Forscientists,theworkismorethantechnicallysatisfying.“It'sthemostrewardingaspectofmycareer,”saysMires,ascientistworkingwiththeagency.“InotherarchaeologysitesI'veworkedon,thehistoryisremote,”hesays.“Here,you'researchingsomethingnotforathing,butforaperson,andallthepeopletheytouched.”9.WhatwasthetelegramaboutinParagraph1?A.AChristmasdinner.B.CharlesKrueger'sloss.C.Abirthdaygreeting.D.JohnKrueger'smemory.10.WhydidpeoplecriticizethepreviousMIAsearchprocess?A.BecauseDPAAwantstocontinuethesearch.B.Becauseittooklongandlackedcreativeness.C.Becausetheworkwasstoppedbythemilitary.D.Because141MIAs'remainswasfoundin2024.11.WhatisMichaelDolski'sattitudetothecooperationwithscientistsandgroups?A.Patient. B.Critical.C.Doubtful. D.Approving.12.Whatisasuitabletitleforthetext?A.AlongsearchforMIAsB.AchievementsofDPAAC.AssistancefromscienceD.Consequencesofwars【語篇解讀】本文是一篇新聞報道。短文介紹了對在戰(zhàn)斗中失蹤人員搜尋的努力。9.B細微環(huán)節(jié)理解題。依據(jù)第一段“Instead,themessagesaidhewasn'tcominghome:HisB-29hadbeenlostoverMukdenandhewaslaterdeclaredMIA(missinginaction).(相反,這條消息說他不會回家了:他的B-29在Mukden上空失蹤了,后來他被宣布為MIA。)”可知,電報是關(guān)于CharlesKrueger的失蹤。故選B。10.B細微環(huán)節(jié)理解題。依據(jù)其次段“ThejoboffindingthemfallstoD

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論