暴力行為的評估與處置_第1頁
暴力行為的評估與處置_第2頁
暴力行為的評估與處置_第3頁
暴力行為的評估與處置_第4頁
暴力行為的評估與處置_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩38頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

暴力行為的評估與處置什么叫做暴力?n暴力(violence)是指以行動、威脅或武力違反他人意

愿而造成他人受傷或財物損壞之行為。n攻擊行為(aggression):

較為廣泛的概念

包含脅迫性的、敵意的、或攻擊性的行為或態(tài)勢

包含暴力及因自我保護而引發(fā)之暴力行為(Cummings

and

Mega,2003)Theannualrateof

job-relatedviolencen

12.6

per

1000

inallworkersn

16.2

:

physiciansn

21.9

:

nursesn

68.2

:

psychiatristsn

69.0

:

mental

healthcustodialworkersn

Happenearlyin

one’s

careern

40-50%ofpsychiatryresidents:during

their4-yeartrainingprogram. Friedman

RA.NEnglJMed.2006;355:2064–2066.

Rueve

M,Welton

R.Psychiatry(Edgmont).2008;5(5):34–48.Workplaceviolenceexperiencesof1362workersovera

12-month

period

(%

of

respondents)inAustraliaWorkplaceVerbalabuseBullyingPhysicalassaultJuvenilejustice68%12%17%Tertiaryeducation50%65%1%Health

care67%10.5%12%Seafaring19%—1%Long-haultransport33%—1%Fast-food48%—1%Taxis81%—10%Mayhew

and

Chappell,

MJA2005;

183

(7):346-347

Violenceinthepsychiatricunitsn

3%~25%住院病人會出現(xiàn)暴力行為

78%直接攻擊護士

(接下來為病人、財物、自己、

醫(yī)師、心理師、家人、清潔人員)(McNiel

et

al.,

1988;Owen

et

al.,

1998)n10-45%精神分裂癥患者會有攻擊或威脅之行為n

Agitation:

Bipolar

disorder:90%(ER)Schizophrenia:21%Dementia:50%(cited

from

Marder,2006)

Violenceinthepsychiatricunitsn

遭受身體攻擊之機率

Psychiatrists:5%

~48%

Psychiatry

residents:40%~50%(2X

of

medical

R)n

2/3住院醫(yī)師覺得并未接受關于處理暴力病人

之訓練或訓練不足.n

高危險工作地點

ER

Psychiatric

ER

Inpatientandoutpatientpsychiatric

settings(citedfrom

Petit,2005)n

沖動型(突然爆發(fā)型)

vs.預謀型(深思熟慮

型)n

暴力并非是一種診斷,也不是一個臨床癥狀。

暴力是一種復雜的行為。n

基因、社會、教育、文化、經(jīng)濟、神經(jīng)學、代謝、情境上等等的因素都會互相作用、加強而

導致暴力產(chǎn)生。暴力(Cummings

and

Mega,2003)n

42,338件的意外通報事件中,有3,621件是暴力事件,占9%,其中有5%的事件中導致工作人員受傷。n

最常見的造成因素

病人因素:

有精神疾病、失智癥、神智混亂、

酒精

或藥物中毒、人格違常。(年齡、性別、

以往暴力

史)

工作人員因素:人力不足、溝通問題、知識或經(jīng)驗

不足。

系統(tǒng)因素:安全問題。醫(yī)療照護體系中的暴力事件(Benvenisteetal.,2005)SwansonJW.

:

UniversityofChicago

Press,

1994:101-36.n

Twogeneralapproaches

violent

offenders

neurological

dysfunction

neurological

disorders

violent

behaviorn

EEG

generalizedslowing,focalslowing,epileptiformabnormalities

temporalandfrontallobes,

limbic

systemn

Functionalimaging

orbitalfrontal,dorsolateralfrontaldefectn

Neurologicalabnormalities

neurologicalsoftsignsn

Pathophysiologicmechanisms

DA↑

,

NE↑

,

GABA↓

,

COMT

gene暴力在神經(jīng)生物學上的發(fā)現(xiàn)Neurobiologicalbasis(Cummingsand

Mega,2003;Sachs,2006)EpilepsyictalpostictalinterictalEpisodicdyscontrolsyndromeFrontal

lobesyndromes

traumatic

injuriesneoplasmsdementiasMRHypothalamic-limbicragesyndromeMetabolicdisordersacuteconfusionalstatesendocrinedysfunctionPMDDTestosteroneexcessToxicdisordersethanolPCP,

LSD,etcNeurologicaldelusional

syndromesXYYgenotypeADHD

inadultIdiopathic

psychiatricdisordersNonpsychoticpersonalitydisorders

antisocialborderlineparanoidexplosivedisorderparaphiliaconductdisorderPsychoticmaniaschizophreniadelusionaldiosorderdepression與暴力相關之神經(jīng)精神疾病之鑒別診斷(Cummings

and

Mega,2003)

誰最危險?n

工作場所中兩個引起暴力的主要核心因素

與個案面對面的接觸

場所中有現(xiàn)金或貴重物品n

在精神科住院病房中,護士暴露于暴力的危險

性是特別高的。(Benvenisteetal.,2005)n

據(jù)報告指出,護士每年約有7.9%經(jīng)歷過暴力

攻擊事件,是一般人的4倍,只低于警察,排

名第二。(64%~75%)(Cater,

1999;citedbyWright

et

al.,

2003)

Highrisk

staffn

Clinicalstaff

nurses

physicians

advancedpractice

nursesn

Non-clinicalstaff

frontdesk

staff

receptionistsn

Staffexperiencedoeshelp

protectfromviolentepisodes,yetitdoes

not

preclude

the

perpetrationofviolence.Privitera

M,Weisman

R,CerulliC,et

al.

Occup

Med

(Lond).

2005;55:480–486.Thehighestriskof

mentalhealth

staff*Who

spend

the

most

time

with

patients*the

nursing

personnel*

frequentcontact*

close

proximity

to

patients*

setting

limits*

authority

figures

or

even

adversaries.14*55%of

staff

took

time

off

of

work

as

a

result

oftheassault*65%of

that

group

required

one

year

to

fullyrecover*Some

victims

reported

symptoms

suggestive

ofposttraumaticstressdisorder(PTSD)Erdos

B,

Hughes

D.PsychiatricServ.2001;52:1175–1177.Sheridan

M,

Henrion

R,

Robinson

L,

BaxterV.Hosp

CommunityPsychiatry.1990;41:776–780.

scenarion

A:小姐,我要拿我的餅干

…n

B:現(xiàn)在不是領物時間,離開

…n

A:可是我肚子餓,而且那也是我的東西

…n

B:我晚餐叫你吃,你都不吃,你不要再吵

了,不然我處理你

…n

A:我要買電話卡,我要打電話

…Nurses’

perspectiven

Twocentres

The

Federal

Psychiatric

Hospital,

Uselu(FPHU)–220

bed

The

UniversityofBeninTeaching

Hospital

(UBTH)–20

bedn

Allmental

health

nursingstaff

102questionnaires

sent

out

76questionnaires

returned

75%participation

rate.of

aggressionperceptionNurses’*

A:Socio-demographicQuestionnaire*B:

Attitudestowardaggressionscale;ATAS*a5-point

Likert

scale

from

totally

agree

(5)

to

totally

disagree

(1).*

offensiveattitude*(seeingaggressionasunpleasant,hurtfuland

an

unacceptable

behaviour–

7

items);*

Communicativeattitude*(aggressionasasignalresultingfroma

patients

powerlessnessaimed

atenhancingatherapeuticrelationship–3

items);*

destructiveattitude*(aggressionasathreatoractofphysical

harm–

3

items);*Protective

attitude*(aggression

asshieldingordefendingofphysicalandemotional

space–2items)*

intrusiveattitude*(viewing

aggression

as

theexpressiontodamageorinjure

others–

3

items).*C:

Perceptionofprevalenceofaggressionscale;

POPASof

aggressionperceptionNurses’n

highlyoffensive;26.16(±4.58),–

7

itemsn

destructive;

12.05

(±2.39),–3

itemsn

intrusive;9.86

(±2.56),–3

itemsn

communicative;9.56(±2.32),–

3

itemsn

protective;5.04

(±2.38)–2

itemsn

femalenursesweremore

likely

to

viewinpatientaggressionasa

means

ofcommunicationcomparedtomale

nurses

(t=-2.391,df=71,

p<0.019).of

aggressionperceptionNurses’nHighdegreeofintolerance

for

aggressionn

Poorercare

physical

restraintsanddrugsedation:thecommonest

methods

Lesscoercive

means:rarely

employednPrecipitatesevereactsofaggressionfrom

patientsnLongerprofessionalexperience

&

Male

nurses

intoleranceofaggression

to

be

involvedorcalled

upon

bytheirfemalecounterpartsto

mediate

incalmingaggressive

patients

nursingnThefrequencyofdifferenttypesofaggressionreportedinthisstudywaslowerwhencomparedto

similarstudies.nNursingstaffhavebecome

insensitiveto

the

frequency

oftheiroccurrenceand

nowseethemas

routine.Implicationsforpatient

care

Treatment

(victimized

staff)n

Critical

IncidentStress

Debriefing(CISD)n

Six

phasesofCISD

typicallyimplementedoverathree-hour

period.

1)

introduction

2)fact

3)feeling

4)symptom

5)teaching

6)

re-entry.n

但大部分不是這樣的理由

.Erdos

B,

Hughes

D.PsychiatricServ.2001;52:1175–1177.

Prevention*

changingbehavioral

patterns.*much

emphasis

on

restraint,

medication,and

seclusion?*

communicatingfeelingsverbally*patients

who

are

repeatedly

chemically

or

physicallyrestrainedlikely

perceiveviolenceasaneffective

means

toexpresstheirfeelingsoffear,anger,orfrustration.*

meetingneedsthroughassertive

ratherthanaggressivebehavior*

recognizingtheirownescalatinganger,andremovingthemselvesfromthesituation.*

Learninghownegativethoughts

perpetuateaggressivebehaviorandhow

to

improve

theirconflictresolution

skills.Andersonis

A.

WestSG.InnovClinNeurosci.2011;8(3):34–39

暴力個案的評估n

最重要的原則:暴力行為很少是單一情境所造

成的。n

個別評估、多面性評估。n

首要工作:確認暴力的起因。n

暴力的起因指明治療的方向。(Cummings

and

Mega,2003;Synopsis,9th

ed.

p906)n

暴力意念、企圖、計劃、計劃的實施、武器

(工具)之可獲得性、獲得幫助的期望n

人口學資料:性別

(男性),年齡

(15-24),社經(jīng)

地位

(low),社會支持

(few)n

以往病史:暴力行為,非暴力之反社會性行為,

沖動控制

(e.g.,gambling,substanceabuse,

suicideorselfinjury,

psychosis)n

壓力

(e.g.,夫妻失和,realorsymbolic

loss)評估暴力危險性Andersonis

A.

WestSG.InnovClinNeurosci.2011;8(3):34–39n快要出現(xiàn)暴力之征候

(Signs

of

impending

violence)

最近有暴力行為,包括破壞物品

言語或身體威脅

(恐嚇)

攜帶武器或可當武器之物品

(e.g.,forks,ashtrays)

愈來愈激動

酒精或物質(zhì)中毒狀態(tài)

被害妄想

(精神病患者)

命令式幻聽

腦傷

(globalorwithfrontallobefindings;較少見于temporallobefindings(controversial))

僵直之興奮狀態(tài)

(Catatonicexcitement)

躁期

(manicepisodes)

激躁型之憂郁期

(Certainagitateddepressiveepisodes)

人格疾患

(rage,violence,orimpulsedyscontrol)暴力行為的評估與預測(Synopsis,9th

ed.

p905)

Riskassessment*

a

structured

risk

assessment

:a

effective

low-

cost

intervention*

twice

daily

for

the

first

three

days

ofhospitalization*

followed

by

action

tailored

to

the

patients

risklevel.*

a

crucial

first

step

in

predicting

andpreventingaggressiveandassaultive

behaviorin

patients.AbderhaldenC,

Needham

I,

DassenT,etal.Br

J

Psychiatry.2008;193:44–50.該做什么?不該做什么?Ten

safety

do’sand

don’ts1.查看所有病人是否有違禁品并移除危險物品2.確認你的環(huán)境整齊安全3.確認私人物品均收放妥當或均清楚可見4.會談時保持房門打開5.安排好您的位置可快速離身6.確知如何尋求幫助7.確知緊急鈴的位置8.信任您自己對病人與可能的危險情境之”膽量”9.詢問病人關于自殺及他殺之想法10.詢問病人獲得武器的方法并立即移除該武器safetydo’sTen1.

允許病人保有危險物品2.允許病人擁有熱飲料

,玻璃或尖銳物品3.

讓自己被病人逼到墻角4.

不好意思或羞于尋求幫助5.覺得會談時不應有助手或他人幫忙6.

允許病人從中分化或前后不一7.當你覺得害怕或遭受恐嚇時仍執(zhí)行會談8.當你獨自一人或病人太激動時,仍出手抓病人或試

圖約束病人9.在使用較不侵犯性的技巧前就用最嚴厲的方法10.允許激動的病人單獨一人或無人觀察don

’tssafetyTenn

環(huán)境調(diào)整

病人安適,相對隔離

,降低等候時間,人員態(tài)度

,降低

刺激,安全距離

,避免兩眼直視,避免兩手交叉或藏

匿不見n

言詞降溫

(De-escalation)

Talkdownn

約束與隔離n

藥物治療(Petit,2005)暴力病人之處置n

暴力危險因素評估。n

言詞降溫(de-escalation),含工作人員訓練及

實施暴力處理計劃。n

改善建物設計以加強工作人員與病人的安全。n

可快速追蹤病人精神疾病史。n

改善病人等待時間(急診室設先行處置之護

士)。基層工作者之暴力處置(Benvenisteetal.,2005).

讓病人表達其感受.

以專業(yè)角度承認問題.

同理病人所遭遇之情境并降低緊張.

解釋為何特殊的要求無法達成.

協(xié)商補救的方法

言詞降溫之階段(Wrightet

al.,2003) Treatmentof

theviolentindividualn

Individualizedand

multifaceted.n

Pharmacotherapy

Anticonvulsants

Propranolol

Lithiumandmood

stabilizing

agents

Methylphenidate

Hormonalagents(antiandrogens&

progesterone)

Anxiolytics

Antipsychoticsandantidepressantsn

Behavioraltherapy

Adaptiveskills,increasecontrol,decrease

violencen

Psychosurgery

Extremecasesandallothertreatment

modalities

havefailed.

Bilateralamygdalotomy

Posteriorhypothalamotomy(Cummings

and

Mega,2003)緊急的藥物治療

(1)n

快速鎮(zhèn)靜療法

(Rapidtranquilization)

Administeringlowdoseofantipsychotics

over30to60

minutes(口服或肌肉注射)

High

potencyantipsychotics+sedatives

or

low

potencyantipsychoticsn

Standardprotocol

Halope

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論