




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
2025/1/2908:27DeepseekandotherchineseFirmsconvergewithwesterncompaniesonAIPromises|carnegieEndowmentforInternation…
ARTICLE
DeepseekandotherChineseFirmsC?nvergewithwesternC?mpanies?nAIPr?mises
BYSc?ttSinger
PubIished?nJanuarY28,2025
Deepseek,apreviouslylittle-knownchineseAIstart-up,sentshockwaves
globallywhenitreleasedoneoftheworld,sbestperformingopen-source
generativeAImodelslastweek.AschinesefrontierAIcapabilitiesrapidly
grow,sodotherisksthatachinesemodelcouldbepowerfulenoughtocauseglobalharm.Anearlier,lesspowerfulversionofDeepseek,smodelwasshown
tobeeasilyjailbrokenandreportedlyprovidedauserwitharecipeformethamphetamine.
Despitegrowingglobalconcernaroundlarge-scalerisks,theU.s.andchinesegovernmentshavemadelittleprogressonabilateralagreementtoregulate
frontierAI.ButasurprisingconsensusamongleadingAIdevelopersinbothcountriesaroundtheneedforsafeguardshasquietlyemerged,including
Deepseek.
Lastmonth,Deepseekjoinedsixteenotherchinesecompaniesinsigning
omtothieArtificialIntelligencesafetycommitments(人工智能安全承諾).
whilebrandedasadomesticchineseinitiative,thecommitmentsbearstrongsimilaritytoongoingglobalindustry-ledeffortstoputsafeguardsinplaceforfrontierAIpilotedatlastyear,sAIsummitinseoul,knownastheseoul
commitmernts.Usingsimilarlanguage,bothsetsofcommitmentsoutline
promisestoconductred-teamingexercisestoidentifyseverethreats,provide
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en1/9
transparencyintofrontiermodelcapabilitiesandlimitations,andbuildorganizationstructurestopromotethesecurityoffrontiersystems.
Thedistinctivesimilaritiesbetweenchina,sAIsafetycommitmentsandtheseoulcommitmentscouldsetthestageforfurtherglobalconvergenceamongindustryactorsonbestpracticesattheupcomingparisAIActionsummit,
scheduledformid-February.onlyonechinesecompany,zhipu.ai,signedontotheseoulcommitmentsattheseoulsummitlastyear.Ifmorechinesefirmsannouncetheywillsignontotheseoulcommitmentsinparis,theycould
helplaythegroundworkforaglobalindustry-basedinternationalconsensusonAI.ThisconsensuscouldofferaninformalpathwaytobuildfoundationalrulesoftheroadininternationalAIgovernance.
AsFr?ntierAICapabiIitiesGr?w,s?d?theRisks
Thecapabilitiesoffrontiermodelsinboththeunitedstatesandchinahave
rapidlyimprovedoverthelastcoupleofmonths.InDecember,openAI,so3
modelblewpastexistingperformamcebenchimarks,demonstratingincreasesinAIcapabilitiesagainsthumanperformanceacrossdifferentdomains.The
capabilitiesboomwasnotjustfeltinsiliconvalley.Inchina,bothDeepseekandMoonshot,anAlibaba-sponsoredstart-up,releasedopensourcereasomingmodelsthatcompetewithopenAI,so1model-asignificantlylesspowerful
predecessortoo3-acrossarangeofbenchmarks.otherchinesecompanies
arealsopushingthefrontier.Tencent,sHunyuanmodelis“bysomemeasuresisworldclass”andpossiblytheworld,sbestopenweightmodel,Anthropic,s
HeadofpolicyJackclarkwroteinNovember.AndAlibaba,sQwen2.5modelisonlyslightlybehind.Itscapabilitiesarealsoarguablyworld-class,exceedingGpT-4oandclaude3.5sonnetacrossarangeofbenchmarks.chineseAI
companiesareclearlyproducingmodelsatAI,sfrontier,especiallyintheopen-sourcedomain.
Thesesignificantbreakthroughsinmodelcapabilitieshavebeenmatchedbyincreasingconcernaboutrisks-oftendocumentedbythecompanies
themselves.Anthropic,incoordinationwithRedwoodResearch,showedthatwhenthemodelbelieveditsresponseswouldbeusedintraining,claude
strategicallydeceiveditscreatorin12percentofcases,causingsometoworryaboutfuture,morepowerfulAIsystemsgoingrogue.Inasimilarlight,
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en2/9
openAI’so1modelattemptedtodeactivateitsoversighitmechanismin5
percentofcasesandhadrisksforchemical’biological’radioactive’andnuclearweaponsratedas“medium.”concernsaboutrisksatAI’sfrontierhavecausedleadingthinkersfromboththewestandchina’includingrecentlydepartednationalsecurityadviserJakeSullivan’towarnthatgreatpowercoordinationisneededtopreverntcatastrophichiarm.Sofar’theU.S.andchinese
governmentshaveagreedonlittletohowtoregulateincreasinglypowerfulgenerativeAImodels.
concernaboutmisuseofpowerfulmodelsandthepossibilityAIsgorogue
hasmotivatedleadingscientistsfromboththewestandchinatosignjointstatementscallingforguardrailsonthetechnologyandcoordinationbetweenthemtoaddressfrontierAI’schallenges.Despitethecallsforinternational
consensus’sofarU.S.-chinacoordinationonfrontierAIhaslackedtractionoutsideofanagreementfromformerpresidentJoeBidenandpresidentxiJinpingontheneedforahiumantomakedecisionsonmuclearweaponsuse.
TheAISummitSeriespushesf?rIndustry-LedC?nsensust?C?mbatRisks
GiventheseconcernsaboutrisksatAI’sfrontierandtheneedforinternational
coordination’theUkandSouthkoreangovernmentshaveattemptedto
generateglobalconsensusonrisksandbestpracticesbyengagingwithmodeldevelopersthemselves.AtthesecondinternationalAISummitheldinMayoflastyearinSeoul’theBritishandSouthkoreangovernmentsannouncedtheFrontierAISafetycommitments(FAIScs)’informallyknownastheSeoul
commitments.Theseindustry-ledeffortsaimtoestablishbestpracticestopreventcatastrophicrisksthatcouldmaterializewithincreasinglypowerfulAI.
TheFAIScsweredesignedtoencouragecompaniestoproactivelyidentify
redlinesforconcerningcapabilitiesandestablishplansfornextstepsifthoseriskthresholdswerecrossed.Achievingindustrybuy-inwillbeacriticalpartofgoverningfrontierAI.voluntarycommitmentsofferflexibleavenuesto
empowerindustrytopromotetransparencyintotheirriskmitigationpracticesandeventuallyformaninformalinternationalindustry-basedconsensus.
whilenotareplacementforregulation’theyofferameansofcreatingafloor
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en3/9
forestablishingconsensusonthemeasuresneededtopreventthemostseriousrisksatAI,sfrontier.
whiletherewaswidespreadbuy-infromleadingwesterncompanies
includingopenAI,DeepMind,Anthropic,andElonMusk,sXAI,mostchinesecompanieswereconspicuouslyabsentfromthelistofsignatories.onlyone
chinesefrontierAIcompanysignedontothecommitments:zhipu.ai,astart-upthatranksthirdinmarketshareamongchina,sbusiness-facingLLM
providers.Theabsenceofchinesefirmswasasubstantiallimitationof
industry-ledefforts:theutilityofthosecommitmentswouldbelimitediftheylackedbuy-infromoneofthetwomostimportantcountriesforfrontierAI
development.Thelackofchinesecompanyparticipationwasnotnecessarilyduetolackofinterest.chinesecompanieswereapproachedbythecreatorsoftheseoulcommitmentsinthelead-uptothesummit,whenitbecamecleartothemthatsecuringbuy-infromcompaniesintheworld,ssecondfrontier
modelAIpowerwouldbecriticalforinternationalAIgovernance.
ChineseIndustryJ?instheGI?baIPushf?rsafetyC?mmitments
Thelackofinitialbroadbuy-infromchinesecompaniesintotheseoul
commitmentsmakesthechineseAIsafetycommitmentsannouncementinDecember2024bythinktankchimaAcademyforImformatiomamd
communicatiomsTectinoiogy(cAIcT,中國信息通信研究院)especiallyimportant.
Thecontentofchina,sAIsafetycommitmentsbearsastrongresemblancetotheseoulcommitmentsthatprecededthem(seeTable1).Theyareboth
describedasindustryself-regulationeffortsthatfocusonensuringthesafetyandsecurityoffrontierAImodelsthrougheffortslikered-teaming.Theyalsoactivelypushformeasurestoensuretransparency,bothtogovernmentsandalsotothepublic,aboutrisksassociatedwiththeirmodels.Bothdocumentsdiscusstheneedformorefoundationalresearchonriskslargemodelspose
andthepromisetodeployfrontiermodelstosolveglobalchallenges.
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en4/9
Table1.pointsofsimilarityintheseoulcommitmentsandchina,sAlsafetycommitments
seoulcommitmentschina,sAlsafetycommitments
AssessingRisksAcrosstheAI
Lifecycle
“Assesstherisksposedbytheir
frontiermodelsorsystemsacrosstheAIlifecycle.”
“Implementriskmanagement
practicesthroughouttheentireAIdevelopmentanddeploymentlifecycle.”
Implementingorganizationalstructuresto
promotesafetyandsecurity
“organisationsareaccountableforsafelydevelopinganddeploying
theirfrontierAImodelsand
systems.Theywill:...develop[]and
continuouslyreview[]internal
accountabilityandgovernanceframeworksandassigningroles’responsibilitiesandsuficient
resourcestodoso.”
“Establishsafetyteamsor
organizationalstructuresandbuild
safetyandsecurityrisk
managementmechanisms.
Designate[a]leaderresponsibleforAIsafetyandsecurity’establish
specializedteamstoconductAIriskassessmentsandsafetygovernancewithintheenterprise.”
RiskMitigation
“Articulatehowriskmitigationswillbeidentifiedandimplementedto
keepriskswithindefinedthresholds.”
“clearlyoutlineprocessesand
measuresforriskidentificationandmitigation.”
Transparencyon
capabilities’
Limitations’andApplications
“Topubliclyreportmodelorsystem
capabilities’limitations’anddomainsofappropriateandinappropriateuse.”
“Enhancemodeltransparency.
proactivelydisclosesafetyand
securitygovernancemeasuresandimprovetransparencyforall
stakeholders.provideclear
informationaboutthemodel,s
capabilities’applicablefields’andlimitations.
Transparencytothepublic
“providepublictransparencyontheimplementation...exceptinsofarasdoingsowouldincreaseriskor
divulgesensitivecommercial
informationtoadegree
disproportionatetothesocietalbenefit.”
“Informpotentialriskstothepublicthroughmodeldocumentation’
serviceagreements’orothers.”
Red-Teaming
“Internalandexternalred-teamingoffrontierAImodelsandsystemsforsevereandnovelthreats.”
“Throughdedicatedsimulationandred-teamingexpertstorigorouslytestmodelspriortotheirreleaseorupdate.”
MoreResearch
“ToprioritizeresearchonsocietalrisksposedbyfrontierAImodelsandsystems.”
“vigorouslyadvancefrontiersafetyandsecurityresearch.”
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en5/9
DeployingModelstosolve
challenges
“DevelopanddeployfrontierAI
modelsandsystemstohelpaddresstheworld,sgreatestchallenges.”
“Innovateinthedevelopmentand
deploymentofAIsystemsthat
embodytheprincipleofAIforgood’contributingtoaddressingthemost
pressingchallengesfacedbysociety.”
source:“FrontierAIsafetycommitments’AIseoulsummit2024’”UKDepartmentforscience’Innovation’and
Technology’May21’2024’.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-
summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024;and“protectingAIsecurityandBuildingaModelofIndustryself-Discipline-TheFirstBatchof17companiessignedthe‘ArtificialIntelligencesecuritycommitment’,”chinaAcademyofInformationandcommunicationsTechnology’December24’2024’/s/s-
XFKQcwhu0uye4opgb3Ng.
Althughtherearemeaningfuldifferencesinthescpeftheircmmitments,thesimilarspecificcmmitmentsandsmetimesidenticallanguageprvide
gdreasnstbelievechina’sAIsafetycmmitmentsweredirectly
inspiredbyseul.Thatseemstfllwanincreasinglyfamiliarpatternin
china’sAIdmain.chinafrequentlyfreshadwseventualcnvergencewithinternatinalAIgvernanceeffrtsbypreemptivelylaunchingdmestic
prjectscdedin“party-speak.”Frfundatinalgvernancecnceptsinanyplicyareainchina,beingablettraceideastdistinctivelychinesertsiscriticalfrtheenduringlegitimacyftheidea.Asimilardynamicplayedut
whenchinalauncheditsGlotalAIGovernanceinitiativejusttwweeksbefreitsignednttheUk-ledBletchleyDeclarationinNvember2023.chinaviewsitsGlbalAIGvernanceInitiativeascmplementaryt
Bletchley,whickiitirequentlypraisesfritspsitiverleininternatinalAIgvernance.
ThesigningfthecmmitmentsmeanssixteennewchinesecmpaniesjinthesixteensignatriesftheseulcmmitmentstmakeAIsafetyprmises,generatingtheptentialfrstrngchinesebuy-inthattheinitialseul
cmmitmentslacked.Betweenthesignatriesftheseulcmmitments
andchineseAIsafetycmmitments,mstfthecmpaniesinvlvedin
prducingpwerfulgenerativeAImdelshavesignedntatleastnefthetwsetsfcmmitments(seetable2).
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en6/9
Table2:companiessigningontoseoulcommitmentsandchina’sAlsafetycommitments
seoulcommitmentssignatories(May2024)
chineseAlsafetycommitmentssignatories(December2024)
Amazon
01.AI
Anthropic
360
cohere
4paradigm
Alibaba
G42
AntGroup
IBM
Baidu
InflectionAI
chinaMobile
Meta
chinaTelecom
Microso什
Deepseek
MistralAI
Huawei
Naver
iFlyTek
openAI
Megvii
samsungElectronics
MiniMax
TechnologyInnovationInstitute
senseTime
XAI
Tencent
zhipu.ai
volcdance
zhipu.AI
source:“FrontierAIsafetycommitments’AIseoulsummit2024’”UKDepartmentforscience’Innovation’and
Technology’May21’2024’.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-
summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024;and“protectingAIsecurityandBuildingaModelofIndustryself-Discipline-TheFirstBatchof17companiessignedthe‘ArtificialIntelligencesecuritycommitment’9”china
AcademyofInformationandcommunicationsTechnology’December24’2024’/s/s-XFKQcwhu0uye4opgb3Ng.
yettherearedifferencesinthesubstanceofthesetwoagreements.The
chineseAIsafetycommitmentsofferamorecomprehensivesetofsecurityrequirementsfordataandcriticalinfrastructuresandhaveaspecificlineonadoptingappropriatesafetymeasuresforopensourceinitiatives,where
chineseproductslikeDeepseek’sareespeciallycompetitiveinternationally.Theseoulcommitments,incontrast,arefundamentallyfocusedon
establishingredlinesforfrontierrisksthatshouldnotbecrossedand
identifyingstepscompanieswouldtakeifthoseriskthresholdswerereached.Thisdifferencecouldbeexplainedbythefactthatchinaisfocusedonusing
/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?Iang=en7/9
AIasameansofboostingitseconomy.RedlinescouldbeseenasanoverlyrestrictivepolicytoolatatimewhenthegovernmentwantstosignalitisembracingAIandnotoverregulatingitduetoconcernsaboutthelastingeffectsofitscOVID-eratechcrackdown.
Andthereisabroaderstructuraldifferencebetweenchinese-ledandinternationaleffortsthathasimportantimplicationsforchineseAI
governance:chineseindustryhasmoreexplicitgovernment-industry
connectionsthanwesterncompanies.Thismakestheimplicitbackingofkeygovernmentstakeholdersthatchina,sAISafetycommitmentsreceived
critical.cAIcTisaleadingchinesethinktankhousedunderthestate,s
MinistryofIndustryandInnovationTechnology(MIIT).MIIT,sinstitutionalbackinglendsthepromisesparticularweightinchina,sregulatorylandscape,whereindustryinitiativestypicallyaligncloselywithgovernmentpriorities.Moreover,theeffortwasexplicitlyspearheadedbychina,sArtificial
ImntelligenceIndustryAlliance(AIIA),aprominentindustryconsortiumguidedbyMIIT.
ThisindustrybackingcouldforeshadowfuturechineseAIpolicy.Historically,AIIAinvolvementhaspresagedfuturechineseregulation.In2019and2020,
AIIAworkinggroupsledbycAIcTofficialsofferedrecommendationsandcreatedtheIndustrySelf-DisciplineJointpledge(行業(yè)自律公約).These
recommendationsformedthefoundationforfoundationalchinese
regulationsonrecommendationalgorithmsanddeepfakes.Evenifchinese
industrylacksthedirectauthoritytoshapeitsdomesticregulatory
environment,itcouldbeempoweredtomatchwesternfirms,effortsandforeshadowmorechinesefirmssigningontotheSeoulcommitments.
TheparisAIActi?nsummitoffersakeyJuncturet?BuiIdIndustryc?nsensus
DeepSeek,srapidascenthighlightsagrowingchallengeforU.S.policymakers:chinesemodelsareincreasinglypowerful,and,withoutsafeguards,theycouldthreatenU.S.nationalsecurityandeconomicinterests.
ThischallengehasintensifiedasboththeU.S.andchinesegovernmentshavebackedtheAIcompaniesatthevanguardoffrontierdevelopment.The
/research/2025/01
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 混凝土道路維修施工方案
- 湖北水幕噴泉施工方案
- 《 龍川別志(節(jié)選) 》
- 重慶公園綠化工程施工方案
- 屋面門窗修理施工方案
- 實(shí)驗(yàn)室通風(fēng)櫥裝修施工方案
- 2025年紙品用膠合作協(xié)議書
- 玻璃幕墻更換施工方案
- 2025年手持云臺項(xiàng)目建議書
- 醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)水污染物排放的公眾參與與社會(huì)監(jiān)督
- 科創(chuàng)板問題測試題庫300題試題及答案
- 微信開放平臺網(wǎng)站信息登記表
- 商業(yè)銀行員工輕微違規(guī)行為積分管理辦法
- JJG 700 -2016氣相色譜儀檢定規(guī)程-(高清現(xiàn)行)
- 壓力容器安全檢查表
- 供應(yīng)商反向評估表
- 曲線帶式輸送機(jī)的設(shè)計(jì)
- 《國際關(guān)系學(xué)入門》課件第三章 國際關(guān)系理論
- 五金公司績效考核(共22頁)
- 體育課(軍體拳)教案(共43頁)
- 市場營銷費(fèi)用核銷管理制度(共4頁)
評論
0/150
提交評論