gmat考試分析性寫(xiě)作例題

1、gmat 考試分析性寫(xiě)作例題在 gmat 考試如何才能寫(xiě)好一篇作文呢 ? 下面由為大家搜集的gmat考試分析性寫(xiě)作例題，希望可以幫到大家小貼士 開(kāi)始寫(xiě)作前，先分析題目并想好如何作答 好思路，充分展開(kāi) 提供相關(guān)的論據(jù)和例子 說(shuō)明 本部分將要求您針對(duì)所提供的論證進(jìn)行批判性評(píng)價(jià)。您不需要就話(huà)題給出自己的觀點(diǎn)。例題Thefollowingappearedintheeditorialsectionofamonthlybusiness newsmagazine:"Mostpanieswouldagreethatastheriskofphysicalinjuryourringon thejobin

2、creases,thewagespaidtoemployeesshouldalsoincrease.H enceitmakesfinancialsenseforemployerstomaketheworkplacesafe r:theycouldthusreducetheirpayrollexpensesandsavemoney."Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.Inyourdiscussionb esuretoanalyzethelineofreasoningandtheuseofevidenceinthearg ument.Fo

3、rexample,youmayneedtoconsiderwhatquestionableassump tionsunderliethethinkingandwhatalternativeexplanationsorcou nterexamplesmightweakentheconclusion.Youcanalsodiscusswhatsortofevidencewouldstrengthenorrefutet heargument,whatchangesintheargumentwouldmakeitmorelogically sound,andwhat,ifanything,wouldh

4、elpyoubetterevaluateitsconcl usion.答案ThefollowingisanactualAWAessaythatreceivedthehighestrating:Thisargumentstatesthatitmakesfinancialsenseforemployerstoma ketheworkplacesaferbecausebymakingtheworkplacesaferthenlowe rwagescouldbepaidtoemployees.Thisconclusionisbasedontheprem isethatasthelistofphysic

5、alinjuryincreases,thewagespaidtoemp loyeesshouldalsoincrease.However,thereareseveralassumptionsthatmaynotnecessarilyappl ytothisargument.Forexample,thecostsassociatedwithmakingthew orkplacesafemustoutweightheincreasedpayrollexpensesduetohaz ardousconditions.Also,onemustlookattheplausibilityofimprovi

6、 ngtheworkenvironment.Andfinally,becausemostpaniesagreethata stheriskofinjuryincreasessowillwagesdoesn'tnecessarilymeant hatallpanieswhichhavehazardousworkenvironmentsagree.Thefirstissuetobeaddressediswhetherincreasedlaborcostsjusti fylargecapitalexpenditurestoimprovetheworkenvironment.Clear lyo

7、necouldarguethatifmakingtheworkplacesafewouldcostanexorb itantamountofmoneyinparisontoleavingtheworkplaceasisandpayi ngslightlyincreasedwagesthanitwouldnotmakesensetoimprovethe workenvironment.Forexample,ifmakingtheworkplacesafewouldcos t$100millionversusadditionalpayrollexpensesofonly$5,000pery ear

8、,itwouldmakefinancialsensetosimplypaytheincreasedwages.N obusinessorbusinessownerwithanysensewouldpayallthatextramon eyjusttosaveacoupledollarsandimproveemployeehealthandrelati ons.Toconsiderthis,acostbenefitanalysismustbemade.Ialsofeel thatalthoughacostbenefitanalysisshouldbethedeterminingfacto rwi

9、thregardtothesedecisionsmakingfinancialsense,itmaynotbet hedeterminingfactorwithregardtomakingsocial,moralandethical sense.Thisargumentalsoreliesontheideathatpaniessolelyusefinancial senseinanalyzingimprovingtheworkenvironment.Thisisnotthecas e.Companieslookatotherconsiderationssuchasthenegativesoci

10、al ramificationsofhighon-jobinjuries.Forexample,Toyotaspendsla rgeamountsofmoneyimprovingitsenvironmentbecausewhileitsgoal istobeprofitable,italsopridesitselfonhighemployeemoraleanda nalmostperfectlysafeworkenvironment.However,Toyotafindsthat itcandoboth,asbyimprovingemployeehealthandemployeerelatio

11、ns theyareguaranteedamoremotivatedstaff,andhenceamoreefficient staff;thisguaranteesmoremoneyforthebusinessaswellasmoresafe tyfortheemployees.Finallyonemustunderstandthatnotallworkenvironmentscanbemade safer.Forexample,inthecaseofcoalmining,apanyonlyhaslimitedw aysofmakingtheworkenvironmentsafe.While

12、paniesmaybeabletoens uresomesafetyprecautions,theymaynotbeabletoprovideallthesaf etymeasuresnecessary.Inotherwords,aminingpanyhaslimitedabil itytocontroltheairqualitywithinacoalmineandthereforeitcanno tcontroltheriskofemployeesgettingblacklung.Inotherwords,reg ardlessoftheintentofthepany,somejobsaresimplydangerousinnat ure.Inconclusion,whileatfirstitmayseemtomakefinancialsensetoimp rovethesafetyoftheworkenvironmentsometimesittrulydoesnotmak efinancialsense.Furthermore,financialsensemaynotbetheonlyis sueapanyfaces.Othertypesofanalysesmustbemadesuchasthesocial