版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、Does transparency improve quality?lessons learnt from cardiac surgery BCIS meeting 2006Ben BridgewaterSMUHTHistory of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1977Cardiac surgery register since 1977UK database since 1994History of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1977
2、UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001History of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1977UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001History of cardiac surgical auditHistory of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1997UK databa
3、se since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2003Cardiac surgery register since 1997UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2003Guardian named surgeon data 2005Freedom of Information ActHist
4、ory of cardiac surgical auditHistory of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1977UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2003Guardian named surgeon data 2005Healthcare commission named surgeon data 2006History of cardiac s
5、urgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1997UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2004Guardian named surgeon data 2005Healthcare commission named surgeon data 2006History of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1997U
6、K database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2004Guardian named surgeon data 2005Healthcare commission named surgeon data 2006History of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1997UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Name
7、d unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standards 2004Guardian named surgeon data 2005Healthcare commission named surgeon data 2006History of cardiac surgical auditCardiac surgery register since 1997UK database since 1994Dr Foster/The Times 2001Named unit mortality SCTS 2001SCTS individual standar
8、ds 2004Guardian named surgeon data 2005Healthcare commission named surgeon data 2006IssuesHas public accountability improved quality?IssuesHas public accountability improved quality?Is there now a culture of risk-averse behaviour?Has public accountability improved quality?Mortality significantly hig
9、her than average Dr FosterMortality significantly lowerthan average Healthcare commissionHas public accountability improved quality? Risk adjusted mortality National data isolated CABGIncreased predicted riskDecreased observed mortalityHawthorn effectNew York state databasePennsylvania report cardsS
10、CTS databaseNorthern New England Cardiovascular study groupVA databaseNW regional audit project 1997 to 2001PublicdisclosureNodisclosureCollecting and using data improves the quality of outcomesWhy is public reporting important?Because it has driven data collection and useClinicians managers support
11、 staff professional organisations Is there now a culture of risk averse behaviour?Is there now a culture of risk averse behaviour?Newsnight survey of UK cardiac surgeons 200080% surgeons in favour of public accountability90% felt that high risk cases would be turned downOnly 6% felt that available a
12、lgorithms adjusted appropriately for riskSee also Burack 1999, Schneider and Epstein 1996, Narins 2005 Existing dataLittle hard statistical data investigating the influence of public accountability on cardiac surgical practiceNY experience suggests conflicting dataHannan 1996Dranove 2003Is there ris
13、k averse behaviour in the UK?Very difficult to measure surgical turndownsIf there was significant risk averse behaviour you would expect to see a decrease in the number of high risk cases coming to surgeryComplex issues with respect to surgical case mix due to PCI developmentsNorthwest data 1997 to
14、200525,730 patients under 30 surgeonsIsolated CABG aloneObserved and predicted mortalityNumber of low risk, high risk and very high patients each year2 time periods1997 to 2001 prior to public disclosure2001 to 2005 post public disclosureResultsSignificant decrease in observed mortalitySignificant i
15、ncrease in overall predicted mortalitySignificant decrease in risk adjusted mortalityResultsSignificant decrease in observed mortalitySignificant increase in overall predicted mortalitySignificant decrease in risk adjusted mortalityIs there now a culture of risk averse behaviour?No overall effectMay
16、 be transient or individual effectsImportant that this is mopped upIs there now a culture of risk averse behaviour?What is perceived by someone as risk-averse behaviour is perceived by another as good clinical decision makingIs there now a culture of risk averse behaviour?What is perceived by someon
17、e as risk-averse behaviour is perceived by another as good clinical decision makingTransparency may have focussed the multidisciplinary team on optimising treatment strategies for individual patientsRisk adjustmentNo model is perfect some are usefulRisk adjustmentNo model is perfect some are usefulNeed clarity around fit for purposeRisk adjustmentNo model is perfect some are usefulNeed clarity around fit for purposeArguments about models can paralyse developmentsRisk adjustmentNo model is perfect some are usefulNeed clarity around fit for purposeArguments about models can paralyse develop
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年代理合同簽署注意事項(xiàng)
- 2025年商業(yè)合作形象授權(quán)代理服務(wù)協(xié)議
- 二零二五版商業(yè)地產(chǎn)買賣合同附帶抵押權(quán)登記0023篇
- 2025年高校與企業(yè)聯(lián)合培養(yǎng)協(xié)議教授合作協(xié)議9篇
- 二零二五年度出口合同模板(含出口貨物倉(cāng)儲(chǔ)與物流服務(wù))4篇
- 2025年度裝配式建筑構(gòu)件生產(chǎn)與施工合同范本4篇
- 2025版水電安裝工程新能源并網(wǎng)服務(wù)合同集錦3篇
- 二零二五版零擔(dān)運(yùn)輸合同物流數(shù)據(jù)安全保護(hù)合同4篇
- 二零二五版路演車輛租賃與后勤保障合同4篇
- 二零二五年度家族財(cái)產(chǎn)管理及子女成長(zhǎng)支持協(xié)議
- (一模)臨汾市2025年高考考前適應(yīng)性訓(xùn)練考試(一)語(yǔ)文試卷(含答案)
- 2024-2025學(xué)年滬科版數(shù)學(xué)七年級(jí)上冊(cè)期末綜合測(cè)試卷(一)(含答案)
- 2023年廣東省公務(wù)員錄用考試《行測(cè)》真題及答案解析
- 2024年公證遺產(chǎn)繼承分配協(xié)議書模板
- 燃?xì)饨?jīng)營(yíng)安全重大隱患判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)課件
- 深圳小學(xué)英語(yǔ)單詞表(中英文)
- 護(hù)理質(zhì)量反饋內(nèi)容
- 抖音搜索用戶分析報(bào)告
- 鉆孔灌注樁技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 2023-2024學(xué)年北師大版必修二unit 5 humans and nature lesson 3 Race to the pole 教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)
- 供貨進(jìn)度計(jì)劃
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論