3.高頻作文講解3.23筆記

1、整個過程, 不要關(guān)注作者結(jié)論本身對錯,而是關(guān)注其邏輯!注意立場的變化Tips: 不要糾結(jié)結(jié)論對不對；不要以增強結(jié)論為目的！Question類就是evidence& assumption & alternative explanation的自由組合！Evidence：作者現(xiàn)有的證據(jù)是否足夠？Assumption: 作者的假設(shè)是否合理？Alternative explanation: 作者有無考慮其他解釋或可能性？1. survey validity(調(diào)查本身的有效性)；2. Even if 1對（調(diào)查有效）， willingness=?action（想和做一定一致？）;3. Even if 2對

2、（人們有action），（OD sales decrease?） OD profit decrease?好句子：第一段：., there are several unsubstantiated assumptions and logical flaws in his lines of reasoning. For a better evaluation of the authors advice, we need to consider at least three critical questions.Tips: argument第一段模板：1. 作者的結(jié)論是什么；2. 作者的理由（簡單復述

3、）；3. 作者的論證存在問題；4. 還需要回答什么問題（question類）/還需要什么證據(jù)(evidence類)。Tips: 除了explanation類，另外三類都可以按上面4步寫第一段；而explanation類就是不要4，保持1&2不變，3變?yōu)楸M管作者解釋可能正確，但是還可能存在其他解釋！Question類主題段模板：問題是什么？（是什么）為什么這個問題存在？（為什么）3. 問題的不同回答會對作者結(jié)論產(chǎn)生怎樣結(jié)果（怎么樣）Tips: 其實這個模板，在evidence& assumption類也適用！學生第一篇作文第三段：Even if we acknowledge that many

4、people do have the desire to reduce their intake of foods containing low fat and cholesterol, we do not know that how many people put it into practice, a question that needs to be addressed(we do not know就是“問題”-“是什么”). This is because consumers may also take in to account other factors, such as .(問題

5、存在的原因“為什么”) ?！霸趺礃印保ㄊ裁椿卮鸺訌娮髡呓Y(jié)論；什么回答削弱作者結(jié)論）第二篇Before這段：1. I feel urge to.-argument不要用第一人稱；argument不要舉現(xiàn)實生活中的例子；issue發(fā)散的（能推廣），argument是收斂的（更有目的性）！第三篇：.lend credible supports to ;建議正反都說argument!正。On the other hand/on the contrary, 反；正，whereas 反（把正反兩方面糅合為一句?。┑谒钠篢he authors statement might seem plausible(

6、注意這3個語氣很弱化的詞的運用-因為這句不是重點，however這句才是重點！) at the first glance; however, several questions need to be answered in order to evaluate the recommendation because there are some unattested assumptions in the authors reasoning. 問題是什么-問題為什么存在-怎么樣（+，-：正負的切入點就是怎樣才能加強作者論證（正的方面）；怎樣才能削弱作者論證（負的方面）In this newslett

7、er, its author recommends stockholders of Old Dairy sell their shares and other investors refrain from investing in Old Dairy, because of a number of facts that presumably indicate an unpromising future for Old Dairys financial performance. Although the advice itself might be useful, close scrutiny reveals that there are some unsubstantiated assumptions and logical flaws in the authors lines of reasoning, which prevent us from giving an effective evaluation on his advice unless several key questions can be adequately a