歷年專八作文真題

2010年真題PARTVIWRITING(45MIN)Recentlynewspapershavereportedthatofficialsinalittle-knownmountainousareacharacteristicsorlocalculturalheritage.Whatisyourviewonthis?Writeanessayofabout400words.Youshouldsupplyanappropriatetitleforyouressay.Theimportantroleofacity’slocalconditionsintheurbandesignRecentlythereisahotdebateonareportthataforeigndesigncompanyinvitedbyalittle-knownmountainousareainGuiyangprovidedadesignwithoutpayingtoomuchattentiontothecity’suniquecharacteristics.Somepeopleappreciatetheboldinnovationofthedesignbutothersdonotlikeit.Inmyopinion,anyurbandesignshouldtakethecity’soriginalculturalheritageintoaccount.Thedesignersshouldsuittheirdesigntolocalconditionsandtrytotakeadvantageofthelocalresources.First,acity’sregionalcharacteristicsorlocalculturalheritageareitssymbol,itsidentity.Inamountainousarea,toomanyunconventional,super-futuristicbuildingswillnotbecompatiblewiththecity’slandscapes.Withouttheselandscapes,itisjustanothersocalledmoderncitycomposedofconcreteandsteel.TakeBeijingforexample.Inthepastfewyears,Beijinghasbeenremovingalargenumberofsuchalleystraditionallycalledhutong,inordertomakeitbecomearealinternationalcity.ButwithoutthesehutongscanthiscitystillbecalledBeijing,anancientcapital?Thedisappearanceofhutongsmeansthedisappearanceofaperiodofhistory,acordiallifestyle,andeventhedisappearanceofBeijingitself.ThenBeijingwillloseitsuniqueness.Second,itcanhelpacitysavealotofmoneybysuitingthedesigntolocalconditionsandtrytotakeadvantageofthelocalresources.Thisisespeciallyimportanttosmallcities,likethisoneinamountainousareanearGuiyang.WeallknowGuiyangisadevelopingcity,notveryrich.Unconventional,super-futuristicbuildingsmeanlargeneedofmoneyinput.Thenmoreburdensmaybeaddedtothiscity,whichwillruncountertothecity’soriginalpurposeofdevelopingitself.Instead,ifconnectionsbetweenacity’scultureandthevariousurbansectors,includinghousing,infrastructureandgovernance,arewellmade,themaximumeconomicbenefitswillbeachieved.Besides,themodernizationshouldbeagradualprocess.Morehaste,lessspeed.Nonetheless,itshouldnotbeoverlookedthattheshortcomingsoffuturistic-styleconstructingoutweighitsadvantagesbrought.Inconclusion,anyurbandesignshouldtakethecity’soriginalculturalheritageintoaccount.Thedesignersshouldsuittheirdesigntolocalconditionsandtrytotakeadvantageofthelocalresources.Ascientificcitydesignshouldbedependentonthecity’sregionalcharacteristics,onacase-by-casebasis.精品文庫精品文庫歡迎下載歡迎下載年真題PARTVIWRITINGAccordingtoarecentnewspaperreport,manyfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestinChinahavebegunorareconsideringchargingtouristshigherentryfeesduringpeaktravelseasons.Thishasarousedalotofpublicattentionandalsopublicdebate.Whatisyouropinion?ShouldfamousChinesesitesofhistoricalinterestchargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons?Writeanessayofabout400words.Youshouldsupplyanappropriatetitleforyouressay.HigherEntryFeesDuringPeakTravelSeasonInrecentyears,peopleinChinahavemoretimeandmoneytovisitfamoussitesofhistoricalinterest,owingtolongerholidaysandhigherincomes.Thesevisits,ontheonehand,canenrichtheirownlifeandbringthesitessubstantialincomes.Ontheotherhand,toomanyvisits,especiallyduringtravelpeakswhentherearemorevisitors,havecausedhugeproblemsinseveralaspects.Inmyopinion,oneeffectivesolutiontothisproblemistochargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons.Foronereason,thosewhoopposehigherfeeshaveignoredtheuniquefeaturesoffamoussitesofhistoricalinterest.Differentfromthecommonparks,thehistoricalspotsnormallyimplyamplehistoricalandculturalvalues.Therelicsinthesespotsaresopreciousandfragilethattheyusuallyneedspecialandprofessionalpreservationandadministration,whichobviouslycostslargeamountsofmoney.Duringpeaktravelseasons,evenmoretouristspayvisitstothehistoricalspots.Suchhugeamountofpeoplearrivingatonehistoricalspotmayprobablyleadtosomeunexpecteddamages.Facingthissituation,thereisnobettermeasurethanraisingtheentryfeestoreducethenumberoftouristsinpeakseasons.Theonlypurposeofcharginghigherentryfeesistostopsomepeople'svisitsduringspecialseasonssoastoachieveabetterprotectionofthevaluablerelics.Withhigherentryfees,somepeoplemaychangetheirplansandgiveuptheirvisits.Hereeconomicmeansareappliedtoconservepreciousthingsatthesitesofhistoricalinterestinanappropriateandsustainableway.Foranotherreason,higherfeeschargedmayeffectivelyreducethenumberoftouristsvisitinghistoricalspotsinpeakseasons,whichisalsogoodtothesafetyofthetourists.Reportsontheaccidentshappeningtotouristsarenotnewtous.Especiallyduringpeakseasons,heavytrafficofpassengersposespotentialthreatstothelifeoftourists.Furthermore,relaxationisalwaysanultimategoalfortourists.Itisalmostimpossibleforanyonetoappreciateanythinginanovercrowdedspotwithaseaofpeoplearound.Anidealholidaymayevenberuinedbythehustleandbustleandendlesswaiting.Inshort,weneedtocontrolthenumberofvisitorsespeciallyduringthepeaktravelseasons,toguaranteeasoundprotectionofhistoricalspotsaswellasthesafetyoftourists.Amongothers,higherentryfeesmaybeasimpleandeffectiveeconomicmeansofregulation,whichshouldbetakenintoaccountbytheauthorities.Asforthetourists,thismaynotbesobadasitsoundsWithsocialandeconomicdevelopment,ourpeoplehavemoretimeandmoneytovisitfamoussitesofhistoricalinterest.Theirvisits,ontheonehand,canenrichtheirownlifeandmeanwhilebringthesitessubstantialincomes.Ontheotherhand,toomanyvisits,especiallyduringpeaktravelpeakwhentherearemorevisitors,havecausedhugeproblems.Onesolutiontothisistochargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons,whichIthinkisnecessaryandIamincompletefavorofthisdecision.Asweallknow,todaythereisnoentrancefeechargedformanyparksinourcountrywhilealmostallfamoussitesofhistoricalintereststillneedanentryfee.Somepeoplecannotacceptthisfortheythinkthatbothparksandfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestarepartofpublicservices.Theyshouldhavefreeaccesstothemoratleastshouldn’tpaytoomuchforthevisitsincetheyhavealreadypaidtaxestothegovernment.Thenitisfarimpossibleforthosepeopletoallowthesitestochargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons.Onthesurface,theargumentsthatpeopleopposingtoentryfeeschargedforfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestholdseemreasonable.Butinfact,thosepeoplehaveignoredtheuniquefeaturesoffamoussitesofhistoricalinterestwhichnormallyimplyamplehistoricalandculturalvalues.Thosesitesdifferfromcommonparks.Therelicsinthesesitesarepreciousandfragiletodestroy,andusuallyneedspecialandprofessionalpreservationandadministration,whichturnouttobeanexpensiveexercisethatconstantlydemandsresources.Entryfeesmustbecharged.Duringpeaktravelseasons,thereisnobettermeasurethanraisingtheentryfeestoreducethenumberoftourists.Thepurposeofcharginghigherfeesistostopsomepeople’visitssoastobetterprotectthevaluablerelicsandatthesametimeensurethesafetyofthetourists.Itisobviousthatsomepeoplewillgiveuptheirvisitsconsideringthehigherfees.Hereeconomicmeansareappliedtoconservepreciousthingsatthesitesofhistoricalinterestinanappropriateandsustainableway.Inaword,duetotheuniquefeaturesofrelicsandtheneedofthesustainableprotectionofsitesofhistoricalinterest,wemustcontrolthenumberofvisitors,especiallyduringthepeaktravelseasonswhentherearetoomanytourists,todiminishtheimpactofhumanactivitiesonthesesitestoitslowestlevel.Andcharginghigherfeesduringthepeaktravelseasons,aneffectiveeconomicmeansofregulationwillbeofgreatimportance.2012年真題PARTVIWRITING(45MIN)Arecentsurveyof2,000collegestudentsaskedabouttheirattitudestowardsphonecallsandtext-messaging(alsoknownasShortMessageService)andfoundthestudentsmaingoalwastopassalonginformationinaslittletime,withaslittlesmalltalk,aspossible."Whattheylikemostabouttheirmobiledevicesisthattheycanreachotherpeople,"saysNaomiBaron,aprofessoroflinguisticsatAmericanUniversityinWashington,D.C.,whoconductedthesurvey."Whattheylikeleastisthatotherpeoplecanreachthem."HowfardoyouagreewithProfessorBaron?Youshouldsupplyanappropriatetitleforyouressay.MobilePhonesMakeStudentsLessHumaneRecently,aprofessorofAmericanUniversityconductedasurveyaboutcollegestudents’attitudestowardsphonecallsandtextmessagingandfinallyheconcludedthatwhatthestudentslikemostabouttheirphonesisthattheycanreachotherpeopleandwhattheylikeleastisthatotherpeoplecanreachthem.Thisresultisseeminglycontradictory,butinfact,itfaithfullyportraysthedilemmafacedbythestudents,whobothaspiretoandarefearfulofcommunication.Inmyopinion,itisnothingbuttheverytelephoneitselfthatislargelyresponsibleformakingstudentslesshumanebydeprivingthemoftheiradaptivecapacityandsocialacceptability.Originallyspeaking,adaptabilityofyoungpeopletonewsurroundingsisoneoftheirgoodqualities,butnowadaystheywouldratherresorttooldfriendsbyphonecallsandtextmessagesthanactivelyintegrateintonewcircumstances.Itseemsquitefortunateforthefreshmentohavetelephonecontactwiththeiroldfriendswhentheyfeelunaccustomedtotheunfamiliarityaround.Yet,thetruthisthattelephonesprovideashelterforthemtoshyawayfromthenewenvironmentaswellastakingawaytheiropportunitiestomakenewfriends.Thus,unabletofostertheiradaptivecapacity,manyofthecollegestudentswouldprobablyfailtoadapttonewworkingconditionsoncetheystepintosociety.What’smore,theshortmessagemakesthestudentsunabletocommunicatewellwithothersintherealworld.Asisknowntoall,theShortMessageServiceculturefeaturesungrammaticalstructuresandnon-standardlanguage,whichtotallydiffersfromtheoralexpression,thusrenderingthephonefreakunabletocommunicatefluentlyinrealdailylife.Ontheotherhand,sincethestudentsdevelopahabitofnon-face-to-facecommunicationbytelephone,theyarepronetosocialphobiabecauseofpoororalexpressionandblushingfacewhentheyareinarealsocialcontext.Consequently,itisnowonderthatmanystudentsturntotheirtelephoneswithanattempttoconcealtheirunnaturalnesswhentheyareatadinnertableorataparty.Inspiteofalltheadverseimpactcausedbythemobilephone,itisequallyunwisetosetalimitforthestudentsonphoneuse.Anyway,itisaprovenfactthatthemobilephoneplaysanimportantroleinourlife.Therefore,inordertoremovesuchembarrassingsituationamongthecollegestudents,theschoolauthoritiesshouldofferappropriateguideaboutphoneuseandcreateamorepositiveandharmoniousambienceforthem,whichisalsobeneficialfortheirfuturedevelopment.2013年真題PARTVIWRITING(45MIN)Isoursocietyhostiletogoodpeople?AccordingtoarecentsurveybyChinaYouthDaily,76.1percentoftherespondentssaythatourcurrentsocietyprovidesa“badenvironment”forgoodpeopledoinggoodthings.Ontheotherhand,themoreoptimisticwouldarguethateachindividualshouldtryhisorherbesttodogoodthingsandbenicetoothers,insteadofwaitingforthe“socialenvironment”toimprove.So,whatdoyouthink?Isasoundsocialenvironmentnecessaryforpeopletohavehighmoralstandardsandbegoodtoothers?Writeanessayofabout400wordsonthefollowingtopic:Isasoundsocialenvironmentnecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothers?Isasoundsocialenvironmentnecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothers?Aproverbsaysthat"Presentarosetoothers,anditsfragranceremainsinyourhands."DespitethefactthathelpingothershasalwaysbeenatraditionalvirtueinChina,peoplearenowbecomingreluctanttohelpthoseinneedforthefearofbeingprosecutedforunintentionalinjuryorwrongfuldeath.Someblamethe"badsocialenvironment"foritwhileothersbelievethesocialenvironmentshouldbenotstressedinviewofhelpingothers.SofarasIamconcerned,Idoholdthatasoundsocialenvironmentisquitenecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothers.Butinthemeanwhile,weindividualsshouldtakeinitiativestocreateaharmonioussociety,ratherthanwaitforittoimprovepassively.Ontheonehand,asoundsocialenvironmentisnecessaryinthatitgivespeopleasenseofsecuritywhentheylendahelpinghand.Thepassionforhelpingothersneverbetraysus.Itisalackoflegalandmoraljusticethatpreventspeoplefromdoinggoodthings.Variousreportsarepermeatingthemassmediaabouthowgood-willedcitizensendupwithtroubleindoinggooddeeds,likethefamousPengYuCase.Toupholdsocialjusticeundersimilarsituations,asoundsocialenvironmentwithGoodSamaritanlawsisbadlyneededtoprotectthosewarm-heartedhelpers,whichcanfreethemfromworriesandriskswhentheydeliverhelp.Inaddition,thesocialindifferenceisalsopartlyduetothelong-existedhoe-one's-own-potatoesdoctrine.Helpersareoftenleftisolatedandunsupported.Asoundsocialenvironmentthatpraiseshumankindnessandtrustcanreducebystanders'hesitationtoassist,surelymakinghelpersbetterprotected.Ontheotherhand,itisfutiletowaitforthesocialenvironmenttoimprovebyitself.Justimaginehowahousecanbebuiltifeverybodywaitsidlyforotherstomakeastart.Sincethesocietyiscomposedofindividuals,itiseachindividual'sbehaviorthatcultivates,protectsandstrengthensthesocialmorality.Thesocialenvironmentwouldnotbechangedovernightwithoutindividualefforts.Wehadbutonechoicethatweourselvessparenoeffortinmoralcultivation,protectionandstrengtheninginordertocreateaharmonioussocialcontext.Onlybyourjointeffortstoaccumulategoodconductsstepbystepcanwereallyimprovethesocialenvironment.Inconclusion,asoundsocialenvironmentisnecessarytoencourageandprotectintentionstodogooddeeds.Withtheclimateofmoralityandcredibilitydeterioratinginsomewaytoday,itishightimethatweshouldactivelydevoteourselvestotheimprovementofsocialmoralityandbuildaharmonioussociety.本文的觀點設(shè)為：人們行善助人需要良好的社會環(huán)境，但我們不能消極地等待社會環(huán)境好起來才去做好事。第二部分對第一部分的觀點進行詳述。本文此部分分兩段論述，其一：良好的社會環(huán)境對助人者提供法律和道德保障，從而可以鼓勵更多人行善。其二：論證作為個體的個人是社會環(huán)境的組成部分，只有大家都積極行動起來，才能建設(shè)出和諧的社會環(huán)境。第三部分對全文做出簡單的總結(jié)，重申主題，強調(diào)改善我們現(xiàn)有的社會環(huán)境刻不容緩，我們每個人都應(yīng)該為改善社會道德環(huán)境作貢獻。IsasoundsocialenvironmentnecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothersHelpingothershasalwaysbeenavirtueintraditionalChineseculture,butnowadaysmanypeopledarenotofferhelptothoseinneed,forfearofgettingintotrouble.Theissuehasarousedpublicdebateovertheclimateofmoralityandcredibility,andmanypeoplesighoverthemoraldegeneration.Inmyopinion,whilesocialenvironmentisnecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothers,eachindividualshouldtryhisorherbesttodogooddeedsandbesympatheticwithothers,insteadofwaitingfortheenvironmenttoimprove.Thereisnodenyingthatsometragiceventsturnouttobetrapsbypeoplewithevilintentions,sopeoplearebecomingmorerisk-consciousandaremorewaryoftrapsanddeceits.somepeopleevenwonder,‘Isoursocietyhostiletogoodpeople?’Thequestionmaysoundridiculousbutmanypeopleapparentlythinkso.Theybelievethatourcurrentsocietyprovidesabadenvironmentforgoodpeopledoinggoodthings,andgoodpeoplepayahighpriceforbeingcompassionate.Infact,suchkindofthingsonlyaccountsforaprettysmallpercentage,butmassivemediacoveragemakesthesituationseemserious.Actually,mostpeoplearoundmearekind,warm-heartedandhelpful,andIamquitedelightedintheircompany.SoIbelievemediashouldpaymoreattentiontopublicizinggoodpeopleandexemplarydeedstoenhanceourconfidence,ratherthanexposingdisgustingbehaviors.Atthesametime,asJohnDonneputsit,“Nomanisanisland,entireofitself.Everymanisapieceofthecontinent,apartofthemain.”Sinceeveryoneofusisacomponentofthesociety,itiseachindividual’sconductsthatformsocialmorality.Justimagineitisyouwhoneedhelp,whatwouldyoufeelifeveryonewatchesindifferentlyorsuspiciously?So,putyourselfinother’spositionandbesympathetic.Ifwedonothingbutwaitfortheenvironmenttoimprove,nothingwillhappen.Onlybyremovingthefencearoundourkindconsciousnesscanwereversetheregressofsocialethics,andmakeourworldfullofwarmthandhappiness.Therefore,ifhelpisneeded,neverhesitatetolendahelpinghand.Itwillmakeyouhappyandfeelbetteraboutlife.Insum,Icontendtheideathatwhilesocialenvironmentisnecessaryforpeopletobegoodtoothers,itiseachindividual’sresponsibilitytoofferhelptothoseinneed,andtogetherwebuildupamoreharmonioussociety.2014年真題PARTVIWRITING(45MIN)Nowadays,somecompanieshavework-from-homeorremoteworkingpolicies,whichmeansthattheiremployeesdonothavetocommutetoworkeveryday.Somepeoplethinkthatthiscansavealotoftimetravellingtoandfromwork,thusraisingemployees'productivity.However,othersarguethatintheworkplace,peoplecancommunicatefacetoface,whichvastlyincreasestheefficiencyofcoordinationandcooperation.Whatisyouropinion?Writeanessayofabout400wordsonthefollowingtopic：MyViewsonWorkingfromHomeNowadays,somecompaniesencouragetheiremployeestoworkathomeinsteadofcommutingtoworkeveryday.Bycuttingthetimespentontravelling,theemployeescanenjoymoretimeonworking.Althoughthismethodseemstoimprovetheemployees’workingefficiency,Iamstronglyagainstitsinceitwillbringalongmanyunexpectedproblems.Firstofall,notalltheemployeesarehighlyself-disciplined.Ifthereisnoonewhoattendstomonitorthem,theywillbeeasilydistracted.Inacomfortableenvironmentlikehome,onewillthinkaboutwatchingTV,eatingsnacksorjustlyinginthesofa.Howcouldtheyconcentrateontheirworkandfinishallthetasksontime?Inthissituation,workingathomecannotguaranteetheworkefficiencyoftheemployeesatall.Eventhereissometimesavedfromtravellingtotheoffice,timeisverylikelyspentonsleepingorentertainmentratherthanwork.Second,muchofacompany’sworkneedstobedoneundercarefulcoordinationandcooperation.Face-to-facecommunicationplaysanessentialroleinsometeamwork.Takethemarketingdepartmentforexample.Ifitistomakeaplanforthecompany’snewproduct,theemployeesofthisdepartmentshouldbrainstormtogether,discusstogether,andmakedecisionstogetherduringthesessionsoftheface-to-facemeetings.Moreover,tobetterimprovetheirplans,theymayalsoneedtoseekinformationandfeedbacksfromthesalesdepartment.Iftheemployeesallworkathome,thecommunicationandcooperationwillbeveryinconvenientanddifficulttofulfill,letaloneraisingtheemployees’productivity.Third,workingtogethercanenhancetherelationshipbetweenindividualemployees.Itisnotonlyhelpfulfortheself-developmentofemployeesinthelongrun,butalsousefulforbuildingaunitedandpromisingcompany.However,workingathomewillmoreorlesscreateasenseofisolationorevenloneliness,whileworkingtogetherprovidesamoreincentiveenvironmentforthemtoaccomplishtheirtasks.Therefore,Isuggestthatemployeesshouldworkintheworkplaceinsteadofworkingfromhome,becausethelattercanneitherguaranteeefficientworknorachievecooperationamongemployees.Seeminglyagoodwaytoredu