版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
英語作文文理分科選擇【篇一:文理分科英語作文】㈠很多學生要求我給出一篇關于文理分科的文章,個人認為高考陜西區(qū)考到的可能性很小,但是也不妨作為正反觀點類練手的文章。大家在寫作中要注意的一個關鍵點就是舉一反三,模板句在不同類型文章中的有效使用。.一些人認為應該分科,可以讓大家有更多時間專注學習自己喜歡的方向,另外可以減少學生學習的壓力。.另一些人贊同部分文理,因為這樣可以培養(yǎng)學生的通識能力,有利于全面發(fā)展,為以后大學的深造打好堅實的基礎。.我的看法。recently,whetherstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartonesisunderheateddiscussionamongthepublic.someareinfavorofthedivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetoconcentrateontheirfavoritesubjects,whichleadstohighefficiencyinstudy.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.onthecontrary,othersobjecttotheformeropinion.theysupposeonlywhenstudentslearnbothsciencesubjectsandartsubjects,cantheybeeducatedtocomprehensivestudents,layingasolidfoundationforthefuturestudyafterenteringcollege.frommyperspective,ireckonthatitmayhavemoreadvantagesthandisadvantagestolearnbothscienceandartsubjects.althoughitwillspendusmoretimeandenergy,it’sbeneficialtostudentsinalongrun(從長遠看).(二)取消高中文理分科,增負還是減負?cancelthedividingofscienceandartinseniormiddleschool,isittoloseloadortoaddload?文理分科幾乎是每一個上過普通高中的學生都要面臨的一個重要選擇。近日,國家教育部就“高中取消文理分科的必要性和可行性”向社會廣泛征詢意見。一石激起千層浪,該不該取消文理分科的老話題,又成了人們最近熱議的話題。dividingofscienceandartisanimportantchoiceforeveryseniormiddleschoolstudent.recently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.但是來自各方的意見卻大相徑庭:butideasfromdifferentpartiesaretotallyopposite:學生:反對取消文理分科,理由:學習壓力會更大;不利于專業(yè)學習;students:theyopposetocancelit.thereasonisthatthepressurewillbecomebigger,whichisnotbenefitforspecialtystudy.教育界人士:大多數(shù)表示贊同,理由:有利于完善國民知識結構;有利學生全面發(fā)展;mostofthepeopleineducationcircleexpresstheiragreement.thereasonisthatitisgoodforcompletingtheknowledgestructureofpeople,whichisalsogoodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.那么,你認為高中文理,分還是不分?whatsyouridea,agreeordisagree?art,science,orboth?dividingofscienceandartisacommonthingwemeetwhenwestepintohighschool.accordingtoyourinterestandyourcharacteristic,youmakeasuitablechoice.wedontknowwhenitbeginsandwhenitwillgotoend.maybeinoureyeswefeelitisanaturalthing,forusjustmakeachoice;wetakeitasarule.butrecently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.itisanimportantthingforeducators,studentsandparents.differentpartieshavedifferentideas.forpeopleineducationcircle,theyapproveofcancelingthisdividing.becausetheythinktodayin21stcentury,ourcountryeventheentireworldneedsinter-disciplinarytalent,notjustinonearea,thisisnotenough.ifcontemporarystudentsknowalittleinmostareas,itisbetterfortheirfuture,goodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.ontheotherhand,ashighschoolstudentstheyhavetheirownideas,theyopposetocancelitandtheythinkitwillproducemorepressureinpreparingforthecollegeentranceexaminationandleadtoabadresultthatmoreandmorestudentswillskipclassesbecauseofthiskindofpressureanddislikeartorscience.inmyopinion,iamalsoagainstforcancelingofdividingofartandscience.irememberwheniwasinhighschool,sciencewasatroublesomesubjectforme,ihadalwayshadfewmarksinthesesubjects.totellyouthetruth,fromelementaryschoolon,ibegantodislikemath,ireallycouldntbearthenumbers.sowhenisteppedintothehighschool,whydontileaveitalone?ifitgoeson,iwillgomad.onthecontrary,ilikeChineseandenglish,socialscience,soitiseasierformetoaccepthistory,geographyandpolitics,thusitiseasierformetogotoagooduniversityifichooseart.thisismytrueexperience,whichithinkisalsotheexperienceofmostartstudents.(三)主題為你是否支持取消文理分科,要求寫作的方向為支持,可以促進素質(zhì)教育這一大方向為主題,同時以一筆帶過的方式指出取消文理分科的敝處,要求是以90后的眼光來看待這一問題,字數(shù)為120?150字,要符合高考的要求,要注意作文的格式,同時盡量少用簡單句,多使用不同類型的叢句,謝謝concerningifweshouldstopseparatingsciencefromartsubjectsinschoolpersonallythinkweprobablyshouldasthisactionwillbebeneficialinfollowingaspects:1:withqualityeducationbeingsomuchstressednowadays,thestudentsareexpectedtoknowalotofthingsinsteadofcompletelyfocusingonsomecertainsubjects.2:studentsshouldbegiventhetimeandchancesothattheycandecidewhattheyreallylikelateronintheuniversityastheycanvirtuallychooseatthattimewhentheyprobablyhaveabetterunderstandingwiththemselves.3:assciencepracticesthelogicwhileartenhancespeoplesemotion,learningthemtogetherwillcertainlydeveloppeopleparalleling.however,weoughttokeepaneyeonthefactthatthereisariskwhichmanystudentswouldfinditdifficultonthesubjectstheydontreallylikewhilethereisnooptiontogivethemup.(四)choosingthelessonstwomonthsago,thestudentsinourschooldecidedtostudyliberalorsciencelessons.somethinkthatitiswiseofthemtochooseliberalartlessons,whileothersinsistontheideathatsciencelessonsisusefultothejob-finding.thestudentswholikeliberalartlessonssaidtheyarefreefromcountingquantitiesofproblemsandcansavethemmuchenergytorememberthecontentappearingintheliberalbooks.theothergroupchoosingthesciencethinktheycanwellpractisetheirbrainandtheywillbemoreandmorecleverdaybyday.inmyopinion,wecandoanythingwelike,andpleaserememberthatwemustrespecteveryonewhomakesthedifferentchoice.ifyoucan,youaresuretodoeverythingwell(五)artandsciencearethetwohandsofhistory.butnowwehavetoseparatethem.isthatfair?idontthinklearningoneofthemisagoodthing.wepeopleborntoknowandchangetheworld.ifweknowonlyahalf,itisjustlikewemarriedapersonwhosenameweyettoknow.butimnotinfavoroflearningbothtoomuch.justskipsomebasicandmostimportanttipsareokay.butthingsarealwayseasiertosaythantodo.ifthenationdidnotchangethencesystem,everynewmethodisimpossible,forthestressgivenbycollegeentranceexamtostudentsarefarmorebeyondtheirability.thatiswhatithink.changeisdifficult.westillhavealongwaytogoandalottodo.butweasanation,asapeoplewillmanageit.【篇二:英語作文文理分科】recently,heighschoolexistinmanypartsofthephenomenonofartsdivision.someofstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartstudentsbythemselvesundernormalcircumstances.somepeopleexpressedoppositiontoartsdivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetolearnthingsthatinterestandtheyhavemoretimetostudytherequiredsubjects.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.othersobjecttotheopinion,ontheonehandaftertheartsdivisionrounddevelopmentofstudentscannot,ontheotherhandlearningcontentistoosimple,boringstudentswillhave.inmyopinion,artsdivisionisbetterthennot,itismoretimeandefforttolearnthestudy,thestudentsbyreducingthepressureofacademic.【篇三:文理分科英語作文】㈠很多學生要求我給出一篇關于文理分科的文章,個人認為高考陜西區(qū)考到的可能性很小,但是也不妨作為正反觀點類練手的文章。大家在寫作中要注意的一個關鍵點就是舉一反三,模板句在不同類型文章中的有效使用。.一些人認為應該分科,可以讓大家有更多時間專注學習自己喜歡的方向,另外可以減少學生學習的壓力。.另一些人贊同部分文理,因為這樣可以培養(yǎng)學生的通識能力,有利于全面發(fā)展,為以后大學的深造打好堅實的基礎。.我的看法。recently,whetherstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartonesisunderheateddiscussionamongthepublic.someareinfavorofthedivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetoconcentrateontheirfavoritesubjects,whichleadstohighefficiencyinstudy.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.onthecontrary,othersobjecttotheformeropinion.theysupposeonlywhenstudentslearnbothsciencesubjectsandartsubjects,cantheybeeducatedtocomprehensivestudents,layingasolidfoundationforthefuturestudyafterenteringcollege.frommyperspective,ireckonthatitmayhavemoreadvantagesthandisadvantagestolearnbothscienceandartsubjects.althoughitwillspendusmoretimeandenergy,it,sbeneficialtostudentsinalongrun(從長遠看).(二)取消高中文理分科,增負還是減負?cancelthedividingofscienceandartinseniormiddleschool,isittoloseloadortoaddload?文理分科幾乎是每一個上過普通高中的學生都要面臨的一個重要選擇。近日,國家教育部就“高中取消文理分科的必要性和可行性”向社會廣泛征詢意見。一石激起千層浪,該不該取消文理分科的老話題,又成了人們最近熱議的話題。dividingofscienceandartisanimportantchoiceforeveryseniormiddleschoolstudent.recently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.但是來自各方的意見卻大相徑庭:butideasfromdifferentpartiesaretotallyopposite:學生:反對取消文理分科,理由:學習壓力會更大;不利于專業(yè)學習;students:theyopposetocancelit.thereasonisthatthepressurewillbecomebigger,whichisnotbenefitforspecialtystudy.教育界人士:大多數(shù)表示贊同,理由:有利于完善國民知識結構;有利學生全面發(fā)展;mostofthepeopleineducationcircleexpresstheiragreement.thereasonisthatitisgoodforcompletingtheknowledgestructureofpeople,whichisalsogoodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.那么,你認為高中文理,分還是不分?whatsyouridea,agreeordisagree?art,science,orboth?dividingofscienceandartisacommonthingwemeetwhenwestepintohighschool.accordingtoyourinterestandyourcharacteristic,youmakeasuitablechoice.wedontknowwhenitbeginsandwhenitwillgotoend.maybeinoureyeswefeelitisanaturalthing,forusjustmakeachoice;wetakeitasarule.butrecently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.itisanimportantthingforeducators,studentsandparents.differentpartieshavedifferentideas.forpeopleineducationcircle,theyapproveofcancelingthisdividing.becausetheythinktodayin21stcentury,ourcountryeventheentireworldneedsinter-disciplinarytalent,notjustinonearea,thisisnotenough.ifcontemporarystudentsknowalittleinmostareas,itisbetterfortheirfuture,goodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.ontheotherhand,ashighschoolstudentstheyhavetheirownideas,theyopposetocancelitandtheythinkitwillproducemorepressureinpreparingforthecollegeentranceexaminationandleadtoabadresultthatmoreandmorestudentswillskipclassesbecauseofthiskindofpressureanddislikeartorscience.inmyopinion,iamalsoagainstforcancelingofdividingofartandscience.irememberwheniwasinhighschool,sciencewasatroublesomesubjectforme,ihadalwayshadfewmarksinthesesubjects.totellyouthetruth,fromelementaryschoolon,ibegantodislikemath,ireallycouldntbearthenumbers.sowhenisteppedintothehighschool,whydontileaveitalone?ifitgoeson,iwillgomad.onthecontrary,ilikechineseandenglish,socialscience,soitiseasierformetoaccepthistory,geographyandpolitics,thusitiseasierformetogotoagooduniversityifichooseart.thisismytrueexperience,whichithinkisalsotheexperienceofmostartstudents.(三)主題為你是否支持取消文理分科,要求寫作的方向為支持,可以促進素質(zhì)教育這一大方向為主題,同時以一筆帶過的方式指出取消文理分科的敝處,要求是以90后的眼光來看待這一問題,字數(shù)為120~150字,要符合高考的要求,要注意作文的格式,同時盡量少用簡單句,多使用不同類型的叢句,謝謝concerningifweshouldstopseparatingsciencefromartsubjectsinschoolpersonallythinkweprobablyshouldasthisactionwillbebeneficialinfollowingaspects:1:withqualityeducationbeingsomuchstressednowadays,thestudentsareexpectedtoknowalotofthingsinsteadofcompletelyfocusingonsomecertainsubjects.2:studentsshouldbegiventhetimeandchancesothattheycandecidewhattheyreallylikelateronintheuniversityastheycanvirtuallychooseatthattimewhentheyprobablyhaveabetterunderstandingwiththemselves.ileartenhancespeoplesemotion,learningthemtogetherwillcertainlydeveloppeopleparalleling.however,weoughttokeepaneyeonthefactthatthereisariskwhichmanystudentswouldfinditdifficultonthesubjectstheydontreallylikewhilethereisnooptiontogivethemup.(四)choosingthelessonstwomonthsago,thestudentsinourschooldecidedtostudyliberalorscien
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 全面詳盡裝飾工程勞務分包合同
- 物流配送服務合同書
- 重返校園學習保證
- 電信使用協(xié)議
- 民間貸款合同范本模板
- 牛飼料購銷合同模板
- 個人借款協(xié)議書模板
- 橋梁工程腳手架分包協(xié)議分析
- 奶粉代理合同范本
- 電力線路工程分包協(xié)議
- who實驗室生物安全手冊
- 集體林權制度改革總結(優(yōu)選3篇)
- 可編程控制器課程設計報告可編程控制器課程設計報告八篇
- 2401危險化學品崗位安全生產(chǎn)操作規(guī)程編寫導則
- 年度供應商審核計劃表
- 不便的便利店
- 題型匯編丨2023屆高考化學反應原理綜合題圖像說理總結
- niren w5500模塊用戶手冊adobe reader打開
- 初中生物新《課程標準》測試題庫及答案
- 結婚函調(diào)報告表
- 房地產(chǎn)市場報告 -威海房地產(chǎn)市場月報2023年02月
評論
0/150
提交評論