外文翻譯--風(fēng)能介紹_第1頁(yè)
外文翻譯--風(fēng)能介紹_第2頁(yè)
外文翻譯--風(fēng)能介紹_第3頁(yè)
外文翻譯--風(fēng)能介紹_第4頁(yè)
外文翻譯--風(fēng)能介紹_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩7頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

附錄 英文文獻(xiàn) Wind Energy Introduction 1.1 Historical Development Windmills have been used for at least 3000 years, mainly for grinding grain or pumping water, while in sailing ships the wind has been an essential source of power for even longer. From as early as the thirteenth century, horizontal-axis windmills were an integral part of the rural economy and only fell into disuse with the advent of cheap fossil-fuelled engines and then the spread of rural electrification.The use of windmills (or wind turbines) to generate electricity can be traced back to the late nineteenth century with the 12 kW DC windmill generator constructed by Brush in the USA and the research undertaken by LaCour in Denmark. However, for much of the twentieth century there was little interest in using wind energy other than for battery charging for remote dwellings and these low-power systems were quickly replaced once access to the electricity grid became available. One notable exception was the 1250 kW SmithPutnam wind turbine constructed in the USA in 1941. This remarkable machine had a steel rotor 53 m in diameter, full-span pitch control and flapping blades to reduce loads. Although a blade spar failed catastrophically in 1945, it remained the largest wind turbine constructed for some 40 years (Putnam, 1948). Golding (1955) and Shepherd and Divone in Spera (1994) provide a fascinating history of early wind turbine development. They record the 100 kW 30 m diameter Balaclava wind turbine in the then USSR in 1931 and the Andrea Enfield 100 kW 24 m diameter pneumatic design constructed in the UK in the early 1950s. In this turbine hollow blades, open at the tip, were used to draw air up through the tower where another turbine drove the generator. In Denmark the 200 kW 24 m diameter Gedser machine was built in 1956 while Electricite de France tested a 1.1 MW 35 m diameter turbine in 1963. In Germany, Professor Hutter constructed a number of innovative, lightweight turbines in the 1950s and 1960s. In spite of these technical advances and the enthusiasm, among others, of Golding at the Electrical Research Association in the UK there was little sustained interest in wind generation until the price of oil rose dramatically in 1973. The sudden increase in the price of oil stimulated a number of substantial Government-funded programme of research, development and demonstration. In the USA this led to the construction of a series of prototype turbines starting with the 38 m diameter 100 kW Mod-0 in 1975 and culminating in the 97.5 m diameter 2.5 MW Mod-5B in 1987. Similar programme were pursued in the UK, Germany and Sweden. There was considerable uncertainty as to which architecture might prove most cost-effective and several innovative concepts were investigated at full scale. In Canada, a 4 MW vertical-axis Darrieus wind turbine was constructed and this concept was also investigated in the 34 m diameter Sandia Vertical Axis Test Facility in the USA. In the UK, an alternative vertical-axis design using straight blades to give an H type rotor was proposed by Dr Peter Musgrove and a 500 kW prototype constructed. In 1981 an innovative horizontal-axis 3 MW wind turbine was built and tested in the USA. This used hydraulic transmission and, as an alternative to a yaw drive, the entire structure was orientated into the wind. The best choice for the number of blades remained unclear for some while and large turbines were constructed with one, two or three blades. Much important scientific and engineering information was gained from these Government-funded research programmes and the prototypes generally worked as designed. However, it has to be recognized that the problems of operating very large Figure 1.1 1.5 MW, 64 m diameter Wind Turbine (Reproduced by permission of NEG MICON) wind turbines, unmanned and in difficult wind climates were often under- estimated and the reliability of the prototypes was not good. At the same time as the multi-megawatt prototypes were being constructed private companies, often with considerable state support, were constructing much smaller, often simpler,turbines for commercial sale. In particular the financial support mechanisms in California in the mid-1980s resulted in the installation of a very large number of quite small(100 kW) wind turbines. A number of these designs also suffered from various problems but, being smaller, they were in general easier to repair and modify. The so-called Danish wind turbine concept emerged of a three-bladed,stall-regulated rotor and a fixed-speed, induction machine drive train. This decep-tively simple architecture has proved to be remarkably successful and has now been implemented on turbines as large as 60 m in diameter and at ratings of 1.5 MW. The machines of Figures 1.1 and 1.2 are examples of this design. However, as the sizes of commercially available turbines now approach that of the large prototypes of the 1980s it is interesting to see that the concepts investigated then of variable-speed operation, full-span control of the blades, and advanced materials are being used increasingly by designers. Figure 1.3 shows a wind farm of direct-drive, variable-speed wind turbines. In this design, the synchronous generator is coupled directly to the aerodynamic rotor so eliminating the requirement for a gearbox. Figure 1.4 shows a more conventional, variable-speed wind turbine that uses a gearbox, while a small wind farm of pitch-regulated wind turbines, where full-span control of the blades is used to regulate power, is shown in Figure 1.5. Figure 1.2 750 kW, 48 m diameter Wind Turbine, Denmark (Reproduced by permission of NEG MICON) Figure 1.3 Wind Farm of Variable-Speed Wind Turbines in Complex Terrain (Reproduced by permission of Wind Prospect Ltd) Figure 1.4 1 MW Wind Turbine in Northern Ireland (Reproduced by permission of Renew-able Energy Systems Ltd) The stimulus for the development of wind energy in 1973 was the price of oil and concern over limited fossil-fuel resources. Now, of course, the main driver for use of wind turbines to generate electrical power is the very low C 錯(cuò)誤 !未找到引用源。 emissions (over the entire life cycle of manufacture, installation, operation and de-commissioning) Figure 1.5 Wind Farm of Six Pitch-regulated Wind Turbines in Flat Terrain (Reproduced by permission of Wind Prospect Ltd) and the potential of wind energy to help limit climate change. In 1997 the Commis-sion of the European Union published its White Paper (CEU, 1997) calling for 12 percent of the gross energy demand of the European Union to be contributed from renewables by 2010. Wind energy was identified as having a key role to play in the supply of renewable energy with an increase in installed wind turbine capacity from 2.5 GW in 1995 to 40 GW by 2010. This target is likely to be achievable since at the time of writing, January 2001, there was some 12 GW of installed wind-turbine capacity in Europe, 2.5 GW of which was constructed in 2000 compared with only 300 MW in 1993. The average annual growth rate of the installation of wind turbines in Europe from 1993-9 was approximately 40 percent (Zervos, 2000). The distribution of wind-turbine capacity is interesting with, in 2000, Germany account- ing for some 45 percent of the European total, and Denmark and Spain each having approximately 18 percent. There is some 2.5 GW of capacity installed in the USA of which 65 percent is in California although with increasing interest in Texas and some states of the midwest. Many of the California wind farms were originally constructed in the 1980s and are now being re-equipped with larger modern wind turbines. Table 1.1 shows the installed wind-power capacity worldwide in January 2001 although it is obvious that with such a rapid growth in some countries data of this kind become out of date very quickly. The reasons development of wind energy in some countries is flourishing while in others it is not fulfilling the potential that might be anticipated from a simple consideration of the wind resource, are complex. Important factors include the financial-support mechanisms for wind-generated electricity, the process by which the local planning authorities give permission for the construction of wind farms,and the perception of the general population particularly with respect to visual impact. In order to overcome the concerns of the rural population over the environ-mental impact of wind farms there is now increasing interest in the development of sites offshore. 1.2 Modern Wind Turbines The power output, P, from a wind turbine is liven by the well-known expression: P=錯(cuò)誤 !未找到引用源。 where is the density of air (1.225 kg/錯(cuò)誤 !未找到引用源。 ), 錯(cuò)誤 !未找到引用源。 is the power coefficient, A is the rotor swept area, and U is the wind speed. The density of air is rather low, 800 times less than that of water which powers hydro plant, and this leads directly to the large size of a wind turbine. Depending on the design wind speed chosen, a 1.5 MW wind turbine may have a rotor that is more than 60 m in diameter. The power coefficient describes that fraction of the power in the wind that may be converted by the turbine into mechanical work. It has a theoretical maximum value of 0.593 (the Betz limit) and rather lower peak values are achieved in practice (see Chapter 3). The power coefficient of a rotor varies with the tip speed ratio (the ratio of rotor tip speed to free wind speed) and is only a maximum for a unique tip speed ratio. Incremental improvements in the power coefficient are continually being sought by detailed design changes of the rotor and, by operating at variable speed, it is possible to maintain the maximum power coefficient over a range of wind speeds. However, these measures will give only a modest increase in the power output. Major increases in the output power can only be achieved by increasing the swept area of the rotor or by locating the wind turbines on sites with higher wind speeds. Hence over the last 10 years there has been a continuous increase in the rotor diameter of commercially available wind turbines from around 30 m to more than 60 m. A doubling of the rotor diameter leads to a four-times increase in power output. The influence of the wind speed is, of course, more pronounced with a doubling of wind speed leading to an eight-fold increase in power. Thus there have been considerable efforts to ensure that wind farms are developed in areas of the highest wind speeds and the turbines optimally located within wind farms. In certain countries very high towers are being used (more than 60-80 m) to take advantage of the increase of wind speed with height. In the past a number of studies were undertaken to determine the optimum size of a wind turbine by balancing the complete costs of manufacture, installation and operation of various sizes of wind turbines against the revenue generated (Mollyet al. 1993). The results indicated a minimum cost of energy would be obtained with wind turbine diameters in the range of 35-60 m, depending on the assumptions made. However, these estimates would now appear to be rather low and there is no obvious point at which rotor diameters, and hence output power, will be limited particularly for offshore wind turbines. All modern electricity-generating wind turbines use the lift force derived from the blades to drive the rotor. A high rotational speed of the rotor is desirable in order to reduce the gearbox ratio required and this leads to low solidity rotors (the ratio of blade area/rotor swept area). The low solidity rotor acts as an effective energy concentrator and as a result the energy recovery period of a wind turbine, on a good site, is less than 1 year, i.e., the energy used to manufacture and install the wind turbine is recovered within its first year of operation (Musgrove in Freris, 1990). 英文翻譯 風(fēng)能介紹 1.1 發(fā)展歷史 風(fēng)車(chē)的使用至少已有三千年,主要用于磨?;虮谜舅?,而在帆船風(fēng)已成為不可缺少的電力來(lái)源甚至更 長(zhǎng)的一段時(shí)間。從早在 13 世紀(jì),水平軸風(fēng)力發(fā)電的一個(gè)組成部分是農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì),只有隨著廉價(jià)的礦物燃料的引擎落入廢棄,農(nóng)村電氣化才蔓延出來(lái)。利用風(fēng)力發(fā)電(或風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī))發(fā)電可以追溯到十九世紀(jì)末期的12 千瓦直流風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī),建造在美國(guó)的丹麥 LaCour 研究所。然而, 20 世紀(jì)大部分時(shí)期人們對(duì)使用風(fēng)能沒(méi)有興趣,除了用于偏遠(yuǎn)住宅電力供應(yīng),并且一旦并入電網(wǎng)成為可能,這些低功耗系統(tǒng)很快就被取代。一個(gè)突出的例子是 1941 年史密斯普特南在美國(guó)建造的 1250 千瓦的風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組,這臺(tái)機(jī)組剛性轉(zhuǎn)子直徑是 53米,充分跨度間距控制和撲葉片,以減 少負(fù)載。雖然這種葉片風(fēng)機(jī)在 1945 年失敗了,但是它仍然是最大的風(fēng)機(jī)在之后的約 40 年間。 Golding (1955 年 ),Shepherd 和 Divone 在 Spera ( 1994 )提供了一個(gè)令人著迷的早期風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)的發(fā)展史。 1931 年他們記錄了 100 千瓦 30 米直徑的蘇聯(lián)巴拉克拉風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組和 1950 年代初英國(guó) Andrea Enfield 100 千瓦 24 米直徑風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組的氣動(dòng)設(shè)計(jì)建造。在這空心渦輪葉片,展開(kāi)著,被用來(lái)吸收空氣動(dòng)能透過(guò)機(jī)身推動(dòng)另一端的發(fā)電機(jī), 1956年在丹麥生產(chǎn)出了 200千瓦 24米直徑 Gedser機(jī)型,而后,在 1963 年法國(guó)的一家電力公司已完成了 1.1 兆瓦 35 米直徑風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)的測(cè)試。五十年代和六十年代,德國(guó)的 Hutter 教授有了一些輕型渦輪機(jī)的創(chuàng)新。盡管有這些技術(shù)進(jìn)步和研究熱情,等等,但是 Golding 在英國(guó)的電氣研究協(xié)會(huì)對(duì)風(fēng)力機(jī)很少有持續(xù)的興趣直到 1973 年石油價(jià)格顯著上升時(shí)。 突然增加的石油價(jià)格刺激了一些實(shí)質(zhì)性的政府資助方案的研究 , 開(kāi)發(fā)和示范。 1975 年,這直接導(dǎo)致美國(guó)設(shè)計(jì)了以 100 千瓦 38 米直徑 0 型風(fēng)機(jī)為開(kāi)始的一系列風(fēng)機(jī)模型,并且最終在 1987 年設(shè)計(jì)出 2.5 兆瓦 97.5 米直徑 5B 的風(fēng)力機(jī) 模型。類(lèi)似的方案同樣在英國(guó),德國(guó)和瑞典受到熱捧。由于這些設(shè)計(jì)在最符合成本效益和一些創(chuàng)新的概念方面可能會(huì)有不確定性,因此,需要對(duì)其進(jìn)行充分規(guī)模的調(diào)查。在加拿大,生產(chǎn)出了一臺(tái) 4 兆瓦垂直軸 Darrieus 型風(fēng)力機(jī), 并且這種 概念也在美國(guó)和英國(guó)的 34 米直徑 Sandia 垂直軸試驗(yàn)設(shè)備中進(jìn)行測(cè)試, Peter Musgrove博士提出使用直葉片做出的 H 型轉(zhuǎn)子替代垂直軸的設(shè)計(jì)建造了一個(gè) 500 千瓦的樣機(jī)。 1981 年美國(guó)的一臺(tái)創(chuàng)新型 3 兆瓦水平軸的風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組被生產(chǎn)出來(lái)并進(jìn)行了測(cè)試。它使用液壓傳動(dòng)以用來(lái)替代偏航驅(qū)動(dòng)器,使整個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)導(dǎo) 向?qū)︼L(fēng)。葉片數(shù)量最好的選擇在某些方面仍然不是很明確,基本上大的風(fēng)機(jī)都是使用單葉片,雙葉片或者是三葉片。 許多重要的科學(xué)和工程信息都是從這些政府資助的研究方案和一般的原型設(shè)計(jì)工作中獲得的。但是,必須認(rèn)識(shí)到運(yùn)行一個(gè)沒(méi)有人工操作,大型的風(fēng)力機(jī)的問(wèn)題,這種惡劣的風(fēng)氣候經(jīng)常是不可估計(jì)的,并且設(shè)備的可靠性不是很好。同時(shí),多兆瓦的風(fēng)機(jī)也在私人的公司中建造,往往相當(dāng)多的國(guó)家支持,建設(shè)要小得多,往往很簡(jiǎn)單的風(fēng)力機(jī)作為商業(yè)銷(xiāo)售。 20 世紀(jì) 80 年代中期在加利福尼亞州,特別 是財(cái)政支持機(jī)制催生了大量小型( 100 千瓦)風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)的安裝。 其中的一些設(shè) 計(jì)也有遇到了各種各樣的問(wèn)題,但是由于是小型的,可以利用普通簡(jiǎn)便的方法來(lái)修理和改進(jìn),所謂的 Danish 風(fēng)力機(jī)概念出現(xiàn)了三葉片,失速調(diào)節(jié)轉(zhuǎn)子和一個(gè)恒定的速率,感應(yīng)電機(jī)驅(qū)動(dòng)。這個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的架構(gòu)已被證明是非常成功的,并且有現(xiàn)在60 米直徑風(fēng)力機(jī)一樣大的直徑和 1.5 兆瓦的功率。圖 1.1 和圖 1.2 這種設(shè)計(jì)的兩個(gè)例子。然而,隨著商用風(fēng)力機(jī)的規(guī)模引用 20 世紀(jì) 80 年代的大型模型成為可能,有趣的是看到當(dāng)時(shí)變速操作的概念調(diào)查,充分跨度控制葉片和增強(qiáng)的材料越來(lái)越多的被設(shè)計(jì)者使用到。圖 1.3 顯示了一個(gè)采用變速直趨的風(fēng)力機(jī)的風(fēng) 場(chǎng)。在 圖 1.1 1.5 兆瓦, 64 米直徑風(fēng)力機(jī) 這種設(shè)計(jì)中,同步發(fā)電機(jī)是直接耦合的氣動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)子,所以這樣的就不需要齒輪變速箱了,圖 1.4 顯示了一個(gè)更傳統(tǒng),使用變速齒輪箱的變速風(fēng)力機(jī),而一個(gè)小風(fēng)電場(chǎng)的音高調(diào)節(jié)風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī),葉片充分跨度控制是用來(lái)限制功率的,如圖 1.5。 圖 1.2 750 千瓦, 48 米直徑風(fēng)力機(jī) 圖 1.3 在復(fù)雜地形上的變速調(diào)節(jié)風(fēng)力發(fā)電場(chǎng) 圖 1.4 北愛(ài)爾蘭 1 兆瓦風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī) 刺激風(fēng)力發(fā)電發(fā)展的是 1973 年的石油價(jià)格和對(duì)有限的化石燃料資源的關(guān)注,利用風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)發(fā)電的主要驅(qū)動(dòng)力量 是非常低的二氧化碳排放量(在制造,安裝,操作和去調(diào)試的整個(gè)生命周期)和用來(lái)幫助限制氣候變化影響的風(fēng)能的潛力。 1997 年,歐洲聯(lián)盟委員會(huì)出版了名為歐盟成員國(guó)在 2010 年 12%的能源需求將從可再生能源中獲得的白皮書(shū)。 隨著從 1995 年已安裝的容量為 2.5 萬(wàn)千瓦的風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組到 2010 年的 40 萬(wàn)千瓦這樣的增長(zhǎng),風(fēng)力發(fā)電已被確定為在可再生能源供應(yīng)方面可發(fā)揮關(guān)鍵作用。這個(gè)目標(biāo)是可能實(shí)現(xiàn)的,因?yàn)樵?

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論