CQI高階占比優(yōu)化案例

CQI高階占比優(yōu)化案例一、概述：1.16%KPI短板。CQI高階占比進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)，對(duì)CQICQI（小區(qū)）RFCQI高階占比的目的。將龍灣分為7CQI高階占比低；指標(biāo)。龍灣片區(qū)六濱海區(qū)域的范圍圖：二、龍灣片區(qū)六覆蓋分析：采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)量，CQI主要用來衡量小區(qū)下行信道的質(zhì)量，CQI越高表明下行信道質(zhì)量越好；而高低是由網(wǎng)絡(luò)的覆蓋好壞和干擾的強(qiáng)弱直接決定的。高階占比的目的；大面積弱覆蓋目前需要通過建站解決，短期內(nèi)無法有效果，PCI模三干擾全網(wǎng)確實(shí)普遍存在，但比較分散，界定較難，且修改PCI會(huì)影響全網(wǎng)PCI規(guī)劃，需要規(guī)劃解顯實(shí)現(xiàn)較容易的方案。方案制定：調(diào)整方案主要根據(jù)覆蓋方向的站間距離，如果小區(qū)覆蓋距離大于站間采樣角與站間距做出補(bǔ)充的調(diào)整方案，都為基覆蓋調(diào)整，調(diào)整各站點(diǎn)的方位角與傾角。10160個(gè)，占總小區(qū)數(shù)的59.4%；調(diào)整方案如下表格：龍灣第六片區(qū)濱海天線調(diào)整方案.xlsx三、龍灣片區(qū)六濱海測(cè)試分析：龍灣片區(qū)六測(cè)試情況：RSRP[-140,-110)[-110,-105)[-105,-100)[-100,-95)[-95,-85)[-85,-70)[-70,-40)采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)20972028485769322243739占比0.05%0.23%0.47%1.98%13.45%75.12%8.72%SINR[-20,-5)[-5,0)[0,5)[5,10)[10,15)[15,20)[20,35)采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)32212862901700712272122806800占比0.75%3.00%6.77%16.35%28.63%28.65%15.86%MCS[0,9)[9,17)[17,23)[23,28)采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)96433122548800占比12.64%43.44%33.42%10.49%15.86%，SINR≥15的占的高階占比64.10%，從統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果可以看出龍灣片區(qū)六覆蓋良好，干擾嚴(yán)重，主要原因是重疊覆蓋造成的。四、實(shí)際調(diào)整情況：（基站與周邊樓房的高度情況49605月22日完成全部調(diào)整工作。調(diào)整情況如下表格：龍灣第六片區(qū)濱海五、調(diào)整后測(cè)試指標(biāo)對(duì)比情況：RSRP對(duì)比情況RSRP[-140,-110)[-110,-105)[-105,-100)[-100,-95)[-95,-85)[-85,-70)[-70,-40)調(diào)整前采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)20972028485769322243739調(diào)整后采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)382464424895797345589930調(diào)整前占比0.05%0.23%0.47%1.98%13.45%75.12%8.72%調(diào)整后占比0.07%0.48%0.86%0.95%11.26%67.10%19.28%點(diǎn)也有所下降，調(diào)整后覆蓋有所提升了，改善用戶對(duì)信號(hào)的感知度。2SINR對(duì)比情況:SINR[-20,-5)[-5,0)[0,5)[5,10)[10,15)[15,20)[20,35)調(diào)整前采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)32212862901700712272122806800調(diào)整后采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)1124517536430125861625714142調(diào)整前占比0.75%3.00%6.77%16.35%28.63%28.65%15.86%調(diào)整后占比0.02%0.48%3.41%12.50%24.47%31.61%27.50%11.64%；SINR≥15dBmSINR覆蓋好點(diǎn)明顯上升，SINR覆蓋差點(diǎn)明顯下降，提升了用戶對(duì)信號(hào)的感知度。3MCS對(duì)比情況:MCS[0,9)[9,17)[17,23)[23,28)調(diào)整前采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)96433122548800調(diào)整后采樣點(diǎn)數(shù)442315237191769調(diào)整前占比12.64%43.44%33.42%10.49%調(diào)整后占比4.87%34.71%40.95%19.48%調(diào)整后下行MCS≥17（64QAM）60.43%16.52%，下行方向高階調(diào)制明顯提升；直接反應(yīng)出下行方向速率的提升，用戶感知明顯改善。六、調(diào)整后CQI高階占比對(duì)比情況：行標(biāo)簽求和項(xiàng):CQI(10-15)上報(bào)數(shù)量_zjwxwyhw(次)求和項(xiàng):CQI-zjwxwyhw(次)CQI2017-05-025517699485835042532466.08%2017-05-036033691509913493179966.05%2017-05-046062220973行標(biāo)簽求和項(xiàng):CQI(10-15)上報(bào)數(shù)量_zjwxwyhw(次)求和項(xiàng):CQI-zjwxwyhw(次)CQI2017-05-025517699485835042532466.08%2017-05-036033691509913493179966.05%2017-05-046062220973917534268366.07%2017-05-056125774027929569175165.90%2017-05-065875572218898206260965.41%2017-05-075610452629852995151765.77%2017-05-086036442427907720701766.50%2017-05-096122049619911384549967.17%2017-05-106071315943900360030767.43%2017-05-116220354756923797144367.33%2017-05-126054659054892274602167.86%2017-05-135828415028852678109468.35%2017-05-145460967188785229377569.55%2017-05-156012849721872028502368.95%2017-05-166046461423878634905568.82%2017-05-176059966884873818527469.35%2017-05-186158589194881138630669.89%2017-05-196208617584883759215470.25%2017-05-206090888509870503596169.97%2017-05-215642013159794724330270.99%2017-05-226095875200862966574370.64%2017-05-236264156013878211007671.33%2017-05-246096588684862090526070.72%201