版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
GlobalPhilanthropy
Tracker2023
Contents
TablesandFigures 01
Introduction
02
KeyFindings 04
Suggestions
06
WhatDoestheReportMeasure? 08
DatainContext:SettingtheStage 12
SpotlightonGivingtoUkraine 14
PartI:TotalCross-BorderResourceFlows 20
A.TotalCross-BorderResourceFlows 20
B.OfficialandPrivateForeignAssistance 26
PartII:Cross-BorderPhilanthropy 28
A.LegalEnvironmentforCross-BorderPhilanthropy 30
B.PhilanthropicOutflowsbyDonorCountries’IncomeLevel 33
C.UnitedNationsSustainableDevelopmentGoals 36
D.Cross-BorderPhilanthropybyCharitableCauses 38
SpotlightonGlobalPhilanthropicResponsestowardstheFightagainsttheCOVID-19Pandemic 39
E.RecipientsofCross-BorderPhilanthropybyRegion 42
SpotlightonCross-BorderPhilanthropyandClimateChange 43
F.Cross-BorderVolunteering 46
PartIII.OtherCross-BorderResourceFlows 52
A.OfficialDevelopmentAssistance 52
B.Remittances 55
SpotlightonDiasporaPhilanthropy 59
C.PrivateCapitalInvestment 62
LookingAhead 64
Methodology 66
References 68
Acknowledgments 76
GLOBALPHILANTHROPYTRACKER202301
TablesandFigures
Figures
Figure1.Totalcross-borderresourcesfrom47countriesbyflow,2020(inbillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars) 20
Figure2.Totalcross-borderprivateresourceflows(philanthropicoutflows,remittances,andprivatecapitalinvestment),
comparedwithofficialdevelopmentassistance,1991–2020(inbillionsofcurrentUSdollars) 22
Figure3.Totalcross-borderresourcesbyflow,1991–2020(inbillionsofcurrentUSdollars) 23
Figure4.Totalcross-borderresourcesbyflowandbycountry,2020(inmillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars) 24
Figure5.Totalcross-borderresourcesasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebyflowandbycountry,2020 25
Figure6.Officialandprivateforeignassistancebycountry,2020(inmillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars) 26
Figure7.Officialandprivateforeignassistanceasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebycountry,2020 27
Figure8.Philanthropicoutflowsasapercentageofgrossnationalincomein47countries,2020 28
Figure9.Philanthropicoutflowsfromlow-incomeandlower-middleincomecountries,2020 33
Figure10.Philanthropicoutflowsfromupper-middleincomecountries,2020 34
Figure11.Philanthropicoutflowsfromhigh-incomecountries,2020 35
Figure12.Netofficialdevelopmentassistancebycountry,2020(inmillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars) 52
Figure13.Netofficialdevelopmentassistanceasashareofgrossnationalincomebycountry,2020 54
Figure14.Remittanceoutflowstoallcountriesbysendingcountry,2020(inmillionsofUSdollars) 56
Figure15.Remittanceoutflowstoallcountriesasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebysendingcountry,2020 57
Figure16.Remittanceoutflowstolow-andmiddle-incomecountriesbytop10sendingcountries
acrossincomegroups,2020(inmillionsofUSdollars) 58
Figure17.Remittanceoutflowstolow-andmiddle-incomecountriesasapercentageofgrossnationalincome
bytop10sendingcountriesacrossincomegroups,2020 58
Figure18.Privatecapitalflowsbycountry,2020(inmillionsofUSdollars) 62
Figure19.Privatecapitalflowsasapercentageofgrossnationalincomebycountry,2020 63
Tables
Table1.WorldBankcountryincomeclassification,2020 10
Table2.Basicfactsofcountriescoveredinthe2023GPT,2020 11
Table3.Totalcross-borderresourcesfrom47countriesbyflow,2018and2020
(inbillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars) 22
Table4.Dataoncross-borderphilanthropicoutflowsbytopcharitablecause 38
Table5.Dataoncross-borderphilanthropicoutflowsbytoprecipientregion 42
Table6.Dataavailabilityoncross-bordervolunteeringbycountry 47
04
KeyFindings
The47countriescoveredinthe2023GPThavevaryinglevelsofeconomicdevelopmentandrepresenteveryworldregion.Together,theyaccountedfor22percentofallcountriesandeconomiesworldwide,61percentoftheglobalpopulation,and85percentofglobalgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)in2020.
47countries
atallstagesof
economicdevelopment
USD70billion
incross-border
philanthropicoutflowsin2020
8percent
ofworldwidecross-borderresources
Countriesincludedinthe2023GlobalPhilanthropyTracker
Comparedwith2018,thetotalamountofthefourcross-borderresourceflowsfromthe47countriesdeclinedslightlyby2percentin2020.
+19%
Remittances
-1%
OfficialDevelopment
Assistance(ODA)
-0.5%
Philanthropic
Outflows
-100%
PrivateCapital
Investment
THELANDSCAPEOFCROSS-BORDERPHILANTHROPIC2.In2020,ofthe47countries,thefiveinthelow-income
OUTFLOWSAMONG47COUNTRIESandlower-middleincomegroupsdonatedatotal
1.In2020,these47countriescontributedUSD70billioninofUSD42milliontoothercountries(seeFigure9);the
philanthropicoutflows,1andUSD841billionwhenadding10upper-middleincomecountriescontributedaround
togetherallfourcross-borderresourceflows—philanthropicUSD644million(seeFigure10);andthe32high-income
outflowsaswellasODA,individualremittances,andPCIcountriescontributednearlyUSD70billion(seeFigure
11)
(seeFigure1).Philanthropicoutflowsrepresent8percentofofcross-borderphilanthropy.
thetotalcross-borderresources.
1Thedataonphilanthropicoutflowsfromthe47countriesincludedinthisreportvaryintermsofdataquality.Thedatadiscussedinthisreport,therefore,mayunderestimatethetruescopeofphilanthropicoutflowsinsomecases.
GLOBALPHILANTHROPYTRACKER202305
CHANGESINPHILANTHROPICOUTFLOWSSINCE2018
3.Thecombinedlevelofcross-borderphilanthropicoutflowsandtheotherthreeresourceflowsfromthe47countriesdeclinedslightlyby2percentwhenadjustedforinflation,fromUSD859billion2in2018toUSD841billionin2020(seeTable3).
?Philanthropyprovedtoberesilientduringtheyear2020,withonlyasmalldeclineof0.5percentfromUSD71billionin2018.About60percentofthe
47countrieshadupdateddatathataredirectlycomparabletotheamountin2018.Amongthissubgroupofcountries,philanthropicoutflowswentupmodestlybyaround4percent,thoughthechangevariedgreatlybycountry.
?ODAremainedatasimilarlevelin2018and2020,droppingbyonly1percent.
?Remittancessawthelargestincreaseandremainedthelargestflow,growingby19percentbetween2018and2020,fromUSD496billiontoUSD590billion.Thiscanbeattributedtotheircounter-cyclicalnature,tostimuluspackagesfromhost-countrygovernmentsleadingtofavorableeconomicconditions,aswellastomovementstowarddigitalandformalwaysofmoneytransfer
thatcouldbetrackedbygovernmentsduetoCOVID-19restrictionswhichincreasedthevisibilityofpreviouslyun-trackedremittances,andfluctuationsinoilpricesandexchangesrates(Kpodaretal.,2022).
?PCIshowedadrasticdeclinefromUSD112billionin2018toUSD0.4billionin2020.Thisisduetothecombinedeffectsoftheglobaleconomicrecession,adepreciationinthevalueofinvestments,andreducedlevelsofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)onprivatecapitalflows(UNCTAD,2021).
CROSS-BORDERPHILANTHROPICOUTFLOWSBYCAUSEANDRECIPIENTREGION
4.Educationandhealthremainedthetoptwomostsupportedcharitablecauses,asin2018,eachreceivingcross-borderdonationsfrom9countriesin2020,basedonasubgroupof14countrieswithavailabledata.ThesecausesdirectlyalignwithUNSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs)4and3(QualityEducationandGlobalHealthandWell-Being,respectively).MostcountrieswithavailabledatadidnotdetailhowtheircausesalignedwiththeSDGs,andonlyaportionofthosecausescouldbecategorizedwithintheSDGframework.
5.Africawastheregioncitedmostfrequentlyasatoprecipientofphilanthropicsupport,accordingtocountriesthatreporteddataonthismatter.Amongthesubgroupofcountriesthatreporteddataonrecipientcountriesorregions,15citedAfrica,9citedAsia,and9citedEurope.Comparedwith2018,AfricaandAsiaremainedthetoptworegionssupportedbycross-borderphilanthropy,whilethenumberofcountriesthatgavetoEuropeincreasedin2020.
THEFUTUREOFCROSS-BORDERPHILANTHROPY
6.Technologicalinnovationsandinnovativewaysofgivinghavethepotentialtorevolutionizecross-borderphilanthropy.Theproliferationofemerginggivingvehicles,suchascrowdfunding,cryptodonations,andcollaborativeglobalfundshavefacilitatedandacceleratedbothlocalandglobalphilanthropyduringtheCOVID-19pandemic.
7.Thefindingsemphasizetheneedforincreasedcollaborationbetweencountries,sectors,andphilanthropicactors,andhighlighttheimportanceofimproveddatacollectiononnewareasofgiving,abetterreportingstructuretocapturegivingthatsupportstheSDGs,andmoreintentionaldatatrackingeffortstoenhancediversity,equity,andinclusioninglobalgiving.
8.Cross-borderphilanthropycanbebolsteredbyhighlightingandutilizingtheexpertiseanddedicationofdiasporacommunitieswho,especiallyduringtimesofcrisis,rallyandprovidetargetedandinformedphilanthropicrelieftotheirhomecountries.
TABLE3.TOTALCROSS-BORDERRESOURCESFROM47COUNTRIESBYFLOW,2018AND2020(inbillionsofinflation-adjusted2020USdollars)
FinancialFlowsfrom47Countries20202018%Changefrom2018to2020
REMITTANCES
$590
$496
19%
OFFICIALDEVELOPMENTASSISTANCE(ODA)
$180
$181
-1%
PHILANTHROPICOUTFLOWS
$70
$71
-0.5%
PRIVATECAPITALINVESTMENT(PCI)
$0.4
$112
-100%
TOTAL
$841
$859
-2%
2Inthisreport,allcurrencieswereadjustedinto2020USDvalues.
06
Suggestions
The2023GPTidentifiesthreeopportunitiesfortheinternationalcommunitytobolstertheroleofphilanthropyinsustainabledevelopment.Byleveragingthelessonslearned,leaderscanrespondappropriatelytocurrentandfuturechallenges.
EnhanceLocalPhilanthropicEcosystemsThroughRegionalCollaborations
Theincreasingnumberofnaturalandhuman-madedisastershighlightstheneedforanimprovedecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropy,especiallythroughlocalgrassrootsorganizationsandtheirleadership,whichareoftenthefirstrespondersintimesofcrisis.Withregionalcollaborations,philanthropicorganizations3havethepotentialtoadvancethelocalandglobalphilanthropicecosystemwithknowledgesharing,localcapacitybuilding,andadvocacywork.Theseorganizationscouldalsofacilitatetheconnectionsandcommunicationbetweeninternationaldonorsandlocalphilanthropicorganizationstoenhanceequityandculturalawarenessincross-borderphilanthropy.Numerousregionalandinternationalcollaborationscanserveasexamplesforgoodpractices,someofwhicharehighlightedbelow.
?IntheAsia-Pacificregion,severalregional-levelcentersandnonprofitassociations,suchastheCentreforAsianPhilanthropyandSocietyandtheAsiaPhilanthropyCircle,aimtoenhancethephilanthropicenvironmentintheregion,includingcross-bordergiving.ThereportonUnlockingCross-borderPhilanthropyinAsiapublishedbyGive2Asiahighlightsthatitiscrucialtocreateamorecohesiveecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropyinthisregionbycultivatingaregionallyfocusedgivingmindset,establishingtrustworthyintermediaryorganizations,andadvocatingforanenablingenvironmentforcross-borderphilanthropy,whichwouldcreateamorecohesiveecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropy(Tran&Thai,2022).
?Althoughthenon-discriminatoryprincipleshouldallowcross-borderphilanthropyintheEuropeanUnion(EU)(EuropeanUnion,2017),thecomparabilityproceduresanddifferenttaxregulationsimplementedbyeachmemberstateshavehistoricallyhinderedcross-borderphilanthropyamongthe27memberstates.Inordertofacilitatecross-bordergiving,theTransnationalGivingEuropenetworkprovidessolutionsfortax-effectivecross-bordercashdonationsin19Europeancountries(TransnationalGivingEurope,2023).Since2021,thePhilanthropyEuropeAssociation(Philea)nurturesthephilanthropicecosysteminover30Europeancountriesbyknowledgesharing,networking,andadvocacywork(Philea,2023).
Theincreasingnumberofnaturalandman-madedisastersandcriseshighlightstheneedforanimprovedecosystemforcross-borderphilanthropyandtheenhancementoflocalphilanthropicorganizations.Regionalcollaborationshavethepotentialtostrengthenthelocalandglobalphilanthropicecosystemwithknowledgesharing,localcapacitybuilding,andadvocacywork.Someoftheseorganizationscouldalsosupportdonorsnavigatetheregulatoryandadministrativerequirementsofforeigndonationsbyprovidingofficialguidelinesandalternativechannelsforcross-bordergiving.Theseorganizationscouldalsoenhanceequityincross-borderphilanthropybyfacilitatingtheconnectionsandcommunicationbetweeninternationaldonorsandlocalphilanthropicorganizations.Allthesestepsarenecessarytocreateamoreeffectiveenvironmentforandenhanceequityincross-borderphilanthropy.
3
“ThetermPhilanthropicOrganization(PO)referstoaformofnon-market,non-stateorganizationsoutsideofthefamilythatprovideservicesforthepublicgood.Itincludesthefollowing:foundations(grant-making,operating,corporate,community,orgovernmentsponsored/created),community-basedorganizationsandvillageassociations,professionalassociations,environmentalgroups,advocacygroups,co-operatives,charitableorganizations,faith-basedorganizations,mutualentities,laborunions,societies,researchinstitutes,diasporicorganizations,onlinesocial-purposeportals,transnationalandcross-sectoralcoalitions,andothertypesofnon-governmentalorganizationsthatarerelevantinagivencountry.”
GLOBALPHILANTHROPYTRACKER202307
EstablishMechanisms
toMobilizeLocalPhilanthropyinAddressingGlobalChallenges
DuringtheCOVID-19pandemic,severalinnovativeinitiativesproactivelycultivatedamoreenablingenvironment
whentraditionalchannelsofsendingandreceivingcross-borderphilanthropybecamemorechallenging,afindingthatisreinforcedinthe2022GlobalPhilanthropyEnvironmentIndex(IndianaUniversityLillyfamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,2022).4
?DuringthebeginningoftheCOVID-19pandemic,individualdonorswereunabletosupporttheglobalworkoftheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO).Thus,inpartnershipwiththeUnitedNationsFoundationandtheSwissPhilanthropyFoundation,WHOestablishedtheCOVID-19SolidarityResponseFundtoraisefundsfromindividuals,companies,andphilanthropiesacrosstheworldforthefirsttimeinitshistory(WHO,2020).ThisinitiativenotonlyhelpedraisefundsfortheglobalworkofWHObutalsoraisedawarenessoftheimportanceofpossiblenewwaysofglobalgiving.
Philanthropicorganizationscouldimplementnovelwaysofgivingtoreinforcelocalphilanthropyandprovidemoreequitable,localizedfunding.Additionally,local,regional,andglobalphilanthropicactorscouldsupportdonorsnavigatingtheregulatoryandadministrativerequirementsofforeigndonationsbyprovidingofficialguidelinesandbestpracticesforcross-bordergiving.
DevelopInternationalStandardsforDataTrackingandPromoteDataTransparency
Thereisadearthofdataoncross-bordergivingtospecificcauses,suchasgivingtofightclimatechangeorracialinjusticeandinequity.Concernsrelatedtoclimatechangehavebecomeincreasinglyrelevantandnecessaryinthepastfewdecades,andracialjusticeandracialequityarelong-standingglobalconcerns,causedbypervasiveandsystemicracism,colonialism,andxenophobia.
Basedonascanof81countriesandeconomies,thisreportsharesdataoncross-bordergivingfrom47countrieswhereitwaspossibletogetbasicestimatesoncross-borderphilanthropy,andonly14countrieshadavailabledataoncross-bordergivingbycharitablecause.
?Thereisagenerallackofdataoncross-bordergivingtospecificcauses(e.g.,climatechange,racialinjustice).
Capturingthemagnitudeofgivingtotheserelativelynewandemergingcausesisstillchallenging,butseveralresearchcentersanddataprovidershavealreadystartedrevisingtheirmethodologiestofocusoncollectingandprovidingsuchdatatothepublic(Candid,n.d.;ClimateWorksFoundation,2022;PhilanthropicInitiativeforRacialEquity,2019).
?DataongivingtotheSDGsisalsoscarce,leadingtolimitedinformationonphilanthropiccontributionstodevelopment.
TofacilitatetheusageoftheSDGlanguageandencourageSDGdatacollectionandreportingforphilanthropicorganizations,theSDGPhilanthropyPlatformcreatedthe“SDGIndicatorWizard”totranslateandalignanorganization’sachievementsandgoalsintothelanguageoftheSDGs.Recently,severalinternationalorganizationsanddataprovidershaveaimedtoprovidebetterinformationongivingtotheSDGsattheregionalandgloballevels(SDGFunders,n.d.;ArabFoundationsForum,2023;
EastAfricaPhilanthropyNetwork,2022).
Thissignificantlackofpublicdatapresentsanongoingchallengetofullyunderstandingthepatternsandtrendsofcross-bordergenerosity.Italsolimitsourunderstandingoftherolethatphilanthropyplaysglobally,especiallyduringglobalcrisesliketheCOVID-19pandemic,whenallsectorsarecalledupontorespond.Promotingdatasharingandtransparency,buildinginfrastructureforsystematicdatacollection,andestablishinginternationalstandardsfordatareportingcouldhelpimprovedataavailabilityandqualityinthelongtermandsupportindividualandinstitutionaldonorstomakeinformed,data-drivendecisions.
4PublishedbytheIndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,theGlobalPhilanthropyEnvironmentIndexexaminestheenablingenvironmentforphilanthropywithinacountryandacrosscountries.Formoreinformation,visit/index.html.
08
WhatDoestheReportMeasure?
TheGlobalPhilanthropyTracker(GPT)measurestheextentofglobalcross-borderphilanthropicoutflowsof47countries.Byfocusingonallcross-borderphilanthropy—notjustphilanthropyfordevelopmentpurposes—itoffersaholisticviewofthephilanthropicoutflows.Itfurthercomparescross-borderphilanthropytothreeotherresourceflows:ODA,remittances,andPCI.Thissectionprovidesadefinitionofthesefourresourcesflowsaswellasanoverviewofthe47countriesincludedinthereport.
PHILANTHROPICOUTFLOWS
Theconceptof‘philanthropy’hasevolvedovertimeandvariesacrosscultures,buttodayitisgenerallyseenasusinganytypeofprivateresources,suchasmoney,time,specifictalents,andcollectiveaction,forthepublicgood(Phillips&Jung,2016).
Philanthropicoutflowsreferto:a)thesumofcharitablefinancialcontributionssentbydonorswhenthedonor(individuals,corporations,foundations,orothergrantmakingorganizations)andthebeneficiary(individuals,philanthropicorganizations,orintermediaryorganizations)arelocatedindifferentcountries;orb)givingwithinacountrytodomesticphilanthropicorganizationsthatfocusonbroadcategoriesofinternationalcauses,suchasforeignaffairs,humanitarianassistance,internationalrelations,promotionofinternationalunderstanding,andinternationalsolidarity.
IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,2020GlobalPhilanthropyTracker
OFFICIALDEVELOPMENTASSISTANCE
OfficialDevelopmentAssistance(ODA)isgovernmentaidthat“promotesandspecificallytargetstheeconomicdevelopmentandwelfareofdevelopingcountries”(OECD,n.d.-b).TheOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)definitionincludes:
[F]lowstocountriesandterritoriesontheDAC[DevelopmentAssistanceCommittee]ListofODARecipientsandtomultilateraldevelopmentinstitutionswhichareprovidedbyofficialagencies,includingstateandlocalgovernments,orbytheirexecutiveagencies…andeachtransactionofwhichisadministeredwiththepromotionoftheeconomicdevelopmentandwelfareofdevelopingcountriesasitsmainobjective;andisconcessionalincharacter(OECD,n.d.-a).
IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,2020GlobalPhilanthropyTracker
Thisbroaddefinitioncoversassistancetomanyareas,suchaseconomicinfrastructure,governmentandcivilsociety,andwatersupplyandsanitation,aswellashumanitarianaid.NuclearenergyisalsoreportableasODAifitisforcivilianpurposes,andculturalprogramsalsocountiftheyincreasetheculturalcapacityoftherecipientcountries.However,thecurrentODAguidelinesexcludemoneyintheformofmilitaryaid,peacekeepingexpenditures,aswellasdealswithprimarilycommercialobjectives.ThestatisticsonODApublishedbytheOECDarealsothesoleverified,officialnumbersforthe
31DACmembersandthe80additionalprovidersofaid,includingnon-DACcountriesandorganizations(OECD,n.d.-a).
REMITTANCES
Vitalforeconomicdevelopmentaroundtheglobe,remittancesaretransfersofmoneythattakeplacewhenindividualssendapartoftheirearningstotheirfamilies,friends,andrelativesintheirhomecountry(Kretchmer,2020).Theycantaketheformofeithercashorgoods.Typically,thesender“paystheremittancetothesendingagentusingcash,check,moneyorder,creditcard,debitcard,oradebitinstructionsentthroughemail,phoneortheInternet.Thesendingagencyinstructsitsagentintherecipient’scountrytodelivertheremittance.Thepayingagentmakesthepaymenttotheaddressedbeneficiary”(Ratha,2020).
IndianaUniversityLillyFamilySchoolofPhilanthropy,2020GlobalPhilanthropyTracker
Remittanceshaveanegativecyclicalpositionwiththemigrant’shomecountry.Thismeansthatduringeconomiccrisesornaturaldisastersinthehomecountry,whenprivatecapitalflowsdecrease,remittancesfrommigrantsactuallyincrease(Frankel,2010).Thisisoftenbecausethemigrantsthemselveschoosetocuttheirownlivingcosts,cushioningtherecipientsoftheremittancesfromeconomicdownturns(Ratha,n.d.).
PRIVATECAPITALINVESTMENT
GLOBALPHILANTHROPYTRACKER202309
Globally,remittancesincreasedbetween2018and2019by4.6percent,androseslightlyfromUSD714billionin2019toUSD719billionin2020(0.6%)(Rathaetal.,2022).DuetotheCOVID-19pandemic,therewereconcerns
thatthesizeofremittanceswoulddecreasegreatly,whichwouldhavehadanoutsizedimpactoncountrieswhichrelyheavilyonthis“l(fā)ifeline”(SayehandChami,2020).Yet,remittancesremainedresilientin2020duetoavarietyoffactors,includingstimuluspackagesfromhost-countrygovernmentswhichresultedinunexpectedlyfavorableeconomicconditions;movementsawayfromcashandinformalchannelsandtowardsdigitalandformalchannels;andcyclicalfluctuationsofoilpricesandexchangesrates(Kpodaretal.,2022).Additionally,weakoilpricesnegativelyimpactedcountriesthatarepartoftheGulfCooperation
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 連云港職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《體育-臺(tái)球》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 江西現(xiàn)代職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《音樂選配與編輯》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 江蘇大學(xué)《水資源系統(tǒng)分析》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 華東理工大學(xué)《國(guó)學(xué)經(jīng)典選讀》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 隔膜壓縮機(jī)開機(jī)停機(jī)操作規(guī)程
- 湖北工業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《醫(yī)藥學(xué)基礎(chǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 遵義醫(yī)科大學(xué)《材料與結(jié)構(gòu)選型》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 珠海城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《Python程序開發(fā)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 重慶旅游職業(yè)學(xué)院《地下水資源勘查與評(píng)價(jià)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 浙江特殊教育職業(yè)學(xué)院《審計(jì)理論與方法》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 泌尿科主任述職報(bào)告
- 新零售門店運(yùn)營(yíng)管理流程手冊(cè)
- 心理學(xué)專業(yè)知識(shí)考試參考題庫500題(含答案)(一)
- 2024年浙江高考技術(shù)試題(含答案)
- 資管行業(yè)投研一體化建設(shè)
- 提高保險(xiǎn)公司客戶投訴處理能力的整改措施
- 物業(yè)費(fèi)收取協(xié)議書模板
- 電工(中級(jí)工)理論知識(shí)練習(xí)題(附參考答案)
- 工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)概論試題
- 起重機(jī)的維護(hù)保養(yǎng)要求與月度、年度檢查記錄表
- 消防設(shè)施維護(hù)保養(yǎng)記錄表
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論