供應(yīng)商評(píng)分體系

PurchasingSupplierRatingSystem供給商評(píng)分體系SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDSRS記分卡KeyPerformanceMeasurables可測量的關(guān)鍵績效：RPPM 百萬不合格品率 25PointsWrittenComplaints記錄下的報(bào)怨 15PointsDelivery 交付 20PointsService 效勞 10PointsCompetitiveness 競爭力 30PointsTOTAL 總分 100PointsToolforRapidCommunication-Monthly快速交流的工具－每月SeniorManagementAwarenessatSupplier 幫助高級(jí)管理層了解供應(yīng)商狀況SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDLEVELS SRS記分卡等級(jí)Corporate集團(tuán)級(jí)Supplier’soverallperformance供給商全部的業(yè)績Specificsupplierlocation’soverallperformance特定供給商地點(diǎn)的全部業(yè)績Division(availablebyrequestonly)分支機(jī)構(gòu)〔只在有要求時(shí)適用〕Supplier’soverallperformanceataLearDivision 在一個(gè)李爾分支機(jī)構(gòu)中，供給商的全部業(yè)績Specificsupplierlocation’soverallperformanceataLearDivision 在一個(gè)李爾分支機(jī)構(gòu)中，特定供給商地點(diǎn)的全部業(yè)績LocationSupplier’sperformanceatasingleLearfacility在單獨(dú)一個(gè)李爾工廠中，供給商的業(yè)績Specificsupplierlocation’sperformanceatasingleLearfacility 在單獨(dú)一個(gè)李爾工廠中，特定供給商地點(diǎn)部業(yè)績SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SRSSCORECARDDISTRIBUTIONSRS記分卡的發(fā)布Approximately2ndweekofeachmonth 大約每月第二周Computerauto-fax,fromLearCorporationorLearDivision

計(jì)算機(jī)自動(dòng)傳送,從李爾集團(tuán)或李爾分支機(jī)構(gòu)。President’sLevel總裁級(jí)Acorporatescorecard集團(tuán)級(jí)的記分卡PlantLevelScorecards工廠級(jí)的記分卡SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-RejectedPartsPerMillion(RPPM):評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)－百萬不合格品率〔RPPM〕TheRPPMcategoryaccountsfor25pointsoftheoverallscorecardrating. RPPM的分?jǐn)?shù)占整個(gè)記分卡總分的25分SupplierRPPMiscalculatedonthebasisoftheamountofnon-conformingmaterialsvs.thetotalamountofmaterialsreceivedinagivenfiscalmonth.供給商的RPPM值是在一個(gè)財(cái)務(wù)月份中，不合格品數(shù)量與收到所有材料的比值Thiscalculationisthennormalizedtoreflectaconstantbasisofonemillionunitsreceived. 這個(gè)公式被標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化用以反映收到的每一百萬件的一致性。SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-RejectedPartsPerMillion(RPPM):評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)－百萬不合格品率Example例如: Asupplierships100,000partstoaplant.Ofthoseparts,tenarefoundtobenon-conforming. 一家供給商發(fā)運(yùn)了十萬件到工廠里，在那些零件中發(fā)現(xiàn)有十件不合格。TheRPPMwillbecalculatedas那RPPM的計(jì)算應(yīng)為: (10/100,000)x1,000,000=100RPPMThesupplier’sscoreforthisexamplewillbe22points此例中，供給商的分?jǐn)?shù)為22分SupplierRatingSystem(SRS) Thefollowingtableoutlinespartspermillionrangesandtheirrespectivescores以下表格是對(duì)PPM范圍與他們所對(duì)應(yīng)分?jǐn)?shù)的略述： RPPMRating Score RPPMRating Score 0–25 25 351-375 11 26-50 24 376-400 10 51-75 23 401-450 9 76-100 22 451-500 8 101–125 21 501–550 7 126–150 20 551-600 6 151–175 19 601–650 5 176–200 18 651-700 4 201–225 17 701-750 3 226–250 16 751-800 2 251–275 15 801-850 1 276–300 14 851orgreater 0 301–325 13 326–350 12 SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-QualityNotices/WrittenComplaints評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)－質(zhì)量通知/記錄下來的抱怨TheQualityNotices/WrittenComplaintcategoryaccountsfor15pointsoftheoverallscorecard. 質(zhì)量通知/記錄下來的抱怨工程占總記分卡的15分ThesystemratesSuppliersonthenumberofformalrejectionnoticesorwrittencomplaintsandtheseverityofeachcomplaintwiththefollowingformula供給商評(píng)分系統(tǒng)中，正式拒收通知或記錄下來抱怨的數(shù)量與每種抱怨的嚴(yán)重程度遵循以下公式：(Thenumberofoccurrencesperclassificationcode)x (severityindex)每種等級(jí)所出現(xiàn)的次數(shù)X嚴(yán)重度指數(shù)SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)Level0 EngineeringIssues 0.00pointsperoccurrence

工程問題 0.00分/次Level1 MinorIssues 0.10pointsperoccurrence

小問題 0.10分/次Level2 RepeatMinorIssues 0.25pointsperoccurrence

重復(fù)出現(xiàn)的小問題 0.25分/次Level3 MajorIssues 0.50pointsperoccurrence

主要問題 0.50分/次Level4 SevereIssues 1.00pointsperoccurrence

嚴(yán)重問題 1.00分/次SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-QualityNotices/WrittenComplaints評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)－質(zhì)量通知/記錄下來的抱怨Example例如: AsupplierreceivesonewrittencomplaintinLevel1andtwo writtencomplaintsinLevel2. 一個(gè)供給商收到1個(gè)Level1和2個(gè)Level2的抱怨Thetotalnumberofpointswillbecalculatedas所得分?jǐn)?shù)為:(1x0.10)+(2x0.25)=0.60totalThesupplier’sscoreinthisexamplewillbe9points此例供給商所得分?jǐn)?shù)為9分SupplierRatingSystem(SRS) ThefollowingtableoutlinestheQualityNoticeRatingrangesandtheirrespectivescores: 以下表格是對(duì)質(zhì)量通知評(píng)分范圍與他們所對(duì)應(yīng)分?jǐn)?shù)的略述 QualityNotice QualityNotice RatingPoints SCORE RatingPoints SCORE 0.00-0.09 15 0.80-0.89 7 0.10-0.19 14 0.90-0.99 6 0.20-0.29 13 1.00-1.09 5 0.30-0.39 12 1.10-1.19 4 0.40-0.49 11 1.20-1.29 3 0.50-0.59 10 1.30-1.39 2 0.60-0.69 9 1.40-1.49 1 0.70-0.79 8 1.5orgreater 0SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-交貨TheDeliveryCategoryaccountsfor20pointsoftheoverallScorecard 交貨工程得分占總得分卡的20分DeliveryRatingsarecalculatedonthebasisofthenumberofshipmentsinagivenfiscalmonth 交貨的評(píng)分是以在一個(gè)指定的財(cái)務(wù)月份發(fā)運(yùn)次數(shù)為根底來計(jì)算的Thisinformationisthencalculatedintoapercentage 這類信息要計(jì)算成百分?jǐn)?shù)SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-交貨Deliveryratingsaredeterminedbytheoccurrenceofthe followingcriteriawhenitisdeterminedtobetheSupplier’sresponsibility: 交貸分級(jí)與以下情況的出現(xiàn)相關(guān),而且已確認(rèn)是供給商的責(zé)任LateDeliveries交貨晚了PremiumFreightOccurrences額外運(yùn)費(fèi)的出現(xiàn)DamagedParts零件損壞OverShipmentoftheQuantityOrdered超出定貨數(shù)量的發(fā)運(yùn)EarlyDeliveries提早交貨ShortShipmentoftheQuantityOrdered少于定貨數(shù)量的發(fā)運(yùn)Thepotentialformorethanoneoccurrencepershipmentdoesexist. 也可能有上述一種以上的情況出現(xiàn)在同一次發(fā)運(yùn)中.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS) SCORINGCRITERIA-Delivery 評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-交貨

Example例如: Asuppliersends36shipmentsforthemonth.Ofthose36shipments,oneislateandoneisshortofthequantityordered.Thiscountsastwooccurrences. 一個(gè)供給商這個(gè)月發(fā)了36次貨.在這36次中發(fā)運(yùn)中,一次晚了,一次發(fā)運(yùn)數(shù)量少了.故作為兩次計(jì)算.Thedeliverypercentagewillbecalculatedas: 交貨百分比計(jì)算為:[(36-2)/36]x100=94.4%TheSupplier’sscoreforthisexamplewillbe13points此例供給商的得分就為13分.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)Thefollowingtableoutlines DeliveryOccurrence% ScoretheDeliveryPercentagesand 100 20theirrespectivescores: 99.2–99.9 19 98.4–99.1 18 以下表格是對(duì)交貨百分率 97.6–98.3 17與他們所對(duì)應(yīng)分?jǐn)?shù)的略述: 96.8–97.5 16 96.0–96.7 15 95.2–95.9 14 94.4–95.1 13 93.6–94.3 12 92.8–93.5 11 92.0–92.7 10 91.2–91.9 9 90.4–91.1 8 89.6–90.3 7 88.8–89.5 6 88.0–88.7 5 87.2–87.9 4 86.4–87.1 3 85.6–86.3 2 84.8–85.5 1 84.7orless 0

SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Service/Responsiveness評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-效勞/反響TheService/Responsivenesscategoryaccountsfor10pointsoftheoverallScorecard. 效勞/反響怨工程占總記分卡的10分ServiceRatingsaredeterminedonthebasisof thefollowingcriteria: 由以下的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為根底,來決定效勞等級(jí)OntimeandaccurateProductionPartApprovalProcess(PPAP),asrequired 按要求,準(zhǔn)時(shí)及正確的PPAPOntimeandaccurateresponsetoqualityissues,includingplantvisitsperLear’srequest. 對(duì)質(zhì)量問題的準(zhǔn)時(shí)及正確的反響,包括按李爾要求參觀工廠Ontimeandaccuratedocumentationasrequiredbyeachlocation,includingbutnotlimitedtoSPC,Certifications,invoices,packingslips,etc. 按每個(gè)工廠的要求,準(zhǔn)時(shí)及正確的文件提交,包括但不僅限于SPC,證書,發(fā)票,裝箱單等.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)SCORINGCRITERIA-Service/Responsiveness評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-效勞/反響Example例如: ASupplierfailstosubmitontimeforthelatestengineering levelintheProductionPartApprovalProcess(PPAP)一家供給商沒能按時(shí)提交零件最新工程等級(jí)的PPAPTheSupplier’sScoreforthisexampleis9points 此例中,供給商的得分為9分.SupplierRatingSystem(SRS) ThefollowingtableoutlinestheService/Responsivenessoccurrencesandtheirrespectivescores: 以下表格是對(duì)效勞/反響事故出現(xiàn)次數(shù)與他們所對(duì)應(yīng)分?jǐn)?shù)的略述

Service Incidents Score 0 10 1 9 2 7 3 5 4 3 5orgreater 0SupplierRatingSystem(SRS)ScoringCriteria-Competitiveness評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)-競爭力TheCompetitivenesscategoryaccountsfor30pointsoftheoverallscorecardrating. 效勞/反響怨工程占總記分卡