江蘇省2014屆高三英語(yǔ)一輪復(fù)習(xí)完形填空攻略訓(xùn)練（1）.doc

江蘇省2014屆高三英語(yǔ)（牛津版）一輪復(fù)習(xí)攻略訓(xùn)練：完形填空（1）New genetic analysis has revealed that many Amazon tree species are likely to survive human-made climate warming in the coming century, contrary to previous findings that temperature increases would cause them to die out. A study, 36 in the latest edition of Ecology and Evolution, reveals the 37 age of some Amazonian tree species - more than 8 million years - and 38 shows that they have survived previous periods as warm as many of the global warming imagined periods 39 for the year 2100. The authors write that, having survived warm periods in the past, the trees will 40 survive future warming, provided there are no other major environmental changes. 41 extreme droughts and forest fires will impact Amazonia as temperatures 42 , the trees will stand the direct impact of higher temperatures. The authors 43 that as well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions to minimize the risk of drought and fire, conservation policy should remain 44 on preventing deforestation（采伐森林）for agriculture and mining. The study disagrees with other recent researches which predicted tree species extinctions 45 relatively small increases in global average air temperatures. Study co-author Dr Simon Lewis (UCL Geography) said the 46 were good news for Amazon tree species, but warned that drought and over-exploitation of the forest remained major 47 to the Amazons future. Dr Lewis said: “The past cannot be compared directly with the future. while tree species seem likely to 48 higher air temperatures than today, the Amazon forest is being transformed for agriculture and 49 , and what remains is being degraded by logging, and increasingly split up by fields and roads. “Species will not move as freely in todays Amazon as they did in previous warm periods, when there was no human 50 . Similarly, todays climate change is extremely fast, making comparisons with slower changes in the past 51 .” “With a clearer 52 of the relative risks to the Amazon forest, we 53 that direct human impacts - such as forest clearances for agriculture or mining - should remain a key point of conservation policy. We also need more aggressive 54 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in order to make minimum the risk of drought and fire impacts and 55 the future of most Amazon tree species.”36. A. advertisedB. describedC. publishedD. presented37. A. frighteningB. surprisingC. excitingD. interesting38. A. stillB. neverthelessC. howeverD. therefore39. A. assessB. confirmC. forecastD. promise40. A. particularlyB. probablyC. merelyD. possibly41. A. SinceB. AlthoughC. When D. If42. A. riseB. change C. dropD. end43. A. considerB. decideC. guaranteeD. recommend44. A. basedB. builtC. focusedD. made45. A. in relation toB. in response toC. in reply toD. in reference to46. A. findingsB. thoughtsC. inventionsD. writings47. A. threatsB. disadvantagesC. embarrassmentsD. instructions48. A. acceptB. tolerateC. permitD. require49. A. farmingB. plantingC. cateringD. mining50. A. powerB. influenceC. desireD. violence51. A. difficultB. clear C. easyD. important52. A. beliefB. directionC. understandingD. suggestion53. A. doubtB. concludeC. calculateD. prefer54. A. thoughtB. guidanceC. protectionD. action55. A. secureB. advanceC. sacrificeD. evaluate完形：36-40 CBDCB 41-45 BADCB 46-50 AABDB 51-55 ACBDA AWranglers and Stranglers Years ago there was a group of brilliant young men at the University of Wisconsin，who seemed to have amazing creative _1_ talent. They were wouldbe poets，novelists，and essayists. They were extraordinary in their _2_ to put the English language to its best use. These promising young men _3_ regularly to read and critique (評(píng)論) each others work. And critique it they did! These men were merciless with one another. They _4_ the minutest literary expression into a hundred pieces. They were heartless，tough，even mean in their _5_.The sessions became such areas of literary criticism that the _6_ of this special club called themselves the “Stranglers (扼殺者)”In order to _7_，the women of literary talent in the university _8_ to start a club of their own，one comparable to the Stranglers. They _9_ themselves the “Wranglers (爭(zhēng)論者)”They，too，read their _10_ one another. But there was one great difference. The criticism was much softer，more _11_，more encouraging. Sometimes，there was almost no criticism at all. Every effort，even the weakest one，was _12_. Twenty years later an alumnus of the university was making an exhaustive _13_ of his classmates careers when he _14_ a vast difference in the literary accomplishments of the Stranglers as opposed to the Wranglers. Of all the _15_ young men in the Stranglers，no one had made a significant literary _16_ of any kind. From the Wranglers had come six or more successful _17_，some of national renown such as Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings，who wrote The Yearling. Talent between the two？Probably the same. Level of _18_？Not much difference. But the Stranglers were strangled，while the Wranglers were determined to give each other a(an) _19_.The Stranglers _20_ an atmosphere of argument and selfdoubt. The Wranglers highlighted the best，not the worst.1. A. architectural B. artisticC. literary D. musical2. A. strength B. ability C. performance D. power3. A. gathered B. organized C. challenged D. collected4. A. turned B. translated C