公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)制度研究,法學(xué)碩士論文

公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)制度研究,法學(xué)碩士論文本篇論文目錄導(dǎo)航：【第1部分】公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)制度研究【第2部分】【第3部分】【第4部分】【第5部分】【第6部分】【第7部分】?jī)?nèi)容摘要自2008年(中國(guó)信息公開(kāi)條例〕施行以來(lái)，我們國(guó)家信息公開(kāi)正在不斷完善和進(jìn)步。隨著行政分權(quán)和行政任務(wù)私法化的出現(xiàn)，附則中的第三十七條逐步成為討論的焦點(diǎn)。實(shí)踐中也發(fā)生了公民訴水公司、電力公司等各種以公用企業(yè)為被告的案件，在訴訟中產(chǎn)生了不少問(wèn)題，如法律法規(guī)根據(jù)缺乏，缺乏程序保障和救濟(jì)等問(wèn)題，所以急需法律的進(jìn)一步完善。本文首先從幾則公民訴公用企業(yè)的案例入手，分析案件的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，然后圍繞這些主要問(wèn)題分四部分進(jìn)行討論：第一部分主要討論的是公用企業(yè)作為信息公開(kāi)主體的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題。如何的企業(yè)能夠算作公用企業(yè)能夠從不同的角度來(lái)考量和分析，本文主要闡述了立法明確列舉標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、公共職能標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、控制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和信息屬性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)四種衡量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并對(duì)四種不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)存在的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)。得出的基本結(jié)論是：在評(píng)判哪些公用企業(yè)需要承當(dāng)信息公開(kāi)義務(wù)時(shí)，任何單一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)都是不夠的，只要將形式標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與本質(zhì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相結(jié)合，才能在個(gè)案中更好地?cái)喽ǔ龀挟?dāng)信息公開(kāi)義務(wù)的主體。第二部分主要闡釋公用企業(yè)信息公幵的范圍。首先將公用企業(yè)可能把握的信息進(jìn)行分類，分為公用企業(yè)需要上報(bào)主管機(jī)關(guān)的信息和其他公用企業(yè)制作或者獲取的信息。其次，試圖尋找公用企業(yè)信息公幵的強(qiáng)度要求。再次，因公用企業(yè)本身所具有營(yíng)利性質(zhì)，所以必須討論信息公開(kāi)與其商業(yè)機(jī)密保衛(wèi)的關(guān)系，進(jìn)而分清公開(kāi)與保密的界線。最后，分析司法機(jī)關(guān)在審查商業(yè)機(jī)密問(wèn)題時(shí)可能碰到的問(wèn)題及解決辦法。第三部分分析了公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的程序問(wèn)題。首先，同樣的信息可能存在于公用企業(yè)和其主管行政機(jī)關(guān)手中，這就產(chǎn)生了雙重公開(kāi)主體問(wèn)題，根據(jù)主動(dòng)公開(kāi)與依申請(qǐng)公開(kāi)的不同又會(huì)產(chǎn)生不同的公開(kāi)程序，同時(shí)還存在其他信息公開(kāi)的方式方法。其次是申請(qǐng)公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的申請(qǐng)人的資格問(wèn)題。最后，假如申請(qǐng)人與要求公開(kāi)的信息之間不存在直接的關(guān)系的話就會(huì)產(chǎn)生公益訴訟問(wèn)題。第四部分主要闡述我們國(guó)家現(xiàn)行對(duì)于公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的立法及適用。本文將用表格的方式呈現(xiàn)我們國(guó)家公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的現(xiàn)行法律、法規(guī)，并進(jìn)行適用分析，進(jìn)而試圖探尋求索將來(lái)公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的立法形式。最后，本文總結(jié)得出公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)任重而道遠(yuǎn)，我們要為公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)工作的順利展幵做好思想上的準(zhǔn)備，并以一系列的配套搐施為其保駕護(hù)航。本文關(guān)鍵詞語(yǔ)：公用企業(yè)，信息公開(kāi)，公開(kāi)范圍，公開(kāi)程序，法律適用ABSTRACTSincetheimplementationofRegulationsonDisclosureofGovernmentInformationofthePeoplesRepublicofChinain2008,thedisclosureofgovernmentinformationhasbeenimprovedcontinually.Withthedecentralizationofexecutivepowersandemergenceofprivatetrendofadministrativetasks,article37hasgraduallybecomethefocusofdiscussion.Infact,somecaseswithpublicenterprisesasthedefendanthaveappeared,suchascitizenscomplaintofwatercompanies,powercompanies.Anumberofproblemshaveemergedinthelitigation,suchasthelackoflegalbasisandproceduralsafeguards,problemsoflegalremediesandsomeotherissues.Sothefurtherimprovementoflawisintheneed.Inthispaper,Iwillfirstlylistsomecasesbetweencitizensandpublicenterprises.Then,Iwillanalyzethecontroversyofthesecases.Inthefollowing,Iwilldiscussthesekeyissuesinfourparts:Thefirstpartfocusesonthestandardsoftheidentificationofpublicenterprisesasthesubjectofthedisclosureofinformation.Theproblemthatwhatkindofbusinesscanbecountedaspublicenterprisecanbeconsideredfromdifferentperspectives.Thispaperconcludesfourstandards:thestandardoflegislationexpresslyenumeration,thestandardofpublicfunctions,thestandardofgovernmentcontrolstandardsandstandardofinformationproperty.Inthesametime,thefourdifferentstandardsallhaveitsadvantagesanddisadvantages.Thebasicconclusionofthispartisthatinjudgingwhichcompaniesneedtoundertakethedisclosureobligationsofpublicinformation,anysinglestandardisnotenough.Weshouldcombinetheformalstandardsandsubstantivestandardsinindividualcasesinordertodeterminethesubjectsthathavethedisclosureobligationsofinformation.Thesecondpartillustratesthescopeofdisclosureofthepublicenterprisesinformation.Firstly,theinformationofthepublicenterprisesmaybedividedintotwoparts.Onepartistheinformationthatpublicenterprisesneedtoreporttotheauthorities.Theotherpartistheinformationthatthepublicenterprisesproduceorobtain.Secondly,this,paperwilltrytofindtheintensityforpublicenterprisestodeterminethescopeofthedisclosureofinformation.Thirdly,becausethepublicenterpriseshavethenatureofpursuingprofit,wemuststudytherelationshipbetweenthedisclosureofinformationandprotectoftradesecrets.Finally,therewillbesomeanalysisoftheproblemsandsolutionsthatappearedinjudicialreviewingtheissueoftradesecrets.Inthethirdpart,IanalyzetheproceduresofdisclosureofpublicenterprisesInformation.Firstly,thesameinformationmayexistinpublicenterprisesandtheircorrespondingadministrativeauthority,whichresultedinaproblemofdoubleopensubjects.Therewillbedifferentproceduresbetweeninitiativedisclosureanddisclosureaccordingtoapplication.Simultaneously,otherdisclosuremethodsalsoexist.Secondly,thereisaproblemaboutthequalificationoftheapplicantwhoappliesfordisclosureofinformationofpublicenterprises.Finally,ifthereisnodirectrelationshipbetweentheapplicantandtheinformationrequiredtobedisclosed,thepublicinterestlitigationissueswillemerge.Thefourthpartfocusesonourcurrentregulationsonthedisclosureofinformationofpublicenterprisesandtheapplicationofthem.Thispaperwillpresentaformofsomecurrentlawsandregulationsonthedisclosureofinformationofpublicenterprises.ThenIwillanalyzetheapplicationoftheselawsandregulations.ThenIattempttoexplorethefuturelegislationmodeofthedisclosureofinformationofpublicenterprises.Finally,thispaperwillshowthattherearemanydifficultiesforthedisclosureofinformationofpublicenterprises,butwehavetomakementalpreparationsforthedisclosureofpublicenterprisesandmakeitbetterwithaseriesofsupportingmeasures.KeyWords:Publicenterprises,disclosureofinformation,thescopeofdisclosureofinformation,disclosureprocedures,applicationoflaws目錄內(nèi)容摘要ABSTRACT目錄引言：?jiǎn)栴}的提出第一章公用企業(yè)作為信息公開(kāi)主體的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)一、立法明確列舉標(biāo)準(zhǔn)二、公共職能標(biāo)準(zhǔn)三、控制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)四、信息屬性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)五、對(duì)不同認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的評(píng)價(jià)第二章公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的范圍一、公用企業(yè)所擁有的信息的分類〔一〕公用企業(yè)需要上報(bào)主管機(jī)關(guān)的信息〔二〕其他公用企業(yè)制作或者獲取的信息二、確定公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的強(qiáng)度三、信息公開(kāi)與商業(yè)機(jī)密保衛(wèi)〔一〕公用企業(yè)商業(yè)機(jī)密的界定〔二〕應(yīng)當(dāng)公開(kāi)的信息〔三〕建立商業(yè)機(jī)密審查機(jī)制〔四〕分割性原則旳使用第三章公用企業(yè)信息公開(kāi)的程序一、兩種傳統(tǒng)的信息