微觀經濟學 Chapter-10-助教張翔_第1頁
微觀經濟學 Chapter-10-助教張翔_第2頁
微觀經濟學 Chapter-10-助教張翔_第3頁
微觀經濟學 Chapter-10-助教張翔_第4頁
微觀經濟學 Chapter-10-助教張翔_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩46頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

Chapter10

OligopolyandMonopolisticCompetition

黃新飛

InternationalBusinessSchoolSun-YatSenUniversity2MarketPowerMarketpowersignifiesthedegreeofcontrolthatafirmorasmallnumberoffirmshasoverthepriceandproductiondecisionsinanindustry.Themostcommonmeasureofmarketpoweristhefour-firmconcentrationratio.3FirmOutputFirm1 25Firm2 20Firm3 15Firm4 10Firm5 8Firm6 7Firm7 5Firm8 5Firm9 3Firm10 2=70Four-FirmConcentrationRatioConcentrationRatios:

c4=

q1+q2+q3+q425+20+15+10100Q==70%4CigarettesHouseholdrefrigeratorsElectriclightbulbsMotorvehiclesGreetingcardsBlastfurnacesScrewproducts5%_4%Tools,dies,andjigs3%_2%93%82%86%84%84%37%7%16%8%7%4%21%4largestcompaniesNext4largestcompanies5WarningonConcentrationConventionalconcentrationmeasuresincludeonlydomesticproductionandexcludeimports.Conventionalconcentrationmeasuresalsoignorethegrowingimpactofcompetitionfromotherindustries.6TheNatureofImperfectCompetitionEconomistshavefoundthatthreemajorfactorsarepresentinimperfectlycompetitivemarkets:CostsBarrierstocompetitionStrategicinteraction

(策略互動)7 Percentageofindustry outputproducedbythe

Industry fourlargestfirms.ChewingGum 96% Householdlaundryequipment 93Cigarettes 92Electriclamps(bulbs) 91Motorvehicles 90Smallarmsammunition 88Primarycopper 87Breakfastcereals 87Beerandmaltbeverages 87Householdrefrigerators 85Greetingcardpublishing 85Bookpublishing 24% Upholsteredfurniture 24Woodfurniture 20Metalhousefurniture 18Paperboardboxes 16Bolts,nuts,andrivets 16Furgoods 16Women’sandmisses’suitsandcoats 13Metaldoors 13Women’sandmisses’dresses 6OligopolyMonopolisticCompetition8StrategicInteractionDescribeshoweachfirm’sbusinessstrategydependsontheirrivals’strategies.Asthenumberoffirmsinanindustryshrinksandindustryconcentrationgrows,eachfirmismorelikelytobasepricingandoutputdecisionsonhowotherfirmsintheindustryarelikelytorespond.9TheoriesofImperfectCompetitionThreeofthemostimportantcasesofimperfectcompetition:Collusiveoligopoly(合謀寡頭)MonopolisticcompetitionSmall-numberoligopoly10CooperativeandNoncooperativeBehaviorWhenthereareonlyasmallnumberoffirmsinamarket,theyhaveachoicebetweencooperative

(合作)andnoncooperative

(非合作)behavior.中國案例分析:華為侵權案7月28日,華為公司、思科公司、3COM公司向得克薩斯州東區(qū)法院馬歇爾分院提交了終止訴訟的申請,法院遂簽發(fā)法令,終止了思科對華為的訴訟。一個是全球最大的網(wǎng)絡設備制造商,一個是中國年輕的網(wǎng)絡設備制造商。思科占據(jù)著全球壟斷性地位,市值1000多億美元,年收入近200億美元。在這場全球化的殘酷對決中,華為孤軍作戰(zhàn)且創(chuàng)造了“神話”,和解其實就已經是勝利。12CollusionCollusionoccurswhenoneormorefirmsjointly(共同地)setpricesoroutputs,dividethemarketamongthemselves,ormakeotherbusinessdecisionsjointly.Suchcollusioncanbeeitherexplicitortacit(公開的或默許的).13ExplicitCollusiveOneexampleofexplicit(清楚的,公開的)collusionwouldbethatoftheGildedAgeoligopolists(市場供應壟斷者)intheearlyyearsofAmericancapitalism.Theseoligopolistsformedtrustsorcartels(托拉斯或卡特爾)tosetprices.TheAntitrustLaws14In1960,someexecutivesatGeneralElectric,Westinghouse,andAllis-Chalmers,amongothers,cookedupaschemetofixpricesinthemarketforheavyelectricalequipmentsuchastransformers,turbines,andcircuitbreakers.PhasesoftheMoonConspiracy15MorePricingFixingIn1993,Borden,Incorporatedpaid$8millioninfinesforfixingbidsonmilksoldtoschools.Bristol-MeyersSquibbandAmericanHomeProductspaid$5millionin1992tosettlechargesthattheyhadfixedpricesonbabyformulas.16ColaAndFaxPaperInacolawarmeltdown,localexecutivesforbothCocaColaandPepsiCowenttoprisonforconspiringtofixsoft-drinkpricesinVirginia.Mitsubishipledguiltyandpaida$1.8millionfineforconspiringtoraisethepriceoffaxpaper.17PriceLeaderTacitCollusionThebroaderproblemiswithimplicitortacitcollusionthatarisespreciselybecauseexplicitcollusionisillegal.Thewordtacitmeansto“expressorcarryonwithoutwordsorspeech.”

Andtacitcollusionissaidtooccurwhenfirmsinanindustryrefrainfromcompetitionwithoutexplicitagreements.18BarriersFirst,collusionisillegal.Second,firmsmay“cheat”ontheagreementbycuttingtheirpricetoselectedcustomers.Third,manycompaniesfaceintensivecompetitionfromforeignfirmsaswellasdomesticcompanies.19ThreeBasicModelsCartelPriceLeaderKinkedDemandDQPTheKinkedDemandTheory元/數(shù)量數(shù)量MRD如果廠商降低價格,其他廠商也會跟著降低價格,結果,需求相對缺乏彈性。如果廠商將價格提高到P*之上,其他廠商不會提高價格,則需求變得富有彈性。P*AE美元/數(shù)量DP1Q1MCMC’只要MC仍然在MR的垂直區(qū)域內,那么,價格與產量仍保持不變。MR數(shù)量AEBN折彎的需求曲線22ANegotiatedPriceTheythennegotiatewhatpriceshouldbechargedfortheproduct.And,ofcourse,aspartoftheirsecretcartelagreement,eachfirmwillalsohavetoagreetorestrictitsoutputsothepricecanbemaintainedinthemarket.23AQuestionSowheredoyouthinktheseoligopolistswillsetprice?

a)Theoligopolywillsetpriceequaltomarginalcost.b)Theoligopolywillsetmarginalrevenueequaltomarginalcost.c)Thisisanincrediblyobscurequestion.24TheAnswerSowheredoyouthinktheseoligopolistswillsetprice?

a)Theoligopolywillsetpriceequaltomarginalcost.b)Theoligopolywillsetmarginalrevenueequaltomarginalcost.c)Thisisanincrediblyobscurequestion.Iftheoligopolistscantrulycoordinatetheiractivities,theobviouspricetosetisthesameasthatwhichwouldbesetbyamonopolist.25CheatingValue產量如果其他人保持價格不變搞欺騙的企業(yè)的好處價格如果所有企業(yè)價格同時變化課堂測試:古諾模型雙寡頭模型假設市場需求曲線P=30–Q,并且Q=Q1+Q2MC1=MC2=0如何推導廠商1和2的反應曲線27MonopolisticCompetitionMonopolisticcompetitionresemblesperfectcompetitioninthreeways:1.Theremanybuyersandsellers,2.Entryandexitareeasy,3.Firmstakeotherfirms’pricesasgiven.28ProductDifferentiationThedifferencefromperfectcompetitionisproductdifferentiation

(產品差異).Productdifferentiationleadstoadownwardslopeineachseller’sdemandcurve.29MonopolisticCompetitionVSoligopolyTherearethreekeydifferencesbetweenoligopolyandmonopolisticcompetition.1.Amonopolisticallycompetitiveindustryisrelativelyunconcentrated.2.Collusionsareimpossible.3.Thereisnofeelingofmutualinterdependenceamongfirms.30PriceMCACWhatisthepriceandquantityinthisindustryandwhataretheeconomicprofits?a)PriceisP1,quantityisQ1andeconomicprofitsareBHG.PriceissetwhereMCintersectsdd.b)PriceisP2,quantityisQ2,andeconomicprofitsareP1P2GB.PriceissetwhereMRequalsMC.c)IfIhadacomputer,Icouldfigureitout.MonopolisticcompetitionbeforeentryP2P1GdBMRHd31PriceMCACWhatisthepriceandquantityinthisindustryandwhataretheeconomicprofits?a)PriceisP1,quantityisQ1andeconomicprofitsareBHG.PriceissetwhereMCintersectsdd.b)PriceisP2,quantityisQ2,andeconomicprofitsareP1P2GB.PriceissetwhereMRequalsMC.c)IfIhadacomputer,Icouldfigureitout.MonopolisticcompetitionbeforeentryP2P1GdBMRHd32ACd'd'MCdPriceAtwhatpointwillentrycease?a)Entrywillceasewheneachsellerhasbeenforcedintoalong-run,no-profittangencysuchasatG'.b)EntrywillceasewhereMCequalsAC.c)EntrywillceasewhenBillGatessaysitwill.MonopolisticcompetitionafterentryddG’MR33ACd'd'MCdPriceAtwhatpointwillentrycease?a)Entrywillceasewheneachsellerhasbeenforcedintoalong-run,no-profittangencysuchasatG'.b)EntrywillceasewhereMCequalsAC.c)EntrywillceasewhenBillGatessaysitwill.MonopolisticcompetitionafterentryddG’MR34ACd'd'MCdPriceMonopolisticcompetitionafterentryddG’MRP1P=MCEachproducerisontheleft-handdecliningbranchofitslongrunaveragecostcurve.Whatdoyouthinkthismeansformarketperformance.35ACd'd'MCdPriceMonopolisticcompetitionafterentryddG’MRP1P=MCAInthelongrun,monopolisticcompetitionisneitherallocativelyorproductivelyefficient.Anunderallocationofresourcesoccursintheindustrybecausetheproductpriceexceedsmarginalcost.ProductiveefficiencyisnotrealizedbecauseproductionoccursatpointG'wheretheaveragetotalcostexceedstheminimumattainablecostatPointA.36Non-PriceandAggressiveAdvertisingThefactthatthatmonopolisticcompetitionisbothallocativelyandproductivelyinefficientrelativetotheperfectcompetitionresultisnottheonlyproblemwithmarketperformance.AtleastsomeeconomistsarguethatmonopolisticcompetitionleadstobothexcessiveadvertisingandneedlessbrandproliferationReducingthenumberofmonopolisticcompetitors,whilecuttingcosts,mightwellenduploweringconsumerwelfarebecauseitwouldreducethediversity(多樣性)ofavailablegoodsandservices.37GameTheoriesCompetitionamongthefewforcesfirmstotakeintoaccountcompetitors’reactionstopriceandoutputdeviations(背離)andbringsstrategic(戰(zhàn)略的)considerationsintotheirmarkets.Thisanalysisistheprovinceofgametheory(博弈論).38DivorceofOwnershipandControlIn1996,morethan2.3millionpeopleownedAT&T’sshares.Becausethestockoflargecompaniesissowidelydispersed(被分散的),ownershipistypicallydivorcedfromcontrol.ThreeConflictsofInterest39RationalityandRulesofThumbIntherealworld,peoplehavelimitedresourcesandinformationtomakedecisions,sofirmsorconsumersoftenexhibitboundedrationality(有限理性).Thismeansthattheyusuallystrivetomakeagooddecision,ratherthanwasteresourceshuntingfor(追逐)thebestdecision.40TheEconomicsofInformationBecauseinformationiscostlytoproducebutcheaptoreproduce,marketsininformationaresubjecttoseveremarketfailures(市場失靈).Theinabilityoffirmstocapturethefullmonetaryvalueoftheirinventions(發(fā)明)iscalledinappropriability(非專用性).IntellectualPropertyRight41AreMonopoliesBad?ThequestionfirstraisedbyHarvardeconomistJosephSchumpeteriswhethermonopoliesarelikelytooutperformcompetitiveindustriesinthedynamicefficiencydimension.Iftheanswerisyes,thenperhapsweshouldjustleavemonopoliesalone.JosephSchumpeter1883-195042IndustrialR&DPerformanceBySizeofCompanySizeofCompanyR&D-SalesRatio(%)TotalCompanyR&D($,billions)

1999(employees)19831999Fewerthan5002.28.931.3500to999na4.06.41,000to4,9992.03.123.95,000to9,9910,000to24,9992.32.824.525,000ormore3.42.059.9課堂測試假設(1)只有A、B寡頭廠商出售同質且生產成本為零的產品;(2)市場對該產品的需求函數(shù)為Q=240-10P;(3)廠商A先進入市場,隨著B進入。各廠商確定產量時認為另一廠商會保持產量不變。試求:a.均

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論