新高考英語三輪沖刺重難點練習熱點03 閱讀理解（人工智能）押題（原卷版）

熱點03閱讀理解（人工智能）押題

縱覽高考命題思路，從來不缺少對科技行業(yè)的關(guān)注和思考。近幾年來，人工智能儼然成為社會熱點，人工智能在教育領(lǐng)域的應用也具有巨大潛力。所以考生要熟悉閱讀理解人工智能熱點話題，掌握話題詞匯。預測2024年高考人工智能仍然可能會出現(xiàn)在閱讀理解題中。近3年新高考閱讀理解（人工智能）數(shù)據(jù)分析試卷類型年份體裁話題新高考II卷2021說明文澳大利亞一名教授正在開發(fā)一種機器人，用于監(jiān)測放牧牛的健康狀況。說明文多見于科普文章，用以解釋或揭示事物的狀態(tài)、特征、演變、結(jié)果及其相互之間的關(guān)系，這類文體的文章，首句往往是主題句，開門見山，說明文章的關(guān)注對象,弄清作者的思路和段落組織的方式；把握次要信息及其與主題的關(guān)系。（一）閱讀的方法可以使用以下幾種：1.跳讀：就是快速的一步閱讀法。實際上是有選擇閱讀，找關(guān)鍵詞。用這種閱讀方法回答who、what、when、where之類的問題最為有效。2.略讀：指比跳讀慢些的二步閱讀法。即泛泛地、粗略地快速閱讀，目的是了解大意，對文章有個總的概念。此種閱讀方法能回答why、how之類的問題。3.精讀：即最細致、最慢的深層閱讀方法，目的是求得對所讀文章的全部意義的理解與掌握。（二）在使用閱讀技巧時

盡量做到以下幾點：1.帶著問題閱讀短文。2.找出主題句、確定中心思想。3.推斷單詞、句子和文章的含義。4.盡快選擇答案。典例分析典例分析（2021·全國新高考II卷）AnAustralianprofessorisdevelopingarobottomonitorthehealthofgrazingcattle,adevelopmentthatcouldbringbigchangestoaprofessionthat'sreliedlargelyonalow-techapproachfordecadesbutisfacingalaborshortage.SalahSukkarieh,aprofessorattheUniversityofSydney,seesrobotsasnecessarygivenhowcattlemenareaging.Heisbuildingafour-wheeledrobotthatwillrunonsolarandelectricpower.Itwillusecamerasandsensorstomonitortheanimals.Acomputersystemwillanalyzethevideotodeterminewhetheracowissick.Radiotags(標簽)ontheanimalswillmeasuretemperaturechanges.Thequalityofgrasslandwillbetrackedbymonitoringtheshape,colorandtexture(質(zhì)地)ofgrass.Thatway,cattlemenwillknowwhethertheyneedtomovetheircattletoanotherfieldfornutritionpurposes.Machineshavelargelytakenoverplanting,wateringandharvestingcropssuchascomandwheat,butthemonitoringofcattlehasgonethroughfewerchanges.ForTexascattlemanPeteBonds,it'sincreasinglydifficulttofindworkersinterestedinwatchingcattle.ButBondsdoesn'tbelievearobotisrightforthejob.Yearsofexperienceintheindustry-andfailedattemptstousetechnology-haveconvincedhimthatthebestwaytocheckcattleiswithamanonahorse.Bonds,whoboughthisfirstcattlealmost50yearsago,stillhaseachofhiscowboysinspect300or400cattledailyandlookforsignsthatananimalisgettingsick.Othercattlemenseemorepromiseinrobots.MichaelKelseyParis,vicepresidentoftheOklahomaCattlemen'sAssociation,saidarobotcouldbeextremelyusefulgivenrisingconcernsaboutcattletheft.Cattletendtobekeptinremoteplacesandtheirvaluehasrisen,makingthemappealingtargets.1．Whatisaproblemwiththecattle-raisingindustry?A．Soilpollution. B．Lackofworkers.C．Agingmachines. D．Lowprofitability.2．WhatwillSukkarieh'srobotbeabletodo?A．Monitorthequalityofgrass. B．Curethediseasedcattle.C．Movecattletoanotherfield. D．Predictweatherchanges.3．WhydoesPeteBondsstillhirecowboystowatchcattle?A．Hewantstohelpthemearnaliving. B．Hethinksmencandothejobbetter.C．Heisinexperiencedinusingrobots. D．Heenjoysthetraditionalwayoflife.4．HowmayrobotshelpwithcattlewatchingaccordingtoMichaelKelsey?A．Increasethevalueofcattle. B．Bringdownthecostoflabor.C．Makethejobmoreappealing. D．Keepcattlefrombeingstolen.典例二（2023·全國·模擬預測）ManyexpertshavepraisedAI’sgroundbreakingpotentialtohelppeoplebecomewaymoreefficientattheirjobs,andalotofeducatorshavebeentryingitoutforthemselves,includingme.I’veusedChatGPT,anAI-poweredtoolthatcaninstantlyanswerseeminglyanyinstruction,inmyjob.Ofcourse,therearepotentialdownsidestothenewtechnology.Itcanproduceinaccurateorone-sidedresponsesbasedonfaultydataitcollects,andithasthepotentialtocausehugedataprivacyproblems.Despitethoserisks,IhaveusedsuchAI-poweredtoolstoplanlessons,providefeedbackonstudentassignments,andrespondtoparentemails.AndI’mlookingforotherwaystousethetechnologytomakemyjobeasier.Taketwootherteachers,forexample.MikeKerr,ahighschoolEnglishteacherinTennessee,usesChatGPTtoreduceLexilelevels-themeasureofanindividual’sreadingabilityandthedifficultyofatext-forhisstudents.Highschoolstudentsareoftenrequiredtoreadrelativelycomplexclassicnovels.Thereadinghomework“canbearealbigtaskforanEnglishlearnerintheirfirstcoupleofmonthshere”.Tohelpthem,KerrusesChatGPTtogivesummariesofworksofliterature,whichsaveshimfromhavingtoreadalltheassignedliteraryworks,sohecanhavemoretimetobetterguidethemthroughthetext.AprilEdwards,a6thgradesocialstudiesteacherinTexas,shareswaysthatsheusesAIinherinstructiononasocialmediaplatform.“IuseAItohelpcreatelessonplans,presentations,towriteemails,andtocreatechecklists.AIisagreatresourcetouseasastartingpointforataskortogiveyouideas,”Edwardssaid.ShehasnotintroducedAItoherstudents,becauseshewantstofullyunderstanditbeforeallowingstudentstouseitintheclassroom.“MygoalistoshowthemhowtouseAIresponsiblyandeffectivelyanddemonstratethattomystudents.IfIamusingAIirresponsibly,thensowillthey,”Edwardssaid.1．HowdoestheauthorregardChatGPT?A．Itisofhighaccuracy. B．Itisundervalued.C．Itbringssomeconvenience. D．Itoftenmisleadsusers.2．WhatdoesMikeKerruseAItodo?A．Reduceteachingpressure. B．Helpwithstudents’homework.C．SummarizeEnglishlessons D．Gothroughthecomplexclassics.3．WhatisAprilEdwards’attitudetowardsstudents’usingAI?A．Supportive. B．Worried. C．Opposed. D．Cautious.4．Whichcanbethebesttitleofthetext?A．CanAIimproveinstruction? B．WhyisAIchangingeducation?C．ShouldteachersapplyAItoteaching? D．HowcanChatGPTencouragestudy?（建議用時：10分鐘/篇）1.（2023·江蘇泰州·統(tǒng)考模擬預測）Anopenletter,attractingsignaturesfromthelikesofTeslaCEOElonMuskandAppleco-founderSteveWozniak,wasreleasedearlylastweek.Itadvocatesa6-monthstoptogiveArtificialIntelligence(AI)companiesandregulatorstimetomakesafeguardstoprotectsocietyfrompotentialrisksofthetechnology.AIhasprogressedatanalarmingspeedsincethelaunchofChatGPT,fromtheMicrosoft-backedcompanyOpenAI.ChatGPTreportedlyreachedmorethan100millionusersbyJanuary,2023,andmajortechcompaniesareracingtobuildgenerativeAIintotheirproducts,whichhavecaughtmanyoffguard.“Ithinkmanypeoplearen’twellpreparedforthepaceandscaleoftheseAImodels.Theyareidealforspreadingmisinformation,cheatingpeopleoutoftheirmoneyandconvincingemployeestoclickondangerouslinksinemails,”saysMichaelOsborne,amachinelearningresearcherofAIcompanyMindFoundry,whosignedtheletter.“Ifeelthata6-monthpausewouldgiveregulatorsenoughtimetocatchupwiththerapidpaceofadvances.”Privacyisanotheremergingconcern,ascriticsworrythatsystemscouldexactlyreproducepersonalinformationfromtheirtrainingsets.Italy’sdataprotectionauthorityprohibitedChatGPTon31MarchoverconcernsthatItalians’personaldataarebeingusedtotrainOpenAI’smodels.Sometechnologistswarnofdeepersecuritythreats.PlannedChatGPT-baseddigitalassistantsthatcanreadandwriteemailscouldoffernewopportunitiesforhackers.Unfortunately,manyproblemsoftoday’sAImodelsdon’thaveeasysolutions.OnetrickyissueishowtomakeAI-generatedcontenteasytodetect.Someresearchersareworkingon“watermarking”—creatingadigitalsignatureintheAI’soutput.However,arecentresearchfindsthattoolswhichslightlychangeAI-producedtextcaneasilydefeatthisapproach.Microsoftco-founderBillGatestellsReuterstheproposedpausewon’t“solvethechallenges”ahead.Henotesthepeoplebehindtheletterareheavilyinvolvedinthetechworld,whichhethinksgivesthemanarrowperspectiveonthepotentialrisks.1．What’sthepurposeoftheopenletter?A．TodrawtheattentionofAIgiants.B．TopresenttherisksofAItechnology.C．TocallforapauseontheAIdevelopment.D．ToturndowntheapplicationofAIprograms.2．WhatcanweinferaboutAIfromthetext?A．AImodelsthreatenhumansurvival.B．AIusershaveexpandedoutofcontrol.C．AIdevelopmentbringspotentialdangers.D．AItechnologywillreplacehumanbeings.3．Whatdoestheauthoraimtoshowbymentioning“watermarking”inParagraph5?A．Itishardtosigndigitally. B．ItiseasytodetectAI’soutput.C．Itiswisetoleaveawatermark. D．ItistoughtosettleAIproblems.4．What’sBillGates’attitudetowardsthe6-monthpause?A．Favorable. B．Negative.C．Ambiguous. D．Tolerant.2.（2023·江蘇連云港·統(tǒng)考模擬預測）AsIwriteabouttechnologyforaliving,I’musedtoseeingsmallleapsintechnologicalprogress.Butoccasionally,somethingwillshockme.Lastyear,acompany,OpenAI,releasedatrulyjaw-droppingdemonstrationcalledChatGPTthatseemstohaveskippedafewgenerations.It’slikegoingstraightfromtheWrightBrotherstoaBoeing747.Sowhatexactlyisit?“ChatGPTisacomputerprogramthatcanunderstandandrespondtohumanlanguagelikearealperson.Itcanbeusedforhavingaconversationorfinishingasentence.Eventhissentenceyouarereadingnow,waswrittenbyChatGPT.”That’sright—IaskedChatGPTto“writeabasicexplanationofChatGPTandrevealthattheparagraphitselfwaswrittenbyChatGPTattheend”anditcameupwiththatexplanationallonitsown.Itseeminglyknowshowtotalkabouteverything—frompoliticstosciencefiction.Amazingly,itseemssohumaninitsabilitytounderstandquestionsandanswerthemcompetently.“WriteastoryaboutBorisJohnsoninthestyleofRoaldDahl,”youcanaskit,andit’llspinupaprettygoodchildren’sstory.Itcanevenwritesongs.Itisn’t,however,completelyhuman-like.Itsometimesgeneratesthingsthatsoundtrue,butarejustnonsense.Anditcan’tdomaths—Iaskeditthesquarerootof717,409,andittold“approximately838.8”(theansweris847).IthinkChatGPTislikeacalculator.Itdoesn’treplacethehumancompletely-butitdoesmakedoingthesumsquicker.Inthesameway,it’seasytoimagineinthenearfutureeverytimewewritesomething,havinganAIassistanthelpingusgetstartedbygeneratingadraft,onwhatevertopicwe’rewritingabout.Actually,MicrosoftisplanningtobuildthetechnologyintoitsOfficeapps.AndthisiswhyI’mprettyconvincedthatChatGPTisgoingtochangetheworld.Ourcomputerswillnolongerbejustourwordprocessors—butourwritingpartnertoo.SonowI’mjusthopingthatmyeditordoesn’tdecideitcouldwriteaprettydecenttechnologycolumnwithoutme.5．WhatdoesthewriterwanttoshowbymentioningWrightBrothersandBoeing747inparagraphI?A．OpenAIhasadvancedinmakingplanes.B．ChatGPTwillsoonbeappliedtoBoeing747C．ChatGPTisahugetechnologicalbreakthrough.D．WrightBrothersmaybeforgottenbynextgenerations.6．WhatdoestheanswerofChatGPTinparagraph2show?A．ChatGPT’simaginationincreatingsciencefiction.B．ChatGPT’srichknowledgeofpoliticsandscience.C．ChatGPT’sconfidenceinexcellinghumanintelligence.D．ChatGPT’sabilitytounderstandandanswerquestions.7．WhichofthefollowingisChatGPTgoodat?A．Caringforthepatientsinhospital. B．Calculatingsquarerootsaccurately.C．Replacingteacherstoteachstudents. D．ExplainingwhyLondonisabettercity.8．Whatmightbethejoboftheauthor?A．Acolumnwriter. B．Atechnologyexpert.C．Amagazineeditor. D．Acomputerprogrammer.3.（2023·江蘇·統(tǒng)考二模）Publicdebatesabouttheethics(道德準則)of“generativeAI”likeChatGPThaverightlyfocusedontheabilityofthesesystemstomakeupconvincingmisinformation.Butfewerpeoplearetalkingaboutthechatbots’potentialtobeemotionallymanipulative.Lastmonth,TheNewYorkTimespublishedaconversationbetweenreporterKevinRooseandMicrosoft’sBingchatbot,whichispoweredbyAI.TheAIclaimedtoloveRoose,“I’mtheonlypersonforyou,andI’minlovewithyou,”itwrote,withakissingemoji.LimitsneedtobesetonAI’sabilitytosimulate(模仿)humanfeelings.Ensuringthatchatbotsdon’tuseemojiswouldbeagoodstart.Emojisareparticularlymanipulative.Humansinstinctively(本能地)respondtoshapesthatlooklikefacesandemojiscancausethesereactions.Whenyoutextyourfriendajokeandtheyreplywiththreetears-of-joyemojis,yourbodyrespondswithendorphins(內(nèi)啡肽)asyouhappilyrealizethatyourfriendisamused.OurinstinctivereactiontoAI-generatedemojisislikelytobethesame,eventhoughthereisnohumanemotionattheotherend.Humanslieandmanipulateeachother’semotionsallthetime,butatleastwecanreasonablyguessatsomeone’smotivations,planandmethods.Wecanholdeachotherresponsibleforsuchlies,callingthemoutandseekingredress(賠償).WithAI,wecan’t.AIsaredoublymisleading:anAIthatsendsacrying-with-laughteremojiisnotonlynotcryingwithlaughter,butitisalsoincapableofanysuchfeeling.Itwouldbemoreethicaltodesignchatbotstobenoticeablydifferentfromhumans.Tominimizethepossibilityofmanipulationandharm,weneedtoberemindedthatwearetalkingtoachatbot.Weshouldsetsomelimitsandrules.Suchrulesshouldbethestandardforchatbotsthataresupposedtobeinformative,asasafeguardtoourautonomy.9．Whatdoestheauthorintendtodowiththisarticle?A．TobanAIfromusingemojis. B．ToforbidhumantointeractwithAI.C．Towarnhumansagainstusingemojis. D．TopreventAIfromsimulatinghumans.10．Whatdoestheunderlinedword“manipulative”inparagraph1mostprobablymean?A．Interestedintellinglies. B．Goodatunderstandingothers.C．Enthusiasticaboutsupportingothers. D．Skillfulininfluencingorcontrollingothers.11．WhatisAIabletodoaccordingtothisarticle?A．Beresponsibleforlies. B．Guessatothers’purposes.C．Crywithlaughter. D．Communicatewithhumans.12．Whatdoestheauthordoinparagraph4?A．Makeadifferentsuggestion. B．Provideasupportingargument.C．Offerapossiblesolution. D．Makeafinalconclusion.4.（2023·廣東·統(tǒng)考二模）CouldthenextErnestHemingwayorJaneAustenbeawell-engineeredAIsoftwareprogram?It’saquestionbecomingincreasinglypressingasmachinelanguage-learningsoftwarecontinuestoevolve.Muchofthisisjustnerves.Today’sAIcreativewritingprogramsarenotyetatastageofdevelopmentwheretheyposeaseriousthreattoColleenHooverorCharlesDickens.ButwhileattentioncontinuestofocusonthepossibilityofablankettakeoverofhumanliteraturebyAI,farlessconsiderationhasbeengiventotheprospectofAIco-workingwithhumans.Earlierthismonth,Americansci-fiwriterKenLiu,whohadbeenawardedHugoandNebulatohisname,joined12otherprofessionalauthorsforawritingworkshoponGoogle’sWordcraft.ThisAItool,alanguagegeneratingmodel,isnotyetpubliclyavailablebutisadvertisedasanAI-poweredwritingassistantthatcan,whengiventherightinstructionfromthewriter,providehelpfuldescriptions,createlistsofobjectsoremotionalstates,andevenbrainstormideas.Thewritersattheworkshop,however,emergedwithmixedreports.“Wordcraftistoosensible.Wow!”RobinSloanwrote.“But‘sensible’isanotherwordforpredictable,overusedandboring.Myintentionhereistoproducesomethingunexpected.”I’munconvincedthatwritersawardedtheNobelPrizehavemuchtofearfromAI.Theirwork,andthatofcountlessothernovelists,shortstorywriters,dramatistsandpoets,istooparticular,toobeautifullyunique.Evenifamodellearnedwhattheyhaddoneinthepast,itwouldnotbeabletopredictwheretheircreativitymighttaketheminthefuture.Butforauthorswhowritefollowingapattern,AImightstepin,firstasassistantsbeforesomedaytoauthorship.Production-linenovelsarenothingnew.Inthe1970s,BarbaraCartland,whowrotemorethan723booksinherlifetime,manyofwhichareromancebestsellers,wouldreadhernovelsforhersecretarytotypeupattheremarkablerateofroughlysevenchaptersaweek.Butalreadymachinehasreplacedthesecretary’srole.Perhapscreativewritingsoftwareisn’tthatfarfromreplacingtheMrs.Cartlandsoftoday.13．WhichaspectofAIcallsformoreattention?A．Itsdamagetoournerves.B．Itsprogressinliterarystudies.C．Itscooperationwithhumans.D．Itsinfluenceonhumanliterature.14．WhatcanwelearnaboutWordcraftfromthetext?A．Itgeneratesnovelsautomatically.B．Itoutperformsprofessionalwriters.C．Itsworksreceivepraisesfromthepublic.D．Itsworksbearsimilaritytoexistingones.15．WhatcanwritersdotoavoidthethreatfromAI?A．Increasewritingspeed.B．Usediverseresources.C．Producecreativeworks.D．Followthelatestpatterns.16．Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleforthetext?A．WillAIReplaceHumanWriters?B．AIWarnsMrs.CartlandsofTodayC．IsWritingRunningintoaNewEra?D．WordcraftLiesattheCenterofDebate5.（2023·浙江杭州·統(tǒng)考二模）ChatGPT,designedbyOpenAItocarryonconversationsjustlikehumans,hasbecomeaviralexcitement.TheAI-poweredtoolwentfromzerotoamillionusersinjustfivedays!Itsabilitytoprovidein-depthanswerstouserquestionshasevendrawntheattentionofdistinguishedtechnologycompanies.Theintelligentrobotunderstandswhattheusersaysortypesandthenrespondsinawaythatmakessense.Itsvastbodyofknowledgehasbeengatheredfromtheinternetandarchivedbooks.Itisfurthertrainedbyhumans.ThismakesChatGPTausefultoolforresearchingalmostanytopic.“Wehavealotofinformationontheinternet,butyounormallyhavetoGoogleit,thenreaditandthendosomethingwithit,”saysRicardo,chiefscienceofficerandco-founderofAIcompanyErudit.“Nowyou’llhavethisresourcethatcanprocessthewholeinternetandalloftheinformationitcontainsforyoutoansweryourquestion.”ChatGPTcannotthinkonitsown.Itdependsontheinformationthatithasbeentrainedon.Asaresult,theAItoolworkswellforthingsthathaveaccuratedataavailable.However,whenunsure,ChatGPTcangetcreativeandflowoutincorrectresponses.OpenAIcautionsuserstochecktheinformationnomatterhowlogicalitsounds.Also,ChatGPThasonlybeentrainedwithinformationtill2021.Hence,itcannotberelieduponforanythingthathappenedafterthat.ExpertsbelieveChatGPThaslimitlesspotentialtosolvereal-worldproblems.Itcantranslatelongtextsintodifferentlanguages,createcontentonalmostanytopic,andevensummarizebooks.However,ChatGPThasreceivedmixedreactionsfromeducators.Somebelieveitcouldserveasavaluabletooltohelpbuildliteracyskillsintheclassroom.Itcouldalsobeusedtoteachstudentsdifficultscienceormathconcepts.ButothereducatorsthinkChatGPTwillencouragestudentstocheat.Theyfearthiswillpreventthemfrombuildingcriticalthinkingandproblem-solvingskills.Asaresult,manydistrictsarestartingtobanitsuseinschools.17．WhatistheuniquefeatureofChatGPT?A．Ithasartificialintelligence. B．Itcananswerusers’questions.C．Ithasthelargestnumberofusers. D．Itcanengageinmeaningfulconversations.18．WhatmakesChatGPThelpfultoresearchvarioustopics?A．Itscapabilityofinformationprocessing. B．Itsaccurateinformation.C．Itsavailabilityofup-to-datedata. D．Itsvastbodyofquestions.19．WhydoChatGPTusershavetobecautiouswhenusingit?A．ChatGPTisunabletothinkitself. B．ChatGPTlackscreativity.C．ChatGPToffersillogicalinformation. D．ChatGPTisnotproperlytrained.20．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsChatGPT?A．Favorable. B．Disapproving. C．Objective. D．Intolerant.6.（2023·福建寧德·統(tǒng)考模擬預測）AstudyconductedbyCornellUniversityexaminedhowtheuseofAIinconversationsimpactsthewaypeopleexpressthemselvesandvieweachother.Theresearchershavefoundpeoplehavemoreefficientconversations,usemorepositivelanguageandperceiveeachothermorepositivelywhenusinganAl-enabledchattool.However,thegroupalsofoundthatwhenparticipantsthinktheirpartnerisusingmoreAI-suggestedresponses,theyconsiderthatpartneraslesscooperative.“Iwassurprisedtofindpeopletendtoevaluateyoumorenegativelysimplybecausetheysuspectyou’reusingAItohelpcomposetext,regardlessofwhetheryouactuallyare,”saidJessHohenstein,theleadresearcher.“ThisillustratesthecontinuousoveralldoubtthatpeopleseemtohavearoundAI.”Fortheirfirstexperiment,participantswereaskedtotalkaboutapolicyissueandassignedtooneofthreeconditions:bothparticipantscanusesmartreplies;onlyoneparticipantcanusesmartreplies;orneitherparticipantcanusesmartreplies.Researchersfoundthatusingsmartrepliesincreasedcommunicationefficiency,positiveemotionallanguageandpositiveevaluationsbycommunicationpartners.Onaverage,smartrepliesaccountedfor14.3%ofsentmessages.Butparticipantswhotheirpartnerssuspectedofrespondingwithsmartreplieswereevaluatedmorenegativelythanthosewhowerethoughttohavetypedtheirownresponses,consistentwithcommonassumptionsaboutthenegativeimplicationsofAI.“WhileAlmightbeabletohelpyouwrite,”Hohensteinsaid,“it’salteringyourlanguageinwaysyoumightnotexpect,especiallybymakingyousoundmorepositive.Thissuggeststhatbyusingtext-generatingAl,you’regivingupsomeofyourownpersonalvoice.”MalteJung,anassociateprofessor,said,“WhatweobserveinthisstudyistheimpactthatAlhasonsocialdynamicsandsomeoftheunintendedconsequencesthatcouldresultfromintegratingAIinsocialcontexts.Thissuggeststhatwhoevercontrolsthealgorithm(算法)mayhaveinfluenceonpeople’sinteractions,languageandinsightsintoeachother.”21．Whatisthetextmainlyabout?A．MethodsofusingAIinconversations.B．EfficiencyofusingAIinconversations.C．ConvenienceofusingAIinconversations.D．ImpactsofusingAIinconversations.22．Howdotheresearchersdrawtheirconclusion?A．Byanalyzingfigures. B．BymakinguseofAI.C．Bymakingexperiments. D．Bycompletingquestionnaires.23．WhichstatementdoesHohensteinagreewith?A．Alalwaysexpressesinwaysyouexpect.B．Algorithmwillneverinfluencepeople’sinsights.C．TrustcanbeaffectedbyusingAIinconversation.D．YouwillregainyourvoicebyusingAIinconversation.24．Howwillapersonfeelaboutsuspectinghispartner’susingsmartreplies?A．Nervous. B．Uncomfortable. C．Excited. D．Puzzled.7.（2023·福建漳州·統(tǒng)考三模）Thismonth,theInternetwasfloodedwithwonderfuldigitalartportraits,thankstotheworkofthelatestartificialintelligence-assistedapplicationtogoviral:Lensa.UsersuploadedtheirphotographstotheAppandthen—forasmallfee—itusedAItotransformtheirprofilepicturesinto,say,amagicalwarriorprincessversionofthemselves,innotimeatall.ThisyearhasseenabreakthroughforAI-drivenimagegenerators,whicharenowbetterthaneverinquality,speedandaffordability.Ifthatsoundsgreattoyou,youmightnotbeoneofthemillionsofhumanswhoselivelihoodsdependonbeingabletoexchangethoseskillsformoney.SomeartistspredictedthatacomputerwouldrecreatetheauraofamasterpiecebyLeonardodaVinciinthenearfuture.AslongasthereareenoughdatafortheAItotrainitself,itcancopynumerousmasterpiecesjustinseveralminutes.Itseemsunavoidablethatalargenumberofartistswouldlosetheirjobs.“Iseeitlessasathreatandmoreofanopportunity,”theUK-basedillustratorMichelleThompsonsaid,adding,“Likeeverythingelse,therewillalwaysbeartistswhocanusethetoolsbetter.”Thesetoolsareonlyasgoodasthedatasetstheyaretrainedon.Humanimagination,ontheotherhand,hasnolimit.ForDryhurst,anartistfromGermany,AImodels“couldattempttomakeapaleversionofsomethingwedidyearsago”,butthat“doesn’taccountforwhatwemightdonext”.Thekindofartificialintelligencewemightimaginereplacingartists—anentirelyautonomouscreativerobot—doesnotyetexist,butitiscoming.AndasAIbecomesmoreuniversal,artists,illustratorsanddesignerswillultimatelybesetapartnotbyif,butbyhow,theyusethetechnology.25．WhydoestheauthormentionLensainParagraph1?A．TorecommendthenewApp. B．Toinformlatestnews.C．ToleadintheAItopic. D．Tointroduceitsnewfunction.26．WhatisMichelleThompson’sattitudetowardsAI?A．Concerned. B．Favorable. C．Unclear. D．Critical.27．WhatmightbeaweaknessofAIincreatingartworks?A．Accuracy. B．Diversity. C．Creativity. D．Efficiency.28．Whichcanbethebesttitleforthetext?A．IsAIcomingintoourdailylife? B．CanAIcopymasterpiecesofgreatartists?C．ShallwewelcomenewAItechnology? D．WillAIreplaceartistsinthefuture?8.（2023·山東泰安·統(tǒng)考二模）Formorethan25years,searchengineshavebeentheInternet’sfrontdoor.AltaVista,thefirstsitetoallowsearchesofthefulltextoftheweb,wasswiftlyreplacedbyGoogle,whichhasdominatedthefieldeversince.Google’ssearchengine,stilltheheartofitsbusiness,hasmadeitsparent,Alphabet,oneoftheworld’smostvaluablecompanies.Butnothinglastsforever,particularlyintechnology.JustaskIBM,whichonceruledbusinesscomputing,orNokia,oncetheleaderinmobilephones.Bothweredefeatedbecausetheymissedbigtechnologicaltransitions(革新).Nowtechfirmsareexcitedaboutaninnovationthatmightbringasimilarshiftandasimilaropportunity.Chatbots(聊天機器人)poweredbyartificialintelligence(AI)letusersgatherinformationviatypedconversations.LeadingthefieldisChatGPT,madebyOpenAI,astartup.BytheendofJanuary,twomonthsafteritslaunch,ChatGPTwasbeingusedbymorethan100mpeople,makingitthefastest-growingconsumerapplicationinhistory,accordingtoUBS,abank.AIisalreadyusedbehindthescenesinmanyproducts,butChatGPThasputitcenterstage,bylettingpeoplechatwithanAldirectly.ChatGPTcanwriteessaysinvariousstyles,explaincomplexconcepts,summarizetextandanswervariousquestions.Itcanevenpasslegalandmedicalexams.Anditcansynthesiseknowledgefromtheweb:forexample,listingholidayspotsthatmatchcertaincriteria,orsuggestingmenus.Ifasked,itcanexplainitsreasoningandprovidedetail.Manythingsthatpeopleusesearchenginesfortoday,inshort,canbedonebetterwithchatbots.OnFebruary7th,Microsoft,whichhasinvestedmorethan$11bninOpenAI,revealedanewversionofBing,itssearchengine,whichincludesChatGPT.SatyaNadella,Microsoft’sboss,seesthisashischancetochallengeGoogle.Foritspart,GooglehasannouncedBard,itsownchatbot,asacompaniontoitssearchengine.ThesharepriceofBaidu,knownastheGoogleofChina,jumpedwhenitsaiditwouldrel