2011年考研英語(yǔ)二真題及答案_第1頁(yè)
2011年考研英語(yǔ)二真題及答案_第2頁(yè)
2011年考研英語(yǔ)二真題及答案_第3頁(yè)
2011年考研英語(yǔ)二真題及答案_第4頁(yè)
2011年考研英語(yǔ)二真題及答案_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩11頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、.2011 年研究生入學(xué)考試英語(yǔ)二真題Section IUse of EnglishDirections : Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered black and markA, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)The Internet affords anonymity to its users a boon to privacy and freedom of speech. Butthat very anonymity is also behin

2、d the explosion of cybercrime that has1across the Web.Can privacy be preserved2 bringing a semblance of safety and security to a world that seemsincreasingly3?Lastmonth,HowardSchmidt, the nation cyberczar,sofferedthe Obama governmenta4 tomaketheWeb asafer place a“ voluntary identifysystem”thatwouldb

3、e thehigh-tech5ofa physical key, fingerprintand a photoID card,all rolled6 one. Thesystem might use a smart identity card, or a digital credential7to a specific computer, andwould authenticate users at a range of online services.The idea is to8 a federation of private online identify systems. Users

4、could9whichsystem to join, and only registered users whose identities have been authenticated could navigatethosesystems. Theapproach contrasts with one that would requirean Internetdriver slicense10by the government.Google and Microsoft are among companies that already have sign-on” systems that ma

5、ke itpossible for users to11just once but use many different services.12,theapproach would create a “walled garden”insafe “neighborhoods ”and bright“ streetlights” to establish a sense13 of community.Mr. Schmidt described it as a“voluntary ecosystem” in which individuals and organizationscan complet

6、e online transactions with14,trusting the identities of the infrastructure that thetransaction runs15.Still, the administrationplan shas16privacy rights activists. Some applaud the approach;others are concerned. It seems clear that such an initiative push toward what would17be alicense” mentality.Th

7、e plan has also been greeted with18by some experts, who worry that the“voluntaryecosystem ” would still leavemuch of the Internet 19 .They argue that should be 20 to register and identify themselves, in drivers must be licensed to drive on public roads.1A.sweptB.skippedC.walkedD.ridden2A.forB.within

8、C.whileD.though3A.carelessB.lawlessC.pointlessD.helpless4A.reasonB.reminderC.compromiseD.proposal5A.informationB.interferenceC.entertainmentD.equivalent6A.byB.intoC.fromD.over7A.linkedB.directedC.chainedD.compared;.8A.dismissB.discoverC.createD.improve9A.recallB.suggestC.selectD.realize10A.relcasedB

9、.issuedC.distributedD.delivered11A.carry onB.linger onC.set inD.log in12A.In vainB.In effectC.In returnD.In contrast13A.trustedB.modernizedC.thrivingD.competing14A.cautionB.delightC.confidenceD.patience15A.onB.afterC.beyondD.across16A.dividedB.disappointedC.protectedD.united17A.frequestlyB.incidenta

10、llyC.occasionallyD.eventually18A.skepticismB.releranceC.indifferenceD.enthusiasm19A.manageableB.defendableC.vulnerableD.invisible20A.invitedB.appointedC.allowedD.forcedSection IIReading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the followingfour texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A,B,

11、C or D.Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40points)Text1Ruth Simmons joined Goldman Sachs s board as an outside director in January 2000: a yearlater she became president of Brown University. For the rest of the decade she apparently managed both roles without attracting much eroticism. But by th

12、e end of 2009 Ms. Simmons wasunder fire for having sat on Goldman s compensation committee; how could she have let thoseenormous bonus payouts pass unremarked? By February the next year Ms. Simmons had left the board. The position was just taking up too much time, she said.Outside directors are supp

13、osed to serve as helpful, yet less biased, advisers on a firmHavingmade theirwealthand theirreputations elsewhere, they presumablyhave enoughindependence to disagree with th e chief executive s proposals. If the sky, and the share price isfalling,outside directors should be able to give advice based

14、 on having weathered their owncrises.The researchers from Ohio University used a database hat covered more than 10,000 firmsand more than 64,000 different directors between 1989 and 2004. Then they simplycheckedwhich directors stayed from one proxy statement to the next. The most likely reason for d

15、epartinga board was age, so the researchers concentrated on thosedisappearances“surpriseby directors”under the age of 70. They fount that after a surprise departure, the probability that the companywill subsequently have to restate earnings increased bynearly 20%. The likelihood of beingnamed in a f

16、ederal class-action lawsuit also increases, and the stock is likely to perform worse.The effect tended to be larger for larger firms. Although a correlation between them leaving andsubsequent bad performance at the firm is suggestive, itdoes not mean that such directors are;.always jumping off a sin

17、king ship. Often they“ trade up.” Leaving riskier, smaller firms for largerand more stable firms.But the researchers believe that outside directors have an easier time of avoiding a blow to their reputations if they leave a firm before bad news breaks, even if a review of history shows they were on

18、the board at the time any wrongdoing occurred. Firms who want to keep their outside directors through tough times may have to create incentives. Otherwise outside directors will follow the example of Ms. Simmons, once again very popular on campus.21. According to Paragraph 1, Ms. Simmons was critici

19、zed for.Againing excessive profitsBfailing to fulfill her dutyCrefusing to make compromisesDleaving the board in tough times22. We learn from Paragraph 2 that outside directors are supposed to be.Agenerous investorsBunbiased executivesCshare price forecastersDindependent advisers23. Accordingto the

20、researchers fromOhio Universityafter an outside director surprisedeparture, the firm is likely to.Abecome more stableBreport increased earningsCdo less well in the stock marketDperform worse in lawsuits24. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that outside directors.Amay stay for the attractive

21、 offers from the firmBhave often had records of wrongdoings in the firmCare accustomed to stress-free work in the firmDwill decline incentives from the firm25. The author s attitude toward the role of outside directorsis.ApermissiveBpositiveCscornfulDcriticalText2Whatever happened to the death ofnew

22、spaper? A year ago the end seemed near. Therecession threatened to remove the advertising and readers that had not already fled to the internet.Newspapers likethe San Francisco Chroniclewere chroniclingtheir own doom. America sFederal Trade commission launched a round of talks about how to save news

23、papers. Should theybecome charitable corporations? Should the state subsidize them ? It willhold another meetingsoon. But the discussions now seem out of date.In much of the world there is the sign of crisis. German and Brazilian papers have shrugged off the recession. Even American newspapers, whic

24、h inhabit the most troubled come of the global industry, have not only survived but often returned to profit. Not the 20% profit margins that were routine a few years ago, but profit all the same.;.It has not been much fun. Many papers stayed afloat by pushing journalists overboard. The American Soc

25、iety of News Editors reckons that 13,500 newsroom jobs have gone since 2007. Readers are paying more for slimmer products. Some papers even had the nerve to refuse delivery to distant suburbs. Yet these desperate measures have proved the right ones and, sadly for many journalists, they can be pushed

26、 further.Newspapers are becoming more balanced businesses, with a healthier mix of revenues from readers and advertisers. American papers have long been highly unusual in their reliance on ads. Fully 87% of their revenues came from advertising in 2008, according to the Organization for Economic Coop

27、eration & Development (OECD). In Japan the proportion is 35%. Not surprisingly, Japanese newspapers are much more stable.The whirlwind that swept through newsrooms harmed everybody, but much of the damage has been concentrated in areas where newspaper are least distinctive. Car and film reviewers ha

28、ve gone. So have science and general business reporters. Foreign bureaus have been savagely cut off. Newspapers are less complete as a result. But completeness is no longer a virtue in the newspaper business.26. By saying“ Newspapers like their own doom -4, Para”(Lines.1),the3 author indicates thatn

29、ewspaper.Aneglected the sign of crisisBfailed to get state subsidiesCwere not charitable corporationsDwere in a desperate situation27. Some newspapers refused delivery to distant suburbs probably because.Areaders threatened to pay lessBnewspapers wanted to reduce costsCjournalists reported little ab

30、out these areasDsubscribers complained about slimmer products28. Compared with their Americancounterparts, Japanese newspapers are much more stablebecause they.Ahave more sources of revenueBhave more balanced newsroomsCare less dependent on advertisingDare less affected by readership29. What can be

31、inferred from the last paragraph about the current newspaper business? ADistinctiveness is an essential feature of newspapers.BCompleteness is to blame for the failure of newspaper. CForeign bureaus play a crucial role in the newspaper business. DReaders have lost their interest in car and film revi

32、ews.30. The most appropriate title for this text would be.AAmerican Newspapers: Struggling for SurvivalBAmerican Newspapers: Gone with the WindCAmerican Newspapers: A Thriving BusinessDAmerican Newspapers: A Hopeless StoryText3We tend to think of the decades immediately following World War II as a t

33、ime of prosperity;.and growth, with soldiers returning home by the millions, going off to college on the G. I. Bill andlining up at the marriage bureaus.But when it came to their houses, it was a time of common sense and a belief that less couldtruly be more. During the Depression and the war, Ameri

34、cans had learned to live with less, andthat restraint, in combinationwith the postwar confidence in the future, made small, efficienthousing positively stylish.Economic condition was only a stimulus for the trend toward efficient living.The phrase“ lessis more ”was actually first popularized by a Ge

35、rman, the architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, who like other people associated with the Bauhaus, a school of design, emigrated to the United States before World War IIand took up posts at American architecture schools. These designers came to exert enormous influence on the course of American archit

36、ecture, but none more so that Mies.Mies s signature phrase means that less decoration, properly organized, has more impact thata lot. Elegance, he believed, did not derive from abundance. Like other modern architects, he employed metal, glass and laminated wood-materials that we take for granted tod

37、ay buy that in the1940s symbolized the future. Mies s sophisticated presentation masked the fact that the spaces hedesigned were small and efficient, rather than big and often empty.The apartments in the elegant towers Mies built on Chicago s Lake Shore Drive, for example,were smaller-two-bedroom un

38、its under 1,000 square feet-than those in their older neighbors along the city Golds Coast. But they were popular because of their airy glass walls, the views theyafforded and the elegance of the buildings details and proportions, the architectural equivalent ofthe abstract art so popular at the tim

39、e.The trend toward“ less ” was not entirely foreign. In the 1930s FrankLloyd Wright startedbuilding more modest and efficient houses-usually around 1,200 square feet-than the spreadingtwo-story ones he had designed in the 1890s and the early 20th century.The “ Case Study Houses” commissioned from ta

40、lented modern architects by California Arts& Architecture magazine between 1945 and 1962 were yet another homegrown influence on the“ lessis more ”trend. Aesthetic effect came from the landscape, new materials and forthright detailing. In his Case Study House, Ralph everyday life - few American fami

41、lies acquired helicopters, though most eventually got clothes dryers - but his belief that self-sufficiency was both desirable and inevitable was widely shared.31. The postwar American h ousing style largely reflected the Americans.Aprosperity and growthBefficiency and practicalityCrestraint and con

42、fidenceDpride and faithfulness32. Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 3 about Bauhaus? AIt was founded by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe.BIts designing concept was affected by World War II. CMost American architects used to be associated with it.DIt had a great influence upon American ar

43、chitecture.33. Mies held that elegance of architectural design.Awas related to large spaceBwas identified with emptiness;.Cwas not reliant on abundant decorationDwas not associated with efficiency34. What is true about the apartments Mies building Chicago s Lake Shore Drive?AThey ignored details and

44、 proportions.BThey were built with materials popular at that time.CThey were more spacious than neighboring buildings.DThey shared some characteristics of abstract art.35. What can we learn about the design of the“ Case Study House”?AMechanical devices were widely used.BNatural scenes were taken int

45、o considerationCDetails were sacrificed for the overall effect.DEco-friendly materials were employed.Text4Will the European Union make it? The question would have sounded strange not long ago.Now even the project s greatest cheerleaders talk of a continent facing a“ Bermuda triangledebt, population

46、decline and lower growth.As well as those chronic problems, the EU face an acute crisis in its economic core, the 16countries that use the single currency. Markets have lost faiththat the euro zone economies,weaker or stronger, will one day converge thanks to the discipline of sharing a single curre

47、ncy,which denies uncompetitive members the quick fix of devaluation.Yet the debate about how to save Europe s single currency from disintegration is stuck. It isstuck because the euro zone dominants powers, France and Germany, agree on the need forgreater harmonization within the euro zone, but disa

48、gree about what to harmonies.Germany thinks the euro must be savedby stricterrules onborrowspending andcompetitiveness, barked by quasi-automatic sanctions for governments that do not obey. Thesemight include threats to freeze EU funds for poorer regions and EU mega-projects and even thesuspension o

49、fa countryvotings rights in EUministerial councils. Itinsiststhat economicco-ordinationshouldinvolve all 27 members ofthe EU club, among whom there is a smallmajority for free-market liberalism and economic rigour; in the inner core alone, Germany fears, asmall majority favour French interference.A

50、“ southern camp”headed by French wants somethingdifferent:” Europeaneconomicgovernment ”withinan inner core of euro-zonemembers. Translated, that means politiciansintervening in monetary policy and a system of redistribution from richer to poorer members, viacheaper borrowing for governments through

51、 common Eurobonds or complete fiscal transfers. Finally, figures close to the France government have murmured, curo-zone members should agree to some fiscal and social harmonization: e.g., curbing competition in corporate-tax rates or labour costs.It is too soon to write off the EU. It remains the w

52、orld s largest trading block. At its best, theEuropean project is remarkably liberal: built around a single market of 27 rich and poor countries,its internal borders are far more open to goods, capital and labour than any comparable tradingarea. It is an ambitious attempt to blunt the sharpest edges

53、 of globalization, and make capitalismbenign.36. The EU is faced with so many problems that.A it has more or less lost faith in markets;.B even its supporters begin to feel concernedC some of its member countries plan to abandon euroD it intends to deny the possibility of devaluation37. The debate over the EU s single currency is stuck because the dominant powers.A are competing for the leading positionB are busy handling their ow

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論